Bug#1059236: marked as done (RFS: nanomsg/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- nanomsg utilities)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:15:57 +0100 with message-id <5ff52249-d68d-42f5-8383-8ad5762e5...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1057954: RFS: nanomsg/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- nanomsg utilities has caused the Debian Bug report #1057954, regarding RFS: nanomsg/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- nanomsg

Bug#1063991: RFS: pyroute2/0.7.7-2.1 [NMU] -- Python3 Netlink library - full package

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyroute2": * Package name : pyroute2 Version : 0.7.7-2.1 Upstream contact : Peter V. Saveliev * URL : https://github.com/svinota/pyroute2 * License

Bug#1063991: RFS: pyroute2/0.7.7-2.1 [NMU] -- Python3 Netlink library - full package

oh, I'm sorry, I forgot to Cc the pyroute2 uploaders in the initial RFS mail. On Thu 15 Feb 2024 11:56:09 GMT, Nicolas Schier wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyroute2": > > * Package name :

Bug#1057954: marked as done (RFS: nanomsg/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- nanomsg utilities)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:15:57 +0100 with message-id <5ff52249-d68d-42f5-8383-8ad5762e5...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1057954: RFS: nanomsg/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- nanomsg utilities has caused the Debian Bug report #1057954, regarding RFS: nanomsg/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- nanomsg

Bug#974209: RFS: human-theme-gtk/2.2.0-1 [ITP] -- Human theme for GTK

Hi Tobias! I'm so sorry, I didn't see your answer. My bad! This is a scandal! Yes: - I removed the logic for libpango - I changed the mv to cp in rules (yes I can also rename the file directly... it's just shortened like that) For the file in /etc/profile.d: export

Bug#974217: RFS: python-radexreader/1.2.4-1 [ITP] -- Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

v1.2.4-1 was uploaded to mentors I think that all previous comment was fixed

Bug#1064012: RFS: oaknut/2.0.2-1 [ITP] -- C++20 assembler for AArch64 (ARMv8.0 to ARMv8.2)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: davidjamescastor...@proton.me Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "oaknut": * Package name : oaknut Version : 2.0.2-1 Upstream contact : merryhime * URL :

Bug#1064027: RFS: mercurial-evolve/11.1.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: andrew.shad...@collabora.co.uk, jcris...@debian.org Dear uploaders, I have pushed a new version 11.1.1-1 of the mercurial-evolve package to https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/mercurial-evolve Note that the previous version,

Question on why package was rebuilt

Hello, I recently had a package sponsors and entered into unstable called tiv. It can be seen here: https://packages.debian.org/sid/tiv Everything went OK, but I see that the amd64 arch package appears to have been re-built for some reason. It's version is showing up with a +b1. I am curious if

Re: Question on why package was rebuilt

On Thu, 2024-02-15 at 16:20 -0800, Loren M. Lang wrote: > Hello, > > I recently had a package sponsors and entered into unstable called tiv. > It can be seen here: > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/tiv > > Everything went OK, but I see that the amd64 arch package appears to > have been