],
Chris Rutter [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ProFTPd being lame
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, David Bristel wrote:
Off topic
The only feature it lacks is the ability to do automated account setup from
another script. (Which is the ONLY thing that apache does better
* David == David Bristel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David I was refering to the equivilant of a VirtualServer section
David in Apache...to just send Roxen the information for a new
David account, including IP address and directories, and have it do
David it automatically without admin
]
To: Debian Developerslist debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Roxen virtual servers, was: Re: ProFTPd being lame
Resent-Date: 21 Sep 1999 11:23:17 -
Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
* David == David Bristel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Roxen does, at least if you have different IP numbers, I can't get IP-less
vistual hosting to work with ftp sessions. And as a ISP the security issues
of
You can't get name-based virtual hosting with FTP. The protocol doesn't
transmit a hostname.
On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Raul Miller wrote:
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 00:29:10 -0400
From: Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Chris Rutter [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ProFTPd being lame
Resent-Date: 19 Sep 1999 04:29:14 -
On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Anders Arnholm wrote:
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 12:18:53 +0200
From: Anders Arnholm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Chris Rutter [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ProFTPd being lame
Resent-Date: 19 Sep 1999 10:19:02
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, David Bristel wrote:
Off topic
The only feature it lacks is the ability to do automated account setup from
another script. (Which is the ONLY thing that apache does better than Roxen).
Maybe I'll tinker a bit and make a module for auto-creation of new web
accounts
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 11:46:52AM +0100, Chris Rutter wrote:
Most people I know prefer using the OpenBSD-derived server, because
it seems to be more stable and less buggy than the rest -- why is
it being deprecated by Debian (or Herbert, I don't know) in this
way?
The OpenBSD ftp
On Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 04:21:34PM -0700, Robert Stone wrote:
Virtualhosting in proftpd is far easier than with wu-ftpd. As it
stands now, I don't believe any debian ftp server supports virtual
anon ftp sites as provided besides proftpd.
roxen does.
--
Raul
Robert Stone wrote:
Virtualhosting in proftpd is far easier than with wu-ftpd. As it
stands now, I don't believe any debian ftp server supports virtual anon ftp
sites as provided besides proftpd.
Roxen does, at least if you have different IP numbers, I can't get IP-less
vistual
* Raul == Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raul On Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 04:21:34PM -0700, Robert Stone wrote:
Virtualhosting in proftpd is far easier than with wu-ftpd. As it
stands now, I don't believe any debian ftp server supports virtual
anon ftp sites as provided besides proftpd.
On Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 06:49:55PM +0200, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
I use Roxen exclusively as a httpd where I have a say on the matter,
but it is mainly a httpd, and lacks configuration features (like
chrooting some selected users into different roots) I use with
proftpd, although I have a
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 11:41:01PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Sep 17, J.H.M. Dassen Ray\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of FTP servers, has anyone taken a good look at troll-ftpd
(ftp://ftp.troll.no/freebies/ftpd)?
I did. IMO it's still unsuitable for big servers (it lacks features
Re: all the bug-finding in ProFTPd (I just read the SuSE notice about
it being dropped for lameness reasons, including it *still* being
vulnerable to remote exploit) -- if it is, indeed, *that* bad
(and the common consensus among admins I know is that it is), perhaps
the netkit ftpd shouldn't come
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 11:46:52 +0100, Chris Rutter wrote:
Most people I know prefer using the OpenBSD-derived server, because it
seems to be more stable and less buggy than the rest -- why is it being
deprecated by Debian (or Herbert, I don't know) in this way?
Speaking of FTP servers, has
On Sep 17, Chris Rutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most people I know prefer using the OpenBSD-derived server, because
it seems to be more stable and less buggy than the rest -- why is
it being deprecated by Debian (or Herbert, I don't know) in this
way?
It lacks a lot of features needed by
On Sep 17, J.H.M. Dassen Ray\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of FTP servers, has anyone taken a good look at troll-ftpd
(ftp://ftp.troll.no/freebies/ftpd)?
I did. IMO it's still unsuitable for big servers (it lacks features like
site exec and a log analyzer) and it does not look designed for
17 matches
Mail list logo
