Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor for the new version of seccure. This new
version makes use of gcrypt's secure memory, so we can drop the patch
that disables memory locking.
You can find the updated packages at
http://people.ubuntu.com/~jamesw/packages/seccure-0.4/seccure_0.4-1.dsc
Thanks,
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 21:31 +0200, George Danchev wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2008 17:27:16 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Change: added patch 05_segfault_params.dpatch and included it in
00list.
Closes: LP #301041
Helping Ubuntu folks is also very nice, and to be honest I was not aware of
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 15:06 +1000, Christopher Halse Rogers wrote:
The bzr equivalent of svn-buildpackage (the strangely named
bzr-builddeb) has a command bd-do which supports exactly this
use-case. For a merge-with-upstream package it exports the package,
then runs the command you specify in
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 16:58 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
python-debian states that can parse debian/changelog: maybe you can
explore how it works, and if it parses names too.
No, it doesn't, it just uses the two space rule and lumps all the
changes up as just a group of lines without trying to
On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 18:23 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
All'incirca Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:23:54 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sembrerebbe aver scritto:
You just need to make the package accomplish the Debian policy, that's
all
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and use eg
binary:. Since your install script seems to be installing just perl
and shell scripts, this shouldn't be a problem.
Policy dictates that you must keep an empty target.
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrules
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG
On (19/04/07 23:01), Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-17 18:09]:
libapache-mod-php4 depends on apache-common, which in turn depends on
apache, so that works ok.
I do not see that:
$ apt-cache show apache-common | grep ^Depends:
Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.6
. Whatever is
writing this out is probably a shell or perl script that isn't escaping
it. I don't have internet access to check your script now though.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu
,
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a config-setup helper. I expect this would faciliate
upgrades, but I'm still a bit undecided.
Could you tell me what config-setup is please?
Apologies if I looked too little and got my assesment wrong.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http
, permission to include the code is not permission to modify it
nor
sell it in another software.
There's an RMD160 implementation in libgcrypt under the LGPL, could that
be used instead?
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure
be considered carefully, but .ds standing for Debian
source is a common choice for suffix.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On (09/03/07 23:50), James Westby wrote:
On (09/03/07 23:54), Benjamin Mesing wrote:
How do I invoke dpkg-source to create the .orig.tar.gz file?
I would say that you don't need dpkg-source to, tar + gzip should work
just fine.
Most (all?) builder scripts are happy with just finding
never packaged a package like this, so you might hit a
snag with this method, if so I suggest you look at other examples.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
reduce dependencies by splitting it out. This would also
help in any transitions that you have to do.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi,
I am resending this request as I have had no response yet.
I saw recently that the package may be rejected if the changed-by date
is too old in the upload. If the date seems like that might apply I
would of course be happy to update it.
Thanks,
James
On (07/01/07 17:57), James Westby
that it has been repetition
that has sparked off this thread, but I also think there are other
things going on here that I haven't highlighted, and don't have the
quick fixes that I have mentioned.
Thanks for reading,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http
.
If poco has parts GPL and parts 4-BSD then you have the problem without
even getting OpenSSL involved.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. This package spent quite a long
time packaged but not uploaded, but has been available publically. If a
potential sponsor would prefer a different arrangement please let me
know.
Kind regards
James Westby
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3
also not sure if it can do multiple packages at once.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
in the
description, and not about the tool itself?
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On (29/11/06 22:05), José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
El mié, 29-11-2006 a las 20:18 +, James Westby escribió:
This should really be an answer to the ITP, but I am posting here for
expediancy reasons.
I guess you're refering to the ITP I've just filled for
gtk-recordmydesktop
that mpb doesn't have
the same dependencies, but it might be worth an email to the maintainer
confirming that they meant to do this. (Note that I wont be doing this
myself).
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N
On (25/11/06 06:30), Andreas K. Foerster wrote:
Am Freitag, dem 24. Nov 2006 schrieb James Westby:
No, don't delete them, they are there for a reason, please read
/usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz
where it is explained.
Now I'm really confused.
The text just talks about
maintainer.
