Re: stringtie_2.1.4+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-11-02 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 04:39:37PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > I missed that very point in my other mail. Please use Debian Med policy. > > It would be also very helpful to mention the commands you used to create > > this to enable others to follow that procedure easily. > > > > Updated

Re: stringtie_2.1.4+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-11-02 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 14:14, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi > > I missed that very point in my other mail. Please use Debian Med policy. > It would be also very helpful to mention the commands you used to create > this to enable others to follow that procedure easily. > Updated here[1] please let

Re: stringtie_2.1.4+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-11-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 01:39:56PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > 2. I think after the ftp master disagreed to have data in debian/ dir, we > will need to do multi-orig tar solution for other upcoming packages with > large testing data as well. Should I document the way to do it

Re: stringtie_2.1.4+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-11-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Nilesh On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 01:42:32PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Cool, two questions. The multi-orig tarball solution coupled with gbp > > embeds data into the source package. > > > > 1. I chose the name "debian-tests-data" for this other source tarball. Is > > this naming scheme OK

Re: stringtie_2.1.4+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-11-02 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020, 13:39 Nilesh Patra, wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Mon, 2 Nov 2020, 13:14 Andreas Tille, wrote: > >> Hi Nilesh, >> >> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:31:16AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: >> > Yes, I just committed the multi-orig tarball solution sometime ago. >> Please >> > take a

Re: stringtie_2.1.4+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-11-02 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Andreas, On Mon, 2 Nov 2020, 13:14 Andreas Tille, wrote: > Hi Nilesh, > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:31:16AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Yes, I just committed the multi-orig tarball solution sometime ago. > Please > > take a look[1]. > > I _really_ need an ACK - if this is done

Re: stringtie_2.1.4+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-11-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Nilesh, On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:31:16AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Yes, I just committed the multi-orig tarball solution sometime ago. Please > take a look[1]. > I _really_ need an ACK - if this is done correctly. It looks correctly to me. > By the looks of it, it is an exact code

Re: stringtie_2.1.4+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-11-01 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 00:19, Steffen Möller wrote: > Hi all, > > So, our FTPmasters have rejected the update (!) of stringtie. > > On 01.11.20 13:00, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > Hi Maintainer, > > > > sorry, going to reject the package this time. > > > > While the bloat here is not as large as

Re: stringtie_2.1.4+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-11-01 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi all, So, our FTPmasters have rejected the update (!) of stringtie. On 01.11.20 13:00, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Hi Maintainer, > > sorry, going to reject the package this time. > > While the bloat here is not as large as some other package had, it > still is bloat in the debian/ dir that does