On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 12:41:24AM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
as for including other's in the Mail-Followup-To mutt only does this
if those users had used `lists' instead of `subscribe' indicating they
WANT to be CCed.
There must be a bug in it somewhere, then, because I often see
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:53:04PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
In fact, the only thing the RFC says to do is to honor Reply-To:
headers,
which I might note you didn't include in your message.
Why should I, when it would be no different
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:07:27PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
have been added to Mail-Followup-To by other Mutt users, and I don't use
the
lists command at all.
in that case there would be something funny going on, here is my
theory:
you post to list, you M-F-To: is set to only the
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:18:40AM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
if this is the case the solution is fixing broken mailers, many of
them are Free software so why have patches to support M-F-To not been
made?
I'd like to see someone convince that M-F-To fix Pine. But I doubt you'll
have an
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:23:23PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:18:40AM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
if this is the case the solution is fixing broken mailers, many of
them are Free software so why have patches to support M-F-To not been
made?
I'd like to see
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Description:http://aterm.sourceforge.net
aterm is based upon rxvt v.2.4.8 with add ons of
Alfredo Kojima's NeXT-ish scrollbars. Fast transparency
functionality, background lightening/darkening or/and
Ethan == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ethan pine is a lost cause anyway. i was thinking of GNUs which
Ethan seems to be the other big offender of ignorage of M-F-To.
Ethan (i am not sure if it respects Mail-Copies-To: never i just
Ethan started adding that.)
Gnus
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:27:13AM -0500, Chris Gray wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Description:http://aterm.sourceforge.net
Someone please close this bug once it gets a number from the BTS.
Package: aterm
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Installed-Size: 308
Maintainer: Jordi
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 03:23:03PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
I'm concerned with some breakage in the man program. Here is an example:
[snip examples]
This is because man runs via a wrapper that makes it run as user man
(and makes root's pager run as user man too for some reason).
Related
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:07:27PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
in that case there would be something funny going on, here is my
theory:
you post to list, you M-F-To: is set to only the list
someone (Mr-Broken) with broken mailer uses reply-to-all which CCs you
anyway ignoring M-F-To.
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 11:11:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not look at this from a different perspective? I don't know if it may be
useful or not for upgrading machines, but the multicast server would be a
very nice thing for mass installations.
I still disagree. Multicast is the
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 11:24:26PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
I try to build a crosscompiler i386-arm (but also other archs). At one
point headerfiles for the target architecture are needed. Where could I find
headerfiles for other archs? Are there development packages for this purpose?
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:39:58PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
* Andreas Schuldei ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [001229 23:24]:
I try to build a crosscompiler i386-arm (but also other archs). At one
point headerfiles for the target architecture are needed. Where could I find
headerfiles for
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:11:50PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
Mail-Followup-To is the correct header to use.
Mail-Followup-To isn't even a registered header! The closest thing to a
registry that RFC822 implies is in the hands of SRI International is
Ethan Benson wrote:
the problem with this is you end up with the catman files owned by
whatever user reads whatever man page. personally as a sysadmin i
don't want users gaining write permission to files in any more places
under /var then there already is (ahem texmf). i am not certain if
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:15:23PM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:23:55PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
the new 'testing' distribution (sid) should be even better - nearly
all the benefits of 'unstable' but tested to at least install properly
without error.
Wrong:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:23:23PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
btw is it Mail-Copies-To: never or Mail-Copies-To: nobody ? i have
seen both which is correct? (assuming any MUA actually pays any
attention to this header anyway)
'nobody' is correct.
'never' is deprecated but still observed by
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:53:37PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
Ethan Benson wrote:
the problem with this is you end up with the catman files owned by
whatever user reads whatever man page. personally as a sysadmin i
don't want users gaining write permission to files in any more places
under
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 01:09:07PM +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
Peter Palfrader wrote:
There is a further weird package disappearance in unstable: all mgetty
packages (execept mgetty-doc) are gone!
[...]
Hey, these are important packages.
Ethan == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ethan pine is a lost cause anyway. i was thinking of GNUs which
Ethan seems to be the other big offender of ignorage of M-F-To. (i
Ethan am not sure if it respects Mail-Copies-To: never i just
Ethan started adding that.)
That just
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:11:50PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
Mail-Followup-To is the correct header to use.
Mail-Followup-To isn't even a registered header! The closest thing to a
registry that RFC822
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:48:46AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
That just demonstrates you have no idea what you are talking about.
oh please. someone already pointed out to me that older versions of
Gnus ignored M-F-To but the current one does not.
go fuck off.
