Hi debian mentors,
skype4py was removed on unstable because unmaintained and not so much used.
Anyway I think now that is actively maintained again would be nice to get it
into debian again,
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/skype4py.html
I made it available on mentors, I can package it and take
Il Domenica 23 Febbraio 2014 10:39, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org ha scritto:
Hi Gianfranco,
Hi Bart and debian mentors, first sorry for the late reply.
I have two questions for you.
1. The patch makes the program use one additional position of the memory
pointed to by buf. Are you sure
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I would like to request a sponsor for this package [1] already packaged on
mentors.
The patches from two DDs fixes two RC bugs.
cheers,
Gianfranco
[1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/kaya
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Vincent, Julian, Jordi and debian-mentors,
unfortunately this morning on irc Julian Taylor pointed out that this release
breaks tcl/tk 8.6 underlinking
Seems that the upload of -15.1 was not completely correct
5.8.0-15.1
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Look for TCL and TK in the multi-arch
Ops, ubuntu folks were slightly faster than me
here the debdiff
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/179006161/vtk_5.8.0-17.3_5.8.0-17.3ubuntu1.diff.gz
cheers,
Gianfranco
Il Lunedì 30 Giugno 2014 17:13, Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it ha scritto:
Hi Vincent, Julian
Hi tobias, I'm ccing debian-legal for the license issue
(Please note, I just can review, but I can't sponsor you.)
thanks for the review, it was highly appreciated
d/control:
- XSBC-Original-Maintainer is ubuntu specific, please remove.
already removed a while ago
- The versioned
Hi again, according to
https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus/issues/69#issuecomment-48609594
there is no more license issues.
For this reason I put a unicode.LICENSE file into debian directory, and
documented this on the copyright file.
thanks for reading,
Gianfranco
--
To
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package binwalk
* Package name : binwalk
Version : 2.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Craig Heffner heffne...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/devttys0/binwalk
*
Hi Pabs,
Il Giovedì 14 Agosto 2014 5:39, Paul Wise p...@debian.org ha scritto:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package binwalk
binwalk is already in Debian and is maintained by someone else. Please
talk to them about
Il Giovedì 14 Agosto 2014 9:20, Paul Wise p...@debian.org ha scritto:
On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 08:08 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
The maintainer didn't answer for more than one month (cc'd again),
however, he publicly stated that he is looking for a comaintainer,
saying feel
Hi Vincent,
Il Martedì 19 Agosto 2014 11:09, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org ha scritto:
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors
in fixing automatically created files... do you
have any advice for this?
Still many thanks for the review, I'm attaching the patch I just added on
mentors for your convenience
From 11ae61f20272b2dd27d4fcf2b04a047243a851a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra
Hi again Andrey,
Il Lunedì 25 Agosto 2014 6:47, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@debian.org ha
scritto:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:26:47AM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
At least some of the d can be made r, such as mtd-utils.
I don't fully agree (I don't honestly know the tradeoff
Hi Łukasz, Gianfranco,
hi Tobi!
I've just got 30 minutes for a short review...
really appreciated :)
- d/patches: the patches need a dep3-header and needs to
ack, changed
- d/changelog should be just Initial Release.
ok
- d/control VCS-Browser does not work (404)
- d/control VCS-bzr
Hi al
Il Mercoledì 27 Agosto 2014 9:24, Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org ha
scritto:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Tobias Frost t...@debian.org wrote:
Malat, this is great, but could you also drop a note to the BTS if you
are doing that to avoid double work, especially if
++ (3.0.6-2) unstable; urgency=medium
-
- * Update copyright file.
- * move doxygen to Build-Depends-Indep.
-
- -- Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it Tue, 26 Aug 2014
11:36:24 +0200
-
lucene++ (3.0.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial release (Closes: #750148).
diff -Nru
++ (3.0.6-2) unstable; urgency=medium
-
- * Update copyright file.
- * move doxygen to Build-Depends-Indep.
