On Sunday 09 November 2003 05:27 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
...
Those hard coded CFLAGS can't be disabled at configure time. On any
architecture with optimizer sensitivities such as is often the case on
less mature ports this can cause trouble.
As help to convince upstream this is bad, refer them to
A levelezm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a kvetkezeket rta:
Two things:
Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
do for me:
[]
Never ever use |xargs rm -f.
Thank you. Is it okay now?
--- orig/debian/rules
+++ mod/debian/rules
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
clean:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
Two things:
Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
do for me:
[]
Never ever use |xargs rm -f.
Thank you. Is it okay
A levelezm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a kvetkezeket rta:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a kvetkez?eket rta:
[quoting]
or [1]
find ... -print0 | xargs -0r rm -f
cu andreas
[1] This is a lot faster,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
Two things:
Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
do for me:
[]
Never ever use |xargs rm -f.
Thank you. Is it okay now?
Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
Two things:
Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
do for me:
[]
Never ever use
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:27:27PM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következõeket írta:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
| | | - find . -name
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:57:17PM +, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
Two things:
Does -name config.{log,status,cache}
A levelezm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a kvetkezeket rta:
My message is: avoid surprises from find.
Got the message, thank you for the warning.
However I doubt that upstream will use names like config.guess
for anything other than files which can and should be regenerated
in build phase, and
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
Anno Domini Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:48:37AM -0800, Joshua Kwan Dixit:
Your reply appears to be all blank.
I'm just wondering why the reply in this ML is not on
the ML itself, but on the author of each
somebody care to mentor me?
--
David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43
http://www.davidkarlsen.com
http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 05:40, Jack O'Quin wrote:
Zenaan Harkness [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I thought jackstart was essentially equivalent to a generic wrapper
- both require RTcap-patched kernel. Which would mean the only
difference between 2 and 3 here is the use of jackstart vs. generic
This message has been processed by the Brightmail(tm) Anti-Virus Solution using
Symantec's Norton AntiVirus Technology.
ACF60C[1].bat was infected with the malicious virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] and has been
deleted because the file cannot be cleaned.
For more information on anti-virus tips and
Hello!
I packaged kbirthday, a KDE kicker applet that reminds
of birthdays (which it reads from the KDE adressbook).
I've got one message from lintian and one from linda
- but two different ones.
linda tells me:
W: kbirthday; Contains shared libraries, but is not in
Section: libs or base.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:00:45AM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
I packaged kbirthday, a KDE kicker applet that reminds
of birthdays (which it reads from the KDE adressbook).
I've got one message from lintian and one from linda
- but two different ones.
linda tells me:
W: kbirthday;
John Lightsey wrote:
If anyone with a non-x86 machine would like to take a look again and give
feedback on wheter or not it compiles properly, I'd really appreciate it.
The build logs that I recieved were very helpfull.
I grabbed that and gave it another run. There are still -O9
references
On Sunday 09 November 2003 05:27 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
...
Those hard coded CFLAGS can't be disabled at configure time. On any
architecture with optimizer sensitivities such as is often the case on
less mature ports this can cause trouble.
As help to convince upstream this is bad, refer them to
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következőeket írta:
Two things:
Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
do for me:
[]
Never ever use |xargs rm -f.
Thank you. Is it okay now?
--- orig/debian/rules
+++ mod/debian/rules
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
clean:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
Two things:
Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
do for me:
[]
Never ever use |xargs rm -f.
Thank you. Is it okay
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következőeket írta:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
[quoting]
or [1]
find ... -print0 | xargs -0r rm -f
cu andreas
[1] This is a lot
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
Two things:
Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
do for me:
[]
Never ever use |xargs rm -f.
Thank you. Is it okay now?
Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
Two things:
Does -name config.{log,status,cache} actually work for you? It doesn't
do for me:
[]
Never ever use
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:27:27PM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következõeket írta:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
A levelez?m azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következ?eket írta:
| | | - find . -name
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:57:17PM +, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:50:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
A levelezõm azt hiszi, hogy Andreas Metzler a következõeket írta:
Two things:
Does -name config.{log,status,cache}
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Geert Stappers a következőeket írta:
My message is: avoid surprises from find.
Got the message, thank you for the warning.
However I doubt that upstream will use names like config.guess
for anything other than files which can and should be regenerated
in build phase,
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
Anno Domini Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:48:37AM -0800, Joshua Kwan Dixit:
Your reply appears to be all blank.
I'm just wondering why the reply in this ML is not on
the ML itself, but on the author of each
somebody care to mentor me?
--
David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43
http://www.davidkarlsen.com
http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 05:40, Jack O'Quin wrote:
Zenaan Harkness [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I thought jackstart was essentially equivalent to a generic wrapper
- both require RTcap-patched kernel. Which would mean the only
difference between 2 and 3 here is the use of jackstart vs. generic
This message has been processed by the Brightmail(tm) Anti-Virus Solution using
Symantec's Norton AntiVirus Technology.
ACF60C[1].bat was infected with the malicious virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] and has
been deleted because the file cannot be cleaned.
For more information on anti-virus tips and
Hello!
I packaged kbirthday, a KDE kicker applet that reminds
of birthdays (which it reads from the KDE adressbook).
I've got one message from lintian and one from linda
- but two different ones.
linda tells me:
W: kbirthday; Contains shared libraries, but is not in
Section: libs or base.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:00:45AM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
I packaged kbirthday, a KDE kicker applet that reminds
of birthdays (which it reads from the KDE adressbook).
I've got one message from lintian and one from linda
- but two different ones.
linda tells me:
W: kbirthday;
John Lightsey wrote:
If anyone with a non-x86 machine would like to take a look again and give
feedback on wheter or not it compiles properly, I'd really appreciate it.
The build logs that I recieved were very helpfull.
I grabbed that and gave it another run. There are still -O9
references
32 matches
Mail list logo