Does this mean that you are not the maintainer of bmpx? You are not
listed as the maintainer on the PTS.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
as required, but they do not appear in
the diff.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no output
2) It produces output on stderr (I believe this wont be caught.
3) The value is overriden by the environment.
I hope this helps, but if not someone with more make skills might be
able to help.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net
On (24/11/06 22:27), Joachim Reichel wrote:
Hi,
James Westby wrote:
There is a cleaner method of handling them though that some packages
use, where the files are updated as required, but they do not appear in
the diff.
can you explain the procedure in a few words, or give a package
explaina chroot to you, as I will assume you know what one is,
but if you don't I suggest you go and look it up, that knowledge is
crucial to understand some things about pbuilder?
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX
-- Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:08:29 +0100
^ Here is an extra space, meaning that this version was changed by
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
while the maintainer is
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hope this helps,
James
--
James
that you manage to get this sorted.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On (26/09/06 12:09), Sylvain Beucler wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0-1
of my package page-crunch.
Uploaded.
(Nothing to do with me, but I wanted to keep the list up to date).
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http
On (01/10/06 11:09), Philipp Benner wrote:
The new package has been uploaded:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cunit/
Hi,
Looks good to me, I believe it is ready for sponsoring.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key
otserv_0.5.0.orig.tar.gz has size 1005244
instead of expected 935205
Can you please correct this?
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On (26/09/06 22:08), Henrique Haas wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:20:15 +0100, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/trueprint/trueprint_5.3-4.dsc
Hi,
The package looks good to me now, I think it is ready for sponsoring.
James
--
James Westby
On (01/10/06 13:18), Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
On Sunday 30 October 2006 19:43, James Westby wrote:
I have found just one more problem, lintian says
I: uzbek.wordlist source: build-depends-without-arch-dep
dictionaries-common-dev
N:
N: The control file lists the given package
sure you want this?
* Please add a watch file.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
more like python-central from the control file.
* You should register the documentation with doc-base.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On (01/10/06 18:28), Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
James Westby wrote:
Hi, I cannot sponsor, but I have a few comments.
* You shouldn't use ${Source-Version} in debian/control any more
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/09/msg00228.html
The policy suggests to use ${Source
On (01/10/06 18:34), Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
James Westby wrote:
Have you contacted formorer to see if he will sponsor this version as
well?
Roberto C. Sanchez was sponsoring the first version of this package as part of
his NM proccess. Alexander Wirt only did the upload, so I didn't want
On (01/10/06 18:56), Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
James Westby wrote:
See
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383040
for an example bug that is the fault of using this field.
The bug is about using ${Source-Version} between Architecture: all and
Architecture: any packages
of DData but could
only find two emails [1,2] in which is stated that you have a specific
BSD-style licence for DData:
Hi Arjan,
Has there been any progress on this issue?
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n
On (21/09/06 15:55), Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 14:01, James Westby wrote:
Not the tarball that I downloaded. It only contained a .tar.gz. I see it
is fixed in this version though. Thanks for that.
Anybody to sponsor it? Please. :-)
Hi,
I have found just one
On (28/09/06 02:20), Arjan Oosting wrote:
Hi,
I hereby renew my request for sponsorship.
I have update the package after some remarks of James Westby and
Stephane Bortzmeyer and hope that someone is willing to upload it,
* Package name: frown
The package looks great to me, and I
.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On (19/09/06 19:30), Philipp Benner wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:46:35 +0100
James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can I suggest to metion that you have uploaded a new version if you do
when you reply to comments, and mention the URL as well, it makes it
clearer what is going on.
I
On (27/09/06 23:50), holoturoide wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:57:58 +0100, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On (25/09/06 19:01), holoturoide wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.6-3
of my package gtksee.
Hi,
Your watch file could use cleaning
for my package inotail.
* Package name: inotail
Hi,
The only changes I would make would be to add a watch file and to change
License to License and Copyright in debian/copyright.
However these are not show stoppers, so I believe the package is ready
to be sponsored.
