Re: SRP

2004-08-02 Thread Andres Salomon
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:11:26 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: MiguelGea [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello debian-legal, I'm thinking about packaging SRP for debian. Question 1: I'm not sure if there are any problem on packaging it. What do you think about? Please note that SRP is patented

Re: SRP

2004-08-02 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm not sure how to interpret this; I'm not familiar enough w/ SRP-Z. Is this a different algorithm, such that the source would need to be significantly modified (such that SRP-Z is essentially a separate thing, convered by its own license; converting SRP-3

Re: SRP

2004-08-02 Thread Andres Salomon
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 09:23:07 +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm not sure how to interpret this; I'm not familiar enough w/ SRP-Z. Is this a different algorithm, such that the source would need to be significantly modified (such that SRP-Z

Re: SRP

2004-07-26 Thread Russ Allbery
MiguelGea [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello debian-legal, I'm thinking about packaging SRP for debian. Question 1: I'm not sure if there are any problem on packaging it. What do you think about? Please note that SRP is patented; that's part of SRP's licensing that tends to make people

Re: SRP

2004-07-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oh wow, a bastard child of the MIT and 4-clause BSD licenses. Somebody was on the really good crack when they did that. Yeah, don't get me started on Stanford and software licenses. Our more recent stuff, at least in the central IT organization, is

SRP

2004-07-25 Thread MiguelGea
Hello debian-legal, I'm thinking about packaging SRP for debian. Question 1: I'm not sure if there are any problem on packaging it. What do you think about? Question 2: If a program that use it shows the license only with a option for the executable like program_name --version, it breaks

Re: SRP

2004-07-25 Thread Andrew Suffield
that incorporates the SRP authentication technology *is requested to include the following acknowlegment in *advertising materials: *This product uses the 'Secure Remote Password' cryptographic * authentication system developed by Tom Wu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). * * 2. Any

Re: SRP

2004-07-25 Thread Don Armstrong
? Probably not, if you're thinking about clause 3, although if program_name --version is an advertising material (probably is) then it needs to include This product includes software developed by Tom Wu and Eugene Jhong for the SRP Distribution (http://srp.stanford.edu/). Question 3