Frédéric Bothamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
C'est probablement vrai, mais ce ne devrait normalement pas être le cas
selon la section 5.11.5 de la référence du développeur Debian (en
anglais).
Ce sujet est abordé sur debian-devel, d'ailleurs...
Tu veux parler de celui sur
Quoting Frédéric Bothamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
* Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-06-30 08:39] :
[snip]
J'ai usé de la méthode habituelle : menace de NMU. Même si le NMU
n'est pas en soi une pratique agressive, il est souvent vécu comme
tel par les mainteneurs et ça fouette
#199278
On rencontre très souvent dans les templates boolean de debconf des
constructions du type If you answer YES here
Les actuels traducteurs francophones y font la chasse, lors de leur
traductions, mais on peut en louper un certain nombre. Cela, à
l'instigation de Denis Barbier à
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Quoting Julien Louis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
(copie à la liste des DD francophones, tiens)
A propos du bogue #193889 : un fichier de traduction de templates
debconf français que le mainteneur a appelé pt_FR.po (portugais comme
il est parlé en
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C'est une évidence. Mais j'ai bien peur que, quoi qu'on écrive, la
réaction du mainteneur à un NMU puisse être courroucée.. :-). Certains
mainteneurs du moins.
Surtout si c'est pour un truc aussi important que des fichiers mal
nommés dans debian/po.
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
A propos du bogue #193889 : un fichier de traduction de templates
debconf français que le mainteneur a appelé pt_FR.po (portugais comme
il est parlé en France... :-)))
Le mainteneur est OK pour le NMU.
NMU envoyé (dans delayed/7-day).
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:40:21PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C'est une évidence. Mais j'ai bien peur que, quoi qu'on écrive, la
réaction du mainteneur à un NMU puisse être courroucée.. :-). Certains
mainteneurs du moins.
Surtout si c'est
Quoting Julien BLACHE ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Surtout si c'est pour un truc aussi important que des fichiers mal
nommés dans debian/po. Là je comprends que le mainteneur puisse avoir
une furieuse envie d'étrangler l'auteur du NMU...
Et pourquoi donc ?
La correction est totalement triviale à
Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
Surtout si c'est pour un truc aussi important que des fichiers mal
nommés dans debian/po. Là je comprends que le mainteneur puisse avoir
une furieuse envie d'étrangler l'auteur du NMU...
Il ne faut pas commencer à NMUer à tout va, même si cela
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 11:03:53PM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
I had a -5 ready to go at about the same time I saw the NMU. I was so
annoyed I decided to let the issue go for a couple of days. Cool down
period.
If it was ready, why not upload it and be done with it? The NMU was
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-02
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libio-zlib-perl
Version : 1.01
Upstream Author : Tom Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:07:12 -0500, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:27:20AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Samium Gromoff wrote:
I`ll proceed in the time order of events:
Tue, 17 Jun
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 05:12:22PM +0200, Julien LEMOINE wrote:
I received a bug report on stunnel package from an user [1] that
complained
about the fact that I didn't warning about the new /etc/default/stunnel file
introduced in package (thereis a note in README.Debian and in
,Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Description : Extension of the java.lang package
And?
The Lang Component contains a set of Java classes that provide helper
methods for standard Java classes, especially those found in the
java.lang
Am Dienstag, 01.07.03 um 19:28 Uhr schrieb Sven Luther:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:28:01PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
Is there any place where someone could advertise jobs that would be
suitable
for Debian developers?
Rapahel Hertzog spoke about something such some time back, when i
looked
at it
Julien LEMOINE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I received a bug report on stunnel package from an user [1] that
complained about the fact that I didn't warning about the new
/etc/default/stunnel file introduced in package (thereis a note in
README.Debian and in changelog).
Since debconf is not
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 06:02:29PM +0200, Lucio wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody!
I am an Italian security admin, and I can progam in c /c++ / java.
I like very much debian, so i would like to start helping the project.
I would like to partecipate to
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 10:57:40PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Gimp and many others software creates dotfiles. Because from the start
you configure it (cache size, temp dir).
Why should I want a per-user configuration option for temp file location?
For
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 09:17:40PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 05:12:22PM +0200, Julien LEMOINE wrote:
Since debconf is not really appreciated for this use, what is the best
solution ? Inform users with debconf or give them informations only in
changelog
Roger Leigh wrote:
If it's not meant to be invoked directly by a user, it should be put
in /usr/libexec/news/inews. It's located under /usr/libexec on the
BSDs.
