I can't come to agreement with Alicq upstream about where is a proper
place to put Alicq optional modules (written in Tcl). FHS 2.1 contains
self-contradictory recommendations on that issue: on one hand, .tcl
files are arch-independent and thus belong to /usr/share, OTOH
/usr/share is supposed to
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:21:59PM +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
I can't come to agreement with Alicq upstream about where is a proper
place to put Alicq optional modules (written in Tcl). FHS 2.1 contains
self-contradictory recommendations on that issue: on one hand, .tcl
files are
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 10:21, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
I can't come to agreement with Alicq upstream about where is a proper
place to put Alicq optional modules (written in Tcl). FHS 2.1 contains
self-contradictory recommendations on that issue: on one hand, .tcl
files are arch-independent and
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 11:55:08AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
DB I can't come to agreement with Alicq upstream about where is a
DB proper place to put Alicq optional modules (written in Tcl). FHS
DB 2.1 contains self-contradictory recommendations on that issue: on
DB one hand, .tcl files are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 14 November 2002 07:16, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
Wednesday 13 November 2002 12.18 skrev Paul Cupis:
It should be called noteedit_2.0.16.orig.tar.gz, per the packaging
manual.
Meaning the only modification is to change the name?
Putting script libraries into /usr/lib does not break systems mounted in
such manner, it only increases number of files that should be stored
separately for each architecture.
Yes, I was quite wondering that too, and people tend to disagree
on that point, and some people tend to be walking
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 04:54:40PM +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 02:25:15PM +, Mark Howard wrote:
MH Java programs/libraries (arch independent bytecode) all go in
MH /usr/share/java, as per policy. I guess your situation isn't all
MH that different, so they
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 12:07:45AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
JU Yes, I was quite wondering that too, and people tend to disagree on
JU that point, and some people tend to be walking around filing RC
JU bugs on this regard.
RC bug would definitely be an overkill, I have shown that FHS is
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:06:29AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
SL Tcl is Tcl, so I wouldn't follow its example for, well... anything.
Except that Alicq is written entirely in Tcl, so I have to at least
respect the choice made by other Tcl programs maintainers.
SL I imagine python stores
I have a bug report against php-gtk:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=164619
The error occured when a new version of php was uploaded to unstable.
The error is:
Warning: php-gtk: Unable to initialize module
Module compiled with debug=0, thread-safety=0 module API=20020429
PHP
I'm adopting Qtella and I'm in need of a sponsor. It's a simple package
with a tiny diff, available here:
http://bignachos.com/~nelson/debian/
Thanks,
Brian
--
People said I was dumb, but I proved them!
msg07865/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Wednesday 13 November 2002 22.30 skrev Roger Leigh:
The `clean' rule is run before the build (by dpkg-buildpackage), so I
would do
find . -name '*.moc' | xargs rm -f
to remove the .moc files. If they can easily be regenerated, I would
ask upstream to remove them from the tarball (but I'm
Wednesday 13 November 2002 12.18 skrev Paul Cupis:
It can be modified. It should be unchanged. Being unchanged has beneifts
including but not limited to allowing users to verify the original tgz with
upstream and clearly showing (in the diff.gz) what changes were made during
packaging. If
I can't come to agreement with Alicq upstream about where is a proper
place to put Alicq optional modules (written in Tcl). FHS 2.1 contains
self-contradictory recommendations on that issue: on one hand, .tcl
files are arch-independent and thus belong to /usr/share, OTOH
/usr/share is supposed to
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:21:59PM +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
I can't come to agreement with Alicq upstream about where is a proper
place to put Alicq optional modules (written in Tcl). FHS 2.1 contains
self-contradictory recommendations on that issue: on one hand, .tcl
files are
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 10:21, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
I can't come to agreement with Alicq upstream about where is a proper
place to put Alicq optional modules (written in Tcl). FHS 2.1 contains
self-contradictory recommendations on that issue: on one hand, .tcl
files are arch-independent and
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 11:55:08AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
DB I can't come to agreement with Alicq upstream about where is a
DB proper place to put Alicq optional modules (written in Tcl). FHS
DB 2.1 contains self-contradictory recommendations on that issue: on
DB one hand, .tcl files are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 14 November 2002 07:16, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
Wednesday 13 November 2002 12.18 skrev Paul Cupis:
It should be called noteedit_2.0.16.orig.tar.gz, per the packaging
manual.
Meaning the only modification is to change the name?
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 02:25:15PM +, Mark Howard wrote:
MH Java programs/libraries (arch independent bytecode) all go in
MH /usr/share/java, as per policy. I guess your situation isn't all
MH that different, so they should go in /usr/share, IMHO.
That shows that Debian interpreted
Putting script libraries into /usr/lib does not break systems mounted in
such manner, it only increases number of files that should be stored
separately for each architecture.
Yes, I was quite wondering that too, and people tend to disagree
on that point, and some people tend to be walking
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 04:54:40PM +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 02:25:15PM +, Mark Howard wrote:
MH Java programs/libraries (arch independent bytecode) all go in
MH /usr/share/java, as per policy. I guess your situation isn't all
MH that different, so they
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 12:07:45AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
JU Yes, I was quite wondering that too, and people tend to disagree on
JU that point, and some people tend to be walking around filing RC
JU bugs on this regard.
RC bug would definitely be an overkill, I have shown that FHS is
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:06:29AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
SL Tcl is Tcl, so I wouldn't follow its example for, well... anything.
Except that Alicq is written entirely in Tcl, so I have to at least
respect the choice made by other Tcl programs maintainers.
SL I imagine python stores
I have a bug report against php-gtk:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=164619
The error occured when a new version of php was uploaded to unstable.
The error is:
Warning: php-gtk: Unable to initialize module
Module compiled with debug=0, thread-safety=0 module API=20020429
PHP
24 matches
Mail list logo
