Accepted cdrdao 1:1.2.1-4 (source i386)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:33:27 + Source: cdrdao Binary: cdrdao Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.2.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted fspanel 0.7-6 (source i386)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:42:05 + Source: fspanel Binary: fspanel Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.7-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted cdrdao 1:1.2.1-3 (source i386)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:57:39 + Source: cdrdao Binary: cdrdao Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.2.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu

as 'part of the Debian world'. We have very little interaction with any of them. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu

we should cooperate better so that we can do Ubuntu's work for them? The arrogance of such a statement is only surpassed by its inanity. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted]

If you can't understand sarcasm, why didn't you read the part for people who can't understand sarcasm? -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:55:14PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Andrew Suffield wrote: That's simply wrong given the many people who use both and who cares about both. By this reasoning, Windows is 'part of the Debian world'. I hope you didn't expect anybody

Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted]

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:20:40PM +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote: Andrew Suffield wrote: If you can't understand sarcasm, why didn't you read the part for people who can't understand sarcasm? I read the part about sarcasm and i partially argee with you. But i'm with Andreas here. Your post

Re: For those who care about lesbians

vendetta. Again. Oh, and that would be 'incitement to cause harm', which is a criminal offense these days. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: For those who care about lesbians

was? Alternatively, what do you think is the correct mailing list for contacting (all of) the developers about appropriate use of d-d-a? -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: For those who care about lesbians

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 11:24:06PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:51:03PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: If you still can't take the hint, I'll be more blunt: this isn't the first crass stunt you've pulled by any means, and you

Re: Dissection of an Ubuntu PR message

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:41:16PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:09:12PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: Let's take this one apart and see what it is that pisses people off so much. I don't intend to participate in this type of email argument with you; I've yet

Re: Development standards for unstable

could just manually exclude those few big offenders, but if you're going to do that then what's the point? -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: Dissection of an Ubuntu PR message

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 05:31:40PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: On 1/12/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:41:16PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:09:12PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: Let's take this one apart and see what

Re: Dissection of an Ubuntu PR message

this. If they fail to contribute in a meaningful way, it just means more work for them (in trying to maintain a diverging fork). Hence, that's their problem. It's not really a problem for us. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: Development standards for unstable

/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Development standards for unstable

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:11:58PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Andrew Suffield wrote: Well it's nice in theory. The problem is that you have to set the threshold high enough to exempt glibc and dpkg, and when you do that, I have not yet found a metric that complains about any other packages

Re: Packet radio and foul language

. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Canonical's business model

software? I think it's the pretending that pisses people off. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Canonical's business model

On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:07:43AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: On 1/10/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:22:03AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: I don't[sic] the same rant over others Debian related companies Have you ever actually subscribed to any

Re: Packet radio and foul language

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:49:25AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 15:41 +, Andrew Suffield wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:43:16PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: Manners/politeness is social lubricant. It makes society run smoother and less violently. I'm pretty

Re: Canonical's business model

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:56:35PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: On 1/11/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:07:43AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: On 1/10/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:22:03AM -0200, Gustavo

Re: Canonical's business model

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:25:01PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: On 1/11/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:56:35PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: On 1/11/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:07:43AM -0200, Gustavo

Dissection of an Ubuntu PR message

. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Packet radio and foul language

substitute for respect. If you're being nice to somebody even though you don't like them, that doesn't make you a better person, it just makes you a liar. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: Canonical's business model

for their continual, offensive PR effort claiming otherwise. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Canonical's business model

On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:22:03AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: I don't[sic] the same rant over others Debian related companies Have you ever actually subscribed to any Debian mailing lists? -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: Need for launchpad

. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Powerfulness (was: tioga : a powerful plotting system in ruby)

** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Need for launchpad

On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 07:49:33PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:02:09AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote: On Sunday 08 January 2006 07:27, Andrew Suffield wrote: On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:19:42PM -0500, Frans Jessop wrote: Ubuntu's launchpad is amazing. Do you

Re: Need for launchpad

to even try it. Perhaps you do? And hey, if you can do all that, can you also solve th psky little problem of global hunger? And get rid of vi while you are doing so? And the SARS thing, and avian flu, and all that? And I want a pony. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield

Re: Need for launchpad

On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:44:57AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote: On Sunday 08 January 2006 10:39, Andrew Suffield wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 07:49:33PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:02:09AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote: On Sunday 08 January 2006 07:27

Re: Need for launchpad

not affect us. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Need for launchpad

** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Canonical's business model

sure there are worse crimes-- Granny Weatherwax: But they starts with thinking about people as things -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: Need for launchpad

to work *all the time*. Just ask the BTS admins what happens when somebody scans http://bugs.debian.org/ to collect data. Oh, and hey - when SuSE are doing better than you at publishing the tools they use, it's a hint that maybe you suck. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield

