Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Mikkel Krautz: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Chris Knadle > wrote: >> Mikkel Krautz: >>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the meta data that they are using

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Kurt Roeckx: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:25:30PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: >> Quoting Kurt Roeckx: >>> I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the >>> meta data that they are using libssl, they would get rebuild at >>> the same time and you wouldn't get into this situation

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Mikkel Krautz: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Chris Knadle wrote: >> Mikkel Krautz: >>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the meta data that they are using

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:25:30PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: > Quoting Kurt Roeckx: > > I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the > > meta data that they are using libssl, they would get rebuild at > > the same time and you wouldn't get into this situation that they > >

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Chris Knadle wrote: > Mikkel Krautz: >> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >>> I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the >>> meta data that they are using libssl, they would get

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Chris Knadle wrote: > Mikkel Krautz: >> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >>> I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the >>> meta data that they are using libssl, they would get

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Mikkel Krautz: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the >> meta data that they are using libssl, they would get rebuild at >> the same time and you wouldn't get into this situation that they >> are

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Chris Knadle: > Mikkel Krautz: >[...] > When a new OpenSSL comes down containing a library rename, the Mumble #2124 > patch will disallow multiple libssl/libcrypto load and Mumble will break. > Besides Mumble not being functional, the broken behavior deletes the user's > SSL key used with Mumble

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Mikkel Krautz: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the >> meta data that they are using libssl, they would get rebuild at >> the same time and you wouldn't get into this situation that they >> are

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:55:54PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: >> >> A tiny bit of

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:55:54PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: > >> A tiny bit of follow-up to my suggestion of using "-openssl-linked" for Qt: > >> > >> In the

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: >> A tiny bit of follow-up to my suggestion of using "-openssl-linked" for Qt: >> >> In the earlier Debian bug that was linked by Chris, it was brought up >> that

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: > A tiny bit of follow-up to my suggestion of using "-openssl-linked" for Qt: > > In the earlier Debian bug that was linked by Chris, it was brought up > that an application may use QtNetwork without using SSL, and therefore > might

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Mikkel Krautz wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the >> meta data that they are using libssl, they would get rebuild at >> the same time

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the > meta data that they are using libssl, they would get rebuild at > the same time and you wouldn't get into this situation that they > are using a different

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 01:57:23PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:56:22PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: > >> > Maybe Qt should have some way to indicate what version it's build > >> > against so that we

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 01:04:12AM +, Chris Knadle wrote: >> Discussions with mumble upstream about this problem have continued, and the >> situation seems much more muddied than I previously knew. This is likely >> not

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:56:22PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: >> > Maybe Qt should have some way to indicate what version it's build >> > against so that we can binNMU it with all the other packages? Or >> > maybe Qt should

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:56:22PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: > > Maybe Qt should have some way to indicate what version it's build > > against so that we can binNMU it with all the other packages? Or > > maybe Qt should just link against it, instead of doing dlopen()? > > Mumble upstream

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Kurt Roeckx: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 01:04:12AM +, Chris Knadle wrote: >> Discussions with mumble upstream about this problem have continued, and the >> situation seems much more muddied than I previously knew. This is likely >> not an OpenSSL issue per se but rather seems to be an issue

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 01:04:12AM +, Chris Knadle wrote: > Discussions with mumble upstream about this problem have continued, and the > situation seems much more muddied than I previously knew. This is likely > not an OpenSSL issue per se but rather seems to be an issue whenever OpenSSL >

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:36:46PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: > Kurt Roeckx: > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:58:30PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: > >> > >> Everybody dealing with the mumble bug agrees that SSL should be initialized > >> before making SSL calls -- the reason I opened #804487 is to try

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:58:30PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: > > Everybody dealing with the mumble bug agrees that SSL should be initialized > before making SSL calls -- the reason I opened #804487 is to try to figure > out /what/ caused mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 to break, when mumble_1.2.10-2 works. >

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:26:42PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: > Package: openssl > Version: 1.0.2d-3 > Severity: serious > > Greetings. > > I'm marking this bug as 'serious' because the upgrade to 1.0.2d-3 seems to > have broken mumble, though it's unclear why that would be. > > After a binNMU

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Kurt Roeckx: > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:26:42PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: >> Package: openssl >> Version: 1.0.2d-3 >> Severity: serious >> >> Greetings. >> >> I'm marking this bug as 'serious' because the upgrade to 1.0.2d-3 seems to >> have broken mumble, though it's unclear why that would be.

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Kurt Roeckx: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:58:30PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: >> >> Everybody dealing with the mumble bug agrees that SSL should be initialized >> before making SSL calls -- the reason I opened #804487 is to try to figure >> out /what/ caused mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 to break, when

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Kurt Roeckx: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:36:46PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: >> Kurt Roeckx: >>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:58:30PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: Everybody dealing with the mumble bug agrees that SSL should be initialized before making SSL calls -- the reason I opened