On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 05:05:25PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Holger Kubiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit:
But I have another problem: When I build the package with debuild there
is no problem, when I build with pdebuild, all scripts (one bash, one
perl) in /usr/bin are not
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 05:05:25PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Holger Kubiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit:
But I have another problem: When I build the package with debuild there
is no problem, when I build with pdebuild, all scripts (one bash, one
perl) in /usr/bin are not
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 23:09:00 +0100
Paul Cupis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you try running pdebuild (with no arguments) in the source
directory, please, rather than pbuilder build .dsc. This problem may
be caused by a error in your .dsc file.
The problem *was* caused by an error: Because I
Holger Kubiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit:
But I have another problem: When I build the package with debuild there is
no problem, when I build with pdebuild, all scripts (one bash, one perl)
in /usr/bin are not executable.
diff does not maintain executable bits.
So, any file that is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 22 September 2002 07:37, Holger Kubiak wrote:
But I have another problem: When I build the package with debuild there is
no problem, when I build with pdebuild, all scripts (one bash, one perl)
in /usr/bin are not executable.
Files in
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 23:09:00 +0100
Paul Cupis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you try running pdebuild (with no arguments) in the source
directory, please, rather than pbuilder build .dsc. This problem may
be caused by a error in your .dsc file.
The problem *was* caused by an error: Because I
Holger Kubiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit:
But I have another problem: When I build the package with debuild there is
no problem, when I build with pdebuild, all scripts (one bash, one perl)
in /usr/bin are not executable.
diff does not maintain executable bits.
So, any file that is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 22 September 2002 07:37, Holger Kubiak wrote:
But I have another problem: When I build the package with debuild there is
no problem, when I build with pdebuild, all scripts (one bash, one perl)
in /usr/bin are not executable.
Files in
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:42:23 +0100
Paul Cupis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Install the pbuilder package, read the documentation, create a Woody
chroot, build your packages in the chroot.
Thanks, it works (almost) fine. But I have a little problem. When I start
pbuilder build ...dsc (the file was
As already said use pbuilder.
Next if you like I have written a script that, given a .dsc in the local
file system, rebuild it using a pbuilder environment, test for the
successfull compilation, copy the generated debs in an apt-gettable
repository and rebuild the dists/* stuff of that
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Is really usefull to rebuild a bounce of packages from unstable to
stable in a single shot.
I'd be interested in that script too!
regards, Stefan
--
http://www.shockfrosted.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 September 2002 07:37, Holger Kubiak wrote:
Thanks, it works (almost) fine. But I have a little problem. When I start
pbuilder build ...dsc (the file was created with debuild) I get from
dh_shlibdeps the message:
dpkg-shlibdeps:
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
SPAM: * 4.5 -- RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
SPAM: [RBL check: found 214.224.20.195.bl.spamcop.net.]
That score should probably be reduced to, oh, 1 or so, given what I've
heard about spamcop's propensity for flagging things like legit list serv
Hallo! Du (Joey Hess) hast geschrieben:
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
SPAM: * 4.5 -- RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
SPAM: [RBL check: found 214.224.20.195.bl.spamcop.net.]
That score should probably be reduced to, oh, 1 or so, given what I've
heard about spamcop's propensity
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:12:54 +0100
Paul Cupis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try putting xibs-dev in your build-dep. Using pbuilder is a good may to
ensure that you have the correct build-deps, as well. :)
Yesterday it did not work, today it works. Perhaps a mistake in writing...
Oh, I might also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 September 2002 22:52, Holger Kubiak wrote:
When I run pbuilder build dsc (as root) I get:
--
/usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-buildpackage: line 1: kill: (19113) - No
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:42:23 +0100
Paul Cupis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Install the pbuilder package, read the documentation, create a Woody
chroot, build your packages in the chroot.
Thanks, it works (almost) fine. But I have a little problem. When I start
pbuilder build ...dsc (the file was
As already said use pbuilder.
Next if you like I have written a script that, given a .dsc in the local
file system, rebuild it using a pbuilder environment, test for the
successfull compilation, copy the generated debs in an apt-gettable
repository and rebuild the dists/* stuff of that
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Is really usefull to rebuild a bounce of packages from unstable to
stable in a single shot.
I'd be interested in that script too!
regards, Stefan
--
http://www.shockfrosted.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 September 2002 07:37, Holger Kubiak wrote:
Thanks, it works (almost) fine. But I have a little problem. When I start
pbuilder build ...dsc (the file was created with debuild) I get from
dh_shlibdeps the message:
dpkg-shlibdeps:
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
SPAM: * 4.5 -- RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
SPAM: [RBL check: found 214.224.20.195.bl.spamcop.net.]
That score should probably be reduced to, oh, 1 or so, given what I've
heard about spamcop's propensity for flagging things like legit list serv
Hallo! Du (Joey Hess) hast geschrieben:
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
SPAM: * 4.5 -- RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
SPAM: [RBL check: found 214.224.20.195.bl.spamcop.net.]
That score should probably be reduced to, oh, 1 or so, given what I've
heard about spamcop's propensity
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:12:54 +0100
Paul Cupis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try putting xibs-dev in your build-dep. Using pbuilder is a good may to
ensure that you have the correct build-deps, as well. :)
Yesterday it did not work, today it works. Perhaps a mistake in writing...
Oh, I might also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 September 2002 22:52, Holger Kubiak wrote:
When I run pbuilder build dsc (as root) I get:
--
/usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-buildpackage: line 1: kill: (19113) - No such
Hello,
I want to build a package on my computer for several other hosts at work.
I use unstable but on some other hosts there is stable. My problem is:
Building packages with debhelper causes a dependency (expanded from
shlibs:Depends) of the package libc6 at least at the version used on my
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Holger Kubiak wrote:
I want to build a package on my computer for several other hosts at work.
I use unstable but on some other hosts there is stable. My problem is:
Building packages with debhelper causes a dependency (expanded from
shlibs:Depends) of the package libc6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 20 September 2002 22:21, Holger Kubiak wrote:
Hello,
I want to build a package on my computer for several other hosts at work.
I use unstable but on some other hosts there is stable. My problem is:
Building packages with debhelper
Hello,
I want to build a package on my computer for several other hosts at work.
I use unstable but on some other hosts there is stable. My problem is:
Building packages with debhelper causes a dependency (expanded from
shlibs:Depends) of the package libc6 at least at the version used on my
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Holger Kubiak wrote:
I want to build a package on my computer for several other hosts at work.
I use unstable but on some other hosts there is stable. My problem is:
Building packages with debhelper causes a dependency (expanded from
shlibs:Depends) of the package libc6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 20 September 2002 22:21, Holger Kubiak wrote:
Hello,
I want to build a package on my computer for several other hosts at work.
I use unstable but on some other hosts there is stable. My problem is:
Building packages with debhelper
Hi Holger!
You wrote:
Please be aware that your mail was tagged as spam by spamassassin:
SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results
SPAM: 5.10 hits, 4.6 required;
SPAM: * 0.6 -- BODY: Spam phrases score is 00 to 01 (low)
SPAM: * 4.5 -- RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
SPAM:
31 matches
Mail list logo