--
Ethan Benson
John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PLEASE DON'T CC ME. I'M ON THE LIST
FYI 28 (aka RFC 1855) is the standard.
Strictly speaking it's is only a standard if it is on the Standard
Track and RFC1855 isn't. It is only an informational RFC.
PLEASE DON'T CC ME. I'M ON THE LIST
On 01-01-04 Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
Does anyone know where Loic has been lately (i.e., for the past two years
or so)? AFAIK his last package upload was in November 1998, and the mail
I sent him about whether he needs help with mailx has generated no reply.
Since mailx is important, if the
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:10:19AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
touch /var/run/debian-mirror.pid
chown mirror.nogroup /var/run/debian-mirror.pid
touch /var/log/debian-mirror.log
chown mirror.nogroup /var/log/debian-mirror.log
Please don't do this. nogroup should not be the group of any
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:06:18PM -0800, Erik Hollensbe wrote:
apt-get and it's kin need more simple getopt-style flags that allow
overriding of certain things, mainly conflicts. Also, an option to
actually view what's being upgraded before you download 250 packages that
are only going to
Ethan == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ethan On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:48:46AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
That just demonstrates you have no idea what you are talking about.
Ethan oh please. someone already pointed out to me that older
Ethan versions of Gnus ignored M-F-To
Hello
One of the programs I'd like to package has somewhat unclean licence.
The readme file says only:
COPYRIGHT: This program is FREEWARE!
which I don't suppose is enough for us.
The webpage is a bit more descriptive and says:
These programs are freeware, which means that they may be
Russell Coker wrote:
I'm sure that Ben will welcome your contributions towards maintaining the
libc6 package. All you have to do is read the list of bugs, solve some, and
send in patches.
I'm not trying to bash Ben. He did a wonderful work in resolving many
bugs and generally keeping
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:34:26AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
You prove my point. Resorting to invective is the last refuge
of the incompetent. This is your second demonstration of incompetence
in a public forum in 24 hours; and I suspect your drop in the
estimation of the
Hello.
I'd like to package CRACK, the well know password security checker.
It has a nice licence, derived from Artistic and is no doubt a useful tool
for an administrator.
Pawel
--
(___) | Pawel Wiecek +48603240006 http://www.coven.vmh.net/ |
o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the other hand, we might want to copy the OpenBSD version instead
of maintaining our own man. But I leave that to whoever maintains the
packages.
We have alternatives on almost everything but dpkg and man. If someone
thinks it's worth the effort to
Is there any apt-able server out there that is accessible with a better
bandwidth than ftp.debian.org (currently 468 bytes/sec) but still is
up-to-date?
ftp.debian.org has been very flaky for me for weeks. And neither
ftp.de.debian.org nor source.rfc822.org are up-to-date. I guess they have
the
Pawel Wiecek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These programs are freeware, which means that they may be distributed
freely.
Nope, we should explicitly have the rights to distribute and modify
the program.
I have a commercial binary that needs this library. Yes, I can find it in
potato, but not in unstable. Is there a new package providing
libnss1-compat?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:20:11AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
I've just reported what I had thought, some many many months ago,
to be a problem. Of course, the maintainer has not done anything
about this report for 7 months, and then he closes it like that.
Not good.
Oh, and just to
Hello
I'd like to package lovecalc (http://www.lovecalculator.com/).
Because of kinda unclean licence I'm not quite sure if it'll go into main or
non-free (this depends on whether I convince the author to write a more
precise one, I guess).
Pawel
--
(___) | Pawel Wiecek
On Thursday 04 January 2001 20:50, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
Russell Coker wrote:
I'm sure that Ben will welcome your contributions towards maintaining the
libc6 package. All you have to do is read the list of bugs, solve some,
and send in patches.
I'm not trying to bash Ben. He did a
Chris Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Description:http://aterm.sourceforge.net
[4 ysabell:~] grep-available -s Package,Maintainer -P aterm
Package: aterm-ml
Maintainer: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: aterm
Maintainer: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please close bug#81180
I gonna package yardradius, see http://yardradius.sourceforge.net.
I'm the upstream author.
$Id: README,v 1.4 2001/01/02 09:41:19 kiavik Exp $
Yet Another Radius Daemon (YARD RADIUS) README File
This program is a RADIUS RFC compliant daemon which is
On 22 Dec 2000, Stephen Zander wrote:
Piotr ITO: libapache-asp-perl
Piotr ITO: libapache-filter-perl
Piotr ITO: libapache-ssi-perl
Piotr ITO: libcgi-pm-perl
Piotr ITO: libdbd-csv-perl
Piotr ITO: libhtml-clean-perl
Piotr ITO: libhtml-simpleparse-perl
Piotr
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Oh, and just to chime in on this little bit, I did not start maintaining
glibc until Aug 31, 2000 (my first changelog entry). So no, I have not
been sitting on this for 7 months. Get your facts straight.
