On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:19:29 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
Does this concern binary distribution: is a compiled version a “copy”?
Le Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:10:29PM +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
Why not? I personally think that a compiled copy of the software is
indeed a copy.
What other
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 09:45:39 +1000 Ben Finney wrote:
Francesco Poli f...@firenze.linux.it writes:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:19:29 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
Does this concern binary distribution: is a compiled version a
“copy”?
Why not? I personally think that a compiled
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:19:29 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
Does this concern binary distribution: is a compiled version a “copy”?
Why not? I personally think that a compiled copy of the software is
indeed a copy.
What other term would you use to describe the compiled thing?
It is my
Francesco Poli f...@firenze.linux.it writes:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:19:29 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
Does this concern binary distribution: is a compiled version a
“copy”?
Why not? I personally think that a compiled copy of the software is
indeed a copy.
There's little to
Le Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:57:28PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
It appeared in various discussions about either DEP5 or the NEW queue that
licenses vary in their requirement for reproducing the authors copyrights in
binary distributions. In order to start clarifying the situation, I
5 matches
Mail list logo
