Re: RFS: nanostat

2020-09-04 Thread Steffen Möller
On 04.09.20 13:51, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Nilesh, > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:17:29PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: >> Would we want to fix the hard-coding here? > Yes, please. :-) PYTHONPATH=`find debian/python3-nanostat/usr/lib/ -maxdepth 1 -name python3* -type d|head -n 1`/dist-packages/

Re: RFS: nanostat

2020-09-04 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi Andreas, On 04.09.20 13:08, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 12:00:49PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: >>> Can you please make it team maintained? >> Done. > Thanks. > >>> To my experience the way >>> I described how to do a package at >>> >>> >>>

Re: RFS: nanostat

2020-09-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Nilesh, On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:17:29PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Would we want to fix the hard-coding here? Yes, please. :-) Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: RFS: nanostat

2020-09-04 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi, I admit I personally stopped creating manpages inside the build process. > On one hand I've never seen a fully acceptable result from help2man. On > the other hand you spent sometimes a lot of time to get help2man working > (as we see here). > Just wanted to add to this + clarify - in the

Re: RFS: nanostat

2020-09-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Steffen, On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 12:00:49PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > Can you please make it team maintained? > Done. Thanks. > > To my experience the way > > I described how to do a package at > > > > > >

Re: RFS: nanostat

2020-09-04 Thread Steffen Möller
On 04.09.20 11:35, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:11:49PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: >> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/nanostat >> >> Please kindly give it a spin. PyTorch etc is more important, no need to >> stress it as a "no-more-running-Sprint"-thingy, we shall add it

Re: RFS: nanostat

2020-09-04 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:11:49PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/nanostat > > Please kindly give it a spin. PyTorch etc is more important, no need to > stress it as a "no-more-running-Sprint"-thingy, we shall add it once it > is accepted, anyway. Can you please