Hi Francois,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:04 AM, francois.niederco...@laposte.net
francois.niederco...@laposte.net wrote:
Now, the first step I've to do is to answer every of these bug reports
(cernlib - #508413, cfortran - #508500,geant321 - #508496, mclibs -
#508498, mn-fit - #508501, paw -
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
On 29 september 2009 03:04:25, Kevin B. McCarty wrote :
Hi all,
I unfortunately don't have the free time at the moment to do much for
the Debian Project, so I'm orphaning my packages.
[...]
Cernlib-related (Cernlib is a huge
Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 03:04:25, Kevin B. McCarty a écrit :
Hi all,
I unfortunately don't have the free time at the moment to do much for
the Debian Project, so I'm orphaning my packages.
If anyone wants to stake a claim to any of the following, please go
ahead and say so, otherwise
Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 03:04:25, Kevin B. McCarty a écrit :
Hi all,
I unfortunately don't have the free time at the moment to do much for
the Debian Project, so I'm orphaning my packages.
[...]
Cernlib-related (Cernlib is a huge, mostly obsolete set of physics
Hi all,
I unfortunately don't have the free time at the moment to do much for
the Debian Project, so I'm orphaning my packages.
If anyone wants to stake a claim to any of the following, please go
ahead and say so, otherwise I'll file the orphaning bugs within a couple
days. (Follow-ups set
Hi Qingning,
Yes, mrxvt is quite nice with its tab support, and other features. And,
mrxvt is being actively developed by the upstream authors.
Unfortunately, I have not been able to spend much time on mrxvt
lately (being busy with the real life). Indeed, I would like to give
mrxvt away to
Hi,
Jan C. Nordholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
* rxvt
as a user of rxvt I like to see it remain in Debian. I'm not a Debian
developer
Same for me. I'd also take rxvt and am no DD either. Michael, maybe you'd
like to agree on some kind of team maintenance? My workload is quite low
at
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 04:12:12PM +0200, Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
Yes, mrxvt is quite nice with its tab support, and other features. And,
mrxvt is being actively developed by the upstream authors.
Unfortunately, I have not been able to spend much time on mrxvt
lately (being busy with the
Hi,
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Moreno Garza wrote:
[...]
The ones which haven't been picked up either with ITAs or in this thread,
and which aren't lib*-perl or lib*-ruby, are:
* dlume
* fpm
* gxmms
* kipina
* revolution
* rxvt
as a user of rxvt I like to see it
Hi,
* rxvt
as a user of rxvt I like to see it remain in Debian. I'm not a Debian
developer
Same for me. I'd also take rxvt and am no DD either. Michael, maybe you'd
like to agree on some kind of team maintenance? My workload is quite low
at the moment, but will rapidly increase in about four
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:02:42AM +0200, Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
* rxvt
as a user of rxvt I like to see it remain in Debian. I'm not a Debian
developer
Same for me. I'd also take rxvt and am no DD either. Michael, maybe you'd
like to agree on some kind of team maintenance? My workload
Hi Josip,
If you two don't manage to get to it, I'm a backup. :) We need an O wnpp bug
report to record this...
may I take that as an offer to sponsor us? :) I've created an ITA bug
against wnpp now. (Don't know the number yet, the BTS bot is slow, and
I'm in a hurry...)
Regards,
Jan
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:38:17AM +0200, Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
* rxvt
as a user of rxvt I like to see it remain in Debian. I'm not a Debian
developer
Same for me. I'd also take rxvt and am no DD either. Michael, maybe
you'd like to agree on some kind of team maintenance?
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 08:41:38PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
It might be worth noting that rxvt seems to be fairly dead upstream, and
that there also exists mrxvt with tab support. I'll Cc: Qingning Huo who
maintains our mrxvt packages, maybe he has an opinion.
