Control: tags -1 confirmed
This transition is ongoing, tagging it as such.
On 23/07/2018 11:26, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> This is a transition request to upgrade boost
On 13/11/2018 17:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/11/2018 11:40, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
>> Dear pochu,
>>
>> Il 12/11/18 22:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
>>> The icu transition has started now. Can you make a boost1.67 upload
>>> build-depending on the new icu, with a bumped
On 13/11/2018 11:40, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Dear pochu,
>
> Il 12/11/18 22:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
>> The icu transition has started now. Can you make a boost1.67 upload
>> build-depending on the new icu, with a bumped shlibs, similar to [1] ? That
>> will
>> break ceph from
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 10:40, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
>
> Dear pochu,
>
> Il 12/11/18 22:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
> > The icu transition has started now. Can you make a boost1.67 upload
> > build-depending on the new icu, with a bumped shlibs, similar to [1] ? That
> > will
> >
Dear pochu,
Il 12/11/18 22:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
> The icu transition has started now. Can you make a boost1.67 upload
> build-depending on the new icu, with a bumped shlibs, similar to [1] ? That
> will
> break ceph from sid (which depends on boost1.67), so an appropriate
On 02/11/2018 09:53, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 02/11/2018 00:13, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:26:34 +0100 Dimitri John Ledkov
>> wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: transition
Hi Emilio,
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:52 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 05/11/2018 09:32, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:> > Now the perl5.28
> transition is over, it's migrated to testing. Boost
> > transition can start as Emilio noted.
> > Still, may I ask for two days to finalize the
On 05/11/2018 09:32, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:57 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> On 02/11/2018 00:13, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:26:34 +0100 Dimitri John Ledkov
>>> wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:57 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 02/11/2018 00:13, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:26:34 +0100 Dimitri John Ledkov
> > wrote:
> >> Package: release.debian.org
> >> Severity: normal
> >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> >>
On 02/11/2018 00:13, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:26:34 +0100 Dimitri John Ledkov
> wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>
> This transition was ready to be started for just
On 02/11/2018 06:39, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> While the decision-makers are obviously ftp-masters as a user I would
> be interested
> to see boost-defaults make to 1.67 in Debian.
This is not a user list. No need for these messages here (also you are wrong)
Emilio
at bottom :-
On 02/11/2018, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:26:34 +0100 Dimitri John Ledkov
> wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>
> This transition was ready to be started for
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:26:34 +0100 Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
This transition was ready to be started for just over three months now.
May I upload boost-defaults to start the
Hi,
Il 28/09/18 18:31, Giovanni Mascellani ha scritto:
> The second block of packages have a failure that is rather clearly
> related to the new boost version. For most of them the problem is that
> something was moved to a different namespace or header, so the patch
> should not be complicated
Hi,
Il 23/09/18 09:59, Giovanni Mascellani ha scritto:
> BTW, I am trying to do a rebuild of all packages depending on boost with
> 1.62 and with 1.67, to see which new build failures are introduced. I
> don't have much experience in mass rebuild and my only available
> hardware is my own laptop,
Hi.
from my point of view it is also better to have new boost-defaults
in the unstable and fix needed packages there. We doe not have too
much time for now to have an intermediate upload into experimental.
If this transition will be smooth and fast, we could consider to package
1.68/1.69. But it
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 at 08:38, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 12:45:12PM +0200, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 at 11:16, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >...
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I noticed at least 13 packages that have boost-related changes in an
> > > Ubuntu diff
On Sunday, September 23, 2018 2:59:10 AM CDT Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> I would suggest to avoid too much speculation on this point: uploading a
> new release to unstable is alone rather time consuming, because (beside
> the technical challenges of correctly installing dozens of binary
>
at bottom :-
On 23/09/2018, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I would suggest to avoid too much speculation on this point: uploading a
> new release to unstable is alone rather time consuming, because (beside
> the technical challenges of correctly installing dozens of binary
> packages)
Hi,
Il 23/09/18 09:38, Adrian Bunk ha scritto:
> What is the version planned to be shipped in buster?
>
> 1.68 is already released, and 1.69 will be released in December.
>
> IMHO doing 1.62 -> 1.67 -> 1.68 would not make sense at this point.
>
> Better options would be:
> 1.62 -> 1.68 -> 1.69
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 12:45:12PM +0200, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 at 11:16, Niels Thykier wrote:
>...
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed at least 13 packages that have boost-related changes in an
> > Ubuntu diff (and I certainly have *not* checked all packages in the
> > boost
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 at 11:16, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> Dimitri John Ledkov:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > This is a transition request to upgrade boost defaults from 1.62 to
> > 1.67. Whilst
Dimitri John Ledkov:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> This is a transition request to upgrade boost defaults from 1.62 to
> 1.67. Whilst 1.65.1 never made it into Debian, it has in Ubuntu and
> the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
This is a transition request to upgrade boost defaults from 1.62 to
1.67. Whilst 1.65.1 never made it into Debian, it has in Ubuntu and
24 matches
Mail list logo
