Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I was in Educatice (see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00023.html) a
few weeks ago and met many people from several projects all related to
free software and education. All projects are based on Debian but they
have
reassign xsltproc 1.1.15-1
retitle 336280 xsltproc: doesn't recognize variables in some particular
situations
thanks
Le vendredi 28 octobre 2005 à 08:06 -0700, Matt Kraai a écrit :
Package: logidee-tools
Version: 1.2.4-2
Severity: serious
pbuilder fails to build logidee-tools in an
reassign 336280 logidee-tools
retitle 336280 XSL files incorrectly use variables in match pattern
thanks
Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 18:06 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
Thus I'm reassigning the bug. I also attach ignore.xsl which can be
used as a minimal test case to reproduce the bug :
$
Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 20:02 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
I hate when good features are removed because the standard says so
without explaining why it makes sense ... in particular when I don't
know any clean workaround to do the same thing. :-(
You can work around with xsl:choose
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006, Nicolas François wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 01:13:08PM +0100, Rafal Maj wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.21
Severity: normal
While doing apt-get update today (debian testing) I got:
dpkg: version '= 2.3' has bad syntax: version string has embedded spaces
Hello Changwoo,
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
Well, the problem is still on python-central, exactly dh_pycentral which
has been used during package build. Before these stupid binary-only
uploads, the packages had the correct Depends, python (= 2.3), python
( 2.4). But the new
severity 371070 normal
thanks
On Fri, 08 Dec 2006, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
# the flightgear package is unusable on my machine, maintainer didn't
answer,
# somebody should at least confirm or infirm the bug
# breaks unrelated software
severity 372070 grave
Given the comments in the bug report
# Fixing severities (typo on bug number)
severity 372070 normal
severity 371070 wishlist
thanks
Sorry for the mixup.
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
severity 371070 normal
thanks
On Fri, 08 Dec 2006, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
# the flightgear package is unusable on my machine
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
No, it is not adding any race condition. If understand correctly from
the comments in the code, you are referring to the fact that the child
could print to stdout after the parent has already died, hence
cluttering other dpkg output, right?
My patch
-central uses the
+standard location which doesn't break the expectation of this package.
+Closes: #387414
+
+ -- Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:55:48 +0100
+
omniorb4 (4.0.6-2.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u omniorb4-4.0.6/debian/control
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006, jamhed wrote:
Well, it worked for me, and seemingly for most other people. I'm not sure
what makes your configuration special, though :-)
I was suspecting my 'special config', because of upgrade, so
I've installed fresh etch on another clean machine, it crashed there
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:30:57AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I took a look at the patch and I understand the same.
I agree it would have been nice to know exactly why the signal code
doesn't work reliably but I don't see any drawback to use
reassign 403088 libemail-mime-perl
retitle 403088 libemail-mime-perl: backwards incompatible change leading to
FTBFS in etch
found 403088 1.851-1
close 403088 1.857-1
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
tags 398371 - patch
thanks
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Alex de Oliveira Silva wrote:
tags 398371 + patch
thanks
Even though this a simple fix, I provide anyhow a patch for it.
It's not a proper fix IMO because we now use openbsd-inetd by default.
And there's not good way to reliably restart the
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Well, it's a step, at least, but it doesn't really help all that much. Lines
123 and 124 are
123 wWorkspaceMenuUpdate(scr, scr-workspace_menu);
124 wWorkspaceMenuUpdate(scr, scr-clip_ws_menu);
I've put a breakpoint on line 122
severity 354355 serious
thanks
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Christian Perrier wrote:
As already said last year, I'm ready for comaintain or maintain this
package.
I'm following the sympa PTS for years and I'm afraid that I have to
confirm Jean-Charles statement.
Agreed. And given the request of
Hi,
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Francesco Cecconi wrote:
Hi Florian,
Looking good so far, but why do you edit in debian/changelog the date
fields of 0.09-4 and 0.09-3? Removing the trailing space in
0.09-dfsg-1 is acceptable, but why the other changes?
I have fixed this problem.
And I
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006, Chris Morris wrote:
Package: sql-ledger
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2006-4244
Recently fully disclosed at
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/445512/30/0/threaded
Looking at the
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
I simply applied the relevant changes between 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 to the old
2.4.7-2 and it applied immediately. However I haven't had the time to test
if the package upgrades fine and if it still works well.
The upgrade did work ok, but I
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
Dieter Simader skrev:
The sessionid is still there but not used anymore.
If you need more info let me know.
OK, as said - I've tested that the new package installs ok, but I have
not found the time to check how the bug is fixed.