The ITA bug report for rxvt
David Moreno Garza wrote:
Hello,
I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software activity
for the next couple of months for personal reasons. Because of that,
I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages. I really think those
packages shouldn't make it to Etch with a non attending
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:58:31 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
(There are quite a few more -perl and -ruby packages, but I'm not quite sure
which ones have been picked up.)
The lib*-perl packages are all already in the Debian Perl Group's svn
repository and will be uploaded soon.
gregor
--
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:58:31AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
The ones which haven't been picked up either with ITAs or in this thread,
and which aren't lib*-perl or lib*-ruby, are:
*
I'll take since it hasn't been claimed.
Steve
--
Debian GNU/Linux System Administration
On (18/09/06 16:35), Steve Kemp wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:58:31AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
The ones which haven't been picked up either with ITAs or in this thread,
and which aren't lib*-perl or lib*-ruby, are:
*
I'll take since it hasn't been claimed.
I
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 06:13:23PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
I'll take since it hasn't been claimed.
I claimes it via ITA straight away, perhaps I should have emailed the
list as well sorry.
No problem, it was my fault for trusting the mail and not checking.
I'm always happy
gregor herrmann wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:58:31 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
(There are quite a few more -perl and -ruby packages, but I'm not quite
sure which ones have been picked up.)
The lib*-perl packages are all already in the Debian Perl Group's svn
repository and will be
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:59:11 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
* sendemail -- does what it says.
-- Small and written in perl -- maybe the Debian Perl Group would like it?
AFAIK at the moment the DPG only maintains Perl modules.
Meanwhile, I don't suppose I could convince the Debian Perl Group
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 04:21:18PM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
If you think you could adopt some of the packages, feel free to do it
(filling an ITA would be nice). Just talk to the Debian Perl Group
first, if thinking on adopting some of the Perl modules; talk first
to the
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 12:39:58AM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
I am going to file an ITA against libsnmp-ruby and to package the
new upstream release (1.0.1). The release in Debian is quite old
(0.4.1). Is this okay with everyone? I already maintain libpgsql-ruby,
so I am rather familiar
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 23:21, David Moreno Garza wrote:
Hello,
I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software activity
for the next couple of months for personal reasons. Because of that,
I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages. I really think those
packages shouldn't
Hello David,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 04:21:18PM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software activity
for the next couple of months for personal reasons. [...]
I hope that the vacation will do you good and hope you'll come back to
us (if it
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 08:58, Francesco Pedrini wrote:
Best whishes for your life! :)
I'll take care of hfsplus and tdfsb if anyone has already taken them
:)
I can take care even of wyg :)
Thanks again.
Francesco
--
:wq
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On 9/12/06, David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you think you could adopt some of the packages, feel free to do it
(filling an ITA would be nice). Just talk to the Debian Perl Group
first, if thinking on adopting some of the Perl modules; talk first
to the pkg-ruby-extras groups if
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 04:21:18PM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
If you think you could adopt some of the packages, feel free to do it
(filling an ITA would be nice). Just talk to the Debian Perl Group
first, if thinking on adopting some of the Perl modules; talk first
to the
Martín Ferrari dijo [Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 03:26:43PM -0300]:
On 9/12/06, David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you think you could adopt some of the packages, feel free to do it
(filling an ITA would be nice). Just talk to the Debian Perl Group
first, if thinking on adopting some of
On 9/13/06, Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was planning on starting the wide adopting process to the group, but
if you can help, much better. In my experience, the pkg-perl group has
helped me not appear like an irresponsable maintainer (which I am! :-P )
during my stress periods. So,
On Sep 13, 2006, at 2:13 AM, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
Hello David,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 04:21:18PM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software activity
for the next couple of months for personal reasons. [...]
I hope that the vacation will do
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:32, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
I filed 2 ITA against hfsplus (#387337) and hfsutils (#387338).
Expect uploads tomorrow or the day after. :)
D'OH!
