Bug#939310: missing systray icon for blueman-applet

2019-09-05 Thread Tom Marble
On Thursday, September 5, 2019, Christopher Schramm wrote: > Peter, In 2.1 you have to provide --loglevel debug to get a useful output. > > Tom, awesomewm with KDE as well? > No. i3 Glad to help debug. --Tom

Bug#939310: missing systray icon for blueman-applet

2019-09-05 Thread Tom Marble
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 23:16:08 +0200 Christopher Schramm wrote: > sounds like there's some issue with the libappindicator-based icon > implementation which disables the GTK-based one. Your edit effectively > avoids the latter. > > Did you try blueman 2.1.1-1 yet? I am running unstable with

Bug#882247:

2018-01-04 Thread Tom Marble
Mike: There is something wrong with the default locale. Try installing a > locale package (even firefox-l10n-en-gb) or downgrade to 57. Turns out I can't install that from unstable (depends on firefox << 57.0.3-1), however I installed it from experimental (58.0~b4-1) and now firefox works!!!

Bug#882247:

2018-01-04 Thread Tom Marble
Package: firefox Version: 58.0~b4-1 Followup-For: Bug #882247 I also have this bug... adding reportbug details... * What led up to the situation? Just starting firefox. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Tried on a new user account with no

Bug#871913: ITP: boot-clj -- Build tooling for Clojure

2017-08-12 Thread Tom Marble
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tom Marble <tmar...@info9.net> * Package name: boot-clj Version : 2.7.1 Upstream Author : Alan Dipert * URL : https://github.com/boot-clj/boot * License : EPL Programming Lang: Java Description : Build t

Bug#871781: ITP: shimdandy -- Shim wrapping multiple Clojure runtimes into the same JVM

2017-08-11 Thread Tom Marble
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tom Marble <tmar...@info9.net> * Package name: shimdandy Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : Toby Crawley * URL : https://github.com/projectodd/shimdandy * License : EPL Programming Lang: Java Description

Bug#859012: maven-debian-helper: unnecessarily gendered pronoun in prompt

2017-03-29 Thread Tom Marble
Package: maven-debian-helper Version: 2.1.3 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, In this source file you will find a prompt... http://sources.debian.net/src/maven-debian-helper/2.1.3/maven-packager-utils/src/main/java/org/debian/maven/packager/GenerateDebianFilesMojo.java/?hl=249#L249 ... which

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

2017-01-22 Thread Tom Marble
Elana Hashman writes: > Should I also go ahead and file RFPs for the missing packages for > visibility? Sure! Thanks! --Tom

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

2017-01-19 Thread Tom Marble
Tom Marble <tmar...@info9.net> writes: > Based on the fabulous work of ehashman and the help of technomancy > I've made some minor reformatting of the "state of packaging leiningen" > below. As everyone knows leiningen is a special case package due to it's signicance

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

2017-01-18 Thread Tom Marble
Based on the fabulous work of ehashman and the help of technomancy I've made some minor reformatting of the "state of packaging leiningen" below. The biggest change is that I'm not calling out transitive deps (on leiningen missing deps). In terms of next steps 1. technomancy is already

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

2017-01-17 Thread Tom Marble
Elana Hashman writes: > Finally following up with some conversations I had at Clojure/conj, I'd > like to help get the ball rolling on this again. Based on leiningen > 2.7.1's dependencies, here's what we'll need to package/upgrade to make > this happen. Awesome, thank

Bug#843530: docker.io: docker broken: oci runtime error: could not synchronize with container process

2016-11-07 Thread Tom Marble
I can confirm I am hitting this exact same bug (same system information). --Tom

Bug#840322: emacs24-common: emacsclient fails with *ERROR*: Invalid function

2016-10-10 Thread Tom Marble
Rob Browning writes: > Hmm. Does foo.txt have anything odd in it, [...] No, it's a non-existant file. > and does it still crash if > you do something like this: > > $ emacs -Q --daemon=foo > $ emacsclient -c -s foo /tmp/foo.txt Interestingly it does not crash:

Bug#840322: emacs24-common: emacsclient fails with *ERROR*: Invalid function

2016-10-10 Thread Tom Marble
Package: emacs24-common Version: 24.5+1-7 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Recently emacsclient stopped working in unstable. * What led up to the situation? Upgrading emacs24. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? tmarble@cerise 127 :)

Bug#769685: awscli: FTBFS: ImportError: Failed to import test module: awscli.testutils

2014-11-17 Thread Tom Marble
Supposedly #769496 fixed this bug, but I continued to have troubles with 'aws' (from package 'awscli'). I suspect the 'monkey patch' fix is very sensitive to import order (?) I partial fix was to make this change in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/botocore/awsrequest.py #from

Bug#754504: ITP: libpedantic-clojure -- A Clojure library designed to be used with pomegrante to check for common unexpected cases.

