Hello,
Here is the website you wanted to visit
We carry only the highest quality Replica Watches
here are a few of your selections
Datejust Silver/GoldBand-GoldFace
MensPearlmaster Silver/GoldBandPearlWhiteFace
Submariner Silver-GoldBandBlueFace
http://nml.besttimewatches.net
gregor herrmann wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:15:06PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
But what and how should I separate the created files?
Should I put them into the same directory? orig, diff, dsc,.. in a flat
way? I guess yes
Yup.
Maybe you'd like to take a look at
John Skaller wrote:
(a) it does not provide binary packages
(b) apt tools can't build from source
The latter is exceptionally annoying (which I consider
a very polite form of what I'd like to actually say ;)
Is there a tool which does that?
I use Synaptic GUI tool, it would be nice if
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Are there any problem in uploading packages built inside that chroot?
It should be fine. In fact that is a recommended practice. It
prevents flavor from the developer's machine leaking into the build.
The 'pbuilder' package is very nice for managing these types of
Hi,
Fathi Boudra wrote:
the project restarted, current version is log4cpp-0.3.5rc2 (dated
2005-06-01)
Only the homepage of the project wasn't updated.
So what should i do ? prepare an updated package or drop it ?
the primary reason for me to package log4cxx instead of ITA log4cpp
was that
also sprach Fathi Boudra [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.07.08.0734 +0200]:
the project restarted, current version is log4cpp-0.3.5rc2 (dated 2005-06-01)
Only the homepage of the project wasn't updated.
So what should i do ? prepare an updated package or drop it ?
We should compare log4cpp and log4cxx
On 05/07/08 15:50 +1000, John Skaller said ...
What I am asking for is:
apt-get install fred
and it installs fred. If 'fred' is not available for my architecture,
it is compiled and installed automatically and transparently. This
occurs recursively for all dependencies, at least up to
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 02:07:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:00:33PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:45:05AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i forgot to say that you can find my package here :
http://fboudra.free.fr/debian/
You
7 липня 2005 о 19:52 -0300 Claudio Matsuoka написав(-ла):
* Package name: softgun
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Jochen Karrer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://softgun.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : ARM system emulator
Softgun
Your message was received by trouble on Jul 8 2005 03:38
** Please Note ** IF you need to update your report with new data, the
Report ID: TQS200506081 - *must* be in the email subject line.
Thanks for your cooperation!
tqs_filer
Hi,
I'm trying to understand the PTS source package page of the udev package
(http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/udev.html). The top-most line in the
Latest News section is
* [2005-07-03] Accepted 0.060-1 in unstable (low) (Marco d'Itri)
i.e. it indicates that the latest version 0.060-1 was
Hi,
Claudio Matsuoka wrote:
* Package name: softgun
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Jochen Karrer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://softgun.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : ARM system emulator
As I'm working with embedded stuff on
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 13:50 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
On 05/07/08 15:50 +1000, John Skaller said ...
What I am asking for is:
apt-get install fred
and it installs fred. If 'fred' is not available for my architecture,
it is compiled and installed automatically and
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 12:11:50PM +0200, Martin Dickopp wrote:
I suspect I'm missing some obvious aspect of how the propagation into
testing works. Could somebody tell me what document I should read, or
otherwise point me in the right direction?
The PTS only displays what britney outputs. But
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 12:11:50PM +0200, Martin Dickopp wrote:
I suspect I'm missing some obvious aspect of how the propagation into
testing works. Could somebody tell me what document I should read, or
otherwise point me in the right direction?
Hi,
I packaged apt-history:
* Package name: apt-history
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Vittorio Palmisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://redclay.altervista.org/archivio/python/apt-history/
* License : GPL
Description : logs the changes when installing
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:
There are several things that linda(1) complains about, some of them:
E: softgun; Object /usr/lib/softgun/dm9000.so is not directly linked
against libc.
The binary object shown above is not directly linked against the
required library
Hi
Thanks for all answers to my request about automake.
Another question :
I try to understand the 'dpkg-buildpackage' . So i used it without
working with the ./debian skeleton created by dh_make. (It was just a
test and i was the surprised the program worked properly.
Among all lintian
On 08.07.2005, at 04:40, John Skaller wrote:
(b) apt tools can't build from source
Is there a tool which does that?
Hm. ``apt-build'' should be able to do it, if it works... I
personally had some problems with it.
It fetches the source from the normal apt repositories and builds
them
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Simon Richter wrote:
As I'm working with embedded stuff on NetSilicon hardware ATM I'd be
interested in sponsoring this package.
Hi,
Eugeniy reviewed the package and found some issues, I'd be thankful if
you could test the emulator and see if there are any additional
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 23:01:56 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) said:
Jarle Aase wrote:
I'm about to make some .deb packages. Some will hopefully be accepted
as official packages, while others will be built for my own
convenience (to ease installation and upgrades on Debian servers I
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:48:30PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
I packaged apt-history:
* Package name: apt-history
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Vittorio Palmisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://redclay.altervista.org/archivio/python/apt-history/
* License
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 03:43:03PM +0200, PY LUYTEN wrote:
Another question :
I try to understand the 'dpkg-buildpackage' . So i used it without
working with the ./debian skeleton created by dh_make. (It was just a
test and i was the surprised the program worked properly.
Among all
Hi,
* Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-08 19:05]:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:48:30PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
I packaged apt-history:
* Package name: apt-history
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Vittorio Palmisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
Em Qua, 2005-07-06 às 20:54 -0300, Marco Tulio Gontijo e Silva escreveu:
Hello,
I'm trying to build c2hs package, and I have made the debian/* files for
it, but when I try to build I get the following problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian$ rm *
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian$ cp
Rock bottom prices on top selling titles!
http://rpias.6vs3956hlyov376.gustavuscb.info
Choice is an illusion, created between those with power, and those without.
Successful education is always a two-way street.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Low cost medical coverage for families and individuals
http://racking.bestmedz4ever.info/?journalizesxtvuyfamiliarizationzgvaggrieves
Don't cry because it's over. Smile because it happened.
Education begins a gentleman, conversation completes him.
Indeed, history is nothing more than
Hallo Guillem,
* Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-09 01:52]:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:03:32PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
* Package name: apt-history
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Vittorio Palmisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
Hi! where I find tutorials for made gcc *.deb's?
Thank you very much!
--
There are many plans in the Human heart, But
is the Lord's Purpose that prevails
[]'s of seventy rounds Dani:-)
So many people simply have no time or do they want to be in a relationship.
This is how we can help. Check out all of our database of members to find just
the type of lay that you want. Listings all over North America. You can screw
someone today.
http://iokbgs.jelloshootzz.com/gaac/
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 02:17:01AM -0300, Dani wrote:
hi! my system is a Debian Testing. I use a Athlon Xp1.7 (x86) and
I already installed the tools give in maint-guide. I tried hard _but_
*all*
tutorials that I encounter use this estructure:
# apt-get source gcc-X.Y
# cd gcc-X.Y
#
hi! my system is a Debian Testing. I use a Athlon Xp1.7 (x86) and
I already installed the tools give in maint-guide. I tried hard _but_ *all*
tutorials that I encounter use this estructure:
# apt-get source gcc-X.Y
# cd gcc-X.Y
# dpkg-buildpackage ( or debuild )
...
But this is _not_ what I
32 matches
Mail list logo
