Re: Freepats

2004-04-25 Thread Ryan Underwood
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 10:30:14PM -0400, Jeremy Hankins wrote: Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't seem to be getting mail from the BTS on this bug. Anyway, it seemed to me that the Creative Commons licenses would be more appropriate since they were specifically designed

Re: Freepats

2004-04-23 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Brian May wrote: snip Brian There are other issues with the GPL that might effect Brian soundfont files, not sure. For instance, would the Brian soundfont file be considered source code when making a Brian *.wav file? Probably; it would be the preferred form for modification,

Re: Freepats

2004-04-23 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Brian May wrote: Ryan == Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ryan I don't seem to be getting mail from the BTS on this bug. You weren't listed in your mail-followup-to header, but I CCed you anyway. Hmmm, I guess I should have CCed you at the start, sorry about that (the BTS

Re: Freepats

2004-04-22 Thread Ryan Underwood
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:41:27AM +1000, Brian May wrote: I would suggest you use the GPL, and add a note somewhere that you interpret the GPL as above. If anyone disagrees with your interpretation (and so far nobody has), then the issue can be resolved at that time. To do this, you could

Re: Freepats

2004-04-22 Thread Brian May
Ryan == Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ryan I don't seem to be getting mail from the BTS on this bug. You weren't listed in your mail-followup-to header, but I CCed you anyway. Hmmm, I guess I should have CCed you at the start, sorry about that (the BTS doesn't automatically send

Re: Freepats

2004-04-22 Thread Ryan Underwood
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 11:43:10AM +1000, Brian May wrote: Ryan Anyway, it seemed to me that the Creative Commons licenses Ryan would be more appropriate since they were specifically Ryan designed to cover media: Ryan This one is just a MIT-ish license: Ryan

Re: Freepats

2004-04-22 Thread Brian Thomas Sniffen
Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:41:27AM +1000, Brian May wrote: I would suggest you use the GPL, and add a note somewhere that you interpret the GPL as above. If anyone disagrees with your interpretation (and so far nobody has), then the issue can be

Re: Freepats

2004-04-22 Thread Jeremy Hankins
Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't seem to be getting mail from the BTS on this bug. Anyway, it seemed to me that the Creative Commons licenses would be more appropriate since they were specifically designed to cover media: This one is just a MIT-ish license:

Re: Freepats

2004-04-21 Thread Sam Hartman
MJ == MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What if the *.wav file has since been edited in Brian a wav editor and cannot be automatically recreated? MJ So be it. It's just been compiled in an odd way. A description would MJ be nice. I disagree. If I edit the sound font file in a

Re: Freepats

2004-04-21 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-04-22 00:13:31 +0100 Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MJ == MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What if the *.wav file has since been edited in Brian a wav editor and cannot be automatically recreated? MJ So be it. It's just been compiled in an odd way. A description

Re: Freepats

2004-04-21 Thread Walter Landry
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2004-04-22 00:13:31 +0100 Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MJ == MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What if the *.wav file has since been edited in Brian a wav editor and cannot be automatically recreated? MJ So be it. It's just been

Re: Freepats

2004-04-20 Thread Brian May
@lists.debian.org). I have cited Mark's response, so there is no confusion who typed it. Neither me or Mark are subscribed, please send CCs to both of us, thanks. Mark == Mark Constable [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mark On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 05:03 pm, Brian May wrote: Q: What are FreePats

Re: Freepats

2004-04-20 Thread Brian May
Brian == Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mark Using source code notes to create a musical audio sequence Mark would not be a derivative in the same sense as modifying the Mark sound font to create a different instrument, or to Mark transcribe the raw wav and meta-info into

Re: Freepats

2004-04-19 Thread Brian May
for some Mark guidance as how best to license and package FreePats. If you Mark have a suggestion as the the most appropriate license and Mark anything I can do to facilitate them getting into Debian Mark then I'm more than happy to do whatever I can. Brian Thank you. I would greatly

Re: Freepats

2004-04-19 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-04-19 12:18:11 +0100 Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brian There are other issues with the GPL that might effect Brian soundfont files, not sure. For instance, would the Brian soundfont file be considered source code when making a Brian *.wav file? I think it