Since
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
Indeed, but I just generated a new version of that update since a second
security issue has been fixed in 2.6.19 (a directory traversal bug). I
also applied applied the fix for the new window function which broke due
to the change in the
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Holger Levsen wrote:
package: developers-reference
severity: wishlist
Hi,
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s-pkg-tracking-system
or 4.10 The Package Tracking System says summary: (This is a planned
expansion.) The
Hello,
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Brett Parker wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:13:48PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hello,
you both indicated (Debian bugs #335246 and #354774) that you want to
package Django.
Well, I need it ...
Questions:
- progress?
- any interim packages?
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Brett Parker wrote:
I would strongly suggest that you start maintining this package in the
python-modules subversion repository:
http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/
I can add you to the team if you agree. Just indicate me your Alioth
login.
I currently
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Jon Dowland wrote:
However, one thing that I used to do manually for acpid was
manage dock/undock events sent by my thinkpad x40 when I use
my ultrabase. These events used to be generated by the
ibm_acpi module.
I understand that having ibm_acpi manage the hotplugging
Hello pkg-voip maintainers,
I'm a bit astonished on how the bugs 375141 and 397147 have been handled.
While recompiling the testing version of asterisk I discovered that I lost
ogg support because of the lack of build-depends so I start looking on the
bugs and find out #375141 which reports the
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, Paul Sladen wrote:
It would be useful if this fix could be filed and sent upstream:
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/acpi-support/+filebug
Feel free to do so to help us.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux :
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Geert Stappers wrote:
The text tells about the (upstream) source by using the generic name
package, the example tells about the Debian directory.
So fix the wording... and don't change everything when there has been some
serious discussion on -devel and when lots of
Package: baobab
Version: 2.4.2-1.1+b1
Severity: important
I store chroots of Debian Sid/Sarge within my home directory (in
/home/rhertzog/local/chroot/{sarge,unstable}). And since I often work in
those chroot I use bind mount to share the /home directory between the
chroots and the main system
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.9.25
Severity: normal
Following the advice here:
http://roland.entierement.nu/blog/2005/04/28/debianwatch-vs-sfnet.html
I added this is debian/watch:
version=3
http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php?project=gnomeicu gnomeicu-([\d.]*).tar.gz
uscan --report works very
Package: ktouch
Version: Many keyboard layouts missing
Severity: important
The latest upstream release, rather than fixing the allegedly broken
keyboard layouts, simply removed them from the build process (see
keyboard_DATA in ./kdeedu-3.5.5/ktouch/keyboards/Makefile.in and
corresponding
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
Hi Stephen,
This is a followup for Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/389126.
Perhaps you can try creating a blank fresh new user and try to login
with that user: does it hang as well?
If it doesn't, it would be really nice if you could
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-4
Severity: normal
On alioth we provide all locales to our users and since I knew of locales-all
in etch, I installed it and immediately after I removed the locales
package since locales-all is providing it anyway.
This resulted in no installed locales... in
Hi Georges,
On Wed, 01 Nov 2006, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
Luk Claes a écrit :
Your package recommends wims-extra which is unavailable in unstable.
Please Raphael, may you sponsor the package ? it is described at
http://debian.ofset.org/dists/etch/main/source/wims-extra_3.58-1.dsc
Checked
Package: websvn
Version: 1.61-13
Severity: minor
We're using Websvn on svn.debian.org and a user reported that the default
colors for diffs are too dark. He suggests replacing 3 CSS styles in the
various themes:
Original values:
TD.diffdeleted
{
font-size: 11px;
background-color: red;
}
tag 391689 + patch
thanks
Hi,
if the package has no versioned dependency on python and contains only
python modules, then it won't have the required python dependency.
I think the attached patch fixes that. At least it works here for the
package I need.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Premier
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Cameron Dale wrote:
Moreover this will prevent my packages inclusion in Etch due to the
lintian errors generated by compiling my program with python-support
and uploading it to the archive. The Lintian error for
python-script-but-no-python-dep states:
Packages with
found 389113 1:4.2.2+dfsg.2-2
severity 389113 serious
thanks
I just upgraded a desktop machine and was hit by this bug. It would be
good to release the fixed version. :-)
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Another problem with smart-notifier is that it calls dh_python but
lacks a pycompat file, so the new dh_python will do old-style stuff
with it, including adding a postinst call to compileall.py.
that's RC then. and a packaging problem, not our
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Brian Sutherland wrote:
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 12:17:21PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
I can reproduce this in my machine. It's due to the fact that
/usr/bin/python points to python2.3 in my box, and smart-notifier's python
version is current. Changing this in
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Yes you should IMO because the current dh_python assumes pycompat==2 if
there's no pycompat file and if there's a Python-Version control field.