And just to chime in, I appreciate the huge effort and many
Russell Coker wrote:
This is already being done for some packages. Check the maintainer address
on the gcc package for an example.
The thing that determines this is whether there are multiple people who are
skillful and willing to work.
If you want to be the second developer for libc6
How long does it take usually for a (GPG) key sent to keyring.debian.org
to show up in official keyring (and maintainers database)?
I'm waiting for my new GPG key to show up for quite a few weeks and it seems a
bit excessive to me :^)
BTW -- our web interface to developers database
Yes, I've been in a packaging mood lately :)
I'd like to have Tk707 packaged. Tk707 is a software clone of the
Roland TR-707 rhythm composer, a drum machine.
It is written in C and Tk and it uses the alsa sequencer. I am using
it together with the latest alsa modules and lib (compiled from
Previously Joey Hess wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
This still leaves us with two problems:
1. there is no 100% correct way to decide if something is an override
or not
They're flagged local or so arn't they?
Either `local' or 'user' in my suid.conf, but it could be anything
except
Hi Pawel!
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Pawel Wiecek wrote:
How long does it take usually for a (GPG) key sent to keyring.debian.org
to show up in official keyring (and maintainers database)?
I'm waiting for my new GPG key to show up for quite a few weeks and it seems a
bit excessive to me :^)
New
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:01:43AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
Is there any apt-able server out there that is accessible with a better
bandwidth than ftp.debian.org (currently 468 bytes/sec) but still is
up-to-date?
There are almost two hundred public Debian mirrors, use them.
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 08:44:49PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 08:41:06PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
If I'm already replying to a list, I'm not going to waste bandwidth by
mailing you personally as well.
So what you're saying is that you're purposely ignoring
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 06:14:05PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:57:07PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Please don't encourage private mirrors!
Debian itself encourages private mirrors. Personally, I'd rather just
download a new ISO every 3 months or so as new versions
THANK YOU. Finally, an answer that I can use.
I will look into contributing towards this package.
--
Erik Hollensbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmer, Powells Internet Division
I respect a man who lets me know where he stands, even if he is wrong.
- Malcolm X
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Matt Zimmerman
The severity of bug #67556 (package quota) should be changed from wishlist to
important since it fixes a problem which makes the package unusable on big
endian architectures (getopt() returns int(-1) and not char(-1)). Or at least
it should be advisable to separate the getopt() bug from the rest
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:03:15AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
I have a commercial binary that needs this library. Yes, I can find it in
potato, but not in unstable. Is there a new package providing
libnss1-compat?
libnss1-compat would not compile cleanly with the latest glibc. So if
you need
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:48:34PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
There are almost two hundred public Debian mirrors, use them.
Sure. But I was hoping someone would know a machine that a) is up-to-date
(the three machines outside the US I tried so far are not) and b) is
accessible pretty well (which
Pawel Wiecek writes:
I'd like to package CRACK, the well know password security checker.
It has a nice licence, derived from Artistic and is no doubt a
useful tool for an administrator.
Have you looked at the package john? AFAIK john can do anything crack
can do.
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:56:41PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:48:34PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
There are almost two hundred public Debian mirrors, use them.
Sure. But I was hoping someone would know a machine that a) is up-to-date
(the three machines outside
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:04:07PM +0100, Andreas Voegele wrote:
Pawel Wiecek writes:
I'd like to package CRACK, the well know password security checker.
It has a nice licence, derived from Artistic and is no doubt a
useful tool for an administrator.
Have you looked at the package john?
On Jan 4, 1:11pm, Peter Palfrader wrote:
New keys sent to keyring.debian.org via gpg --send will take approximatly
Gosh...
forever. New keys have to be added my hand by the keyring maintainer and
Emailed him as well...
this might long (up 2 12 months?) (see a thread here on -devel perhaps
With the raging flame war going on about MUAs, I'm embarassed to mail this
with lotus notes, but, hey, its all I have at work.
