On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Iulian Udrea wrote:
2009/2/18 Marc Singer e...@buici.com
Is your package patch available so I can review it?
Also, it doesn't look like you're a DD. Why are you so keen to
maintain it?
*shrug*
Have you never been excited about being able to contribute to
Debian?
Le mardi 17 février 2009 à 19:14 -0800, Marc Singer a écrit :
Also, it doesn't look like you're a DD. Why are you so keen to
maintain it?
For a second, I thought AJ was back. Phew.
--
.''`. Debian 5.0 Lenny has been released!
: :' :
`. `' Last night, Darth Vader came down from planet
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 07:14:45PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
Also, it doesn't look like you're a DD. Why are you so keen to
maintain it?
Please consider refraining to post comments like this in the
future. Your intention might have been good, but written as you wrote
it, it can discourage
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 06:50:55AM +, Iulian Udrea wrote:
2009/2/18 Marc Singer e...@buici.com
Is your package patch available so I can review it?
Also, it doesn't look like you're a DD. Why are you so keen to
maintain it?
Yes, you're right, I'm not a DD. Anyway, I've had no
2009/2/18 Marc Singer e...@buici.com
It was not my intention to shut you down. I am just trying to figure
out how far you've gotten in packaging the program.
Sure, no problem. I haven't gotten too far in packaging it because of
bug #407722.
There is a serious blockage in pushing cgit
Twas brillig at 17:47:57 18.02.2009 UTC+00 when iul...@ubuntu.com did gyre and
gimble:
IU Perhaps we will find a way to get it back.
What about this solution: building git-core cgit from the one source
package, containing both source trees? This way they won't go
out-of-sync.
--
2009/2/18 Marc Singer e...@buici.com
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:47:57PM +, Iulian Udrea wrote:
2009/2/18 Marc Singer e...@buici.com
It was not my intention to shut you down. I am just trying to figure
out how far you've gotten in packaging the program.
Sure, no problem. I
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:47:57PM +, Iulian Udrea wrote:
2009/2/18 Marc Singer e...@buici.com
It was not my intention to shut you down. I am just trying to figure
out how far you've gotten in packaging the program.
Sure, no problem. I haven't gotten too far in packaging it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
The upstream build of cgit requires a download of git to build libgit
which this package links statically. Thus, this package practically
depends on a change to git-core.
http://hjemli.net/git/cgit/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello Marc.
I have already packaged this. I was going to submit an ITP and upload
it through a sponsor in the next days.
So, I would like to take care of this. May I take over this ITP?
Cheers!
Iulian
2009/2/17 Marc Singer e...@buici.com
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
The upstream
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 06:30:58PM +, Iulian Udrea wrote:
I have already packaged this. I was going to submit an ITP and upload
it through a sponsor in the next days.
This is one reason why an ITP is expected *before* beginning work.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216
2009/2/17 Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 06:30:58PM +, Iulian Udrea wrote:
I have already packaged this. I was going to submit an ITP and upload
it through a sponsor in the next days.
This is one reason why an ITP is expected *before* beginning
I have already packaged this. I was going to submit an ITP and upload
it through a sponsor in the next days.
This is one reason why an ITP is expected *before* beginning work.
Yea, indeed. I completely forgot about it, sorry.
How did you package it? If it includes the git source do not
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 06:30:58PM +, Iulian Udrea wrote:
Hello Marc.
I have already packaged this. I was going to submit an ITP and upload
it through a sponsor in the next days.
So, I would like to take care of this. May I take over this ITP?
Is your package patch available so I
Marc Singer e...@buici.com (17/02/2009):
Also, it doesn't look like you're a DD. Why are you so keen to
maintain it?
WHEN DID BEING A DD BECOME A PREREQUISITE FOR MAINTAINING A PACKAGE?
The “you're not a DD” blablabla is quite frustrating already, and I
can't think of a good reason to
2009/2/17 Joerg Jaspert jo...@debian.org
I have already packaged this. I was going to submit an ITP and upload
it through a sponsor in the next days.
This is one reason why an ITP is expected *before* beginning work.
Yea, indeed. I completely forgot about it, sorry.
How did you
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Iulian Udrea iul...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I'm still thinking of a way to get rid of git source and not affect the
rest.
Get upstream git to stabilise libgit into a proper shared library.
Please see #407722, which I set as blocking the ITP #515793.
--
bye,
pabs
2009/2/18 Marc Singer e...@buici.com
Is your package patch available so I can review it?
Also, it doesn't look like you're a DD. Why are you so keen to
maintain it?
Yes, you're right, I'm not a DD. Anyway, I've had no idea that you're a
DD.
That being said, perhaps it's better to submit
18 matches
Mail list logo
