-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jérémy,
Am 01.12.2012 12:28, schrieb Jérémy Lal:
I thought public-domain wasn't DFSG (because it's not in some countries).
That's interesting and something new to me. The public domain
is listed on the page
http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Francesco, Charles and Kuno,
thank you very much for your helpful answers and clarifications!
I didn't receive Kuno's original mail (maybe because there was no
CC to me) but I hope that I got the relevant parts from the quoted
paragraphs (his
On 03/12/2012 10:38, Florian Rothmaier wrote:
Hi Jérémy,
Am 01.12.2012 12:28, schrieb Jérémy Lal:
I thought public-domain wasn't DFSG (because it's not in some countries).
That's interesting and something new to me. The public domain
is listed on the page
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 10:47:47 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:26:29PM +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit :
P.P.S.: I am not sure what you should write in the Copyright field for
the upstream files, but (c) 1996-2012 by Thomas A. McGlynn does not
look right, as long as
Le Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 12:17:15PM +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit :
Since one of the standard short names for the License field is
public-domain, I thought that specifying
Copyright: public-domain
License: public-domain
[explanation of why the files are in the public domain...]
On 01/12/2012 12:17, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 10:47:47 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:26:29PM +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit :
P.P.S.: I am not sure what you should write in the Copyright field for
the upstream files, but (c) 1996-2012 by Thomas A.
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 20:34:39 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
If you would like, you can open a wishlist bug, and if the specification is
updated in the future (there is no timeline for this and my opinion is that
currently it would be premature), this bug will remind us to consider adding a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Francesco,
fortunately, the upstream author Thomas MyGlynn made a new release for
which he added a statement that the code is in the public domain.
In my debian package which can be found at
http://mentors.debian.net/package/fits
or
Hello,
On 11/30/2012 02:01 PM, Florian Rothmaier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Francesco,
fortunately, the upstream author Thomas MyGlynn made a new release for
which he added a statement that the code is in the public domain.
In my debian package which can be
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:19:01 +0100 Kuno Woudt wrote:
[...]
On 11/30/2012 02:01 PM, Florian Rothmaier wrote:
[...]
fortunately, the upstream author Thomas MyGlynn made a new release for
which he added a statement that the code is in the public domain.
Hi Florian,
this seems to be really
Le Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:26:29PM +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit :
P.P.S.: I am not sure what you should write in the Copyright field for
the upstream files, but (c) 1996-2012 by Thomas A. McGlynn does not
look right, as long as the upstream work is really in the public domain
(which, as you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Francesco!
Am 28.08.2012 19:19, schrieb Francesco Poli:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:37:46 +0200 Florian Rothmaier wrote:
Hi to everyone involved in debian-legal,
Hello!
I've got a licensing issue related to the astronomical Java library
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:37:46 +0200 Florian Rothmaier wrote:
Hi to everyone involved in debian-legal,
Hello!
I've got a licensing issue related to the astronomical Java library
fits (nom.tam.fits) from Thomas McGlynn.
The newest release can be obtained at:
13 matches
Mail list logo