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00353.html
:P
if you need help with hfsplus please you just have
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:56:21PM +0200, Francesco Pedrini wrote:
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:32, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
I filed 2 ITA against hfsplus (#387337) and hfsutils (#387338).
Expect uploads tomorrow or the day after. :)
D'OH!
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 23:03, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:56:21PM +0200, Francesco Pedrini wrote:
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:32, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
I filed 2 ITA against hfsplus (#387337) and hfsutils (#387338).
Expect uploads tomorrow or the day
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 23:21, David Moreno Garza wrote:
Hello,
I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software activity
for the next couple of months for personal reasons. Because of that,
I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages. I really think those
packages shouldn't
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:00:06 -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
I was planning on starting the wide adopting process to the group,
Fine, I had the same idea.
but
if you can help, much better.
Ack.
I have no experience with maintaining within a group, but I will be
happy to learn :)
Just
On 9/13/06, gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just take a look at http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/ and start
working :-)
Feel free to ask any questions an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks!!
--
Martín Ferrari
Hello,
I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software activity
for the next couple of months for personal reasons. Because of that,
I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages. I really think those
packages shouldn't make it to Etch with a non attending maintainer,
just like
Hi David,
* David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-13 00:32]:
I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software
activity for the next couple of months for personal reasons.
Best wishes for your personal life!
Because of that, I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages.
[...]
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 04:21:18PM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
If you think you could adopt some of the packages, feel free to do it
(filling an ITA would be nice).
I'll take gparted.
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:21:18 -0500
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you think you could adopt some of the packages, feel free to do it
(filling an ITA would be nice).
I'll take bastet.
--
bye,
- Nacho
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On 9/13/06, Nacho Barrientos Arias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:21:18 -0500
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you think you could adopt some of the packages, feel free to do it
(filling an ITA would be nice).
I'll take bastet.
I already took it. Sorry.
El mar, 12-09-2006 a las 16:21 -0500, David Moreno Garza escribió:
Here is the list:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=damogcomaint=no
I'll take playground* and xchat-systray, but I'll be only able to work
on them after the next week-end.
Best regards,
Santiago
signature.asc
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:31:21 +0200
César Gómez Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already took it. Sorry.
I've got an improved package ready for upload, probably we can join our
efforts.
--
bye,
- Nacho
On 9/13/06, Nacho Barrientos Arias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:31:21 +0200
César Gómez Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already took it. Sorry.
I've got an improved package ready for upload, probably we can join our
efforts.
It's all yours then :)
Cheers,
César
El Martes, 12 de Septiembre de 2006 18:21, David Moreno Garza escribió:
Here is the list:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=damogcomaint=no
I will take care of parprouted
Toda la suerte david! (best of the luck, david!)
luciano
pgpULKwkNGAii.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Em Ter, 2006-09-12 às 16:21 -0500, David Moreno Garza escreveu:
Hello,
I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software activity
for the next couple of months for personal reasons. Because of that,
I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages. I really think those
packages
Em Ter, 2006-09-12 às 23:54 -0300, Fernando Ike de Oliveira escreveu:
Sorry, discard message.
Kind Regards,
--
Fernando Ike - http://www.midstorm.org/~fike/weblog
Linux User 303638 - Debian User 352
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
On 9/13/06, David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software activity
for the next couple of months for personal reasons. Because of that,
I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages. I really think those
packages shouldn't make it to Etch
El mar, 12-09-2006 a las 16:21 -0500, David Moreno Garza escribió:
Here is the list:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=damogcomaint=no
I'll take gnome-schedule if none has done it.
--
Alejandro Ríos Peña
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:46:45AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another point of note is that nascent packagers are encouraged to adopt
other software that's already in the archive before packaging new
items. In this case, he is merely following that
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another point of note is that nascent packagers are encouraged to adopt
other software that's already in the archive before packaging new
items. In this case, he is merely following that advice.
