Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
(b) For Source Code and executable versions of any Derivative Works that
You create for external use to your organization, the following notice
must be provided at the top level (e.g. main screen of an application)
This application is based on the
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:53:39 +1100 Ben Finney wrote:
Guillaume Yziquel guillaume.yziq...@citycable.ch writes:
I've noticed a software with a custom licence.
Which software work is that?
Seems to roughly adhere to DFSG (section 4 and 6 may not...):
Hello,
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
No, it violates DFSG §3.
If the package violates DFSG, so it should be moved to non-free archive.
Because the package d4x does not have an maintainer (it is orphaned
again) Who can do this? Should it do the QA group? Or can it be an NMU?
I
Hello,
Christofer C. Bell christofer.c.b...@gmail.com wrote:
ie; Not even a Debian Maintainer can modify the software to package it. So
this software looks like a non-starter for inclusion in Debian, even in
non-free.
So what is the right way? Who can / must decide this? If non-free is
not
Le Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:18:57PM +0100, Joachim Wiedorn a écrit :
/*WebDownloader for X-Window
*
*Copyright (C) 1999-2002 Koshelev Maxim
*This Program is free but not GPL!!! You can't modify it
*without agreement with author. You can't distribute modified
*
5 matches
Mail list logo