Re: RFS: latexdiff (take 2)

On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 18:03, Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Pietro, On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 17:52, Pietro Abate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello dear mentors. I've packaged latexdiff (ITP:#469460), a small utilty to generate friendly latex file that contains the annotated diff

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 02:07:24PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: A few comments: Your package version does not include a Debian revision number. My bad, fixed. I would use a phrase other than 'project management' in the descriptions, perhaps 'release management'? debian/copyright: You might

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Uploaded to http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2+20081201-1.dsc if you have a chance to look. I just noticed that releaseforge already exists in Debian. From the description it sounds like

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 08:16:49PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: I just noticed that releaseforge already exists in Debian. From the description it sounds like it does the same thing as copher. Is it still nessecary to add copher to Debian? Copher is command line base rather than a GUI, is platform

Re: RFS: giplet

Dear mentors, On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:52:52AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package giplet. * Package name: giplet Version : 0.1.7-1 Upstream Author : Erik Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL :

Re: RFS: latexdiff (take 2)

also sprach Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.12.02.1002 +0100]: - please note that short descr is meant to be something like package name is a short description so you might want to rephrase a bit. do not repeat the package name in the short description though. - why are you using both

RFS quickplay [2nd try]

Sorry, forgot to put RFS in the subject line resending to m.d.n list Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package quickplay. * Package name: quickplay Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Kevin Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://quickplay.isfound.at/ *

Re: RFS: crip (fixing RC/important bugs, adopting)

Hi, On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 08:45:11AM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: Hi Dne Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:20:33 -0800 Ryan Niebur [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a): The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/crip - Source repository: deb-src

Re: RFS: crip (fixing RC/important bugs, adopting)

Hi Dne Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:12:22 -0800 Ryan Niebur [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a): Hi, On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 08:45:11AM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: Hi Dne Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:20:33 -0800 Ryan Niebur [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a): The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: -

Re: RFS: crip (fixing RC/important bugs, adopting)

Hi, On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:14:19AM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: [...] And is there any particular reason why you did not apply patch for important bug #457749? It looks to me as another one which should be fixed if you target the package for Lenny inclusion. yes, taken care of, re

Re: RFS: crip (fixing RC/important bugs, adopting)

Dne Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:11:07 -0800 Ryan Niebur [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a): Hi, On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:14:19AM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: [...] And is there any particular reason why you did not apply patch for important bug #457749? It looks to me as another one which should be

RFS: upprint

Hello everyone, I seek sponsoring for the package upprint. The description from http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/11/msg00664.html is as follows: Description: tools for better n-up printing The upprint package contains tools for better formatting of print jobs. Unlike print systems

Question about bug hunting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi mentors, Is there any means to know if someone work on a bug from RC bug ? rc-alert or popbugs show all RC bugs of our packages but if someone is already on, it isn't necessary to work to solve the bug. Are all works in progress referenced

Re: Question about bug hunting

Hello Laurent, On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 21:11, Laurent Guignard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any means to know if someone work on a bug from RC bug ? rc-alert or popbugs show all RC bugs of our packages but if someone is already on, it isn't necessary to work to solve the bug. Are all

Re: Question about bug hunting

On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:11:36PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote: Is there any means to know if someone work on a bug from RC bug ? rc-alert or popbugs show all RC bugs of our packages but if someone is already on, it isn't necessary to work to solve the bug. Are all works in progress

RFS: hexec (second try)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package hexec. Package name: hexec Version : 0.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Alexander Block [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/hexec/ License : GPL Section : devel It builds these binary

Re: Question about bug hunting

Sandro Tosi wrote: Hello Laurent, On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 21:11, Laurent Guignard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any means to know if someone work on a bug from RC bug ? rc-alert or popbugs show all RC bugs of our packages but if someone is already on, it isn't necessary to work to solve

Re: RFS: ocropus (3nd try)

Hi Sandro, Apologies for the delay in making the changes. Thanks for looking at the package. 2008/11/10 Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: - please remove XS-DM-Upload-Allowed field (that should be called Done. - Document in short description should be uncapitalized: think at it like package

Re: Question about bug hunting

Hi! Laurent Guignard schrieb: Is there any means to know if someone work on a bug from RC bug ? rc-alert or popbugs show all RC bugs of our packages but if someone is already on, it isn't necessary to work to solve the bug. Are all works in progress referenced somewhere ? The unoffical

Re: Question about bug hunting

Eugene V. Lyubimkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I also think it would be a good addition to display such info in the BTS bug page, as BTS is now missing something like 'assigned' tag/info. The Debian BTS has a `owner' field[1]: The owner of a bug claims responsibility for fixing it. This

RFS: nightfall - application for producing a best-fit model for a binary star

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package nightfall. Nightfall is an astronomy application for fun, education, and science. It can produce animated views of eclipsing binary stars, calculate synthetic lightcurves and radial velocity curves, and eventually determine the best-fit

Re: RFS: ocropus (3nd try)

Hello Jeffrey, On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 22:20, Jeffrey Ratcliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apologies for the delay in making the changes. Ah, no problem: take your time 2008/11/10 Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: - please explain what OCR is in the long description, so that even un-experienced

RFS: tspc (updated package, adopting)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.1.1-7 of my package tspc. It builds these binary packages: tspc - Client to configure an IPv6 tunnel to Hexago's migration broker The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 292905, 293072,