Granted. OTOH, applications may be a better place to
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Goulais, Raphael wrote:
On Friday 23 May 2003 03:52, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Morgon Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
None taken. And no, I am not.
[a DD]
OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
Does this mean that debian policy is that DD
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Goulais, Raphael wrote:
On Friday 23 May 2003 03:52, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Morgon Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
None taken. And no, I am not.
[a DD]
OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
Does this mean that debian policy is that DD
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Also, he seems to have no official status whatsoever; if he's serious
about wanting to maintain stuff, he is welcome to go through the NM
process.
Part of the NM process can be packaging by way of a sponsor. I would guess that
it's common for a person's advocate (required to
This one time, at band camp, Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None taken. And no, I am not.
[a DD]
OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
Does this mean that debian policy is that DD have priority over a non-DD ?
i would hope not, though, in this case, it does not
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:16:21AM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Goulais, Raphael wrote:
On Friday 23 May 2003 03:52, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Morgon Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
None taken. And no, I am not.
[a DD]
OK, then, I'm going
Graham Wilson wrote:
i would hope not, though, in this case, it does not matter, since aaron
responded before moron did.
Passing a package off is not a race to post first. If I am passing a
package on, I will pick whomever I feel is best suited to maintain it.
And yes, that will generally be
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 12:19:57PM -0400, John Belmonte wrote:
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Also, he seems to have no official status whatsoever; if he's serious
about wanting to maintain stuff, he is welcome to go through the NM
process.
Part of the NM process can be packaging by way of a sponsor.
On Friday 23 May 2003 03:52, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Morgon Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
None taken. And no, I am not.
[a DD]
OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
Does this mean that debian policy is that DD have priority over a non-DD ?
Perhaps Morgon wants to become a DD ... and
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Goulais, Raphael wrote:
None taken. And no, I am not.
[a DD]
OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
Does this mean that debian policy is that DD have priority over a non-DD ?
Perhaps Morgon wants to become a DD ... and packaging fltk1.1
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 04:58:05PM +0200, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
spiralsynthmodular (http://www.pawfal.org/Software/SSM/) : a modular
software synth. Needs fltk.
I'll take this one.
--
Chris
pgpFjKF7aVL4U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Goulais, Raphael [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does this mean that debian policy is that DD have priority over a non-DD ?
Perhaps Morgon wants to become a DD ... and packaging fltk1.1 could be an
interesting work for him, and could give him some help in the process of
displaying interest to the
Hello!
[Please CC me!]
I have some packages left I'd like to orphan:
fltk, fltk1.1: The Fast Light Toolkit (www.fltk.org). A C++ GUI toolkit.
spiralsynthmodular (http://www.pawfal.org/Software/SSM/) : a modular
software synth. Needs fltk.
aseqview: displays ALSA synthesizer events.
I'd be glad
Stefan Schwandter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd be glad if someone could orphan the packages that nobody wants to
take right now, because I don't have access to a debian system to do
it myself.
I'd be willing to adopt fltk1.1, and will also upload a new build of
spiralsynthmodular shortly
This one time, at band camp, Stefan Schwandter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fltk, fltk1.1: The Fast Light Toolkit (www.fltk.org). A C++ GUI toolkit.
I'd be interested in taking these over if no one else wants to, because
one if my ITPs (Quat) depends on these.
Morgon
--
You said homosexuals form a
Morgon Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This one time, at band camp, Stefan Schwandter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fltk, fltk1.1: The Fast Light Toolkit (www.fltk.org). A C++ GUI toolkit.
I'd be interested in taking these over if no one else wants to, because
one if my ITPs (Quat) depends on
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron M. Ucko) wrote:
fltk, fltk1.1: The Fast Light Toolkit (www.fltk.org). A C++ GUI toolkit.
I'd be interested in taking these over if no one else wants to, because
one if my ITPs (Quat) depends on these.
No offense, but are you
Morgon Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
None taken. And no, I am not.
[a DD]
OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
69 matches
Mail list logo
