Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder avbid...@fortytwo.ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: zeromq
Version : 2.0~beta2 (right now)
Upstream Author : iMartix Corp.
* URL : http://www.zeromq.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder avbid...@fortytwo.ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Needed for zeromq library:
* Package name: openpgm
Version : 2.0.something
Upstream Author : Have to check this
* URL
Package: general
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Heyho!
Quite an annoying bug and no idea where to start looking...
On this Atom (AOA 150; kernel, hal, udev, X mostly from sid or at least
squeeze), I have now twice (both times after several suspend/wakeup cycles)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder avbid...@fortytwo.ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: opticalraytracer
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Paul Lutus
* URL : http://www.arachnoid.com
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm currently investigating this perl module; I'll package it or close
or rename to RFP depending on how complex this stuff is.
* Package name: libxml
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I noticed the pdp1-unix-v{5,6,7} images - how useful are they really?
popcon suggests that only a few people have installed them.
Since Kevin now orphaned them and they are non-free, can we get rid of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cedilla
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Juliusz Chroboczek
* URL : http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/cedilla/
* License : GPL
Description : ascii to postscript renderer with unicode support
An ascii
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 00.19, Roger Leigh wrote:
I think going to UTF-8 as the default locale charmap for all locales
is a feasable goal for etch, as is recoding everything to UTF-8 (where
it makes sense).
Yep.
My biggest problem right now is 'lpr sometextfile' to a postscript printer
On Sunday 05 December 2004 20.11, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Any parser that acceps 8bit non-ascii chars
will accept UTF-8 then. What remains is just making the UTF-8 chars
visually correct then.
And make sure that, where character strings are modified, the multibyte
sequences are counted
On Thursday 02 December 2004 10.36, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:04:15PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
In Europe, cheap printing led to [...] a
sudden huge broadening in thought [...]
In China, the result of the very same technology was the exact
opposite; [...]
On Sunday 14 November 2004 21.55, Martin Pitt wrote:
Martin Schulze [2004-11-14 20:13 +0100]:
[...]
Thanks for your comments, I believe I have covered all that now.
cheers
-- vbi
(And: hey, it's a wiki, do it yourself :-)
--
Oops
pgpMIDf03LZ1t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday 13 November 2004 14.53, Martin Schulze wrote:
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 23.44, Colin Watson wrote:
N+0 days
Official security support for sarge begins
Will the start of official security support for sarge be announced
On Friday 12 November 2004 16.16, Christoph Berg wrote:
That leaves us with text editor ;-)
Debian, the distribution of a hundred window managers and a thousand text
editors...
-- vbi
--
Oops
pgptm6UpoamMe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[list policy is not to send cc:s - thank you]
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 17.00, Frank Küster wrote:
Please do not use language like brain-dead in the text of this
page.
Right - and you're too late, was already removed.
An other point could be Use sensible version numbering:
added, thanks.
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 23.44, Colin Watson wrote:
N+0 days
Official security support for sarge begins
Will the start of official security support for sarge be announced widely,
to get as much testing as possible? (Like: general debian-announce, press
contacts, ...)
-- vbi
--
Oops
Hi,
I've just started http://wiki.debian.net/SoftwarePackaging, intended to
collect thoughts of packagers how upstream developers can make the life of
a packager easier.
I'm sure all packagers have wondered about brain-dead upstream developers
who have not put much thought into how their
On Thursday 04 November 2004 17.46, Otto Wyss wrote:
Why do you keep on saying this without providing _any_ figures!
Who is you here? Please pay attention to attribution on mailing list
postings - especially if you're starting a new thread with your mail. I
posted this statement about cpu
On Friday 29 October 2004 01.57, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 18:08 +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
On Thursday 28 October 2004 16.40, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Warning: The signature is bad.
I guess
[please remember Debian list policy: no cc:s unless requested]
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 17.54, Christian Perrier wrote:
But does anything warn me (linda/lintian?) when I update debconf
templates and/or package descriptions and forget to post to
debian-i18n? (which would be: it should
On Thursday 28 October 2004 01.53, Joey Hess wrote:
paddy wrote:
what about ~/Desktop and friends?
I don't know if Desktop falls under the heading of being a configuration
file or directorty. Not that I much like that directory, but like
Maildir, it seems out of the scope of this FHS
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 09.20, Ian Bruce wrote:
Can anyone explain why rsync is no longer considered an appropriate
method for fetching Packages files?
IIRC the problem is that rsync is quite CPU-heavy on the servers, so while
the mirrors have the (network) resources to feed downloads to
On Thursday 28 October 2004 16.40, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Warning: The signature is bad.
I guess this was unavoidable in a posting about a security related issue
with GnuPG...
greetings
-- vbi
--
Oops
pgpsZSnPddRmR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Monday 25 October 2004 23.47, Eduard Bloch wrote:
- in difference to apt-pupdate, I do not use chains of small diffs,
based on days and managed by the server. Instead, the server provides
the patch for a md5sum which contains the diffs between the version
of the client and the
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 07.41, Christian Perrier wrote:
Again, please make your best for requesting translation updates on
debian-i18n@lists.debian.org when introducing new templates to your
packages or when you change some other internationalised material.