-
- -- Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it Tue, 26 Aug 2014
11:36:24 +0200
-
lucene++ (3.0.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial release (Closes: #750148).
diff -Nru
Hi Tobias
Il Domenica 31 Agosto 2014 14:15, Tobias Frost t...@debian.org ha scritto:
On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 08:23 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi Tobias, sorry for top posting, I'm on vac and mobile :-)
The reason for the VCS not created is that I'm not yet in the ubuntu
unity
++-3.0.6/debian/changelog2014-08-26 12:49:11.0 +0200
+++ lucene++-3.0.6/debian/changelog2014-09-01 12:28:56.0 +0200
@@ -1,10 +1,3 @@
-lucene++ (3.0.6-2) unstable; urgency=medium
-
- * Update copyright file.
- * move doxygen to Build-Depends-Indep.
-
- -- Gianfranco Costamagna
Il Mercoledì 3 Settembre 2014 8:24, Tobias Frost t...@debian.org ha scritto:
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 11:01 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Il Lunedì 1 Settembre 2014 15:42, Tobias Frost t...@frost.de ha scritto:
Hi Tobias
Hi Gianfranco,
Yes, collab-maint would
-global-httplib2.patch
-use-local-scans-dir.patch
-remove-unused-js-scripts.patch
* Add install-changelog-once.patch, avoiding double
changelog installation.
* Patch refresh.
* Change rules file, dropping workarounds not needed anymore.
-- Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package amap
* Package name: amap
Version: 5.4+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : 2003-2005 van Hauser and DJ RevMoon
* URL: http://www.thc.org/thc-amap/
* License: GPL-2
Hi Gianfranco,
Well, amap has been previously been removed from Debian due to licesnse
reasons. (Please see #346313) You write in #753704 that is no longer is the
case -- I just saw that LICENSE.AMAP is still there without any further
digging; can you briefly update me?
Hi Tobias,
Hi Tobias,
Il Venerdì 5 Settembre 2014 8:46, Tobias Frost t...@debian.org ha scritto:
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:36 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi Gianfranco,
Well, amap has been previously been removed from Debian due to
licesnse
reasons. (Please see #346313) You
Hi Markus,
sorry for taking part of the discussion.
If you think the FTP master position is contraddittory I suggest you to open a
thread in debian-devel with ftpmasters cc'ed.
Anyway in my opinion duplicating the lines is better also because copyright
file is shown in
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package binwalk
* Package name: binwalk
Version : 2.0.1+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Craig Heffner
* URL : ttps://github.com/devttys0/binwalk/
* License : Expat
It
Following up after upstream issue [1], I slightly changed my opinion and
committed [2].
I think the best solution is now just remove ssdeep support, since it will be
removed anyway in the next release.
(on mentors you will already find the updated version)
[1]
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi Vincent,
Please either implement a get-orig-source target in debian/rules, or
(since you're using copyright format 1.0) Files-Excluded in
debian/copyright, so that a sponsor (or anyone, really) can reproduce
your new orig tarball.
done, and pushed on git and
Hi Harlan!
(ccing Mikhail so he can ack/nack the GPL-2 to GPL-2+ change)
The most concerning issue to me is the change in d/copyright from GPL-2
to GPL-2+ for the files under debian/. Matching them to upstream is
best practice, to be sure, but to do so needs the permission of the
authors of
Hi Paul,
All good points Harlan. I also won't be sponsoring this.
thanks to you too!
(now we have the ack)
That tool doesn't appear to be run at build time to generate themanual page,
which means that if downstream folks patch the command
they won't get an updated manual page. I'd strongly
Hi Paul
I opened upstream issue 505
https://github.com/s3tools/s3cmd/issues/505
Could you also suggest removing the manual page from git and tarballs
so it is always built from source?
I just noticed Matt here is also upstream, bad me I didn't check :)
Personally I'd suggest upstream
patches, accepted upstream.
* change doc file location.
* Update watch file.
[ Gianfranco Costamagna ]
* Change debian packaging to gpl-2+, to ease upstream patch forwarding.
* Remove old scripts from rules file.
* Add setuptools b-d, needed to build the package in a clean environment.
* Update compat
Hi Paul,
Either way is fine, but I generally subscribe to the release early,release
often principle. Releasing also benefits the rest of the Free
Software community, as Debian has promised to do. Of course it is
completely up to upstream as to when they do releases.
I completely agree, but
Agreed, getting upstream to fix them and start using these tools is
the best option.
Hi Paul, upstream fixed all the issues, so the next version will drop all our
patches.