James
--
James
/main/d/drapes/drapes_0.4.97-3.dsc
You have lots of lintain warnings of the form
I: drapes source: build-depends-without-arch-dep
If you fix these I think the package will be ready for sponsoring.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net
On (29/09/06 22:13), Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez wrote:
Hi James,
On 9/26/06, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Please drop the use of ${Source-Version}, see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/09/msg00228.html
I read all the thread including [1] and [2]. I think
a different license to debian/rules from that you
state the packaging is under in debian/copyright.
The package looks good apart from these though.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM
as
you say it is not needed.
* Remove the blank line from debian/docs.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/vbuf.1.gz:66
that you might like to fix.
The binary packages look good though.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
with the License. You may obtain a copy of
* the License at http://www.mozilla.org/NPL/
Asking the upstream author about the license of the program, he said
that it's legacy code and the program is licensed under GPL only.
He holds the copyright on this code?
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key
/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html
* I doubt you need to have
include /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make
if you have
include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/dpatch.mk
* Please add a watch file.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net
On (26/09/06 07:15), James Stone wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:31:07 +0100, James Westby wrote:
- add a copyright/license statement about your packaging.
Can you give an example of what you mean?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html
* Does your
On (26/09/06 10:20), Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Hi!
On 9/26/06, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Asking the upstream author about the license of the program, he said
that it's legacy code and the program is licensed under GPL only.
He holds the copyright on this code?
The full
/doc/libmtp/INSTALL.gz
W: libmtp: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libmtp1
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On (26/09/06 09:35), Luca bedogni wrote:
Il giorno Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:07:59 +0100
James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
On (23/09/06 13:36), Luca bedogni wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package webcam-server.
* You have created a very strange package with all
: blacs1-pvm; The library libblacs is not in a shlibs file.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On (25/09/06 01:48), Francesco Namuri wrote:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:15:22PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
If copyright has been asserted on the file then it must be mentioned in
debian/rules, along with its distribution license. If there isn't one
you should find out what it is and add
that it can't write to.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ship an empty /tmp/ in the deb, please drop this.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
good job, even if
he has managed to break linda, the poor girl.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On (25/09/06 23:25), Kim Kuylen wrote:
James Westby wrote:
On (23/09/06 19:41), Kim Kuylen wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package personalbackup.
* The files you add to the upstream code can be shipped under debian/
I believe, making it clearer
, science, games...?).
If you tell us what you want to do we can suggest ways that you can get
involved.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
/pool/main/t/tunapie
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tunapie/tunapie_1.0-5.dsc
m.d.n still has version -4. So you wish to upload an updated version?
James
--
James Westby
|
python-dev | python-all-dev
I: tunapie: possible-non-posix-code-in-maintainer-script postrm:3 '[
$1 = purge -a '
W: tunapie: no-debconf-config
W: tunapie: postinst-uses-db-input
Please fix these and I will review the package again.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13
for autotools packages where it is possible the
Makefile is not there, and that should be ignored.
* You have missed the copyright info for inotify.h in
debian/copyright. There is also no license information for this
file, can you get it and add it?
James
--
James Westby --GPG
On (24/09/06 18:43), Tobias Klauser wrote:
Hi,
On 2006-09-24 at 17:19:13 +0200, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* You have missed the copyright info for inotify.h in
debian/copyright. There is also no license information for this
file, can you get it and add
. There are some common
--CUT--
Depends what you mean by normal. It seemd to be something in the build
of your package, and as such probably wont have been seen in any other
packages. You should find out what it means and if it is a problem.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13
on khelpcenter for the docs to be
viewable.
James
P.S. I see you use bzr for versioning your packaging, do you know about
bzr-builddeb for automating the task of building packages from a bzr
branch? See http://jameswestby.net/bzr/bzr-builddeb/ if you are
interested. /shameless_plug
--
James
?
Anyway I tried to document this here
http://jameswestby.net/mentors/commonpackingmistakes/nativepackage.html
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On (21/09/06 20:26), James Westby wrote:
On (21/09/06 18:12), Timo Jyrinki wrote:
* Package name: suomi-malaga
Hi,
* Have you filed an ITP? If so you should close it in the changelog.
