Re: HELP: [Bug#122501: latex2html: should depend on gs for pstoimg]

2001-12-17 Thread Richard Braakman
exactly describes a Recommends relationship. It's not the package's fault that apt-get doesn't support Recommends. Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: HELP: [Bug#122501: latex2html: should depend on gs for pstoimg]

2001-12-17 Thread Richard Braakman
describes a Recommends relationship. It's not the package's fault that apt-get doesn't support Recommends. Richard Braakman

Re: html2man ?

2001-10-24 Thread Richard Braakman
a similar problem. I wrote a little python script for it (debian/html2man.py) which converts those html pages to manpages. You might be able to use it for ideas. -- Richard Braakman Will write free software for money. See http://www.xs4all.nl/~dark/resume.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: html2man ?

2001-10-24 Thread Richard Braakman
a similar problem. I wrote a little python script for it (debian/html2man.py) which converts those html pages to manpages. You might be able to use it for ideas. -- Richard Braakman Will write free software for money. See http://www.xs4all.nl/~dark/resume.html

Re: lintian - man pages

2001-10-20 Thread Richard Braakman
. The installation instructions are _not_ the reason for including the file. So it should not be named INSTALL. -- Richard Braakman Will write free software for money. See http://www.xs4all.nl/~dark/resume.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe

Re: lintian - man pages

2001-10-20 Thread Richard Braakman
. The installation instructions are _not_ the reason for including the file. So it should not be named INSTALL. -- Richard Braakman Will write free software for money. See http://www.xs4all.nl/~dark/resume.html

Re: to conffile or not to conffile

2001-10-18 Thread Richard Braakman
. The Essential ones are bash, perl, and probably awk. (awk is not itself Essential but base-files depends on it.) -- Richard Braakman Will write free software for money. See http://www.xs4all.nl/~dark/resume.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Re: to conffile or not to conffile

2001-10-18 Thread Richard Braakman
. The Essential ones are bash, perl, and probably awk. (awk is not itself Essential but base-files depends on it.) -- Richard Braakman Will write free software for money. See http://www.xs4all.nl/~dark/resume.html

Re: upstream library without a SONAME

2001-07-31 Thread Richard Braakman
compatibility. -- Richard Braakman Will write free software for money. See http://www.xs4all.nl/~dark/resume.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: upstream library without a SONAME

2001-07-31 Thread Richard Braakman
compatibility. -- Richard Braakman Will write free software for money. See http://www.xs4all.nl/~dark/resume.html

Re: Change of package name or command name.

2001-06-28 Thread Richard Braakman
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:08:33AM +0900, Yooseong Yang wrote: Yes. poEdit is a horrible name. Command names should be all lowercase. What item in Debian Policy? you mean policy 2.3.1 or something? It's not in Debian Policy, it's a Unix tradition going back 30 years. Richard Braakman

Re: Change of package name or command name.

2001-06-28 Thread Richard Braakman
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:08:33AM +0900, Yooseong Yang wrote: Yes. poEdit is a horrible name. Command names should be all lowercase. What item in Debian Policy? you mean policy 2.3.1 or something? It's not in Debian Policy, it's a Unix tradition going back 30 years. Richard Braakman

Re: Change of package name or command name.

2001-06-27 Thread Richard Braakman
to them. Did you contact the maintainer of the other package? It might be easier to change the name there, because its poedit is not the primary tool of the package. -- Richard Braakman Will write free software for money. See http://www.xs4all.nl/~dark/resume.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Change of package name or command name.

2001-06-27 Thread Richard Braakman
to them. Did you contact the maintainer of the other package? It might be easier to change the name there, because its poedit is not the primary tool of the package. -- Richard Braakman Will write free software for money. See http://www.xs4all.nl/~dark/resume.html

Re: Bug#101325: lintian: empty (transition) packages shouldn't n

2001-06-21 Thread Richard Braakman
should be blocked out, but this does not seem intrinsically difficult. It's slightly more difficult than that, because you do want to keep the warnings about the control file and other metadata. -- Richard Braakman Looking for a job writing free software. See http://www.xs4all.nl/~dark/resume.html

Re: Bug#101325: lintian: empty (transition) packages shouldn't n

2001-06-21 Thread Richard Braakman
should be blocked out, but this does not seem intrinsically difficult. It's slightly more difficult than that, because you do want to keep the warnings about the control file and other metadata. -- Richard Braakman Looking for a job writing free software. See http://www.xs4all.nl/~dark/resume.html

Re: one package, many libraries. dependency break!