Hopefully, Debian Policy (and FHS) will allow the use of libexec some
day...
Christ, no. If it's not meant to be run by any users,
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 05:12:22PM +0200, Julien LEMOINE wrote:
I received a bug report on stunnel package from an user [1] that
complained
about the fact that I didn't warning about the new /etc/default/stunnel file
introduced in package (thereis a note in README.Debian and in
Hello all,
Since sid's sysvinit was recently fixed I am able to try another chroot install
of sid per the Debain Reference directions. Sadly the following command,
debootstrap sid /sid-root http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
Creates the following error,
E: Couldn't download
Hello,
In fact, i have also this bug. It comes from a circular versionned
dependency betwee lipam0g and libpam-modules :
libpam0g depend on libpam-modules 0.7.X and
libpam-modules depends on libpam0g 0.7.X...
So if you try to upgrade from a version below 0.7.X you cannot get it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name : libapache-miniwiki-perl
Version : 0.83
Upstream Authors : Jonas Oberg, Wim Kerkhoff, James Farrell
URL : http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/miniwiki/
:
Will Newton wrote:
Is there any place where someone could advertise jobs that would be suitable
for Debian developers?
That's what jobs.debian.net was meant for.
It doesn't seem to exist anymore, though.
Regards,
Joey
--
Long noun chains don't automatically imply security. --
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: librcs-perl
Version : 1.04-1
Upstream Author : Craig Freter craig at freter.com
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/search?query=Rcsmode=module
* License : Perl (GPL / Artistic)
Description : Front end to
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 17:12, Julien LEMOINE wrote:
Hello,
I received a bug report on stunnel package from an user [1] that
complained about the fact that I didn't warning about the new
/etc/default/stunnel file introduced in package (thereis a note in
README.Debian and in changelog).
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 07:14:10AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
You *do* realize that saying virii is a guaranteed method of summoning
Thomas Bushnell, right?
I'll bear it in mind if I ever need to contact him urgently. Is it his
secret call
I'm aware you can downgrade packages with
`apt-get --force-yes install package=version-revision`
but this doesn't seem to apply any postrm processing on the existing
version of the package being replaced.
How about a postrm::downgrade hook to reverse any changes made in the
new version's
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 10:55:44AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
what's the point? Surely you want the best, not necessarily the GNU
version (which might be an incredibly bleeding-edge pre-alpha thing,
like for example mailutils was not so long ago)?
OK, let's just say I like the GNU
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-02
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: rfc-tool
Version : 3.2
Upstream Author : Derrick Daugherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.dewn.com/rfc/
* License : Unclear, probably free
Description : Tool
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-02
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: kernel-patch-2.4-supermount-ng
Version : 1.2.7a
Upstream Author : Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stephen Tweedie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Alexis
My kernel module packages (lm-sensors and i2c) both build-depend on
kernel-build-2.4.20-1, which provides enough bits to build packages
(as far as I can tell, successfully). Problem is, evidence suggests
that kernel-build-2.4.20-1 is i386-only. I'm looking at moving to
2.4.21, but
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, francesco levorato wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-01
Severity: wishlist
Package name: minido
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Michael Opdenacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://michaelo.free.fr/minido/
License
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
Tobias Wolter wrote:
I still haven't seen any bugfix from you. How about you go stop
ranting about being treated unfair and DOING YOUR WORK?
And you think an attitude like this is going to make me work
harder? For *you* ?? Get real.
Regardless of whether it
Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since debconf is not really appreciated for this use, what is the best
solution ? Inform users with debconf or give them informations only in
changelog and README.Debian ?
What makes you think that a debconf note is inappropriate for this? It
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 11:27:21PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote:
http://jobs.debian.net is your friend. Looks like a theres a problem
if i change the dns entries. I`ll try it one more time.
Still problems:
$ host jobs.debian.net
Host jobs.debian.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
--
Stefano
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:49:10PM +0100, Esteban Manchado Vel?zquez wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 10:57:40PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Anyway, there's email readers (my .sylpheed is 73 MBytes), news
readers, picture browsers, ... my ~/.sylpheed is bigger than my
~/.kde.