I hope we can avoid pushing upstream to release, right?
let me know,
cheers,
Gianfranco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Ghislain,
I did a quick review of this package, and looks mostly good to me, but I have
some
nitpicks (some errors) for you:
1) you seem to produce a source only library, with no binaries:
- why do you have an arch:any?
2) you seem to disable the testsuite during the build
Hi Tobi, do you plan to do the upload on unstable?
Let me know if I can sponsor the package, seems you already reviewed it ;)
cheers,
Gianfranco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Tonnerre,
do you still need help?
I would like to see an answer to Jonas on the RC bug you are trying to fix,
do you want to move in a team maintained fashion your package?
Another question is: I see a new release is out, do you plan to package it?
cheers,
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Bastien,
security uploads needs usually an ack from Security Team, did you already
receive that'
Second: you asked to upload for stable, oldstable and o-o-stable, but the
debdiff is only against stable.
Does the debdiff applies to the other two suites too?
Let
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Antti,
I did a quick review of the package, since it should be time for
an unstable upload.
Some nitpicks (and some showstoppers to me):
1) d/changelog: please update the changelog to point to unstable suite
(maybe also refresh the timestamp)
2) d/changelog might
Hi Ghislain,
I did not expect a review so soon, many thanks!
sorry to ruin your Saturday :)
Should be arch:all indeed.
ack
That one is a bit difficult. It is temporarily disabled because at the
time v0.4 was released the test suite was quite buggy and most tests
failed. According to the
Hi Ghislain,
the package looks good!
There still are some copyright issues: e.g.
licensecheck cmake/FindTBB.cmake
cmake/FindTBB.cmake: MIT/X11 (BSD like)
seems that you missed one :)
cheers (sorry for noticing only now)
G.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Antti,
Not changed yet, but inquiry sent to
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/pkg-qemu-devel/2015-August/006604.html
so if they have good suggestions, then one more upload to mentors
will be needed.
I can't/won't read, but ok, it is good as-is, let me know if you
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Peter
some comments
1) d/changelog:
sndio (0.0.10-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
(feel free to spot the error :) )
2) d/rules:
I would prefer to run dh_auto_configure -- instead of ./configure
but it should be the same...
(actually dh_auto_configure fails, because it adds
Hi Victor,
some spurious commenting
(not a perl user, so I can't help in sponsoring)
d/control: debhelper =9 might be better
perl, perl (= 5.13.11) | libtest-simple-perl (= 0.98)
seems hacky, but I understand simple-perl might be needed only for older perl
releases
(note: I'm not sure
For perl arch:all packages there are no relevant changes between
debhelper compat level 8 and 9.
But yes, it at least makes lintian (with its new pedantic warning)
happy.
exactly :)
That's perfectly fine, is used all over the place in perl packages
and works.
so my guess was true,
Hi Zhou,
General Note: I don't think I'll sponsor this package without a discussion on
debian-devel mail list,
because I do not honestly think we need another package management, specially
because
mixing stuff might lead to libraries incompatibilities, and something more.
Do you install
Hi Lumin,
I didn't mean overriding the env is bad. I mean:
- can we directly add ENVs for users?
- how about doing this in wrapper script:
sed -i -e $a\$(cat /usr/share/.../example/profile) .bashrc
- very bad.
Then can ENVs be handled automatically?
Then there are 2 things to convey
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Markus,
Following my review:
1)
# upstream does not sign releases
#yadifa source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
ls upstream/signing-key.asc
upstream/signing-key.asc
which one is correct?
2) sbin/yadifad/install-sh
not mentioned in copyright
(and every
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Adrien, I did have some problem in recreating the pristine tarball,
I had to change back on changelog, and control the source name, and then
git-buildpackage didn't
fail anymore
(and to move back the orig tarball of course)
BuiltSignedUploaded on experimental and tagged
when confirmed that this package is really ready
to be uploaded.
ok
Yes, indeed I should provide a manpage for /usr/bin/linuxbrew
and merly override the lintian-missing-manpage of symlink /usr/bin/brew.
yes
I'm going to remove it.
ok
Thank you Gianfranco Costamagna for reviewing
Well, race conditions happens!