Back on topic, I would have thought that package distribution was a one
time shot. Caches are for people who would otherwise download the
slashdot.org header graphic
Date:Thu, 04 Jan 2001 11:06:43 +1100
To: Jim Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: Erik Hollensbe [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
On Wed, Jan
For few days (first experienced this on 1.1.) I've been trying to figure
out what's wrong with APT as whatever command I try, I get:
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing emusic (NewVersion1)
E: Problem with MergeList
A hobby server? OK; sorry: I saw server and read that as important
server.
But in truth, you should be -filing- bugs against things you find
wrong, for the following reason: not all developers read debian-devel,
so your concerns, as important as they may be, may or may not reach
the responsible
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:56:41PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
There are almost two hundred public Debian mirrors, use them.
Sure. But I was hoping someone would know a machine that a) is up-to-date
(the three machines outside the US I tried so far are not) and b) is
accessible pretty well
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:04:55AM -0200, Eduardo Marcel Macan wrote:
alsa + timidity makes it possible do create really good sounding music
without having an expensive sound card. Jazz++ can also use alsa and
timidity. If we had alsa, timidity and jazz++ into debian enabled to
work together
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:08:39AM +0200, Heikki Kantola wrote:
For few days (first experienced this on 1.1.) I've been trying to figure
out what's wrong with APT as whatever command I try, I get:
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while
Marcelo E Magallon writes:
Chris Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Description:http://aterm.sourceforge.net
mem [4 ysabell:~] grep-available -s Package,Maintainer -P aterm
mem Package: aterm-ml
mem Maintainer: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mem Package: aterm
mem
XML::Simple is a Perl module that facilitates reading and writing Perl
data structures to XML. It is especially useful for configuration
files.
It's licensed under the same terms as Perl.
--
Gordon Matzigkeit [EMAIL PROTECTED] //\ I'm a FIG (http://fig.org/)
Committed to diversity and
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 08:37:26AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
Back on topic, I would have thought that package distribution was a one
time shot. Caches are for people who would otherwise download the
slashdot.org header graphic fifty times a day. Whereas each individual
debian machine
Anthony Towns wrote:
Basically: don't do them.
Cool! I will tag all pine bugs as wontfix...
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:27:57AM -0800, Jim Lynch wrote:
But in truth, you should be -filing- bugs against things you find
wrong, for the following reason: not all developers read debian-devel,
so your concerns, as important as they may be, may or may not reach
the responsible parties, and
Hi Pawel!
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Pawel Wiecek wrote:
On Jan 4, 1:11pm, Peter Palfrader wrote:
(see a thread here on -devel perhaps a
month or two ago).
I can't find it in the archive...
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0010/msg00683.html Fups.
Hi Gordon!
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
XML::Simple is a Perl module that facilitates reading and writing Perl
data structures to XML. It is especially useful for configuration
files.
It's licensed under the same terms as Perl.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -S XML/Simple
On 03-Jan-01, 22:53 (CST), John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
I didn't say there was. Does Mail-Copies-To: begin with an X?
RFC 822 this time:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html
and Mail-Copies-To: fails to rear it's ugly head, so
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:00:19AM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote:
Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the other hand, we might want to copy the OpenBSD version instead
of maintaining our own man. But I leave that to whoever maintains the
packages.
We have alternatives on almost
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:04:55AM -0200, Eduardo Marcel Macan wrote:
I'd like to have Tk707 packaged. Tk707 is a software clone of the
Roland TR-707 rhythm composer, a drum machine.
It is written in C and Tk and it uses the alsa sequencer. I am using
it together with the latest alsa modules
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Enrique Robledo Arnuncio wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:04:55AM -0200, Eduardo Marcel Macan wrote:
Well, it was me, and I did package it, but I sent an ITP-delay message
some time ago, when a developer from the WxWindows team asked me not
to put
== Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Jan 02, Goswin Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So would there be intrest in a deb of the script coming with a
debconf interface for configuration, cronjob or ip-up support
and whatever else is needed to keep an uptodate
According to Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Have you tried removing the files under /var/state/apt/lists?
Nope.
These are what is being read during the Reading Package Lists...
phase.
But this information revealed the reason for the behaviour I reported:
the problem spot was
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
The problem is L4M3RZ using that broken piece of non-free shit PINE, which
doesn't appear to respect *any* conventions of netiquette.
Is there a free mailer to replace that broken piece of non-free shit
PINE that supports IMAP?
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001 18:59:47 -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
Please bear in mind that many of us have been running unstable since
before Debian was released (at all), and fondly remember many fun little
incidents like ld.so completly breaking. Tends to put minor breakage in
perspective.
On 20010104T100704-0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 03-Jan-01, 22:53 (CST), John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The difference between pine and mutt is that you KNOW the overflows in
pinemutt allegedly shares code with pine...