Re: APT public key updates?

a conservative estimate. To defend against ancillary attacks (like somebody grabbing a copy of the key from ftp-master) you need to know how probable they are, and reduce these figures accordingly. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: stable aliases for CD drives

won't necessarily be stable anymore. (and, once more, and much worse: network interfaces need a solution to the same problem...) nameif, ifrename - really, this problem has been solved so many times that it's just not funny any more. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield

Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:43:34AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 08:38 +, Andrew Suffield wrote: On the other hand, I think there might be some benefit to requiring that the Maintainer field must always denote one single Debian developer, who would be the buck

Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing

On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:31:19PM -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote: Andrew Suffield wrote: On the other hand, I think there might be some benefit to requiring that the Maintainer field must always denote one single Debian developer, who would be the buck stops here guy for that package

Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing

a pumpking, because dogpiling creates lousy software. For Debian this would be cumbersome and unwieldy as a rule, but some high-importance tasks could benefit from it. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: Size matters. Debian binary package stats

On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 09:56:27AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: On 12/19/05, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 08:27:36PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Steinar H. Gunderson: My comments are about the same as on IRC: - Disk space is cheap

Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing

/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Size matters. Debian binary package stats

it that cheap for my day job. What we have to pay to get useful bandwidth has more zeros in it. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Stephen Frost MIA?

that is on topic (or at least relevant) to Debian development spam? Everything on -devel is spam these days, didn't you get the memo? -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc

Accepted cdrdao 1:1.2.1-2 (source i386)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:26:09 + Source: cdrdao Binary: cdrdao Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.2.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted cdrdao 1:1.2.1-1 (source i386)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 22:43:37 + Source: cdrdao Binary: cdrdao Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.2.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Debian based GNU/Solaris: pilot program

On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 08:49:35PM -0500, Michael Poole wrote: Only quoting the first part of the second definition changes the meaning significantly -- but that is what is necessary to make it apply at all. Complete bullshit. Get a life. plonk -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew

Re: Debian based GNU/Solaris: pilot program

for the purpose of prohibiting you from doing this is wrong? That's not deserving of respect either. Now go away and stop doing it. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc

Re: Debian based GNU/Solaris: pilot program

gibberish. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Debian based GNU/Solaris: pilot program

On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 06:07:58PM -0500, Michael Poole wrote: Andrew Suffield writes: On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:48:53PM -0800, Erast Benson wrote: CDDL works similar way, except on per-file basis. This is incomprehensible gibberish. This is unsupportable hyperbole. Erast's

Accepted icheck 0.9.7-4 (source i386)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:05:18 +0100 Source: icheck Binary: icheck Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.7-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted tla 1.3.3-3 (source i386 all)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:55:20 +0100 Source: tla Binary: tla-doc tla Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.3.3-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL

Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...

. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...

, no. There's a few statutes on the books around the place which say This applies to [...] unless waived by both parties and similar stuff. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...

with the following slight modifications: Which constitutes a trademark violation at the very least (it's not the CDDL any more) and quite probably a copyright one (the CDDL isn't modifiable). Yeesh. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: Bug#326656: ITP: libjetty4-lib -- Pure Java HTTP Server

: ^^^ The point here is that these are all names for the same person? Also, in the time it took you to type this list I could have packaged it twice, and liberated a small country from an oppressive dictator. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: It is 23:53, do you know whether your package (un)installs cleanly?

the example postrm given in ucf is wrong, so if you're using ucf, beware. See #326085 -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#325709: ITP: xmms2 -- XMMS2 is a redesign of the XMMS music player

GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: long long support on all archs?

/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Mindterm

code on windows. Most people can't even do it to people who *don't* have terminal access. Not that mindterm isn't still useful. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc

Re: README - confusing, irrelevant, redundant, useless

On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 01:25:37PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: Perhaps the upstream README should be renamed 'README.upstream'? Given the context, it would probably make more sense to rename it to IGNOREME. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Accepted icheck 0.9.7-2 (source i386)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:29:57 +0100 Source: icheck Binary: icheck Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.7-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted icheck 0.9.7-3 (source i386)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:57:52 +0100 Source: icheck Binary: icheck Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.7-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Bug#322774: ITP: ddccontrol -- a program to control monitor parameters

memory in the case of Intel video, as Nicolas described. Definitely ask then, and include this piece of information in the question. Only people with the relevent hardware would ever want it suid, the rest don't. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: Firefox:I get redirected to microsoft website when entering http//kernel.org or http//debian.org

foundation are bankrolled by google nowadays. It can't be 'improved' without forking. Remember folks, corporate involvement in free software is a 'good' thing. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: Firefox:I get redirected to microsoft website when entering http//kernel.org or http//debian.org

