Re: Joke non-free clauses?

2010-04-08 Thread Shan-Bin Chen (DreamerC)
Hi, recently I try to package deadbeef [1] into Debian and Ubuntu, but it includes the libdumb (0.9.2). It seems that the libdumb has a license issue which blocked the upload. We need to clear the license issue, and make sure that everyone agree. [1] http://deadbeef.sourceforge.net/ an audio

Does this license meet DSFG?

2010-04-08 Thread Dererk
Hello! I was asked to verify that the license below does meet DFSG, before releasing the software itself, so I would like you to take a look at this text and tell me what your opinions are, before getting rejected on the NEW queue :-) Altought IANAL, It appears to me that it meets the

Re: Joke non-free clauses?

2010-04-08 Thread Ben Davis
Hi, You mention DUMB v0.9.2, whereas the latest version is 0.9.3. Is this intentional on the part of the 'deadbeef' package? When DUMB v0.9.2 was the latest version and the problem was first brought to my attention, I put a notice on the website stating that Point 4 of the licence was

Re: Does this license meet DSFG?

2010-04-08 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:05:39PM -0300, Dererk a écrit : I was asked to verify that the license below does meet DFSG, before releasing the software itself, so I would like you to take a look at this text and tell me what your opinions are, before getting rejected on the NEW queue :-)