That's because pycompat has only been introduced after the start of the
migration
Context for debian-python: we're deprecating dh_python on Joey's request
and thus move the logic of substvars generation into
dh_pycentral/dh_pysupport. debhelper/python-central/python-support will
be jointly uploaded in 2 days (the packages are in DELAYED/2-days right now)
to make that happen.
Hi,
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006, Brian Sutherland wrote:
I reproduced the installation problem, but didn't try the build leading
up to it with the latest debhelper.
I wanted to prepare a patch for this, but I really get 2.4 and not current
when building smart-notifier with python 2.4...
Yeah,
Package: aide
Version: 0.11a-4
Severity: serious
I upgraded my personal server to etch and choosed to use a Xen enabled
kernel since we're going to have Xen support in etch (and also because
we're using this for the new alioth.debian.org so I wanted to have a
testbed for me).
This morning my
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
I see two solutions:
- either you link again libc6 dynamically
That's going to render aide useless, see README.Debian.gz.
Useless is a bit strong... I understand the need to be paranoid and
that's why I'm ok with the default of using a statically
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
The experimental Buildd Logs link does not only list experimental
package versions but also non-release archs, thus confusing people
into thinking there is nothing interesting when there are no
severity 369395 serious
tag 369395 + patch
thanks
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
since the LC_* settings were moved from /etc/environment to
/etc/default/locale pam_env no longer reads and sets them.
See /usr/share/doc/locales/NEWS.Debian.gz for more information.
Perhaps
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.46.2
Severity: serious
I'm filing this new bug following some discussion (attached) in
debian-devel. I've also seen this behaviour a few time and it's very
annoying. This should be fixed for etch...
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Premier livre français sur Debian
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
reopen 399986
thanks
Still fails with 0.5.12.
Sorry, you need to provide more info. How exactly have you encountered a
failure ?
When installing which package on which distribution with which version of
python-minimal ?
Testing still has a bad
severity 398899 serious
retitle 398899 python-iconvcodec: won't install without python2.3, either
remove or depend explicitely on python2.3
thanks
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
$ sudo dpkg --configure -a
[...]
Setting up python-iconvcodec (1.1.2-3+b1) ...
pycentral: pycentral
Hello,
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Attached is a patch that fixes the two bugs and that improves various
other things.
If you want me to upload this as NMU, just ask.
It's been a week without news. I uploaded the NMU.
Ed Joe, I'd suggest to move the maintenance
Hi,
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Daniel Schepler wrote:
This is the normal behaviour of the package since in sid python2.3 is no
more marked as supported in /usr/share/python/debian_defaults ...
It seems to me that it's a bad idea to make this change in sid while the old
python packages are
+generating the depends line (to avoid unwanted dependencies on pythonX.Y).
+
+ -- Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:35:43 +0100
+
python-setuptools (0.6c3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream version (release candidate 3). Closes: #389780.
diff -u python-setuptools-0.6c3
fixed 348733 1.43-1
tag 348773 +sarge
thanks
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Matthew Powell wrote:
Package: libdbd-pg-perl
Version: 1.41-3
Severity: important
I'm using placeholders of the form $1, $2, etc. Executing a query
causes a segmentation fault if it contains the same placeholder more
than
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.14
Severity: normal
While working on a new version of sql-ledger we decided to use hardlinks
(and not symlinks) between several files inside /usr/lib/sql-ledger/.
The upstream author prefers hardlinks over symlinks because they are
better handled by suexec. And
Package: debhelper
Version: 5.0.16
Followup-For: Bug #109642
I'm ccing the current maintainers of lintian so that they can give their
opinion on this bug.
Given the opinions voiced in this bug log here's what I suggest :
Overrides should only be placed with care, that's right, that doesn't mean
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006, Russ Allbery wrote:
But IMHO, debian/package.lintian-overrides should automatically be
installed in /usr/share/lintian/overrides/package by one of the dh_*
script (maybe dh_lintian could be folded into a generic dh_ script?).
Please make it just package.lintian; the
Hi everybody,
is there any progress on the packaging of Turbogears ? I wanted to try
turbogears 0.9 and it doesn't seem that we have a package ready yet ...
