On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 20:31:57 +0100 Michael Banck wrote:
[...]
After thinking about this some more, I guess their fear might be that
people modify and redistribute their ELPA library as part of a bigger
GPL project.
It's possible...
As the LGPL-GPL relicensing seems to be a one-way street,
On 11/03/2012 08:15 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 03:28:08PM -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
After reading the -legal thread, comments above, the CAcert mailing list
thread, the Fedora explanation, and carefully reading the licensing
myself, the cautious side of me says the
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:56:27PM -0600, Michael Shuler wrote:
Among other suggestions, Francesco Poli recommended including a verbatim
copy of this license.
You should not. If the license has no legal force, you should not propagate
it and give people the impression that it does.
The
hello debian-legal,
as paul wise pointed out in march[1], some programs include flattr
this or paypal donation buttons.
i found that thread looking up what to do with my openscad package,
which since recently includes a flattr this image. as i see it, my
options as a packager are:
1. keep the
Control: tags -1 wontfix
On 11/04/2012 03:23 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
I hereby grant you a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to eat
cheese with salami, subject to the following conditions:
- You do not use the name of debian-legal while talking with food in your
mouth.
-
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:14 AM, chrysn wrote:
as paul wise pointed out in march[1], some programs include flattr
this or paypal donation buttons.
Thanks for your interest in this issue.
4. replace the image with text. probably the most viable way. has the
same implications as 3., but not
6 matches
Mail list logo
