-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 20:03:00 +0100
Source: rtf2htm
Binary: rtf2htm
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.12.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dr. Guenter Bechly [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 12:46:40 +0900
Source: asclassic
Binary: asclassic
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.1b-17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Taketoshi Sano [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 15:20:39 +0100
Source: gnuplot
Binary: gnuplot
Architecture: sparc
Version: 3.7.1p1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Thimo Neubauer [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:02:54 +1000
Source: byacc
Binary: byacc
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.9-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jason Henry Parker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 20:09:34 +0100
Source: procmail
Binary: procmail
Architecture: sparc
Version: 3.15.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Santiago Vila [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 21:49:01 -0500
Source: gkrellm
Binary: gkrellm
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Brian M. Almeida [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 02:41:32 -0700
Source: hztty
Binary: hztty
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Anthony Fok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Goswin Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 07 Jan 2001 23:00:59 +0100
% tar -cIvvf bla.tar.bz2 bla
tar: bla: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
That is indeed a bug. Thanks for reporting it. I'll fix it as follows:
@@ -439,5 +434,5 @@ or a device. *This* `tar' defaults to `
On Mon, 8 January 2001 04:15:10 +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
method will result in the immediate termination of public rsync
access to our servers.
I think that is something to be discussed. As I said before, I expect
the rsync + some features to produce less load than ftp or
Hello world,
Since people seem to want more information about why valid candidates
aren't going in (which is quite sensible, just hard to provide), I've
tried adding some code that'll report what packages became uninstallable
when a package was attempted to be added to testing.
At the moment,
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Steve Langasek wrote:
SLOn Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
SL
SL Hamish Moffatt wrote:
SL There IS a debconf question about it.. it's not like it just does it to
you
SL without asking. Maybe the debconf priority of the question is too low if
SL too many people
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
BROn Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 06:26:24PM -0600, Bud Rogers wrote:
BR It is spectacularly bad form to quote private email in a public forum,
BR but it is not illegal. And it is spectacularly naive to count on the
BR privacy of anything you tell another
Hi!
I was just wondering - there is this icq-field on
http://db.debian.org/, which I have to say I'm not really happy with.
It's not the kind of thing that seems the right thing[tm] for Debian. I
would rather like to have a jabber field instead of that
jabber, you might ask? From
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to package mboxgrep, a utility which greps mailboxes.
Description: Grep through mailboxes
mboxgrep is a small utility that scans either standard Unix
mailboxes, Gnus nnml or nnmh mailboxes, or MH mailboxes, and
displays messages matching a basic,
I ve read in this list some ideas about a new package manager project for
Debian.
Do you know if the Ability to install more than one version of a package
simultaneously
is an idea working in progress for future Debian release ?
Many thanks per advance
Tony
Package: doc-debian-ja
Severity: wishlist
I will package doc-debian-ja.
The output of `dpkg -I':
new debian package, version 2.0.
size 161570 bytes: control archive= 854 bytes.
668 bytes,22 lines control
879 bytes,21 lines * postinst
Hi,
Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
no clue...I don't use apt to upgrade. :) Your not alone tho, there is a
existing bug report on this (#81365)...so any help you can give me to track
down what's going on would be appreciated. On all the boxes I have access
to I use dselect to manage my package
Damian M Gryski writes:
On Sun, 07 Jan 2001, Svante Signell wrote:
Is openssh ever going to be upgraded? Latest unstable version is
2.2.0p1-1.1 from September? while the latest OpenBSD release is now
2.3.0p1! Maybe the package also should change name from ssh to openssh.
openssh
Title: ATTENTION! The Well-Paid Job in the Internet!
We wish You a pleasant and successful day!In RussianMake money without leaving Your computer!If You show some interest and patience and understand as IT works, You can earn up to $100,000 and more!!! During the following 120 days - it depends
On 03-Jan-2001 Paul Hedderly wrote:
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:37:17AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who recalls a cddb access program designed for blind people where
cddb.com DENIED a certification because the program couldn't display a
graphical logo where the blind people could see it.
Hi all,
I'm the italian teacher interested using linux at school.
I write articles for a national school magazine about linux at school
and my next one I thought it could be about debian jr.