I noticed that Fredrik Steen [EMAIL PROTECTED] was willing to help. Maybe
he can join the pkg-turbogears alioth project so that you can
Package: hplip
Version: 2.8.6.b-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
It's in french but it's the usual dpkg error about file conflict between
two packages (hplip and hplip-gui). Decide which package owns
/usr/share/pixmaps/hp-logo.xpm and adjust their content and their
severity 406715 normal
retitle 406715 dpkg should warn the user when there's a dir/symlink mismatch
between the package and the system
thanks
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Torsten Werner wrote:
On 2008-10-12, Sven Joachim wrote:
I guess this bug is wontfix; however, the procedures how to convert a
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.22
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please use RUNPATH when defined instead of RPATH. A possible
implementation's attached.
Can you explain why ? Is it used by GNU's ld.so ? Can you point us to the
corresponding
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-10-15 17:20 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 15 octobre 2008 à 10:37 -0400, Higgins, Paul a écrit :
I'm not sure where the problem lies. I saw that the packages that
couldn't find File/Copy.pm seemed to have their dependencies
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
The fundamental problem here is that perl-modules/perl/perl-base are not
unpacked together. Unless you predepend on perl-modules/perl you can't ensure
that they are in sync. IMO any perl script that is called in a prerm
script should only rely
severity 502738 wishlist
thanks
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008, Sune Vuorela wrote:
I would like to be able to tell dpkg-dev to not warn me about specific
symbols in specific binaries not being found. Like:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol PyList_New used by
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Hello Ansgar,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 13:23, Ansgar Burchardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reportbug sometimes looks up the wrong maintainer for packages that have
been removed from the system.
The output from dpkg --print-avail can be wrong if the
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, jaalto wrote:
Surrent developers-reference documents:
6.2.5.1. Vcs-Browser
6.2.5.2. Vcs-*
Please also add fields that can be used to refer to upstream:
Upstream-Bts-UrlThe bug tracking system address (Trac, Bugzilla
...)
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Jari Aalto wrote:
This does not prevent them from being documented in Best ractises for
future use.
I don't agree that it is a good practice.
1) Keeping upstream information up-to-date is a goal for every package.
We have to keep Homepage and copyrigth up-to-date, for
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Jari Aalto wrote:
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Indeed, and this is wasted time when the person filing the bug could have
gone to the CRMI website and filled the infos by himself.
When would you estimate that it would be a reality? The page is dated
2006
Hi,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
$ dpkg-source --format=3 -b wmaker-data-0.9~2
dpkg-source: error: source package format `3' is not supported (Perl module
Dpkg::Source::Package::V3 is required)
/usr/share/perl5/Dpkg/Source/Package/V3.pm in fact does not exist.
Package: debconf
Version: 1.5.23
Severity: normal
The noninterative frontend is named non-interactive instead of
noninteractive in the french version of debconf(7). I filed this at
normal instead of minor because that information is pretty important
for scripts users... and if they write
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Santiago Vila wrote:
Sorry for not answering this before. Is this something that you would
like to see implemented in lenny?
It's not required for lenny. The code making use of this is only in dpkg
1.15 which will only be uploaded in lenny+1.
However, I can understand
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
However the symlink should point to ubuntu if base-files is built on
Ubuntu and to debian if built on Debian. [...]
Hmm, first it is suggested that this is done in base-files because it
is easier
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Holger Levsen wrote:
package: developers-reference
severity: wishlist
x-debbugs-cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 26 August 2008 10:28, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Probably not well advertised. developers-reference doesn't mention
collab-maint anywhere.
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.14.22) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * The last small fix actually broke conversion of source packages to
#3.0 (quilt) format when they have local changes and no pre-existing
#quilt series
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Sven Joachim wrote:
I see no good reason for having debian-changes-* world-unreadable.
Indeed, also fixed in lenny branch now.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Sven Joachim wrote:
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.21
Severity: important
It seems that dpkg-source is unable to convert existing packages into
the new 3.0 (quilt) format if these packages do not use quilt already:
Indeed. Here's the patch pushed in lenny branch:
tag 497291 wontfix
thanks
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Sven Mueller wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.25
Severity: wishlist
On slow systems, dpkg uses up so much CPU time that all other processes
get slowed down even more than necessary. So it would be nice if dpkg
had a commandline option (to
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:1.7.1
Severity: important
Given that this plugin is the best implementation of Flash available, it
should be the default implementation selected if you install this package.
Hence it should have a higher priority compared to swfdec-mozilla or gnash
and
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Bug#496869 is a release blocker. We don't want to produce d-i images
that do not work on some machines.
agreed, but that's not the point. to fulfil the license /for that
specific version/ of syslinux embedded in debian-cd,
Hi,
On Sat, 27 Sep 2008, Chris Lamb wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chris Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: python-django-debug-toolbar
Upstream Author : Rob Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://github.com/robhudson/django-debug-toolbar
* License
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Package: debsums
Version: 2.0.37
Severity: important
As subject says, it should be weekly at most.
