> > i'm open to suggestions on how to address it, but i would prefer to
> > avoid frankenstein monsters of x.y.zreallym.n.o or giant patches
> > against an old version of tqdm that could be addressed by a new
> > upstream release.
>
> Me too, but tqdm is a key package
apologies, i did not
Hi Sandro,
On 06-03-2021 19:50, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> to properly fix 980680 tqdm/4.56.2-1 is required, which is a newer
> upstream release than bullseye anyway (since it has 4.51.0-1).
>
> i'm open to suggestions on how to address it, but i would prefer to
> avoid frankenstein monsters of
> What matters here is the delta between testing and unstable:
> 88 files changed, 2803 insertions(+), 1897 deletions(-)
that's right: the 4.56.2-1 upload fixed 980680 while this unblock
request is for 4.57.0-2 which fixes #983007, but you're right i didnt
diff testing..unstable
> Please review
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Sandro,
On 06-03-2021 05:42, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> the last upload of tqdm fixes a RC bug
Thanks.
> [ Risks ]
> trivial fix
What matters here is the delta between testing and unstable:
88 files changed, 2803 insertions(+), 1897 deletions(-)
That's not "trivial
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package tqdm
[ Reason ]
the last upload of tqdm fixes a RC bug
the effects of that bug are only visible in reverse dependencies, and they were
caused by disabling
5 matches
Mail list logo
