Re: Unsure about a License with mandatory attribution clause

Andreas Moog writes: > while packaging libml I noticed the following part in a license text: > (https://github.com/volkszaehler/libsml/blob/master/test/unity/license.txt) > > The end-user documentation included with the redistribution, if any, > must include the

Re: Unsure about a License with mandatory attribution clause

On Sat, 17 Jun 2017 at 12:52:06 +0200, Andreas Moog wrote: > The end-user documentation included with the redistribution, if > any, must include the following acknowledgment: "This product > includes software developed for the Unity Project, by Mike Karlesky, > Mark VanderVoord, and Greg

Unsure about a License with mandatory attribution clause

Hi, while packaging libml I noticed the following part in a license text: (https://github.com/volkszaehler/libsml/blob/master/test/unity/license.txt) The end-user documentation included with the redistribution, if any, must include the following acknowledgment: "This product includes

Re: Unsure about a License with mandatory attribution clause

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 11:31:05PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > My conclusion is that this is a DFSG-free license, with an > unconventionally specific requirement of attribution. Thank you and Simon for your expertise! -- PGP-encrypted mails preferred PGP Fingerprint: 74CD D9FE 5BCB FE0D 13EE