Full ack. It takes several hours on my laptop… and my computer is very
slow when debsums still runs at 8 AM when I start my work.
Furthermore its
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Chris Lamb wrote:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Do you plan to maintain the various Django related packages in the
python-modules team ?
I'm open to persuasion on this, otherwise no.
Well, I'm maintaining like you several Django related packages
(python-django itself
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008, Luk Claes wrote:
Hi
I recently tested an upgrade to lenny by doing an apt-get update,
apt-get upgrade, apt-get dist-upgrade run (like I'm used to) without any
problems. I guess apt gets upgraded in the apt-get upgrade run.
Do you think mentioning that upgrading
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
The other is that when onerr_abort is signaled dpkg should not
continue processing anything anymore, it should just do whatever cleanup
is required and exit. But that can wait probably post-lenny.
So this is the proper fix, and it should not be
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
On 2008-10-05 15:02, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I've seen several reports that aptitude from etch is unable to dist-upgrade
to Lenny, it loops searching for a solution… so yes I believe that
recommending to upgrade aptitude first is a good idea
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
Any progress ?
Yeah got the code the day after that mail, but I've not found the time
to test it. I guess the easiest is to change one of the function
return values to the output of rand() or similar and see from there.
I'll try to get to it this
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Remove the `|| true' statements in /var/lib/dpkg/info/docbook-xml.prerm
and add an `set -ex' at the top and you will get the error doing:
A prerm cannot rely on packages being configured unless you predepend on
them. But predependencies are to be
enabling implicitly -I), but have to check
how to fix this later as it's affecting v3 source packages which are
supposed to have -I enabled by default.
I just pushed a simple fix for this in the lenny branch.
Cheers,
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+2008-08-15 Raphael Hertzog
severity 491396 serious
thanks
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
Therefore, I think this deserves to be fixed for lenny, unless we want
to release with a non-working ACPI support.
I should even have tagged the bug as release critical, imho. Leaving
that up to the maintainer.
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Bart Samwel wrote:
Agreed. Bart, can you handle that?
The bug is in acpid, right?
Why? /etc/acpi/power.sh is part of acpi-support and needs to be updated to
use /sys/class/power_supply/ instead of /proc/acpi/ac_adapter/ which has
been removed in recent kernels (2.6.26 in
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Bart Samwel wrote:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Bart Samwel wrote:
Agreed. Bart, can you handle that?
The bug is in acpid, right?
Why? /etc/acpi/power.sh is part of acpi-support and needs to be updated to
use /sys/class/power_supply/ instead of /proc/acpi
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Bart Samwel wrote:
OK, a fix has been uploaded. I guess this should hang around in unstable
for a couple of days before I send it as a proposed update to the
release team, right? (My experience with this process is limited, so
hints are appreciated. ;-) )
Yes it needs
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.35
Severity: normal
I see more and more people with changelog entries like:
* /etc/acpi/battery.d is ignored on newer kernels (Closes: #491396)
The changelog entry describes the problem instead of the fix (or the
change done to avoid the problem). After
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
I've noted the following things when studying the man page of
dpkg-source
* In the section Building of the description of 3.0 (quilt) it
is stated:
The updated debian directory and the list of modified
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Clarify two points in dpkg-source(1). Closes: #490693
#
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 490693 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.14.21) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Slovak (Ivan Masár). Closes: #488903, #495505
#
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 495505 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Russell Coker wrote:
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 16:38, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Could you instead explain why you didn't use dpkg-source in the first
place ?
If dpkg-source could take just an orig.tar.gz file and a diff.gz then I would
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.14.23) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Greek (Emmanuel Galatoulas). Closes: #498585
# * Russian (Yuri Kozlov). Closes: #499028
#
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 498585 + pending
tags 499028 +
retitle 489132 upgrade apt/aptitude first
thanks
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Sven Joachim wrote:
Is it still correct that dpkg needs to be upgraded first before doing a
dist-upgrade from Etch? With perl-base 5.10.0-14 pre-depending on a
fixed version of dpkg, that should not be the case anymore,
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote:
I have to say i verry rarely do not use debuild. And 99% of the
exceptions are calling debian/rules clean.
Precisely, debuild does not use dpkg-buildpackage, but call debian/rules
directly.
This has been fixed already. It calls dpkg-buildpackage
1 - 100 of 4217 matches
Mail list logo