2001-06-15 Thread Richard Braakman
setting that makes it find the libaries in the build tree. This way you get a warning that it couldn't find what package provides them, but you don't get a bogus dependency. I haven't found a cleaner solution. -- Richard Braakman Looking for a job writing free software. See http://www.xs4all.nl

Re: one package, many libraries. dependency break!

2001-06-15 Thread Richard Braakman
setting that makes it find the libaries in the build tree. This way you get a warning that it couldn't find what package provides them, but you don't get a bogus dependency. I haven't found a cleaner solution. -- Richard Braakman Looking for a job writing free software. See http://www.xs4all.nl

Re: Packaging of Misterhouse

2001-05-16 Thread Richard Braakman
it in the standard search path. So a directory under /usr/lib might be a good place for it. Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Packaging of Misterhouse

2001-05-16 Thread Richard Braakman
it in the standard search path. So a directory under /usr/lib might be a good place for it. Richard Braakman

Re: question about debian constitution (vote counting)

2001-03-23 Thread Richard Braakman
this section in November and December, you can find it in the archives for debian-vote. I can't really comment on the specific problem you found, maybe you can use it to restart the discussion :) Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Re: Forwarded Bug Reports

2001-03-11 Thread Richard Braakman
ugs that are waiting for upstream to fix? If you've informed the upstream about the bug, it's forwarded and you can/should mark it as such. IMHO. I always just close such bugs. They're fixed. If the next upstream version doesn't contain my patch, it'll still be in the Debian diffs, and I can nag

Re: Forwarded Bug Reports

2001-03-11 Thread Richard Braakman
for upstream to fix? If you've informed the upstream about the bug, it's forwarded and you can/should mark it as such. IMHO. I always just close such bugs. They're fixed. If the next upstream version doesn't contain my patch, it'll still be in the Debian diffs, and I can nag them again. Richard

Re: after dupload...

2001-03-02 Thread Richard Braakman
is probably to ask the submitter. Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: after dupload...

2001-03-02 Thread Richard Braakman
is probably to ask the submitter. Richard Braakman

Re: debian revision numbers for gnome-utils

2001-02-24 Thread Richard Braakman
ur changes file. Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: debian revision numbers for gnome-utils

2001-02-24 Thread Richard Braakman
. Richard Braakman

Re: Porting of non-free packages

2001-02-21 Thread Richard Braakman
supplying the source requires an NDA), or a build dependency on non-free components that the admins will not install. Then there are non-free non-US packages, which cannot be build on machines in the US. Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

Re: Porting of non-free packages

2001-02-21 Thread Richard Braakman
the source requires an NDA), or a build dependency on non-free components that the admins will not install. Then there are non-free non-US packages, which cannot be build on machines in the US. Richard Braakman

Re: Porting of non-free packages

2001-02-21 Thread Richard Braakman
with that when it happens, not before. Richard Braakman

Re: Porting of non-free packages

2001-02-20 Thread Richard Braakman
he package can be built at all. (I don't know what testing does with later builds of a package on new architectures -- are they moved into testing immediately, or held for ten days? Is it possible to get such builds into the archive even if there's already a newer version in unstable?) Richard

Re: Porting of non-free packages

2001-02-20 Thread Richard Braakman
don't know what testing does with later builds of a package on new architectures -- are they moved into testing immediately, or held for ten days? Is it possible to get such builds into the archive even if there's already a newer version in unstable?) Richard Braakman

Re: Build-Depends

2001-02-16 Thread Richard Braakman
. If your package depends on all of those directly (i.e. it invokes their commands or includes their headers), then you should list them all. But if for example it only needs B because it needs A, and A needs B, then you should let A take care of its own dependencies. Richard Braakman