Yo!
Jujst wondering: hor much
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 12.11, martin f krafft wrote:
2. apt-cacher:
Also a very nice concept, I have found it rather unusable. Clients
would time out as the streaming does not work reliably. Also,
after using it for a day or two, I found 30 or more Perl zombies
on the system
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 14.05, Samuel Ferrer wrote:
Hi guys
I am very interested in the Debian project.
great!
- How to install the developer package and thus be abe to use the make
Such user questions are properly addressed at the debian-user mailing list
instead of the developer
On Monday 18 October 2004 09.54, Brian May wrote:
Hello,
I have a number of bugs reported against my packages which are
actually (already reported) bugs in other packages.
Reading the rest of the thread, I conclude that adding an explanation to the
bug and tagging it wontfix is probably the
On Wednesday 13 October 2004 08.30, Thomas Hood wrote:
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 23:28, Robert Collins wrote:
Does it hook into ppp to handle persistent ppp connections? (i.e.
adsl).
I am not sure what you mean.
The new ifupdown uses pppd's updetach option. Run with this option,
pppd only
On Saturday 09 October 2004 21.33, Adam Majer wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
Scroll up to the top of the country list and you'll see enter
information manually.
Not to nitpick here, but shouldn't options like None of the above be
at the end of a list? Generally, the idea of picking something
On Monday 11 October 2004 20.24, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Oct 11, Joerg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why ppp provides its own mechanism of telling programs when the
interface is coming up or down? Many programs register for the ppp
mechanism, but not for the network mechanism. Where is the
Yo!
This was discussed at length (iirc soon after woody release, in one of the
'what should be better in sarge' threads). but without any real solution
being presented.
I don't know, has there been any progress? Somebody (a DD) failed to reproduce
it. I did set up a few Debian machines
[on list, this time. sorry]
On Saturday 09 August 2003 04:48, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
You can talk but you can't second a proposal. You somewhat can (or
could) make a proposal since that isn't signed and normaly noone
bothered to check if one was a DD. But thats more of a backdoor than
On Friday 08 August 2003 05:23, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Policy changes, voting and the internal discussions all need
membership. Having NMs hang in limbo without due cause is denying them
the right to those.
Voting yes. But to me it seems that most issues are discussed on the open
lists
Not wanting to start yet another thread, but I not knowing where to tack it
on...
How about moving from the one-step application (one is non-dd or dd) two a two
stage process: introduce the 'Debian Contributor' brand with very easy entry
level, and only DC's (older than a month or something
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 18:42, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
Your conclusion that long DAM wait times leads to slow releases has
little or no basis in fact. You do not need to have completed the NM
process to contribute to Debian. In fact, I believe the whole DAM
process would be more
On Monday 04 August 2003 19:08, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 05:27:38PM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
Bidder wrote:
see, there's no lucidatypewriter ISO-10646 font, but I don't have all
the packages installed.
I have -bh-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-normal-sans
On Monday 28 July 2003 22:31, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Currently, BTS sends weekly two mails to debian-devel-announce - one about
WNPP and one about RC bugs.
I think it will help to improve Debian quality if several more lists will
be broadcasted by BTS:
[...]
- Packages with more than N
On Friday 25 July 2003 18:57, Colin Watson wrote:
Oh, konsole? No idea, as I don't use KDE. I saw your mentions of font
problems elsewhere in this thread. Have you tried, say, uxterm with a
known-good UTF-8 font? I use
'-misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--15-140-75-75-c-*-iso10646-1' on my work
On Saturday 26 July 2003 01:08, John Hasler wrote:
No research, but I've had a couple of experiences that tend to confirm it.
It's irrelevant, though, because people who have never used Windows or Mac
are getting scarce.
In the industrialized world. But there's 3 billion people who have never
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 14:11, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote:
Is Debian aims to be unicode compatible system?
IANADD - but I guess the answer definitely is yes. But it's not a very urgent
task.
If yes, then should I mail a bug report against packages which are not
able to handle unicode?
On Friday 25 July 2003 11:04, David Pashley wrote:
Probably the biggest unicode problem I have noticed is with man and/or
less where it can't display dashes correctly. At least it doesn't seem
to work out of the box.
Fully ACK
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat ~/bin/man
On Friday 25 July 2003 11:10, Michael Piefel wrote:
Am 25.07.03 um 10:04:26 schrieb David Pashley:
Probably the biggest unicode problem I have noticed is with man and/or
less where it can't display dashes correctly. At least it doesn't seem
to work out of the box.
What's a dash? Sorry,
On Friday 25 July 2003 12:21, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 11:43:15AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
Bidder wrote:
On Friday 25 July 2003 11:10, Michael Piefel wrote:
What's a dash? Sorry, but you have to be more specific here.
There's the minus sign (usually
On Friday 25 July 2003 13:51, Michael Piefel wrote:
Am 25.07.03 um 11:43:15 schrieb Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder:
Hmmm. This is really funny. Look at
http://fortytwo.ch/~avbidder/man-page.png.
