)
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
is vulnerable.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
notfound 322467 2.0.2-31
stop
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Hello Thomas, hello Debian Security team,
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tetex-bin_3.0 in experimental is vulnerable.
This is about CAN-2005-2097, see
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14529/info. The provided patch (see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=322467) is said
the application unresponsive.
`
Is a patch around?
Yes, as an attachment on http://bugs.debian.org/322467, or at
ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/security_patches/ where Hilmar took it from.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
is now closed.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Hi,
I have NMU'ed this with the following patch (sorry for not sending
first, but I was offline the weekend). Now the package cooperates
nicely with teTeX-3.0.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
diff -Nur thailatex-0.3.2.orig/debian/babel.sty
representation which isn't covered by the GPL,
anyway.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
retitle 345604 contains non-free documentation
thanks
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please take my apologies for bringing this up, but it seems I need to.
According to mreadme.pdf, the documentation is under a different license
than the code, with a currently attached
/texdoctk/README: Should be updated from tetex-bin, report upstream
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
version (currently 3.1.8) must be packaged
for use with a current web2c. I won't do that, since this is not
something for an NMU.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
convinced
of just using a DFSG-free software license (and I didn't know, and still
don't know, any documentation-specific DFSG-free license).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
tags 349330 patch
thanks
Ralf Angeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster (2006-01-23) writes:
Christopher J Peikert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After reading the install log for auctex, I installed autoconf, and
auctex configured properly. I can't imagine that this would be an
intended
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess the license is GPL-incompatible, but DFSG-free. And *that* is
not a practical problem, since nobody would want to reuse the code from
tex.web in a new project.
But pdfTeX does, and it claims to be GPLed
wouldn't like to use the new version's documentation
(with its CC license) and bundle it with the ConTeXt version in teTeX
3.0, since that would cause confusion. That's why I specifically ask
whether this applies to the old version, too.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
.
I'd keep it open as important as long as woody is supported.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
-sgml cannot be backported
to sarge withouth changes. Is this really a problem - there are also
other alternatives, although less elegant.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:44:25PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Jens Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
debiandoc-sgml does no longer build Debian FAQ.
$ latex /tmp/error.tex
This is e-TeX, Version 3.14159-2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5)
entering extended mode
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:44:25PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Jens Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
debiandoc-sgml does no longer build Debian FAQ.
$ latex /tmp/error.tex
This is e-TeX, Version 3.14159-2.1
| grep tetex
ii tetex-base 3.0-13 Basic library files of
teTeX
ii tetex-bin 3.0-10.1 The teTeX binary files
Please update tetex-bin to the version in sid and check whether the
problem persists.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 18:54 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
here's the start of a list of documents that have no source in
tetex-base or tetex-src, but whose source is available elsewhere:
And here some documents with (possibly) problematic license
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 20:27 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
[GFDL, OpenPub, ...]
I think we should move these to tetex-doc-nonfree, and only try to
contact the maintainers whether they are willing to relicense them once
we know about a DFSG-free
Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola Frank Küster!
This is a really low value. For debugging, we need some more
information. Can you please send us the output of the following
commands:
grep trie_size /etc/texmf/texmf.d/95NonPath.cnf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep trie_size /etc
Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hola Frank Küster!
To find out what happened, please do the following, and send us the
output:
grep texmf.cnf /var/lib/ucf/hashfile
2150a9c617c9c8f221dcb152bd9f34d2 /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
md5sum /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
, this bug was not a bug, but a human's (namely, me) fault, yet I feel
that something should be done to prevent this from happening again, don't
you think?
Yes, it would be good. I'll think it over, and keep the bug open under a
different title, and with lower severity.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: emacspeak
Version: 17.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks other emacs add-ons, unsuitable for release
M-x list-load-path-shadows:
[...]
/usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/emacspeak/regexp-opt hides
/usr/share/emacs/21.3/lisp/emacs-lisp
already looked at this problem, and do you have any statement
From the authors?
Many thanks in advance,
Frank Küster
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
pgpjHq2ermwKq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
statement, but I doubt they are copyrightable.
sawfish/sawfishrc is missing a license statement, but it is very short
and perhaps not copyrightable.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
to do after February 6 than planned...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
severity 294405 grave
stop
Janusz S. Bie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A simple upgrade made my tetex installation unsuable because of the
failure to generate a format. I've reinstalled tetex from the scratch
(at least I tried to), but the problem didn't vanished. It can be
ilustrated by the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Janusz S. Bien) schrieb:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:20:25 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster) writes:
[...]
You could have done
this yourself, by sending your answer to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Sorry, I didn't know.
No need to apologize. It didn't cause any inconvenience
disk seem to be intact.
Is any tetex package installed on the system, and can you give the
version numbers currently installed and, ideally, of the old ones before
the upgrade? We had a bug with /usr/local/ in tetex-base, and this might
be connected.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f
Please be so kind and keep the bug number address in the Cc
Tuomo Valkonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 03:24:59PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Is any tetex package installed on the system, and can you give the
version numbers currently installed and, ideally, of the old
Hi Tuomo,
Please be so kind and keep the bugnumber address in the Cc line.