Re: Build-Depends

2001-02-16 Thread Richard Braakman
package depends on all of those directly (i.e. it invokes their commands or includes their headers), then you should list them all. But if for example it only needs B because it needs A, and A needs B, then you should let A take care of its own dependencies. Richard Braakman

Re: autoconf macros and C++

2001-02-15 Thread Richard Braakman
ly to have an autoconf macro specifically for testing for C++ functions. Note that using C++ kind of defeats the whole purpose of using autoconf :-) Autoconf is not even very happy about using ANSI C, because it's not available everywhere. Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: autoconf macros and C++

2001-02-15 Thread Richard Braakman
an autoconf macro specifically for testing for C++ functions. Note that using C++ kind of defeats the whole purpose of using autoconf :-) Autoconf is not even very happy about using ANSI C, because it's not available everywhere. Richard Braakman

Re: dependency mess: i'd like boolean operators

2001-02-09 Thread Richard Braakman
applications of the distribution rule for and |. The end result looks complicated but has the same meaning as the original, and it can be expressed in dpkg's Depends syntax. Richard Braakman

Re: dependency mess: i'd like boolean operators

2001-02-08 Thread Richard Braakman
e upgrade problems in woody are ok since it is "testing". Then I don't think it's worth the complication. Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: dependency mess: i'd like boolean operators

2001-02-08 Thread Richard Braakman
problems in woody are ok since it is testing. Then I don't think it's worth the complication. Richard Braakman

Re: lintian: binary-has-unneeded-section

2001-02-06 Thread Richard Braakman
satisfied your curiosity by running lintian -I on the archive :) IIRC, the archive scanner was originally set up this way. Richard Braakman

Re: lintian: binary-has-unneeded-section

2001-02-03 Thread Richard Braakman
to use install -s. With some packages I use strip --remove-section=.note --remove-section=.comment and with some packages, where I use the upstream makefile to install, I just leave them in. It's about 1% of the binary size, IIRC. Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: lintian: binary-has-unneeded-section

2001-02-03 Thread Richard Braakman
to use install -s. With some packages I use strip --remove-section=.note --remove-section=.comment and with some packages, where I use the upstream makefile to install, I just leave them in. It's about 1% of the binary size, IIRC. Richard Braakman

Re: New key = New package?

2000-08-18 Thread Richard Braakman
. Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New key = New package?

2000-08-18 Thread Richard Braakman
. Richard Braakman

Re: Describing complex Depends - How?

2000-06-05 Thread Richard Braakman
to do this. If libfoo 0.1.26 is not compatible with 0.1.25, then it should have a new major number. Otherwise, upgrading libfoo is going to get really icky. The svgalib experiment showed this. Richard Braakman

Re: symlink in /etc/init.d directory

1999-08-25 Thread Richard Braakman
with the permissions check was fixed). Do I simply ignore the errors? We can add another override for powstatd, or teach Lintian about the specialness of ups-monitor. In fact, it could then also check that the package Provides and Conflicts with ups-monitor. Richard Braakman

Re: Depenency Bugs in Debian Packages (long)

1999-08-10 Thread Richard Braakman
not be.) Should I just upload one with Architecture: All and see what fails? Any, not all. Please re-read section 4.2.3 of the Packaging Manual. Richard Braakman

Re: another: copyright question

1999-07-03 Thread Richard Braakman
can pakcage this xacursor. and if I can, whether it should be main or non-free. Thanks. No, without a license statement we cannot legally distribute it. I see that the author has provided a number of ways to contact him. Perhaps you can ask the author for a license statement. Richard Braakman

Re: replacing conflicting packages

1999-06-27 Thread Richard Braakman
of the A* packets but I get many bugreports now that claims this behaviour as bugs :-( Just add a lot of conflicts :-) Richard Braakman

Re: Old bugs, which cannot be reproduced

1999-06-09 Thread Richard Braakman
, that is a reasonable course. But remember that mail sent to the bug number does *not* reach the submitter. Are you sure that you have contacted them? ([EMAIL PROTECTED] is a handy, though undocumented, way to reach a bug's submitter.) Richard Braakman

Re: Shared libraries and symlinks

1999-05-10 Thread Richard Braakman
the postinst, *AND* install the symlink it wants to make. Otherwise, you leave dangling symlinks when the package is removed. Richard Braakman

Re: conflicts with itself?

