he service to run as root instead of
Debian-snmp.
What exactly is going on now is unclear to me.
Rob
On 2024-02-02 06:13, Craig Small wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 08:54, Rob Janssen wrote:
>
> I am using systemd.
>
> Where are you seeing this error? The systemd socket is t
On 2024-02-01 22:09, Craig Small wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 at 06:15, Rob Janssen wrote:
>
> After the upgrade, the snmptrapd service no longer starts.
> The error message is: couldn't open udp:162 -- errno 13 ("Permission
> denied")
>
> Could you
Sorry, title of this bug report is wrong! (due to re-using an existing mail)
Should be: snmptrapd does not start on bookworm
Package: snmptrapd
Version: 5.9.3+dfsg-2
I upgraded a system from bullseye to bookworm.
It had snmptrapd installed.
Before the upgrade, all was OK.
After the upgrade, the snmptrapd service no longer starts.
The error message is: couldn't open udp:162 -- errno 13 ("Permission denied")
It appears
On 6/7/23 10:54, Richard Laager wrote:
>
> I thought the sequences of events was this:
>
> 0. You are running ntp on bullseye.
> 1. You upgrade to bookworm. This results in ntpsec being installed.
> 2. You removed ntpsec.
> 3. [The part I was asking about.] You reinstalled ntpsec.
> 4. You found
On 6/7/23 10:13, Richard Laager wrote:
> On 2023-06-07 02:37, Rob Janssen wrote:
>> Yes I was using the "ntp" package before.
>> I have upgraded and it installed "ntpsec". I tried to remove it as I have
>> no need
>> for the "security&
Yes I was using the "ntp" package before.
I have upgraded and it installed "ntpsec". I tried to remove it as I have no
need
for the "security" part but it removed "ntp" as well. It looks like "ntp" is
only a dummy package.
I am in the process of upgrading a couple of systems so I will likely
status before I removed ntp:
root@**-video:~# ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
===
+router.**.** 216.239.35.4 2 u 50 64 377 0.3705 -1604.11 1.2697
Package: ntpsec
Version: 1.2.2+dfsg1-1
I upgraded a system running on VMware from bullseye to bookworm.
It had a simple NTP setup with two local servers (no pool servers).
Before the upgrade, all was OK.
After the upgrade, the system does not keep accurate time. It is synced,
but it hovers at a
Package: squid
Version: 4.6-1+deb10u4
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When squid is installed on a buster system with systemd and a DNS resolver, the
squid
proxy appears to be started too early. I use bind9 as a DNS server/resolver
and have
127.0.0.1 configured in /etc/resolv.conf and in the
10 matches
Mail list logo