I'm studying in the mailing list your complex work on-line to make
debian junior a successful distribution,
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:32:33AM +1100, Sam Couter wrote:
My point is that the -I option *doesn't* mean uncompress this file using
bzip2 for anything other than GNU tar. Now that it doesn't mean that for
GNU tar either, people are complaining. I think they probably shouldn't have
been using
On 03-Jan-2001 Philip Brown wrote:
Reply-to is meant to send a message back to the person who wrote the
first one, not to someone they wrote the message to.
reply-to is meant to direct where you should send replies to.
Reply-To is meant to direct where you should send replies to
if you
Chris == Chris L Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chris Hi Stefan,
Chris Unfortunately, no, I'm still having trouble. :( I might
Chris wind up installing a fresh potato system on another
Chris partition to see if it works in potato or not. If not, I
Chris guess I should
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 09:04:50AM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OpenBSD took another tack on this problem and just did away with
cached man pages altogether. (no suid or sgid man)
They always re-format a manual page? This might be reasonable, actually.
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:44:38AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
I was just wondering - there is this icq-field on
http://db.debian.org/, which I have to say I'm not really happy with.
It's not the kind of thing that seems the right thing[tm] for Debian. I
would rather like to have a jabber
Below is an RFC for the implementation of the SGML/XML Proposal for the LSB
(version 0.3) in Debian. I've send this to several mailing list to give it
broad attention, but please keep all the further discussion on debian-sgml.
All affected package maintainers please subscribe to debian-sgml.
== Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 8 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
I don't need to get a filelisting, apt-get tells me the
name. :)
You have missed the point, the presence of the ability to do
file listings prevents the adoption of rsync servers
== Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 7 Jan 2001, Bdale Garbee wrote:
gzip --rsyncable, aloready implemented, ask Rusty Russell.
I have a copy of Rusty's patch, but have not applied it since I
don't like diverging Debian packages from upstream this way.
On Monday 8 January 2001, at 9 h 5, the keyboard of Tollef Fog Heen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend to package mboxgrep, a utility which greps mailboxes.
BTW, we already have sgrep, which is fine for that purpose.
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:27:53AM +1100, Sam Couter wrote:
Otto Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So why not solve the compression problem at the root? Why not try to
change the compression in a way so it does produce a compressed result
with the same (or similar) difference rate as the
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 01:27:24PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Monday 8 January 2001, at 9 h 5, the keyboard of Tollef Fog Heen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend to package mboxgrep, a utility which greps mailboxes.
BTW, we already have sgrep, which is fine for that purpose.
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:32:02PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 01:27:24PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Monday 8 January 2001, at 9 h 5, the keyboard of Tollef Fog Heen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend to package mboxgrep, a utility which greps
The reason for installing ssh in this case was for troubleshooting,
although higher security would be a positive side effect.
He reports trouble from an unknown source, and telnetd is involved.
Installing ssh would allow comparisons of the failure modes with different
network login clients.
If
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:55:12AM +0100, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
Just did it on a Potato box a week ago, no problems whatsoever. Thought
you might wish to know.
Okay, the problem seems to be with how mkdep is being compiled. I managed
to get the kernel to compile by copying the mkdep.c
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:58:26PM +1100, Peter Eckersley wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:27:53AM +1100, Sam Couter wrote:
Otto Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So why not solve the compression problem at the root? Why not try to
change the compression in a way so it does produce a
Some Eray quotes, one paragraph of advice for Eray, and a possibly useful
idea at the end for everyone.
Non-regulation is a false claim
His actions are simply not tolerable
I'd be greatly surprised if anybody told me that developers have the right
to swear publicly in an outburst of adolescent
Package: grepmail
Description: search mailboxes for mail matching an expression
Grepmail looks for mail messages containing a pattern, and prints the
resulting messages. It can handle compressed mailbox files, and can search
the header or body of emails. Usage is very similar to grep.
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:08:22AM -0500 , Chris L. Mason wrote:
Anyway, this might help others who need to compile old kernels, and
hopefully the problem will be fixed by gcc 2.95.3 final.
2.0.38 will probably not compile with gcc 2.7.2.3 very well. You might
want to try gcc272
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:17:42AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
waiting for DAM approval, whenever that is supposed to happen (emphasis
on the supposed to happen)
No offense to the DAM, but I share Eray's pedicament and feel that I
could definately contribute more effectively if I had the
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:22:22PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:08:22AM -0500 , Chris L. Mason wrote:
Anyway, this might help others who need to compile old kernels, and
hopefully the problem will be fixed by gcc 2.95.3 final.