1999-03-24 Thread Richard Braakman
Having a package Conflict with itself is only useful if its name doubles as a virtual package name. Since no package Provides xpm4g-dev, the Conflict has no effect. Just remove it. Richard Braakman

Re: couple quick questions

1999-03-15 Thread Richard Braakman
Randolph Chung wrote: what's the easiest way to write a manpage if i don't want to learn troff? :) Grab a manpage from a similar utility and fill in your own stuff :-) Learning troff is not hard, though. man(7) tells you all you need to know. Richard Braakman

Unidentified subject!

1999-03-14 Thread Richard Braakman

Re: dpkg-source: cannot represent change

1999-03-02 Thread Richard Braakman
in the clean target, and recreate it in the build target. Of course, this is going to be an icky solution either way, because it means your package can't autobuild. Richard Braakman

Re: Depends: on (lynx|wget|(libwww-perllibhtml-parser-perl))?

1999-02-16 Thread Richard Braakman
, lynx | wget | libhtml-parser-perl Richard Braakman

Re: New copyright for Postilion's graphics

1999-02-05 Thread Richard Braakman
the program, which the license doesn't allow :) It may be possible to have a Postilion with graphics in non-free, and one without graphics in main. Richard Braakman

Re: Seperate package for man pages

1998-12-22 Thread Richard Braakman
package from another source instead. Richard Braakman

Re: upstream upgrade and user's files

1998-12-17 Thread Richard Braakman
? ps used to have this problem... and it was solved by fixing the package. I don't think there's any other way. At the least, the program should detect when a config file is an old version, and offer to delete it. Richard Braakman

Re: Packaging beyond one's means

1998-12-15 Thread Richard Braakman
of swap. Like 128 MB. I found that building the static-Motif version took a lot more memory than any other step, so if you're building dynamic only (lesstif), you might need a less room than I did. Or did Mozilla leave Motif behind entirely? Richard Braakman

Re: Fw: New section in potato?

1998-12-14 Thread Richard Braakman
from yours. Richard Braakman

Re: xwatch installed in correct section?

1998-12-13 Thread Richard Braakman
-policy.) In this case, it was probably a mistake. I don't consciously remember changing it. utils fits as well as anything, though perhaps admin would be better. I changed it back to utils yesterday. Richard Braakman

Re: Progress report of upload queue

1998-12-02 Thread Richard Braakman
for the rejection. Richard Braakman

Re: A few new-maintainer questions.

1998-12-01 Thread Richard Braakman
Joseph Carter wrote: Lintian checks against current standards version (or as current as it knows about) You can probably up the standards version to whatever lintian was built with. = No, there are large areas of policy that lintian does not check. It's a linter, not a validator! Richard

Re: Questions on libc5 for new architecture (arm)

1998-11-28 Thread Richard Braakman
building the libc5 packages on architectures that don't want them. Richard Braakman

Re: A lintian warning question

1998-11-24 Thread Richard Braakman
0.9.4. Richard Braakman

Re: Checking if directory is empty in postrm

1998-11-17 Thread Richard Braakman
will fail if it's not empty :) (You can use its return code if you need to check if it succeeded) Richard Braakman

Re: How to update packages in frozen?

1998-11-17 Thread Richard Braakman
with distribution frozen unstable. Richard Braakman

Re: Checking if directory is empty in postrm

1998-11-17 Thread Richard Braakman
Chris Waters wrote: if [ $(echo * .*) = * . .. ] ; then echo empty dir; fi Brilliant. :-) It has only one flaw. *cough* % mkdir emptydir; cd emptydir % touch * % if [ $(echo * .*) = * . .. ] ; then echo empty dir; fi empty dir *evil grin* Richard

Re: Taking over a package...