No problem, thanks Andreas for taking care of the upload then :)
(BTW the problem was actually that I had to build and review the packaging,
specially for the multiarch part, and it took me some time :) )
cheers,
G.
--
Il dom 16 ago
Hi Lumin,
some new stuff
(btw feel free to discuss on -devel, there is no need to have a perfect package
for the discussion)
d/changelog should mention only initial release (closes: #) and nothing
more.
debian/linuxbrew-wrapper.lintian-overrides
useless now?
debian/copyright, please
Hi
the issue comes from patch: add-license-info.patch
The patch is patching author's source files with author's original
copyright declaration in the global LICENSE file and the one
in head of progress.c . The patch was sent to author days ago
and we (Asias and me) are waiting for author to
Hi
W debian-watch-file-in-native-package* You asked me to add a watch file, but
I created a native
package. Should I remove the file?
why? don't you have an orig tarball to start from?
http://opensips.org/pub/opensips/latest/src/
just use quilt source format, and make the vcs point to
Control: owner -1 !
Lets review:
1) debian/changelog should only contain one entry.
Initial release (Closes: #ITPBUG)
2) debian/control: debhelper =9 is recommended
3) d/control: python-pyinotify, python-boto, python-dateutil, python-argparse
they are all listed in setup.py install_requires
Hi Lumin,
I have just uploaded a updated package to mentors several seconds ago,
and I will CC you later in the d-devel discussion.
thanks but I already follow -devel :)
If I don't write them in dch, even I will forget what I've done to
the package months later.
Policy chapter 4.4 said so:
Hi Jeremy,
I've started by branching upstream and getting the scripts to pass 2to3,
but those are breaking changes... I'm not exactly sure how I'd include
these in the package while still maintaining compatibility with Python
2.
you can run 2to3 or 3to2 (both available on Debian) during build
Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com
On 08/19/2015 04:14 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi
W debian-watch-file-in-native-package* You asked me to add a watch file, but
I created a native
package. Should I remove the file?
why? don't you have an orig tarball to start
Kimiki review:
please fix all the above (message #72 of bug 772823)
d/changelog: no need to put your name into []
when you are the only one who worked on the package (and the signature
is your)
d/rules: as said skipping tests is usually bad, please enable them if possible
d/copyright:
sphde:
d/changelog: please set to unstable the target series
d/control: what about having the doxygen documentation in a -doc package
arch=all with doxygen moved to build-depends-indep?
look e.g.
https://sources.debian.net/src/websocketpp/0.6.0-1/debian/control/
and the rules file
(note, you
disappear)
thanks a lot,
Gianfranco
Il Mercoledì 19 Agosto 2015 18:34, Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it ha scritto:
Hi,
I didn't have time for a complete review, but two things needs to be fixed:
some copyrights are missing, ISL and some BSD2 IIRC
(I did a licensecheck
Hi Gerrit,
Alright, would it help moving forward if I were doing that? Reverting
to 2014.65 is easy, and the current 2015.68-1 could always be uploaded
once 2014.65-1 has entered testing. It'd be quite sad to upload known
bugs in a package containing multiple lintian warnings and errors [0],
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Johan,
* Imported Upstream version 2.3.0 (Closes: #726069)
* Bump standards version (no changes needed)
* Bump library package number
* Update install filename
* Switch to debhelper 9 - enable multiarch
multiarch should be mentioned in
Hi Alex,
let's review :)
d/changelog please set to unstable, and update the timestamp
d/rules: wl-asneeded is good if enable, does it introduce some problems?
are both autotools-dev and autoreconf needed?
usually the latter should superceed the former
d/rules: I personally do not like calling
rebuild,
ongoing right now)
How do you feel about updating afl, checking if everything is good and then
followup with python-afl?
cheers,
Gianfranco
Il Lunedì 10 Agosto 2015 11:36, Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com ha
scritto:
On 10.08.2015 11:04, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
I did
Hi,
Actually no. I think this needs clarification. The upstream tarball
contains .c .h files and some (non-dfsg-compliant) temporary files.