73
On Jun 29, Yann Dirson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Despite the build-essential list and gcc-defaults package pointing to
gcc 3.3, at least 6 archs still used 3.2 this week (alpha ia64 powerpc
m68k mips mipsel) and buildds on s390 and hppa still do not print the
toolchain versions, so I
Hello,
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 22:51, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Julien LEMOINE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I received a bug report on stunnel package from an user [1] that
complained about the fact that I didn't warning about the new
/etc/default/stunnel file introduced in package (thereis a
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 09:57:43PM -0400, Matthew P. McGuire wrote:
|
| For the curious, the upgrade route failed as well, but on libpam0g not
| console-tools-libs. Any work around would be appreciated.
|
dpkg -i libpam0g*.deb and its dependencies. I don't know /why/ this
works when apt
Hi,
[ please wrap your lines after 72 chars ]
Matthew P. McGuire wrote:
The grumpy user might accuse console-tools-libs of being the problem, but I
decided to try another route. Install a chroot woody system, and upgrade that
chroot system to sid using apt. During that upgrade apt shows
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 08:40:02PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 05:12:22PM +0200, Julien LEMOINE wrote:
I received a bug report on stunnel package from an user [1] that
complained
about the fact that I didn't warning about the new /etc/default/stunnel file
* Niall Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030702 16:53]:
I'm using a custom package pool for deploying software, but we need to
cleanly rollback if an upgrade doesn't go as expected.
In easy cases it is possible to first test a package with some testing
machine and only put in in the used archive when
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 02:57, Matthew P. McGuire wrote:
Hello all,
Since sid's sysvinit was recently fixed I am able to try another chroot
install of sid per the Debain Reference directions. Sadly the following
command,
debootstrap sid /sid-root http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Cameron Patrick wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 09:57:43PM -0400, Matthew P. McGuire wrote:
|
| For the curious, the upgrade route failed as well, but on libpam0g not
| console-tools-libs. Any work around would be appreciated.
|
dpkg -i libpam0g*.deb and its
Matthew P. McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
E: Couldn't download console-tools-libs
You need a newer version of debootstrap; it looks like 0.1.17.29
corrects console-tools-libs to libconsole.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 20:40:02 -0500
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 05:12:22PM +0200, Julien LEMOINE wrote:
I received a bug report on stunnel package from an user [1] that
complained
about the fact that I didn't warning about the new
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:18:36PM +0800, Niall Young wrote:
I'm aware you can downgrade packages with
`apt-get --force-yes install package=version-revision`
but this doesn't seem to apply any postrm processing on the existing
version of the package being replaced.
How about a
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:18:36PM +0800, Niall Young wrote:
I'm aware you can downgrade packages with
`apt-get --force-yes install package=version-revision`
but this doesn't seem to apply any postrm processing on the existing
version of the package being replaced.
How about a
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 08:18, Niall Young wrote:
How about a postrm::downgrade hook to reverse any changes made in the
new version's preinst::upgrade so that when the old version's
preinst::upgrade is applied you're not left with a potential mix of
configuration?
It would be cool if:
Em Ter, 2003-07-01 às 08:49, Esteban Manchado Velázquez escreveu:
It would be nice, perhaps, having a tool to do it by hand, but I don't
think everybody wants it to be done automatically when removing packages.
Well, this is the beggining of the proposal, that is:
Include into debian
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:28:01PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
Is there any place where someone could advertise jobs that would be suitable
for Debian developers?
We (the folks at mentors.debian.net) are planning a forum where NMs are
seeking sponsors. It would be no additional effort to create
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 08:40:02PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
It does not belong in debconf. Put it in the changelog -- users who
want to know what's changing on their system should be looking there
anyway, and tools such as apt-listchanges make it easier and ever to
access changelog
Mark Brown wrote:
What makes you think that a debconf note is inappropriate for this? It
appears to be quite a common thing to do and seems helpful.
Because it's documented and has been discussed to death on devel that debconf
neither is a registry nor system for displaying random notes. [0]
The last time I posted my unofficial release issues status I received
several requests to change the formatting, and so I have. I plan to find a
site to host this html document (preferably alioth), but I haven't ironed
out the details yet. It should also be strongly noted that this is an
I didn't see any noise in debian-devel about the half upgrade to gnome2
in sarge, was it an accident? and now, will the other packages be
upgraded also or I'll still have a half gnome2 desktop in sarge?
i.e.: gnomeicu is still in the gnome1 version, but the gnome panel is
gnome2, so gnomeicu
On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 07:49 US/Eastern, Esteban Manchado
Velázquez wrote:
73 Mbytes? What does sylpheed save in its directory? Sent mail,
perhaps?