On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 06:50:31AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 02:42:23PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:47:27AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: The fact that a number of these searches wind up at microsoft.com, though, when doing a direct

Re: Bruce Perens hosts party at OSCON Wednesday night

No. This is why the debian-jobs list exists. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: fresh blood gets congested: long way to become DD

GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: fresh blood gets congested: long way to become DD

'? I'm not going to argue that the rejections being made are bad ones. If you are, this is the wrong place to do it. If you're not, then you don't have a point here. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: fresh blood gets congested: long way to become DD

On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 09:35:24PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Andrew Suffield] How about 'not second guessing people without cause'? Sounds like a good idea. I am not sure how this comment is connected to the message you replied to. It was an answer to the quoted question. I

Re: fresh blood gets congested: long way to become DD

, they don't really say anything useful. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Accepted icheck 0.9.7-1 (source i386)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:28:17 +0100 Source: icheck Binary: icheck Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.7-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted icheck 0.9.5-1 (source i386)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 18:48:26 +0100 Source: icheck Binary: icheck Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted arch-buildpackage 0.1-3 (source all)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 02:16:55 +0100 Source: arch-buildpackage Binary: arch-buildpackage Architecture: source all Version: 0.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield

Accepted icheck 0.9.6-1 (source i386)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 01:54:55 +0100 Source: icheck Binary: icheck Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?

patches reducing the description to one or two lines, but it seems kinda like a waste of effort. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: cpufrequtils init script in rcS.d

On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:52:52AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: Hi, * Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-15 10:50]: On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:21:52AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: * Mattia Dongili | - setting the CPUFreq policy must be done as early as possible

Re: cpufrequtils init script in rcS.d

, you'd have done it on the kernel command line. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: no time for all debian tasks was: interacting with the press

, or in other words Bringing to your attention before you embarrass him before a multitude of people. How exactly do you know that he didn't? Do you read Joey's mail for him? [That goes for all you other people saying the same thing] -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http

Re: Bug#317722: ITP: libfile-nfslock-perl -- perl module to do NFS (or not) locking

On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 01:12:53AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: Program based of concept of hard linking of files being atomic across NFS. No. Talk to debian-l10n-english@lists.debian.org -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Accepted tla 1.3.3-2 (i386 source all)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 19:56:17 +0100 Source: tla Binary: tla-doc tla Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.3.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL

Re: How to tell user default random pass for daemon?

GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Does Debian need a press office?

** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?

multiarch would warrant a major version bump. Gcc 4 and X.org would not IMHO. I think that none of these things warrant a major version bump, and the Debian major version number should be increased with releases of fspanel. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http

Accepted icheck 0.9.4-1 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 19:48:39 +0100 Source: icheck Binary: icheck Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted icheck 0.9.3-1 (i386 source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 21:28:06 +0100 Source: icheck Binary: icheck Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted tla 1.3.3-1 (i386 source all)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 19:01:45 +0100 Source: tla Binary: tla-doc tla Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.3.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL

Re: Ongoing Firefox (and Thunderbird) Trademark problems

certificates are presented to the browser such that the user can just whack 'ok' without reading it. SSL security on the internet at large is a myth. Anybody who trusts it is insane; the risks aren't very significant. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: Meta-Tag for non-free docs bugs?

all the tags in the future. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Question regarding offensive material

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 10:05:11PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: * Andrew Suffield | On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 02:32:36PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: | I therefore propose | that we do the following: | | * Don't install any screensaver modules whatsoever, except one that | shows

Re: ftp-master, ftp and db .debian.org moving - hosting sought

from the hosting company, with no money changing hands. Anything else is grossly inefficient. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: TODO for etch ?

*no circumstances* should adjtimex be used at the same time as ntpd. The clock will jitter all over the place because they won't agree and will keep slewing it in opposition to each other. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: TODO for etch ?

). -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Debian concordance

basis, only a per-library one (I can find examples that break all the 'obvious' approaches). -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Debian concordance

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 12:15:25AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:07:34AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:26:36AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 17:20 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: So, maybe it's time to revisit

Re: Ongoing Firefox (and Thunderbird) Trademark problems

that a free software that elects to use trademarks automagically transmutates into non-free state. That would be the part where the trademark holder tells you that you can't distribute modified versions. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org

Re: Question regarding 'offensive' material

/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please

or false negatives, pretty much speak for themselves (and the people who cite them) as to their relevance. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: Ongoing Firefox (and Thunderbird) Trademark problems

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 06:08:36PM +0200, Rapha?l Hertzog wrote: Le vendredi 17 juin 2005 14:09 +0100, Andrew Suffield a crit : You could also, as a courtesy to other readers, lay before us the stunningly obvious proof that a free software that elects to use trademarks automagically

  1   2   3   4   5   >