The repack script removes the (non-dfsg-compliant) temporary files and
move all the .c .h files into a directory called src/. The build
system and friends
Hi,
W: paflib source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
if you are nmuing it you need to mention the Non-maintainer upload
in changelog.
dch --nmu (or similar) does it for you
W: paflib source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 0.2.0-1
same here, 0.2.0-1 is not an NMU number, 0.2.0-1.1 is
Hi
Okay. I think this needs further explaination. Upstream does not
include a build system, not even a Makefile. Building is done by
invoking gcc directly using different flags for different platform.
This is however cumbersome, so I add autotools to ease building. I use
git for development
Hi,
Ok, I've tested on a clean jessie install and the systemd script works
as expected. I also made sure this package will build properly against
sid.
wonderful
The python-3to2 packages does not appear to exist in jessie, only
stretch and sid. 3to2 is not installed by the python package in
Did you mean to close the bug?
nope, sorry
About the dep5 copyright issue, yes, I accidentally left out the header.
no problem
I will fix the use-flag patch as you described.
ok
(this shouldn't change anything, since LDFLAGS in this case are the Debian
flags,
and for sure they do not add
Hi,
Done.
[snip]
Done.
The testsuite isn't included in the distribution tar file generated by
upstream. I filed an upstream github but to include the testsuite:
https://github.com/niwinz/django-jinja/issues/135
I don't see the package on mentors...
did you upload it?
cheers,
G.
BuiltSignedUploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian!
cheers,
G.
Il Giovedì 20 Agosto 2015 11:54, Edward Betts edw...@4angle.com ha scritto:
Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it wrote:
well, it appeared at the end
Copyright: 2015, Edward Betts
please add your mail
I do remove them now. Not in the previous release where the tarball
was made with make dist (vs github snapshot now).
ok, so it is dfsg, well!
now the changelog has one line extra (line 1)
and maybe you can remove something, like a double
Imported Upstream version 2.3.0+dfsg
(but this is a
Hi,
It is not removed - it is still in the sources, but not in the
.orig.tar.gz archive, since I read the upstream tarball should not have
packaging specs inside it.
Should I remove the copyright exception?
For Debian sources means the orig tarball, that should be the same as
the upstream
Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com
On 08/19/2015 09:14 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
BTW I would like to have a rules file with plain dh_ calls, can you please
try to use the rules file from julian's svn?
you can compare the output of two builds with debdiff if needed, I would
Hi,
A -dev package may contain an architecture dependent -config executable,
that cannot be included in a M-A: same package. The same goes for
headers which vary across architectures.
If there are no architecture dependent files in a -dev package M-A: same
should be fine.
isn't the so link
that I didn't detect (I
was using an older lintian version), but I will work on fixing those too.
Best regards,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com
On 08/18/2015 05:11 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi,
unfortunately the upload seems to be missing
Uploaded: 2015-08
[1].
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/opensips
Many thanks,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com
On 08/14/2015 10:41 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi Răzvan,
thanks for the fixes,
mentors is showing many lintian errors...
can you please fix them
control: owner -1 !
Hi Andreas,
let's review:
1) please use a machine-readable copyright file
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
2) d/compat: please bump to 9
3) d/control: you might want to run wrap-and-sort to clean the formatting up,
to bump debhelper to =9 and
Hi Lumin
Such packaging bug is upstream bug, and is handled by Homebrew
and Linuxbrew upstream. And files made that trouble was not provided
by Debian package ..
yes, exactly the point I had, so somewhere the user should be aware that
reporting
the bug on Debian Bug Tracking System is
Hi Alex,
I contacted Ernst (upstream dev) and he agreed to integrate the build
system into his dev branch.
Wonderful! Good news are good :)
I think the above should solve the version string problem as well. Or
if it doesn't we can use the old method based on date string. I think
it should
Hi again Thomas,
I've uploaded a new version to mentors fixing all the problems described
above/below.
yes, mostly done I see just some issues left:
1)
* Update debian/changelog to conform to DEP5
I guess you didn't mean changelog :p
2)
About the cmake file, please answer.
I really do not
Hi Thomas
So this in libburn4.install:
debian/tmp/usr/lib/*/libburn.so.4*
You can just say usr/lib/*/libburn.so.4*
or even better
usr/lib/*/libburn.so.*
that way at the next soname bump you won't need
to change the install files too.