Tuomo Valkonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:54:22PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Could it have been after January 24st?
Unlikely.
Then it is probably not tetex-base's fault.
And shouldn't
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
Please be so kind and keep the bug number address in the Cc
Tuomo Valkonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 03:24:59PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Is any tetex package installed on the system
.
As a quick fix for you, you can uninstall texinfo, then install
tetex-bin, and install texinfo again afterwards.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-10-19 13:18:15 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
As a quick fix for you, you can uninstall texinfo, then install
tetex-bin, and install texinfo again afterwards.
I've just tried, but I get the same error as for the unstable version
(bug 334613
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-10-19 11:19:54 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
So the problem seems to be jadetex, but I could install jadetex from
unstable just fine. Assuming that libkpathsea4 is in fact installed,
can you send us the output of the following commands
with xmltex.
Yes, the jadetex issue solves itself. Even without downgrading, just
dpkg --configure -a after the failed run will do it. I'm not sure
about the reason, though.
The xmltex is a different thing, it's a bug in xmltex which I will
report soon.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: serious
The teTeX-3.0 package should not migrate to testing too soon, even if
they are free of RC bugs for a couple of days. I'd like to have more
packages recompiled with them before they're let in.
Bye, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie
this version is no longer
available in sid. If you like, you can report a separate bug against
the testing version, but I won't put time into it.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
, not tex, and I
think this needs a different pool file, too, and therefore leads to
incompatible formats.
Regards, Frank
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
--
Frank Küster
with tetex-bin (= 2.0.2-31).
No, because it is wrong...
Gruß, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, one part of it was that we did not install the md5sums file for
/etc/texmf/fmt.d/01tetex.cnf, and therefore ucf did not recognize the
old file. Upon noninteractive upgrade, or when choosing to keep the
locally changed file, we don't get the right
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-10-19 22:17:38 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Vincent's statements whether he is using etch or sid were a little
confusing, but since tetex-bin_2.0.2-31 is now only in etch, it
might be that he is using this;
On this machine, I track unstable
. The difference is that on your system, tex is used
instead of etex. Could it be that you have changed or refused an update
of xmltex's configuration files?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
symlink
(mfw - mf), but then we get problems in case we want to split of a
tetex-bin-nowin package and want /usr/bin/mf to be managed with
update-alternatives.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
)
+ * Change all invocations of fmtutil to fmtutil-sys
+ * Do not check for LaTeX/pdfLaTeX format files, they are provided if
+tetex-bin is configured
+
+ -- Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:49:29 +0200
+
xmltex (1.9-10) unstable; urgency=high
* debian/postinst,debian/postrm
this helps you solve this problem.
Yes, it clearly shows that the problem is the result of a local change
of the configuration, and cannot be blamed on tetex-bin. However, we
will again provide the mfw executable and thus fix the bug.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ
added yourself to the
Uploaders, I think.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
has problem.
You are right, and thanks to Ralf and Florent this has already been
fixed. Will you report the x11-common thing separately?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
(and thus in a temporary file).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure that there are errors, or just error messages? At least
^
That should have been: TeX messages...
Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
:
kpsewhich --format=map dvips35.map
kpsewhere --format=map dvips35.map
kpsewhere dvips35.map
kpsewhich --show-path map
grep ^TEXFONTMAPS /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
grep ^TEXFONTMAPS /etc/texmf/texmf.d/*
Thanks in advance, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Eddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in
/tmp/tetex.postinst.XXKSxUFW
Please include this file if you report a bug.
Do you still have the file, or can you reproduce it, and send it to us?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So this is not a bug, but a local misconfiguration. In order to fix
your system, I think the best way is to do the following:
Did that work, and do you agree that we can close the bug?
On the other hand, we (the maintainer team) should collect all those
be fixed to handle correctly this
separator. Unfortunately, I don't know how to fix this.
...because is already works
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
.
AFAIK, the distribution tags are deprecated and rather meaningless, now
that we have a version-aware BTS.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-11-03 12:51:51 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
AFAIK, the distribution tags are deprecated and rather meaningless,
now that we have a version-aware BTS.
In fact, the problem I had was on a machine with Debian/unstable,
and I tried to reinstall
? I just tried in a pbuilder environment, and it
didn't give an error...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I can reproduce that bug. But only if I have configured debconf to
ask me the low questions too and selecting var at the first question
(BTW
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 328749 patch
thanks
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from
experimental installed:
Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC. Here is a patch, for
explanations please see
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Hi all,
I have finally sorted this all out.
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The strange thing is that it is so hard to reproduce. It depends on the
precence of apt-utils,
this is true...
so it means it depends on whether the config
script is run on its own (before preinst
need a specific versioned
Depends - the bug was already a bug with tetex-2.0.2, but then its
impact was only minor.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
, but an error that causes the postinst to fail, you
have local changes in your conffiles and should merge them.
More than this information I cannot give - we need the specific error
messages you get (and of course the commands that caused them).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ
-sys.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
is included in the
tex-common package?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
, because even in sarge
jadetex fails with tex (it must use etex).