2014-07-11 Thread Tom Marble
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tom Marble tmar...@info9.net * Package name: libpedantic-clojure Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Nelson Morris nmor...@nelsonmorris.net * URL : https://github.com/xeqi/pedantic * License : EPL-1.0 Programming Lang

Bug#739295: python3-dbus: rebuild required for python 3.4

2014-02-17 Thread Tom Marble
Package: python3-dbus Version: 1.2.0-2+b1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, The recent upload of python 3.4 to experimental causes this library to fail with _dbus_bindings not found. Please consider rebuilding this library before python 3.4 hits unstable. --Tom -- System Information: Debian

Bug#739296: python3-gi: rebuild required for python 3.4

2014-02-17 Thread Tom Marble
Package: python3-gi Version: 3.10.2-2 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, The recent upload of python 3.4 to experimental causes this library to fail with ImportError: No module named 'gi._gi'. Please consider rebuilding this library before python 3.4 hits unstable. --Tom -- System

Bug#715207: apel failure prevents emacs upgrade

2013-07-07 Thread Tom Marble
On 07/07/2013 01:58 AM, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: If log files /tmp/elc.* exist, please show me. There are several of these (but only two distinct ones -- for emacs23 and emacs24): root@octane 138# cat elc.5ytbJrSCnHqL emacs23 -q -no-site-file -batch -l __myinit.el -f batch-byte-compile alist.el

Bug#715207: apel failure prevents emacs upgrade

2013-07-06 Thread Tom Marble
Package: apel Version: 10.8+0.20120427-3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? A routine upgrade include apel 10.8+0.20120427-3 which caused all installed emacs upgrades to fail. * What

Bug#639875: fglrx-driver: xorg-video-abi-11

2011-11-17 Thread Tom Marble
Way back on 4 november, Patrick wrote: 11-11 will be compatible with it, I just tested the next version. ATI just released this version. I tried building it with the 11-10 packaging and failed with errors like: dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory arch/x86/etc dpkg-source:

Bug#639875: fglrx-driver: xorg-video-abi-11

2011-11-04 Thread Tom Marble
All: I can confirm the segfault with 11-10 :( [42.897] 0: /usr/bin/Xorg (xorg_backtrace+0x26) [0x7fcea52478f6] [42.897] 1: /usr/bin/Xorg (0x7fcea50c3000+0x188559) [0x7fcea524b559] [42.897] 2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x7fcea43eb000+0xf020) [0x7fcea43fa020] [42.898]

Bug#639875: fglrx-driver: xorg-video-abi-11

2011-10-31 Thread Tom Marble
All: New upstream has just become available... I'll try it soon. $ wget http://www2.ati.com/drivers/linux/ati-driver-installer-11-10-x86.x86_64.run HTH, --Tom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#639875: fglrx-driver: xorg-video-abi-11

2011-09-29 Thread Tom Marble
All: I took a chance on rebuilding the driver for the upstream version 11-9 which was released yesterday. I am running a custom 3.1.0-rc7 kernel with unstable+experimental amd64 on an eMachines eME443-BZ602 with a ATI Radeon HD 6250. And it still segfaults :( Snippets from Xorg.0.log below.

Bug#633982: sun-java6-bin: Multiarch support issue with Sun Java

2011-07-27 Thread Tom Marble
John: I tried to reproduce your problem on my amd64 system running unstable, but jenkins worked for me. I configured the system to use the DLJ version of the JDK: # update-java-alternatives --set java-6-sun Once running I was able to confirm that the nss libraries are loaded by doing (where PID

Bug#633982: sun-java6-bin: Multiarch support issue with Sun Java

2011-07-27 Thread Tom Marble
On 07/27/2011 08:53 AM, Livingston, John A wrote: [...] We still have one or two applications that have little glitches unless Sun Java is used, but this is probably the push we've needed to default to using OpenJDK. At the risk of going off topic a little bit for this bug report I'm quite

Bug#595060: signing-party: Please include kspsig

2010-08-31 Thread Tom Marble
Package: signing-party Version: 1.1.3-1 Severity: normal By request in #594907 please add the kspsig program to signing-party. The upstream tarball for released version 0.1 can be extracted as follows: $ git clone --no-checkout git://github.com/tmarble/kspsig.git $ cd kspsig/ $ git checkout -b

Bug#594907: ITP: kspsig -- Key Signing Party signature verification tool

2010-08-30 Thread Tom Marble
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tom Marble tmar...@info9.net * Package name: kspsig Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Tom Marble tmar...@info9.net * URL : http://github.com/tmarble/kspsig * License : GPL-3 Programming Lang: Python Description

Bug#594907: ITP: kspsig -- Key Signing Party signature verification tool

2010-08-30 Thread Tom Marble
On 08/30/2010 04:34 PM, Joerg Jaspert wrote: And this needs an own package because of Sounds like it should be in signing-party instead. Indeed it very well may want to be part of signing-party when it grows up... The primary rationale for it being separate now