1998-10-29 Thread Richard Braakman
replied to. I say go for it :) Richard Braakman

Re: keyword=value in debian/changelog

1998-10-28 Thread Richard Braakman
. See bug#17575 for more information. Richard Braakman

Re: man page

1998-10-24 Thread Richard Braakman
man 7 man is a good start. And pick a manpage for a program similar to yours, to see how it's structured :) (There's no one true style for manpages, but it's better to use an existing one than to invent your own.) Richard Braakman

Re: Reminder: echoping_2.2.0-2_i386.changes was rejected

1998-09-28 Thread Richard Braakman
the keyring in /debian2/debian/doc/debian-keyring.tar.gz This is done just before the daily install run, so if your key is in that tarfile it should be ok. Richard Braakman

Re: Why only one non-free section?

1998-09-12 Thread Richard Braakman
the distributions is. Richard Braakman

Re: conflicting values

1998-09-07 Thread Richard Braakman
. Richard Braakman

Re: Questions about packaging a python script

1998-09-04 Thread Richard Braakman
That's quite a lot of detail :) Perhaps this should all be written down somewhere and become the Python Subpolicy? We already have such subpolicies for emacs and menu files and probably some that I forgot. It could be distributed in the python package and referenced from debian-policy. Richard

Re: TCPQuota: postinst, postrm and Depends

1998-08-11 Thread Richard Braakman
-perl | libdbd-msql-perl, libdbd-mysql-perl | msql, mysql | libdbd-msql-perl, mysql | msql It's not pretty, I'll admit :) Richard Braakman

Re: lintian

1998-08-08 Thread Richard Braakman
in any case. Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: What is override package?

1998-07-22 Thread Richard Braakman
. There is no way to change the override files by myself, isn't it? Indeed not, you'll have to wait. Fortunately the main archive now has three maintainers, so it shouldn't take long. Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: tempfile - IO::Handle::new_tmpfile?

1998-07-12 Thread Richard Braakman
in other situations with other arguments, and dependencies are guaranteed for those. (See section 6.2 of the Packaging manual) Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: uploading packages

1998-06-08 Thread Richard Braakman
fields including the description architecture, md5 sums and such. You are writing the changes file by hand? You should use dpkg-buildpackage to compile Debian packages, and it creates the changes file for you. Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: Licences ok?

1998-04-10 Thread Richard Braakman
as I'm concerned it makes the entire license meaningless; there's nothing you can do with the code that they cannot revoke whenever they feel like it. It looks free, right? Not to me. Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: lintian errors...

1998-03-15 Thread Richard Braakman
? Please submit a bug report for lintian. Do you get this behaviour with other packages as well, or just tcpquota? Richard Braakman -- E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bug fixing and uploading.

1998-03-09 Thread Richard Braakman
to be fast with even small bugfixes. Richard Braakman

Re: Different version numbers for different binary packages

1998-02-23 Thread Richard Braakman
, otherwise you will have to remember to update it manually each time there is a new upstream release. Richard Braakman

Re: using ...@debian.org as maintainer address

1998-02-09 Thread Richard Braakman
closing feature that's in the works will probably view such uploads as non-maintainer uploads. It would be a good idea to either change your maintainer address to match one of the userids on your PGP key, or add the address as a new userid. Richard Braakman

Re: Processed: More non-free packages

1998-02-08 Thread Richard Braakman
Ulf Fredriksson wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Braakman) writes: Ulf Fredriksson wrote: tcpquota (1.6.10-1) unstable contrib; urgency=low You need to upload it to unstable, with section contrib/admin. Isn't that what 'unstable contrib' should take care of? Nope, contrib

Re: Processed: More non-free packages

1998-02-07 Thread Richard Braakman
have not yet been installed, so... ? Now what? You need to upload it to unstable, with section contrib/admin. Then it will sit in Incoming until Guy edits the override files, because packages can't move from one distribution to another without manual intervention. Richard Braakman