* Why does the source package go in section misc if it's only binary
package goes
-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not done
i486-linux-gnu-g++: defs: linker input file unused because linking
not done
here, maybe you want to fix that.
* There is a lintian warning
W: tmispell-voikko: binary-without-manpage ispell
but I'm not sure how this should be handled.
James
--
James Westby
, the consequence
of which is that the package is built without -g.
* The binary package name differs from the source package name again.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1
lintian warnings. There should be spaces after
commas, and around pipes (|).
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
delete unused dh_* calls from debian/rules.
* You should move tetex-extra and debiandoc-sgml to
Build-Depends-Indep as you are building arch: all and are not using
them in the clean target. (Thanks to lintian).
Unfortunately I cannot sponsor the package for you.
James
--
James Westby
On (21/09/06 12:00), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
On (20/09/06 15:00), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
Could someone please sponsor a New Maintainer upload of swish++?
Note: Must bump version to 6.1.4-1 before upload.
Why
files in the archive, while the
official archive does not.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
On (21/09/06 10:41), George Danchev wrote:
On Thursday 21 September 2006 10:27, James Westby wrote:
So that I can keep the ordering before the final upload.
For example the version after I incorporate the changes you suggest
will be 6.1.4-0pre4.
Isn't `pre' meant to be replaced
On (21/09/06 14:29), martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.21.1419 +0200]:
The convention is, I believe, that an upload to mentors.debian.net
does not count as a release, as anyone who downloads a package
from there should realise it is a work in flux
On (21/09/06 12:47), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote detailed comments
on my packaging of swish++.
Consequently, I have newer versions at:
http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/debian/swish++/swish++_6.1.4-0pre4.dsc
Hi,
Your debian/copyright
but the COPYRIGHT file doesn't contain BSD3. Is it worth seeking
clarification?
The packages look good overall. I hope you find a sponsor.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM
On (20/09/06 14:08), James Westby wrote:
I'll have another look on my next checking run, if they haven't been
sponsored by then.
They look good to me, though upstream could do with sorting out the
copyright and licenses.
I have tested the package and a short example seems to work well
considered moving to a debhelper debian/rules?
* Does the package really need to doo auto* in the debian/rules?
* Consider adding a debian/watch file.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM
On (21/09/06 18:57), James Westby wrote:
[I'm splitting this up to make it clearer what is going on]
On (21/09/06 18:12), Timo Jyrinki wrote:
Lovely mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages suomi-malaga, libvoikko,
tmispell-voikko and oo2-voikko. They also require
file doesn't work. It is pretty clear why, please
fix it or remove it (preferably the former).
The binary packages look ok, but I haven't tested them, I wouldn't know
where to start.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7
On (20/09/06 15:00), Frank S. Thomas wrote:
Hi James and thanks for reviewing!
No problem.
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 22:07, James Westby wrote:
* These lines from your install file are odd
debian/tmp/usr/bin usr
debian/tmp/usr/share/euler usr/share
I
with them try and fix it.
The binary package looks OK, but I haven't tested it.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
this software is being packaged
by someone else. Do you know about wnpp?
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
error and asked upstream to correct this.
* Oddly, the file RSSKit/GNUmakefile seems to be under LGPL. I have
indicated that in debian/copyright and asked upstream to clarify
this.
Are these two points the same?
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13
On (19/09/06 12:27), Neil Williams wrote:
Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 03:44, James Westby wrote:
Hi, I can't sponsor as I am not a DD, but I have some comments,
* I don't think the package should be Debian native.
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean
On (19/09/06 22:56), Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 01:01:15PM +0100, James Westby a écrit :
See http://jameswestby.net/mentors/glossary/native.html
Hi James,
Quoting your site:
A Debian native package is a package that is specific to Debian, and
would
if
packages/programs want to link statically to the libs then ship it.
The packaging looks ok otherwise. I haven't installed the packages and
tested them though.
Does anybody else have an opinion on .a and .la files in packages?
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http
On (19/09/06 19:30), Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 19/09/06, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A Debian native package is a program written specifically to Debian,
A package is not a program. s/to/for/ =
A Debian native package is a package of a program written
specifically for Debian
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