Bug#567244: grub-common: fix grub-set-default and savedefault

2010-01-27 Thread Tom Marble
Package: grub-common Version: 1.98~20100126-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch All: This minor patch enables grub-set-default(8) and the savedefault option to work correctly by reading the grubenv saved_entry. Regards, --Tom -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers

Bug#561309: firmware-linux-nonfree: needs firmware for module r8169

2009-12-20 Thread Tom Marble
Ben (et al): Your patch (with Stefan's addition, replacing dev-name with r8169) also worked for me on an Intel i7 920 system (amd64) running unstable (w/o the firmware). Dec 20 18:39:08 octane kernel: [1.100454] r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.3LK-NAPI loaded Dec 20 18:39:08 octane kernel:

Bug#393153: sun-java5-jdk: please package 1.5.0-09

2006-10-16 Thread Tom Marble
Albert (et al): Thank you for your interest in 1.5.0_09. This issue is also captured in an upstream bug [1]. It turns out that the _09 release has been especially delicate. Nevertheless I expect to push out the DLJ bundles for _09 in the next day or so -- within our goal of a 1-week delay from

Bug#370295: DLJ prevents running jython with sun-java

2006-07-14 Thread Tom Marble
Walter Landry wrote: [...] All of the examples given above are good, but libgetenv-java is about as clear as you can get. It only depends on java2-runtime and libc, and it serves as a replacement for java.lang.System.getenv. It creates a hybrid implementation. If you want to argue that

Bug#376888: sun-java5-bin: README.alternatives includes wrong syntax to

2006-07-09 Thread Tom Marble
Florian Laws wrote: the call to update-java-alternatives as documented in /usr/share/doc/sun-java5-bin/README.alternatives seems to be wrong. I think it should read update-java-alternatives -s java-1.5.0-sun instead of just update-java-alternatives sun-java5 You are right! I have fixed

Bug#370296: Bug#369950: eclipse could is not search in the right place for sun-java5-jdk

2006-07-09 Thread Tom Marble
All: Please note that 1. The Eclipse packaging predates the recent changes in java-common (= 0.25) which is part of a broader Debian Java Policy initiative to harmonize access to multiple implementations [1]. At some point the Eclipse packaging should simply start with

Bug#375745: sun-java5: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation

2006-07-09 Thread Tom Marble
Daniel Nylander wrote: Here is the Swedish translation of the debconf template for sun-java5. Thank you very much for this translation! I have included it in SVN [1] and it will get included in the next upload. Regards, --Tom [1]

Bug#369950: eclipse could is not search in the right place for sun-java5-jdk

2006-07-09 Thread Tom Marble
(sorry, sent previously to the wrong bug number :-( ) All: Please note that 1. The Eclipse packaging predates the recent changes in java-common (= 0.25) which is part of a broader Debian Java Policy initiative to harmonize access to multiple implementations [1]. At some point the

Bug#370296: DLJ only allows distributing the exact same file

2006-06-05 Thread Tom Marble
Walter: I have just posted a notice to debian-legal about the availability of new DLJ FAQ [1] which further clarifies our intent. It is the intent of the DLJ that licensees such as Debian will work towards compatibility with their Operating System [2]. The sun-java5 packages have been split

Bug#370295: DLJ prevents running jython with sun-java

2006-06-05 Thread Tom Marble
Walter: I have just posted a notice to debian-legal about the availability of new DLJ FAQ [1] which further clarifies our intent. It is not the intent of the DLJ to prevent running Jython. Please see the new FAQ #13 #14 and #15 [2]. If Sun wanted to discourage innovations like Jython and JRuby

Bug#370245: Export control problems in license

2006-06-05 Thread Tom Marble
Walter: I have just posted a notice to debian-legal about the availability of new DLJ FAQ [1] which further clarifies our intent. Please see the new FAQ#30 [2]. HTH, --Tom [1] https://jdk-distros.dev.java.net/developer.html [2] http://download.java.net/dlj/DLJ-FAQ-v1.2.html#q30

Bug#367562: Please make dependency on sun-java5-demo optional

2006-05-29 Thread Tom Marble
Alessandro Polverini is correct. We intend to loosen this restriction which is currently part of the README [1] in the DLJ bundle for 1.5.0_06. As soon as allowed by the license then the control file can be changed to make the demos/ and samples/ subdirectories optional. The packaging has been

Bug#368467: sun-java5-plugin: amd64 support

2006-05-29 Thread Tom Marble
We realize that this is important as demonstrated by the fact that this is RFE# 4 for Java [4]. The original bug has the background information [1] and we now have tracking bugs in Debian [2] and the jdk-distros project [3]. What would be helpful is to document best practices for the install

Bug#365408: [POLICY-PROPOSAL] Drop java*-runtime/compiler...

2006-05-26 Thread Tom Marble
All: In reviewing the proposed changes to Debian Java Policy [1] [2] please allow me to make the following suggestions: 1. With respect to virtual packages [3] I understand that Debian Policy does not allow packages in main to depend on packages in non-free. Therefore a distinction