n Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Holger Levsen wrote:
Well, I definition can not be right or wrong.
s/, I /, a /
Neither the world nor definitions are black and white. Definitions might be
right or wrong in physics (I doubt it already there...), but certainly in
social sciences definitions can also be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 05:07:36PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
So that part is what we would call CDD from the current definition.
For the purpose of finding a new name and definition, please stop
refering to the old one. Write something down (you
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 06:49:01PM -0600, David Stone wrote:
I would like some help with the packages.gz error I keep getting.
this sounds similar to a bug that was fixed in debian-cd, perhaps there
was a regression:
http://bugs.debian.org/423835
live well,
vagrant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
And IMO, either something is a Debian Subdistribution or not. Thats quite
binary in my opinion :-)
Yes. Either something fits a definition or not. Our task is now to
find a reasonable definition for Debian Subdistribution write it down
and stick
Hi,
For those joining in on [EMAIL PROTECTED], this thread started on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I'm crossposting this now, as I think it's relevant
for Debian Edu development.
Phillip and Luk, _you_ can skip the first quote+reply pair after this intro
and just read the second :-) (There are three
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Do you honestly claim that Skolelinux is inside Etch confused you
about the definition of CDD?
I think the precise statement that fits the definition is:
The Debian Edu team has developed the main part of the the
SkoleLinux distribution which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 12:48:53AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
Andreas, Jonas and me just had a nice real life discussion, which made me send
this mail the topic was that one cannot change a written down definition.
(Or at least I think
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BOF at debconf8, anyone? :)
In case I'm not there, some comments/questions/statements;
Fedora uses the term spins:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CustomSpins
http://spins.fedoraproject.org/
I like the term slices, and this is
Hi,
On Monday 31 March 2008 22:12, Andreas Tille wrote:
Yep, no problem about this. That's why I wrote that we are tolerant
to use the list for this.
I think there is a difference between being tolerant about stuff which doesnt
belong here, and accepting stuff because it belongs here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 03:31:08PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Holger Levsen wrote:
Maybe it would be wise to introduce a new term, for Debian based
distributions, which are not CDDs according to our definition. That
would
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I also suggest avoiding custom - Debian itself is customizable, CDDs
just automate what must already be possible within the distro.
Very reasonable.
Perhaps squeeze in subset, slice, fraction or similar - to
emphasize relationship.
Fully ACK.
Hi,
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 18:42, Andreas Tille wrote:
I'm happe that we brought this discussion up short before the
Extremadura meeting. We might be able to fix something there.
Your tests sound very convincing.
I liked Jonas tests and suggestions too :-) But I dont think we should try to
Hi,
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 15:31, Andreas Tille wrote:
2. What is the meaning you once gave to CDD, where is it documented?
Easy: Try the first Google hit Custom Debian Distributions. If in
doubt follow the link I gave in one of these mails in this thread I have
given. There were several
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 07:25:09PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 15:31, Andreas Tille wrote:
2. What is the meaning you once gave to CDD, where is it documented?
Easy: Try the first Google hit Custom Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 10:38:17PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 21:30, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
What's wrong with pointing to an earlier answer in same mailinglist
thread?
He just said, STFU (in a way more friendly way :), he
Hi,
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 21:54, Andreas Tille wrote:
I normally regard this as impolite as well, but the answer I intended
to give was actually given in this thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-custom/2008/03/msg00038.html
Thanks.
There you explain that this lists purpose is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 10:59:28PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
So, this list is not about Custom Debian Distributions as defined in
http://wiki.debian.org/CustomDebian or in your paper - this list is
about custom Debian distributions. A small, but
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, David Stone wrote:
You were so helpful with my last issue I thought I'd give you more
information about my project and some other issues I am having. What I
am doing is building a simple computer for the Senior Project.
Basically, it will be a computer that your Grandmother
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:19:10AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Is there any reason to do this outside Debian or would you consider
tp follow the path of Debian-Junior who is supporting the other end
of the age scale ;-) _INSIDE_ Debian. Your are asking on a list that
is about doing
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while i fully support pushing to include everything entirely within
Debian, i think it's important to acknowledge that *sometimes* it may
actually be better to develop a proof of concept outside of Debian
first.
Yep, no problem about this. That's
Hello all,
You were so helpful with my last issue I thought I'd give you more
information about my project and some other issues I am having. What I
am doing is building a simple computer for the Senior Project.
Basically, it will be a computer that your Grandmother could use. I uses
the
21 matches
Mail list logo