Extremely unlikely, as it originated from elm.
Pine also
Previously Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
Pine also originated from elm, so theoretically it's possible (although
I think both are complete rewrites).
mutt is a complete rewrite and shouldn't share core with elm.
Wichert.
--
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I intend to package Bakery.
Package: bakery
License: GPL
URL: http://bakery.sourceforge.net/
Bakery is a C++ Framework for creating GNOME applications using Gnome--
(gnomemm) and Gtk-- (gtkmm).
I also maintain gtkmm and gnomemm packages.
--
Mariusz
On 20010103T212649-0600, Adam Heath wrote:
Perl is a required package, there is no need to list the dependency.
That it is required is not relevant. That it is a virtual essential
package is.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:01:43AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
Hi!
Is there any apt-able server out there that is accessible with a better
bandwidth than ftp.debian.org (currently 468 bytes/sec) but still is
up-to-date?
ftp.freenet.de seems to be very actually and it's fast too. Give it a
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:45:50AM -0500, David Greene wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
The problem is L4M3RZ using that broken piece of non-free shit PINE, which
doesn't appear to respect *any* conventions of netiquette.
Is there a free mailer to replace that broken
(Not Cced :) )
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:15:42PM -0500, D-Man [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard
to say:
What if I set my Reply-To header to be the address I was sending To?
How would you reply to me? ;-)
To make a totally pointless observation: mutt lets you override Reply-To
when you use the
[ Craig Sanders writes ]
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:26:25AM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
And in the case of the debian mailing lists, you should reply to the
list.
bullshit.
some replies should go to the list, and some replies should be private.
it's up to the person writing the reply to
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Steve Greenland wrote:
SGOn 03-Jan-01, 22:53 (CST), John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SG On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
SG
SG I didn't say there was. Does Mail-Copies-To: begin with an X?
SG
SG RFC 822 this time:
SG
SG http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html
hi,
[i'm not sure if this has been resolved, lart me if you like.]
my proposal to resolve big Packages.gz is through package
pool system.
add 36 or so new debian package, namely,
[a-zA-Z0-1]-packages-gz_date_all.deb
contents of each is quite obvious. ;-)
and a virtual unstable-packages-gz
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:53:37PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
I'll bet (have not verified) that you can already trick it into writing
bogus file by sticking trojan pages elsewhere in your manpath.
i just tried it, did not end up with a cached file.
[EMAIL
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:43:05 -0800,
Philip Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
But the primary point of a mailing list is for discussion ON THE LIST.
Do you want to disagree with that?
partially. there are enough announce-only and moderated MLs.
So headers should be optimized for group
On Jan 04, Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp.debian.org has been very flaky for me for weeks. And neither
ftp.de.debian.org nor source.rfc822.org are up-to-date. I guess they have
the very same problem accessing ftp.debian.org during their mirror process.
{ftp,http}.it.debian.org is
[read my previous semi-proposal]
this has some more benefits,
1) package maintainer could upload (to pool) in whatever
frequency they like.
2) release is seperated from package pool which is a storage
system. and release is a qa system.
3) release could be managed through BTS on specific
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:17:30AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
[read my previous semi-proposal]
this has some more benefits,
1) package maintainer could upload (to pool) in whatever
frequency they like.
in an ideal world, developer should upload to ''xxx-auto-builder'' ;-)
9i'm turning out to
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:49:45 -0700,
John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Let's see: Pine Is Nearly (no-longer lately...) Elm, you say that mutt
actually derives from elm, yet they don't share code. Um, yeah, sure,
whatever. BTW from the LG article about mutt...
AFAICT mutt does not
Oooops, sorry, I forgot telling it in my ITP.
It is covered by the GPL and its page is at:
http://www.vislab.usyd.edu.au/staff/chris/tk707/
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:19:20AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:04:55AM -0200, Eduardo Marcel Macan
[ Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr writes ]
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:43:05 -0800,
Philip Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So headers should be optimized for group discussion.
Replying to individuals is a secondary function.
not at all. replying to individuals is an essentail function that is no
As pointed out to me, bug #71768 has a workaround to my problem listed
in it. However, I find it quite appalling that a fix involving a one
character change to a source file, where the fix has been listed in
the bug report has not been pushed through, given its age.
The console-tools package has
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
They always re-format a manual page? This might be reasonable, actually.
Groff is pretty fast, and most manual pages are short, so it shouldn't
take too long even on older hardware.
I think it would take a while on my 386 for things like the zshall man page.
(Several
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
