On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:59:29 +1100
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Are you saying that you don't want any BSD packages or that you're
trying to make Debian out of only packages using GNU licences?
I would find it useful, for example, to more easily determine which
works, or
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:59:29 +1100
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Are you saying that you don't want any BSD packages or that
you're trying to make Debian out of only packages using GNU
licences?
I would find it useful, for
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 10:03 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Anyway, thanks for the work on the format. To me it seems to
probably be a good thing. I hope this mail wasn't too negative.
I find this a little confusing, since you spent most of your message
saying how you *don't* think it's a good
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:03:10 +1100
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
* Display of the copyright notices, license grant and terms (in e.g.
‘aptitude’) when deciding whether or not to install a package.
I don't see how that is a real gain, except for packages in non-free.
Are we
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:03:10 +1100
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
* Display of the copyright notices, license grant and terms (in
e.g. ‘aptitude’) when deciding whether or not to install a
package.
I don't see how that is a real
5 matches
Mail list logo