Good you mention it. File a bug against gnupg. It uses '-' in its
manpage where it should
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 22:44, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 01:23:45PM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
Bidder wrote:
I went through some of the older bug reports of gnupg - I'd like some
input whether I should act as suggested, or rather not. All of those bugs
On Thursday 24 July 2003 17:09, Martin Pitt wrote:
Could
someone tell me what is actually wrong with them (apart from not
having a more colorful interface, SCNR)? If it is totally screwed up
under the hood, then a clean redesign is good. If its only a cosmetic
issue, I do not see the point.
Yo all!
I went through some of the older bug reports of gnupg - I'd like some input
whether I should act as suggested, or rather not. All of those bugs are more
than 1 year old.
Greetings
-- vbi
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=101502
gnupg: gnupg uses wrong key
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 13:14, Ignacio García Fernández wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:09:46PM +0200, Lucas Moulin wrote:
On mar, jui 08 09:36
Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
[...]
Birthday
Debian
10 years
100 countries
1000 maintainers
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 15:45, Matt Hope wrote:
This Perl module provides an object oriented interface to access
Revision Control System (RCS) utilities.
Is this the original rcs specifically, or revision control system utilities in
general? This is not entirely clear to me from this
Thanks a lot, this is great!
On Friday 04 July 2003 10:02, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
Is it reasonable to think about some sort of localizzation support for NEWS
file? Changes documented there might be worthy of translation.
Not about i18n, really, but please at least specify from
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 17:12, Julien LEMOINE wrote:
Hello,
I received a bug report on stunnel package from an user [1] that
complained about the fact that I didn't warning about the new
/etc/default/stunnel file introduced in package (thereis a note in
README.Debian and in changelog).
On Friday 27 June 2003 01:32, Millis Miller wrote:
Description : Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP,
with optional encryption
Also, if gpg is installed, it can digitally sign and encrypt outgoing
emails.
Just out of curiosity: inline PGP, or PGP/MIME
cheers
-- vbi
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 11:51, Daniel Stone wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: debbackup
Version : 0.1
Version 0.1...
How much of it does already work? How much is sid specific and won't work on
woody/sarge?
On Sunday 15 June 2003 17:39, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:23:34AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
What about a version _with_ all non-threaded interpreters, but _without_
gtk2/kde support?
That would be console Vim, from either package. The GUI doesn't add so
much to it
On Monday 26 May 2003 22:30, Kai Henningsen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerfried Fuchs) wrote on 26.05.03 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As for the long descriptions, I really don't see what the use is in an
ITP. The packages will of course have them.
A proper long description will help avoid question
On Wednesday 14 May 2003 16:05, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:24:25PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Usually this is controlled by the Content-Disposition: header.
Content-Disposition: inline should be displayed inline;
Content-Disposition: attachment will often be hidden until
On Tuesday 29 April 2003 16:40, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 04:32:37PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
* i486 guarantees a 32-bit external data bus (386SX has a 16-bit bus.).
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200304/msg02043.ht
ml Not sure if there's
On Saturday 19 April 2003 20:32, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
b) The licensing information certainly ist misleading: The first line says
GPL 2, period. Then there's lengthy information for assigning copyright
of patches. After that, there is that funny nothing ... shall be
interpreted to
Did you start a new thread on purpose? If not: please use a sensible mail
program. Also, please use proper attribution lines when replying to mail.
On Tuesday 22 April 2003 08:31, Jarno Elonen wrote:
Just because one small feature of a magnificent piece of software is
slightly annoying,
On Wednesday 16 April 2003 11:11, Ayman Negm wrote:
Description : dd_rescue does copy data from one file or block device
to another
I guess a better Description: would be 'dd clone which ignores read errors'.
But I see in the dd man page:
conv=KEYWORDS
convert the
On Saturday 12 April 2003 15:34, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 10:57:34PM +0200, Lars Bahner wrote:
pptp-linux
AIUI, you have to rebuild your kernel with a patch, and the version of
the patch in the archive doesn't work on recent kernels. So I doubt
many people will be
On Saturday 12 April 2003 18:57, Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
- Mensagem Reenviada de [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
With no restrictions or special requirements, osCommerce is able
to run on any PHP3 or PHP4 enabled web server, on any environment
that PHP and MySQL supports, which includes
On Friday 11 April 2003 16:34, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
* Programs which access SQL databases should do so through
libgda2/unixodbc/???.
... assuming that we can reach some sort of consensus on which library
should be used..?
Why is a consesus needed?
I agree with you that having each
On Friday 11 April 2003 19:52, Joe Nahmias wrote:
Will these packages will still be available through archive.d.o or will
they be purged from there as well?
I guess you thought about http://snapshot.debian.net/ instead of archive?
s.d.n main page explicitely says that removed pkgs will be
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 02:38, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 10:29:38PM +0100, Aaron Isotton wrote:
Hi,
(sorry for the overlong subject).
I originally sent this to debian-doc but I got no answers, so I
thought I'd post it here too.
Because debian-doc was busy discussing
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 15:25, John Lines wrote:
Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help
new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they
started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system
which will be
66 matches
Mail list logo
