I demand that Branden Robinson may or may not have written...
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:02:09AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
It wan't asking for help, it was asking that we change the way we do
things for their minor benefit.
Thinking that the world revolves around yourself is a serious
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:02:09AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
It wan't asking for help, it was asking that we change the way we do things
for their minor benefit.
Thinking that the world revolves around yourself is a serious attitude
problem, and not something that we want to pander to.
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 13:56, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:02:09AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
Also the Driscoll is very annoying by using a false email address so it
can't be replied to.
As far as I'm concerned, mail that can't be replied to *is* spam.
Fair enough.
Ava
I did not intend to send an Email that could not be replied to.
However, I will send this post to let you know I do have Email --
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 05 September 2003 23:34, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Richard Braakman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 05:12:35PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Ava Driscoll wrote:
I do not appreciate the following showing up:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:34:32AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
However, pulling that message from the list archives may be a good idea.
It's what Ava Driscoll asked for, and the big HTML links sure don't look
good on the Debian pages.
Debian is not in the habit of editing its history (mailing
Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:34:32AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
However, pulling that message from the list archives may be a good idea.
It's what Ava Driscoll asked for, and the big HTML links sure don't look
good on the Debian pages.
Debian is not in
Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:34:32AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
However, pulling that message from the list archives may be a good idea.
It's what Ava Driscoll asked for, and the big HTML links sure don't look
good on the Debian pages.
Debian is
On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 01:26:00 -0400, Daniel Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:34:32AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
However, pulling that message from the list archives may be a good
idea. It's what Ava Driscoll asked for, and the
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 12:38:48AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
Debian is not in the habit of editing its history (mailing list
archives). Don't start down that slope.
Spam is routinely removed from the BTS.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
I have sent a complaint regarding SPAM abuse to Yahoo regarding the
originator of the SPAM. Perhaps I am not the only Ava Driscoll in the
world. However, it is the name of my web portfolio site and the only
name I ever had. I am against SPAM and it hurts to have it associated
with my name
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 12:38:48AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
However, pulling that message from the list archives may be a good idea.
It's what Ava Driscoll asked for, and the big HTML links sure don't look
good on the Debian pages.
Debian is not in the habit of editing its history
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 02:46:57PM -0700, Ava Driscoll wrote:
I do not appreciate the following showing up:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01662.html
Please cease and desist using my name. Thank you.
It's not us, it's some random spammer whose spam
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 18:22, Ava Driscoll wrote:
I have sent a complaint regarding SPAM abuse to Yahoo regarding the
originator of the SPAM. Perhaps I am not the only Ava Driscoll in the
world. However, it is the name of my web portfolio site and the only
name I ever had. I am against SPAM and
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 11:46:47PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 18:22, Ava Driscoll wrote:
I have sent a complaint regarding SPAM abuse to Yahoo regarding the
originator of the SPAM. Perhaps I am not the only Ava Driscoll in the
world. However, it is the name of my web
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 02:59:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Given the tone of Driscoll's messages to us, whom are innocent
bystanders in this affair, I think your solution is quite unlikely to
happen.
Huh? What's wrong with the tone? The first message wasn't to
us, it was to the
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 07:35, Richard Braakman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 02:59:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Given the tone of Driscoll's messages to us, whom are innocent
bystanders in this affair, I think your solution is quite unlikely to
happen.
Huh? What's wrong with the
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:02:09AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
Also the Driscoll is very annoying by using a false email address so it can't
be replied to.
As far as I'm concerned, mail that can't be replied to *is* spam.
--
Glenn Maynard
Original Message
Subject:
False Representation at Google.com
Date:
Fri, 05 Sep 2003 14:20:27 -0700
From:
Ava Driscoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Ava Driscoll wrote:
Original Message
Subject: False Representation at Google.com
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 14:20:27 -0700
From: Ava Driscoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am
Driscoll
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:47 PM
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: [Fwd: False
Representation at Google.com]
Original Message
Subject:
False Representation at Google.com
Date:
Fri, 05
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 05:12:35PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Ava Driscoll wrote:
I do not appreciate the following showing up:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01662.html
That email was sent by a virus. This virus is really nasty.
Are
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Richard Braakman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 05:12:35PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Ava Driscoll wrote:
I do not appreciate the following showing up:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01662.html
That email was
23 matches
Mail list logo