2.0.38 will probably not compile with gcc
So why not solve the compression problem at the root? Why not try to
change the compression in a way so it does produce a compressed
result
with the same (or similar) difference rate as the source?
Are you going to hack at *every* different kind of file format that you
might ever want to
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:28:25AM -0500 , Chris L. Mason wrote:
Right, good point. In fact I did use gcc272 for the actual compile. But
neither gcc272 or gcc 2.95.3 compiled mkdep.c properly. Hmm, I wonder if
hmm. I wonder how could we compile it in the first place, given there was no
other
Yes, it took me about a year's wait also.
The point I'm making is that complaining to volunteers is ineffective
unless you give a solution.
Now that you and Eray have publically complained about the team's slowness,
that means that after you complete the NM process, you both be joining the
NM
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:17:42AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
5) A Debian Developer will never knowingly run a production server on
unstable and will never encourage a non-developer to run unstable.
I don't see how this affects the Debian community. If anything, it
would result in more bug
Hello,
I'm looking for a Debian developer to sign my key. I'm in the NM
process. If you're in Barcelona (Spain) please mail me.
Thanks
Santi
--
Looking for signature...
Looking for signature...done
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:35:51AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
Now that you and Eray have publically complained about the team's slowness,
that means that after you complete the NM process, you both be joining the
NM team to help your fellow developers get processed quicker, right?
I'm not
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:33:26PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:28:25AM -0500 , Chris L. Mason wrote:
Right, good point. In fact I did use gcc272 for the actual compile. But
neither gcc272 or gcc 2.95.3 compiled mkdep.c properly. Hmm, I wonder if
hmm. I wonder how
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:17:42AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
5) A Debian Developer will never knowingly run a production server on
unstable and will never encourage a non-developer to run unstable
Why shouldn't a developer encourage an ordinary user to run unstable?
* It would speed up the
On 8 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
Then that feature should be limited to non-recursive listings or
turned off. Or .listing files should be created that are just served.
*couf* rproxy *couf*
So when you have more blocks, the hash will fill up. So you have more
hits on the first level
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 06:47:01PM +0200, Yotam wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:17:42AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
5) A Debian Developer will never knowingly run a production server on
unstable and will never encourage a non-developer to run unstable
Why shouldn't a developer
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:33:26PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:28:25AM -0500 , Chris L. Mason wrote:
Right, good point. In fact I did use gcc272 for the actual compile. But
neither gcc272 or gcc 2.95.3 compiled
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:28:56PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote:
So why not solve the compression problem at the root? Why not try to
change the compression in a way so it does produce a compressed
result
with the same (or similar) difference rate as the source?
Are you going to hack at
** On Jan 08, Aaron Lehmann scribbled:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:35:51AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
Now that you and Eray have publically complained about the team's slowness,
that means that after you complete the NM process, you both be joining the
NM team to help your fellow
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
Yes, it took me about a year's wait also.
I created my pgp key on Dec. 27, 1997. 2 weeks later, I was a
developer. Granted, this was before the closing, and the reorganization, but
even for that time frame, that was fast.
What I'm trying to say is
Today, Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-) Or, during a short period (say, 2 months or so?) both fields could
be there, and icq should really be dropped.
Or, they could both be there (if space permits) with the ICQ field
output as [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Talking about encouragement... (-:
--
On 2001-01-07, Goswin Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zhaoway 1) It prevent many more packages to come into Debian, for
zhaoway example, Linux Gazette are now not present newest issues
zhaoway in Debian. People occasionally got fucked up by packages
Any reasons why the Linux
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:54:37AM -0600 , Steve Langasek wrote:
While a 2.0 kernel may not /run/ with a given glibc, I'm puzzled as to how
kernel doesn't care what you have under it. and newer glibc's should work OK
even with an older one.
Petr Cech
--
Debian
On 20010108T084511-0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
The DAM is quite busy, and I sympathize with him. However, once
allowed to I would voulenteer to aid him with his duties to expedite
the processes.
I doubt that a fresh developer would be allowed to take on such a
vulnerable position as the DAM.
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
Agreed. Bitching about problems in unstable is bad. Running unstable
is not necessarily evil.
Just to make sure everyone understands, bitching about unstable bugs is
bad. Finding and reporting unstable bugs is ok.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
** On Jan 08, Adam Heath scribbled:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
Yes, it took me about a year's wait also.