Not sure about sylpheed, but my evolution directory is even bigger.
It's all cached IMAP mail.
Hmmm, on this Mac, I've got 600MB of cached
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Herbert Xu wrote:
I for one am sick and tired of useless Debconf messages popping up
during installation or being sent to me via email when I'm upgrading
hundreds of machines automatically.
Would you prefer the old way of STDOUT
Neil Roeth wrote:
I'd like to know this, too. I recently fixed some bugs on
m68k (a painful experience) and the most recent bug reports are basically
the bug you closed is reoccurring. If the compiler I'm using to test my
fixes is different than the one used to build the package, that
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:50:29AM -0400, Jim Penny wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 20:40:02 -0500 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 05:12:22PM +0200, Julien LEMOINE wrote:
I received a bug report on stunnel package from an user [1] that
complained
about
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 07:52:10PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What makes you think that a debconf note is inappropriate for this? It
appears to be quite a common thing to do and seems helpful.
Just because lots of people are doing it doesn't mean that
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:46:50AM +0200, Michel Grentzinger wrote:
Please find the attached fr.po file, which is the french translation of
the debconf templates. This file has been reviewed by the contributors
of the debian-l10n-french mailing-list.
Could you put it to the debian/po
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 11:20, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
I know text is preferred by many over html, but formatting is easier for
me in html than in text. If anyone's interested in a text only version,
let me know.
$ lynx -dump usri.html usri.txt
Attach/use that next time, with a reference to
Julien LEMOINE wrote:
Not exactly, there is a variable ENABLED which is set to 0 at installation.
So
the service will not start while variable is not set to 1.
Well the user should notice this then and look in the README.Debian and
changelog. If it's the only problem, however, it might be
badly.
http://people.debian.org/~willy/gcc-transition/
i think technically these are all worthy of an RC bug, but i don't want
to file them and you don't want to see them. if your name's on the list:
http://people.debian.org/~willy/gcc-transition/maint-packages-2.95
then figure out which of
On 2003-07-03 at 00:21， Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I didn't see any noise in debian-devel about the half upgrade to gnome2
in sarge, was it an accident? and now, will the other packages be
upgraded also or I'll still have a half gnome2 desktop in sarge?
i.e.: gnomeicu is still in the gnome1
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:20:52AM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
I know text is preferred by many over html, but formatting is easier for
me in html than in text. If anyone's interested in a text only version,
let me know.
at least use the correct mime type. This is not
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 06:10:49PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:28:01PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
Is there any place where someone could advertise jobs that would be
suitable
for Debian developers?
We (the folks at mentors.debian.net) are planning a forum
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:57:01 -0500
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:50:29AM -0400, Jim Penny wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 20:40:02 -0500 Steve Langasek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 05:12:22PM +0200, Julien LEMOINE wrote:
I
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: parsewiki
Version : 0.4.3
Upstream Author : Jaime Villate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://villate.org/parsewiki/
* License : GPL
Description : Documentation System
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
Tobias Wolter wrote:
I still haven't seen any bugfix from you. How about you go stop
ranting about being treated unfair and DOING YOUR WORK?
And you think an attitude like this is going to make me work
harder? For *you* ?? Get real.
Regardless
Zheng XiaoJun [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On 2003-07-03 at 00:21ï¼ Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I didn't see any noise in debian-devel about the half upgrade to gnome2
in sarge, was it an accident? and now, will the other packages be
upgraded also or I'll still have a half gnome2 desktop in
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 06:34:53PM -0400, Jim Penny wrote:
It breaks 100% of stunnel installations. The old stunnel was
command line oriented, the current one is configuration file
oriented. It would be very difficult to write a converter.
I am going to disagree with most
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: zebra-pj
Version : 0.94+cvs20030701
Upstream Author : Kunihiro Ishiguro [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others
* URL : http://zebra.dishone.st/
* License : GPL
Description :
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 01:41:13PM +0200, Julien LEMOINE wrote:
Not exactly, there is a variable ENABLED which is set to 0 at installation.
So
the service will not start while variable is not set to 1.
So, just set the variable to 1 if upgrading from a version earlier than
that in which you
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: jfree-java
Version : 0.8.2
Upstream Author : Name various
* URL : http://www.jfree.org/
* License : (LGPL)
Description : Chart and Report library for java
Source:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: StatCvs
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://statcvs.sourceforge.net/
* License : (LGPL)
Description : CVS Repository statistic
Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but...
