On 11/03/2012 08:15 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 03:28:08PM -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
After reading the -legal thread, comments above, the CAcert mailing list
thread, the Fedora explanation, and carefully reading the licensing
myself, the cautious side of me says the
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:56:27PM -0600, Michael Shuler wrote:
Among other suggestions, Francesco Poli recommended including a verbatim
copy of this license.
You should not. If the license has no legal force, you should not propagate
it and give people the impression that it does.
The
Control: tags -1 wontfix
On 11/04/2012 03:23 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
I hereby grant you a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to eat
cheese with salami, subject to the following conditions:
- You do not use the name of debian-legal while talking with food in your
mouth.
-
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 pending
(Setting to serious, due to policy violation)
After reading the -legal thread, comments above, the CAcert mailing list
thread, the Fedora explanation, and carefully reading the licensing
myself, the cautious side of me says the right thing to
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 03:28:08PM -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 pending
(Setting to serious, due to policy violation)
After reading the -legal thread, comments above, the CAcert mailing list
thread, the Fedora explanation, and carefully reading
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 12:35:09 -0500 Raphael Geissert wrote:
Hi everyone,
Hello Raphael,
mejiko: thanks for pointing it out, I'm forwarding your report to our
debian-legal mailing list to seek their opinion.
Thanks for asking.
Please note that you may receive multiple and possibly
* Raphael Geissert:
TL;RD; RDL looks non-free, Philipp Dunkel from CAcert says Debian is fine (to
distribute) because of the disclaimer re the certificates included in ca-
certificates, Fedora says it is non-free.
What do the others think about it?
If we take CA certificate license
Le Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 12:35:09PM -0500, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
Hi everyone,
mejiko: thanks for pointing it out, I'm forwarding your report to our
debian-legal mailing list to seek their opinion.
On Saturday 15 September 2012 03:15:10 mejiko wrote:
[...]
ca-certificates packeages
Hi everyone,
mejiko: thanks for pointing it out, I'm forwarding your report to our
debian-legal mailing list to seek their opinion.
On Saturday 15 September 2012 03:15:10 mejiko wrote:
[...]
ca-certificates packeages included Cacert Root certificates.
This certificates licensed under Cacert
9 matches
Mail list logo
