Hi again,
now aptcc backend install/remove/update
things in noninteractive mode, and following
Josselin Mouette advices I'm planning to write
a DBus frontend to debconf that will emit a signal
when it needs a Session frontend to be attached.
I created a sequence diagram to ilustrate what i'm
I don't know if there is a better list to ask this
question but as people here know dpkg
well i'd like to know if there is some
way of telling it to use another fd as
stdin, I have done the following code
to handle answering to conffile prompts
but it works some times and other times it
doesn't...
Daniel Nicoletti a écrit :
Hey Josselin,
De: Josselin Mouette
This solution is not implemented as I don't know debconf verry well
but there is one problem that I'd like to know if there is a already a way
to deal with this:
when aptcc backend starts installing packages it's status are in
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
Ok now I'm forking and using --status-fd, but i got this localized
pmstatus:k3b:0:Removendo k3b
which i can't parse, actually i'm a bit afraid if it's status are
some kind of standard, maybe i should look at the source.. :P
So
Hey Josselin,
De: Josselin Mouette
This solution is not implemented as I don't know debconf verry well
but there is one problem that I'd like to know if there is a already a
way
to deal with this:
when aptcc backend starts installing packages it's status are in a fd
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:26:01 -0700, Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
This solution is not implemented as I don't know debconf verry well
but there is one problem that I'd like to know if there is a already a way
to deal with this:
when aptcc backend starts installing packages it's status are in a
Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 à 10:26 -0700, Daniel Nicoletti a écrit :
Installing/Removing/Updating are the last problem of this backend
mostly because of debconf.
PackageKit works this way (if you didn't take a look at the web site):
Backend (apt | aptcc | yum | zyppy )
||
|| (some are
De: Josselin Mouette
Currently, the question will simply be ignored, the frontend being set
to noninteractive when there is no TTY nor display available.
The hard work imo will be if i start in an interactive mode (in the backend)
but when a question needs to popup the user loged out and i
Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 à 11:37 -0700, Daniel Nicoletti a écrit :
Currently, the question will simply be ignored, the frontend being set
to noninteractive when there is no TTY nor display available.
The hard work imo will be if i start in an interactive mode (in the backend)
but when a
De: Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 à 11:37 -0700, Daniel Nicoletti a écrit :
Currently, the question will simply be ignored, the frontend being set
to noninteractive when there is no TTY nor display available.
The hard work imo will be if i start in an interactive mode (in
10 matches
Mail list logo