I created my pgp key on Dec. 27, 1997. 2 weeks later, I was a
developer. Granted, this was before the closing, and the reorganization, but
even for that time frame,
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:17:42AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
Some Eray quotes, one paragraph of advice for Eray, and a possibly useful
idea at the end for everyone.
I think you are grossly overestimating Eray's desire to work well with
others, his ability to contribute anything of substance
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Marek Habersack wrote:
** On Jan 08, Adam Heath scribbled:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
Yes, it took me about a year's wait also.
I created my pgp key on Dec. 27, 1997. 2 weeks later, I was a
developer. Granted, this was before the closing, and
Vince Mulhollon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that you and Eray have publically complained about the team's slowness,
that means that after you complete the NM process, you both be joining the
NM team to help your fellow developers get processed quicker, right?
I'm not being sarcastic, my initial
** On Jan 08, Adam Heath scribbled:
[snip]
Hmm... http://debian.vip.net.pl/caudium,
http://debian.vip.net.pl/caudium-unstable - does that prove _anything_ about
me? I guess not and the NM process is what there's needed to confirm whether
the applicant can do anything good for the project
No, I want rsync not even to be mentioned. All I want is something
similar to
gzip --compress-like=old-foo foo
where foo will be compressed as old-foo was or as aquivalent as
possible. Gzip does not need to know anything about foo except how it
was compressed. The switch
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Marek Habersack wrote:
Note that I did not flaunt my deeds to the new maintainer team. My nightly
neither do I do that... It's just that I _really_ want to work and
contribute to Debian and being a de-facto developer but not _Debian_
developer my contributions are very
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 22:52:33 -0600
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg-dev dpkg-doc dpkg
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.8.1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Adam
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:54:07AM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
| A case where it might make sense to encourage someone to run unstable
| is if [...] the developer thinks that they are resonably competant.
I think that this is the key. If the user is competent enough there
is no harm suggesting
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:25:16AM -0800 , Kenneth Scharf wrote:
Just saw this as I suppose many already have
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-01-05-001-04-NW-LF-KN
Since Woody is probably still many months away is
there a chance that it will include the 2.4 Kernel?
yes. It
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 10:48:47AM +1100 , Brian May wrote:
I have to wonder if it is really worth having a different name for the
newer package version. Are the versions really that different?
Personally, I would prefer to have apt-get automatically upgrade the
package, and that will be
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:53:52AM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
Something like this should be implemented anyway when
translated Descriptions will be supported and Packages size
will grow by some 6 times.
Oh, man, you got another strong point against general package
index. (Big Packages.gz
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 05:18:02PM -0500, Chris Gray wrote:
Brian May writes:
bm What do large packages have to do with the size of the index file,
bm Packages?
I think the point was that every package adds about 30-45 lines to the
Packages file. You don't need to download any of
== Otto Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So why not solve the compression problem at the root? Why not
try to change the compression in a way so it does produce a
compressed
result
with the same (or similar) difference rate as the source?
Are you going to hack at
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:23:05AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
I created my pgp key on Dec. 27, 1997. 2 weeks later, I was a
developer. Granted, this was before the closing, and the reorganization, but
even for that time frame, that was fast.
What I'm trying to say is that if you prove beyond
== Andrew Lenharth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is better and easier is to ensure that the compression is
deturministic (gzip by default is not, bzip2 seems to be), so
that rsync can decompress, rsync, compress, and get the exact
file back on the other side.
gzip
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 03:04:10AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
* To seperate Packages.gz to be along with each package as another seperate
file. Ceazar's belong to Ceazar. ;)
i.e., each pkg_ver-sub_arch.deb with a pkg_ver-sub_arch.idx
No, thats not a win. You would end up checking time
Hi all
Please reply directly to me as I am currently not subscribed to -devel.
I have ITPed for freeswan quite a while ago and have made semi-official
(people who were interested at that time knew of the download location) packages
since then. Now I am happy enough with my version of the
Hi Zdenek,
Zdenek Kabelac [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After a while there is finaly version which looks stable enough for me,
so there are new packages of this program available here
I went back to the archived discussion that took place in October, and
I'm surprised noone pointed this
I have used tar with gzip and bzip2 in debian unstable and in each case
users who use older versions of tar ( like 1.13.11 ) were unable to
decompress it.
[49: huff+mtf rt+rld]data integrity (CRC) error in data
and such error messages like that . This troubles me greatly. Any info
about this?
