On Monday 22 September 2008 15:20:20 Cameron Dale wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Thomas Goirand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've been using apt-proxy for about a year, and then found it quite
buggy. So we moved to using apt-cacher. Now we have loads of problems
with apt-cacher as
Hello Mentors and DPMT,
I'd like to know if somebody is interested on reviewing
(and eventually uploading) my package python-osd [0].
This revision would fix the bug #497768 [1] also it would remove
an unnecessary dependency on python-simplejson [*], and I've
already made a commit to the DPMT SVN
On Mon, September 22, 2008 08:11, Kel Modderman wrote:
On Monday 22 September 2008 15:20:20 Cameron Dale wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Thomas Goirand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We've been using apt-proxy for about a year, and then found it quite
buggy. So we moved to using
On Monday 22 September 2008 17:14:02 Mauro Lizaur wrote:
Hello Mentors and DPMT,
I'd like to know if somebody is interested on reviewing
(and eventually uploading) my package python-osd [0].
This revision would fix the bug #497768 [1] also it would remove
an unnecessary dependency on
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 01:14:42PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
mismatch error). I was wondering if approx is any better than the other
two. Did any of you try?
I made similar observations with the use of apt-cacher and apt-proxy and
therefore switched to approx. This is working like a
Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] (21/09/2008):
as you may know, I'm going to be more available nowadays. :)
As discussed, please people hold on, and don't upload it, since the
package name is going to change.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Kel Modderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (22/09/2008):
BTW, Since the bug in the previous revision practically renders
pyosd unusable, in order to have the chance to update this package
on Lenny would be OK to change the severity from 'normal' to
'important' and/or the urgency to 'high'? Any
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 01:14:42PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
We've been using apt-proxy for about a year, and then found it quite
buggy. So we moved to using apt-cacher. Now we have loads of problems
with apt-cacher as well (like currently, a recurring tzdata size
mismatch error). I was
Hi Thomas,
I just use squid and it works like charm.
regards,
Holger
pgp2SZFG4JDaU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 11:46 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
Hi,
Charliej wrote:
That depends on what your definition of what mature is? If you mean
mature as in will the software do what it's suppose to do then yes.
If you mean mature as in time then probable not.
mature means for
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
If you don't find a sponsor, you're welcome to get back to me tomorrow
or so.
Mraw,
KiBi.
Hi KiBi,
i've just updated the package, you may find it here [0], also I updated
the severity to 'serious' and I'm sending a commit to the DPMT too.
BTW,
Hi Charlie,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:57:09AM -0500, Charliej wrote:
I have been thinking about this quite a bit, and you are absolutely
correct. Upstreams documentation is sourly lacking. I asked myself the
question If I was the end user would I use something so poorly
documented and of
Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I just use squid and it works like charm.
regards,
Holger
I has a quite long discussion with my employee about it, and I really
don't think that Squid is appropriate. First, I would have to deal with
many ACL to make it limited to the Debian
Hello,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Thomas Goirand wrote:
P.S: I also had hard time doing a backport of the Lenny version of
apt-cacher that depends on so many packages to be backported.
You can use schroot or chroot to run the lenny version of
software under etch (for example
Hello,
there seems to be no interest in my package, but I will continue providing
updates to this list. Below is my proposal of debian/copyright.
Yours sincerely,
Ferdinand
Format-Specification:
On Sunday 21 September 2008, you wrote:
On Sunday 21 September 2008 16:36:21 Michael Renner wrote:
Moin,
Guten Tag,
Moin,
I managed to build a font package that installs and uninstalls without
problems. Therefor I checked how the xfont-base package works. But while
there is a FontPath
Am Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:06:59 +0200
schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- - - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/ocropus
- - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
unstable main contrib non-free
- -
Mauro Lizaur [EMAIL PROTECTED] (22/09/2008):
BTW, if you sponsor this package, the only thing left is to contact
RMs explaining the situation, right?
Mostly, yes.
[0] http://lusers.com.ar/packages/python-osd_0.2.14-4.dsc
Hmm, many remarks:
- debian/rules modifications aren't documented at
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 17:20 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
Hi Charlie,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:57:09AM -0500, Charliej wrote:
I have been thinking about this quite a bit, and you are absolutely
correct. Upstreams documentation is sourly lacking. I asked myself the
question If I was
19 matches
Mail list logo