What's the output of the following commands, please:
ls -l /etc/texmf/fmt.d/
grep jadetex /etc/texmf/fmt.d/*
grep jadetex /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:29:25AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-10.1
Followup-For: Bug #334613
I haven't upgraded Sid in several weeks--is it possible that something's
do? We can't overwrite it
with the dpkg-dist file without risking to overwrite local changes. We
also can't edit it, because it is a conffile which may not be changed by
maintainer scripts.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
introduction of the change, as
we did previously with TEXMFSYSVAR.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
clone 334613 -1
found -1 3.0-10.1
retitle -1 Should make sure the TEXFONTPATH setting is correct
severity -1 normal
submitter -1 Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stop
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
04:06:19
daddy:~# kpsewhich --format=map
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:48:34AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm attaching the output of this and the others asked by Frank. I did
include a listing of /etc/texmf as well (1st run wasn't recursive
get them installed (because its
/usr/share/doc/package is just a symlink to -base's). I'll add a -p
tetex-doc.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
tags 338334 pending
stop
Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: serious
The Debian changelog is missing in the /usr/share/doc/tetex-doc
directory. Please add it there as mandated by section 12.7 of the
Policy Manual.
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f
:
FMT=efmt
I think you could extract the format extension with
formatfile=$(basename `kpsewhich --format fmt latex`)
FMT=${formatfile#latex.}
Thus if somebody changes the system to use some other engine for latex,
whizzytex will still work.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der
.
If he'd never touched 00tetex.cnf, ucf would know the old version and
not ask at all, but simply overwrite. Except if the file already
existed in woody; we don't have an old md5sum for woody versions.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
clone 334613 -1
found -1 3.0-10.1
retitle -1 Should make sure the TEXFONTPATH setting is correct
severity -1 normal
submitter -1 Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stop
I guess you forgot to put [EMAIL PROTECTED] into Bcc. At least I don't
see a cloned bug.
H.
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f
is clearly not the issue here).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:30:44AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Now in the future, *never* edit texmf.cnf again, but instead just edit
the files in texmf.d. You will (of course) still be asked by dpkg if
...
I don't believe I ever have--I have
is a well-known interface for generating
dumps with tex.
Many obsolete things are well-known. It's a good idea to provide an
initex script that will echo please use tex --ini, but Debian packages
will still have to switch to the new (as of 1990 or so) ways.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f
were running? Or you do know this (which?) but don't
remember where you took the postinst from?
Thanks in advance,
Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
in sarge, but we won't do this again, but instead refer those
packages to the TeX Policy.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
it with --ini, although doing it
right is still a bit more complicated than the current setup in
whizzytex.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
formats
described in the Debian TeX Policy Draft should be used - please look at
the tex-common package.
Second, it doesn't make sense to build the formats twice, once by
calling an engine with -ini directly, and a second time using fmtutil.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ
installed.)
Removing tetex-base ...
rm: cannot remove `/usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R': Read-only file system
dpkg: error processing tetex-base (--remove):
subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
tetex-base
Regards, Frank
--
Frank
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:51:35PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:30:44AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Now in the future, *never* edit texmf.cnf again, but instead just edit
the files
there, as well as on the tex-k list, but it
didn't give any hits. When I find time, I'll simply ask the question
again on texlive.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
similar as my debconf default config is dialog/LOW.
Which bug do you mean - #337073? Why do you think it looks similar -
it's about an error in a chmod invocation, while yours involves a Perl
error in Debconf.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Christoph,
please send mails to the bug address, so that they get properly
archived.
TIA, Frank
---BeginMessage---
Frank Küster schrieb am 02.08.2005 19:57:
I'm in a hurry, therefore only very short.
Christoph Bier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: tetex-bin: Updmap error because a map
---BeginMessage---
Frank Küster schrieb am 03.08.2005 10:44:
Christoph Bier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This file shouldn't exist (neither in tetex-2.0.2 nor in 3.0).
This Debian box has also seen tetex-1 ...
But dpkg should have removed old files in /usr/share...
I guess there are many
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe we have a design flaw here in our updmap-magic scheme. Just that
it should have revealed itself earlier.
Nope. :)
Here, tetex-base, tetex-bin and tetex-extra are upgraded in the same
apt-get run
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mit, 28 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
For more than 5 weeks no answer. How do we proceed with this? We should
think about something rather soon, as with teTeX 3 going into unstable
texinfo is broken.
I think we do it rather now, than when I'm
with --force-depends). Just tried, it
does, although there's now an ugly circular dependency between texinfo
and tetex-base; both upgrading texinfo when tetex-base is installed, and
installing texinfo and tetex-base in one run works.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ
like Now depends
on tex-common, or tetex-bin until teTeX-3.0 is in unstable. On the
other hand, isn't #253124 also fixed by this upload?
New -1 packages are on the tug server.
Unfortunately, one more important thing is missing:
* New maintainer. Taking over because...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank
using it for
the normal arch specific build too.
Fixed in SVN.
Thank you very much, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
1 - 100 of 862 matches
Mail list logo