Can you explain a bit more about your process for generating this
list? Why are the packages in the exceptions file in there?
It seems that you're not including the c102 packages. Attached is a
list of the c102 packages, and its longer than 1.
On
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Julian Mehnle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
Tobias Wolter wrote:
I still haven't seen any bugfix from you. How about you go stop
ranting about being treated unfair and DOING YOUR WORK?
And you think an attitude like this is going to
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 19:05, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Will GNOME2 be soon completely available in Sarge?
Yes.
Is it a work in progress?
Yes.
Or is it an accident which no one cares about?
No.
Sorry, I forgot the attachment, but you can all just apt-cache search
c102.
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:52:32PM -0700, Cardenas wrote:
It seems that you're not including the c102 packages. Attached is a
list of the c102 packages, and its longer than 1.
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 07:24:39PM
On Jun 29, Yann Dirson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Despite the build-essential list and gcc-defaults package pointing to
gcc 3.3, at least 6 archs still used 3.2 this week (alpha ia64 powerpc
m68k mips mipsel) and buildds on s390 and hppa still do not print the
toolchain versions,
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 06:25:15PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Equally well, it's really nasty to break the user system and not warn
them about it and there aren't many options for warning people.
One of the things that Debian has been impressively good at is providing
smooth upgrades that don't
Jim Penny wrote:
Now, this breakage happens to be somewhat benign, in that without
configuration, it does not function at all. But it is also somewhat
difficult to test for many uses. Further, when the unconfigured
system fails to start, the failure is completely silent. This adds
to the
Andreas Metzler wrote:
possible anyway, new packages, might use new file-formats which can be
converted from the old-version but not back again.
Strictly speaking, any automatic conversion done during upgrades needs to be
injective and thus (theoretically) reversible for being correct.
Of
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:49:10PM +0100, Esteban Manchado Vel?zquez wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 10:57:40PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Now, if one removes or purges, say, KDE to install an unofficial
version... would (s)he loose all his
ON 2003-07-03 at 07:05, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Zheng XiaoJun [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On 2003-07-03 at 00:21ï¼ Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I didn't see any noise in debian-devel about the half upgrade to gnome2
in sarge, was it an accident? and now, will the other packages be
upgraded also
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:34:50PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Herbert Xu wrote:
I for one am sick and tired of useless Debconf messages popping up
during installation or being sent to me via email when I'm upgrading
hundreds of machines automatically.
Would you prefer
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 14:00, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
It does not belong in debconf. Put it in the changelog -- users who
want to know what's changing on their system should be looking there
anyway, and tools such as apt-listchanges make it easier and ever to
access changelog information.
Em Qua, 2003-07-02 às 21:36, Zheng XiaoJun escreveu:
I desire a completed gnome2 in sarge as well.
But I don't think it's an accident -- just my own opinion:
I've searched some packages in http://packages.debian.org/ , and found
that many packages involved still have too many bugs unfixed in
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 17:23, Herbert Xu wrote:
I'd prefer no interaction at all during installation. I'm perfectly
able to read documenation thank you very much.
Happily, the noninteractive debconf frontend exists.
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:53:57PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 14:00, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
This kind of thing would go in the hypothetical NEWS.Debian, but
unfortunately I haven't gotten around to implementing support for it in
apt-listchanges yet.
Having just
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 06:34:53PM -0400, Jim Penny wrote:
Because of security considerations. The configuration file is read on
startup, and then stunnel chroots away, so that it is no longer visible.
The command line interface leaked information, internal IP structure,
internal ports, etc.
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:52:32PM -0700, Cardenas wrote:
Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but...
Can you explain a bit more about your process for generating this
list? Why are the packages in the exceptions file in there?
There seem to be two types of things in the exceptions list:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 22:47:33 +0200
Source: adzapper
Binary: adzapper
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.20030611-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ludovic Drolez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ludovic Drolez [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 20:15:54 +0200
Source: roundup
Binary: roundup
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5.8-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:01:02 +0200
Source: zope
Binary: zope
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6.1-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Luca - De Whiskey's -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 19:00:47 +0200
Source: wmgtemp
Binary: wmgtemp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6-1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Lenart Janos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 15:02:00 -0500
Source: samba
Binary: samba-doc libsmbclient libpam-smbpass swat python2.2-samba winbind smbclient
samba libsmbclient-dev samba-common smbfs
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 3.0.0beta1-2
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
