Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

2017-03-20 Thread M G Berberich
Hello, Am Montag, den 20. März schrieb solitone: > we had a discussion on the kde mailing list, and a gentoo user spotted this > out. Looking at package versions in gentoo it's pretty easy to figure out > whether something is based on kf5 or kf4. Yes. Because in stretch kf5-based

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

2017-03-20 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Monday, 20 March 2017 17:01:24 CET solitone wrote: > On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:42:21 CET Luigi Toscano wrote: > > On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:36:11 CET solitone wrote: > > > > As well as okular, kde-baseapps-bin (providing kdialog) would need an > > > upgrade to 16.12 to take advantage of

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

2017-03-20 Thread solitone
On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:42:21 CET Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:36:11 CET solitone wrote: > > I fear that too. It would be nice thought that it'd be at least included > > in sid, so that we could backport it to stretch. > > I guess you mean experimental. That will happen

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

2017-03-20 Thread solitone
On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:39:53 CET Luigi Toscano wrote: > The package name in gentoo seems to have no specific hints; but anyway, > looking at the dependencies in Debian you can spot the version of Qt used > (and/or whether it's kdelibs4 vs Frameworks). This is what that user sees on gentoo:

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

2017-03-20 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:36:11 CET solitone wrote: > On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:23:06 CET Luigi Toscano wrote: > > > Anyway, for the reason you gave, I think it would be a good thing if > > > that > > > was included in stretch. It might give a better user experience. > > > > I think it's a

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

2017-03-20 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:32:06 CET solitone wrote: > On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:15:43 CET inkbottle wrote: > > what made you find out that the 16.12 version was kf5 based? > > I can see it there: > > > version=16.12.0#okular> > >

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

2017-03-20 Thread solitone
On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:23:06 CET Luigi Toscano wrote: > > Anyway, for the reason you gave, I think it would be a good thing if that > > was included in stretch. It might give a better user experience. > > I think it's a bit too late given the release cycle, but I'm not a packager > for those

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

2017-03-20 Thread solitone
On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:15:43 CET inkbottle wrote: > what made you find out that the 16.12 version was kf5 based? > I can see it there: > version=16.12.0#okular> > But I have to read hard. Hi, we had a discussion on the kde

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

2017-03-20 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:15:43 CET inkbottle wrote: > On Monday, March 20, 2017 2:56:03 PM CET solitone wrote: > > So my question is: is there any chance that relase 16.12 of okular and > > kdialog (based on kde-frameworks5) are included in stretch? Currently > > we've got 16.08 (kde4 based),

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

2017-03-20 Thread inkbottle
On Monday, March 20, 2017 2:56:03 PM CET solitone wrote: > So my question is: is there any chance that relase 16.12 of okular and > kdialog (based on kde-frameworks5) are included in stretch? Currently > we've got 16.08 (kde4 based), both in stretch an in sid. That is interesting, I haven't

[stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

2017-03-20 Thread solitone
Hi, I'm on stretch, and use Plasma 5 as desktop environment. While I've managed to set the right size for most desktop and application icons on my HiDPI display,there are some few icons that appear still too small. One example is Okular and the icons of the menu entries, as you can see in