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Kimberlite is a complete framework providing high availability for
application services on Linux. The key features of the architecture
include the following:
- A complete high-availability service infrastructure prevents you
from having to assemble an
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:12:35PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
I went back to the archived discussion that took place in October, and
I'm surprised noone pointed this out. As far as I can tell, DivX, what
that codecs package contains, is illegal. It started off the Microsoft
DLLs
On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 16:17:42 Vince Mulhollon wrote:
5) A Debian Developer will never knowingly run a production server
on
unstable and will never encourage a non-developer to run
unstable.
For the record I object to any Code of Condust that includes this
clause.
btw I'm a Ham operator and
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Marek Habersack wrote:
Same for me... My application was accepted in September, I applied in June -
the only thing missing is the account. I have 8 packages waiting to be
uploaded, one more to overtake from the current maintainer (he could/would
sponsor it, but I prefer to
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
...
5) A Debian Developer will never knowingly run a production server on
unstable and will never encourage a non-developer to run unstable.
...
Tou want to forbid that:
- I run unstable on a production server even if I know what I'm doing
- I tell my
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Kimberlite is a complete framework providing high availability for
application services on Linux. The key features of the architecture
Which licence? -Ralf.
There was a few discussions on the rsync mailing lists about how to
handle compressed files, specifically .debs
I'd like to see some way of handling it better, but I don't think
it'll happen at the rsync end. Reasons include higher server cpu load
to (de)compress every file that is transferred and
In Mon, 08 Jan 2001 15:21:30 -0500 safemode [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate
scripsit :
I have used tar with gzip and bzip2 in debian unstable and in each case
users who use older versions of tar ( like 1.13.11 ) were unable to
decompress it.
[49: huff+mtf rt+rld]data integrity (CRC) error
1)
It's a totally informal and unofficial first draft. Maybe a better way of
expressing my thoughts would be:
A Debian Developer will never knowingly allow a mission critical server to
run unstable unless all the affected users and managers understand the
danger.
or, perhaps more acceptable:
A
Hello!
I'm working on fixing some bugs and after that packaging up
sked, a conosle-based calendar and scheduling program.
Thanks,
Gergely
Hi Zdenek,
[ I hope you don't mind me mailing the reply back to d-d, please keep
your replies there ]
Zdenek Kabelac [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But in this case - maybe downloading script would be legal for Debian ?
(just like for realplayer ? - or do you think Debian user should never
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:52:25PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
...
5) A Debian Developer will never knowingly run a production server on
unstable and will never encourage a non-developer to run unstable.
...
Tou want to forbid that:
- I run
William Lee Irwin III [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Say, could you cite some proof of this?
I admit this being hearsay. Before sending my previous message I did
try to find some credible source for this information. The Project
Mayo doesn't give much info in that direction, and the articles
On Mon, Jan 8, 2001 at 18:20:16 +0100 (+), Andreas Fuchs wrote:
On 2001-01-07, Goswin Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zhaoway 1) It prevent many more packages to come into Debian, for
zhaoway example, Linux Gazette are now not present newest issues
zhaoway in Debian.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Description: A system resource monitor dockapp for Afterstep and WindowMaker
Asmon is a wharfable/dockable application for that displays meters
detailing CPU, memory, swap, and X mem usage. Also included the
exact numbers for load average, mem, swap, and
Hi,
does anybody know if it is possible to start the built-in run command
(similar to xexec) of the gnome-panel, outside the gnome desktop, e.g.
under icewm. I tried to find the command's name but did not succeeed. I
also tried to find it out by looking into the process-list, but the start
of the
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:23:05AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
What I'm trying to say is that if you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that
you would benefit the project, you will be accepted.
All I stated was that it was less efficient for many people to do work
through sponsors. Well, let's do an
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to package MOL, an emulator for running MacOS on PowerPC Linux.
MOL is licensed under the GPL. Source, binaries, and rpm files can be
downloaded from http://www.maconlinux.org/ .
Regards, Jens.
--
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb et
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to package cfitsio, the C version of a library for handling
the Flexible Image Transport System (FITS) file format, widely used in
the astronomical community.
The current version of cfitsio can be downloaded in form of a
compressed tarball
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to package xgospel, a client for playing the game of Go on
the Internet Go Server IGS.
While the source of xgospel is readily available from
http://img.teaser.fr/~jlgailly/go.html, I couldn't find any hint of a
license for this program. So the first step
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