($somebody might object that having the 4 makes you
Hi Thomas,
(please open an RFS if you need a sponsor, otherwise it might be difficult
to track packages reviews and to actually have an upload)
There will be no SONAME change as long as i am the upstream
developer. ABI compatibility is one of the most important
goals of my development.
this
Hi Andreas,
thanks again for your review. I have uploaded dblatex-0.3.7-2 to
first nitpick: not needed to upload a -2 version. using the same -1
is fine and works until the real upload (on Debian ftp-master) is
performed
Sorry to disagree with your first suggestion (terrible start, I know):
Hi Thomas,
If you dput $something, you need to wait until $something is processed,
any later upload will fail because you can't overwrite the files
in ftp unprocessed queue.
So wait for the upload, get the email confirmation, and then dput again.
According to the log you posted, seems that
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
the packaging looks mostly good.
Just a few questions:
python-setuptools (= 0.6b3),
the version is already satisfied in old old stable, you can remove it.
setup.py
install_requiresjinja2 =2.5,
django =1.4,
they aren't listed in B-D, so
Hi Johan
Ok, I will check - some time since I last did this.
ack
Should I do so before uploading to experimental?
nope, experimental will setup an automatic tracker for you, they might even
tell you to go for unstable whenever you like
Looking at the policy I think it is better to
Hi Jakub,
This particular package doesn't contain any executables, AFAICS.
true
It is now permitted to put architecture-dependent headers files in
/usr/include/triplet, so this is no longer show-stopper.
nice to know :)
If the symlink lives in architecture-specific directory, it's not an
nitpicks :)
cheers,
Gianfranco
Il Martedì 4 Agosto 2015 15:03, Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it ha scritto:
Hi Danny,
(just answering where possible)
Could you take a look at the debian/watch file? Those opts and regexes
twisted my mind a bit, not sure if I have done
Hi Danny,
(just answering where possible)
Could you take a look at the debian/watch file? Those opts and regexes
twisted my mind a bit, not sure if I have done that right.
Please look e.g. at this one
https://sources.debian.net/src/s3cmd/1.5.2-4/debian/watch/
it should be good for you too.
Hi
My name is Razvan Crainea[1] and I am one of the Core developers of the
OpenSIPS project, a Voice-over-IP SIP server. We would like our project
to be added to the official Debian repository and we need a mentor to
help us achieve this.
We already have some DEB packages for OpenSIPS that
lucascastrobor...@gmail.com:
Gianfranco,
No problem about about that on irc.
I think I should take a time on another package, then mailed here.
and if anyone know about this, it's fine. I really spent much time on this
package,
and learned a lot with it.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Gianfranco
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Johan,
the package looks good.
Some nitpicks,
1) please do not usee the © symbol in debian copyright(I remember there were
issues with machine readable format and that symbol)
2) licensecheck says:
click_plugins/__init__.py: BSD (2 clause)
but seems that it is
This is working exactly as intended : )
Try the -f / --full-page command-line switch for regular PDFs.
ok, I thought this was a bug... BTW I have the main monitor to the left, and
the extended to the right, why does it show the opposite order for regular pdfs?
The main feature is the
If you pass no command-line switch it assumes its a double-width pdf,
which has the presenter side on the right and audience on the left.
It should™ render the presenter view (with the clocks and the notes) to
the primary screen (you can set with xrandr --output XXX --primary),
regardless of
Well, it is, under the controls section. But I guess that's not really
well-placed, since you didn't find it straight away : )
nope, the manpage is correct, I tried a --help, and I didn't find it
(sorry for the confusion)
If you have a suggestion on where to place and/or how to re-word the
Other two nitpicks, no need to cc me, I'm subscribed to the list, and
it is called Debian, not debian :)
cheers!
G.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Control: owner -1 !
Hi,
Changes since the last upload:
* New upstream release.
* Add patch 01: use /dev/urandom instead of /dev/random in test 20
to prevent lengthy delays during build.
Hi, I'm doing a test build right now, I'll see how it goes and report back :)
The packaging looks
Hi Răzvan,
thanks for the fixes,
mentors is showing many lintian errors...
can you please fix them?
reporting them here:
E copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl
W hardening-no-relro
I hardening-no-fortify-functions
(usually fixed by not overriding C*FLAGS and LDFLAGS
I
1 - 100 of 1453 matches
Mail list logo
