On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:59:13PM +0100, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
This Program is the property of the Secretary of State for Defence
(United Kingdom) acting through the Defence Research Agency (DRA). Use,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:07:38 +0900 Osamu Aoki wrote:
[...]
No problem.
I instead see problems with this license:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/09/msg00026.html
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
Chris wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:44:17AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
INAL, so someone feel free to call me wrong. Comments inline.
I'll call me wrong:
09:31 Ganneff svuorela: name the/a organisation, not
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 13:25:21 +0100 Steve McIntyre wrote:
[...]
Please point to the DFSG section that mentions the dissident test.
This has been asked a number of times on debian-legal and has already
been answered:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/09/msg00215.html
Francesco Poli wrote:
Please let's try and avoid running in circles...
*rotfl*
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
We're the technical experts. We were hired so that management could
ignore our recommendations and tell us how to do our jobs. --
Le Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:25:21PM +0100, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
Chris wrote:
I think this clause in the license absolutely fails the dissident test
Please point to the DFSG section that mentions the dissident test.
Hi Steve,
I think that the dissident test and others are indirectly
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:44:17AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:59:13PM +0100, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
Dear List
Please find attached a copy of the copyright in all the source files
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
I'd not be so quick to retract those comments! I agree it fails the
dissident test. One is not able to contribute anonymously. You must
identify the organization you are a part of (and what is an
organization, anyway?). And what
Dear List
Please find attached a copy of the copyright in all the source files of
the algol68toc compiler.
You will note that the licence accords with the DFSG. I am of the
opinion that the compiler
package could go into the main Debian distribution.
Please confirm.
--
Sian Mountbatten
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:59:13PM +0100, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
Dear List
Please find attached a copy of the copyright in all the source files
of the algol68toc compiler.
You will note that the licence accords with the DFSG. I am of the
opinion that the compiler
package could go into the
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:44:17AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:59:13PM +0100, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
Dear List
Please find attached a copy of the copyright in all the source files
of the algol68toc compiler.
You will note that the licence accords with the
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:59:13PM +0100, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
(b) any amended version of this Program be clearly marked to show the
nature of the amendment and of the name of the amending organisation,
^ IMHO this
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:59:13 +0100 Sian Mountbatten wrote:
Dear List
Please find attached a copy of the copyright in all the source files of
the algol68toc compiler.
Dear Sian,
thanks for contacting debian-legal and for trying to check the
DFSG-freeness of the package under consideration.
13 matches
Mail list logo
