Re: OK to create a new package in "python-team/packages/"

Carsten Schoenert writes: > Am 15.03.24 um 08:31 schrieb c.bu...@posteo.jp: > >> On the long run it is my goal to make the package [1] ready for official >> upload. But I suspect this is a long way. So on short view that repo >> will be for practicing only. Am I allowed to create such a repo in

Re: Review of package dunamai

Louis-Philippe Véronneau writes: > Hmm, whatever? It's really a matter of personal preferences. I tend to > be lazy and not want to build on experimental because the sbuild script > is more tedious... :) > Can I interest you in testing a wrapper script that I've been thinking about sharing

Re: pybuild now supports meson

Stefano Rivera writes: > Hi Simon (2023.08.02_18:23:31_+) >> On Wed, 02 Aug 2023 at 17:44:24 +, Stefano Rivera wrote: >> > The latest upload of dh-python to unstable (6.20230802) includes a >> > meson plugin, so pybuild can easily build a package multiple times for >> > all supported

Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)"

Carsten Schoenert writes: > There is a private list there such information *can* be given, again, > there is no rule that I need to do this. > There are options if some other DD believes a package is needing an > update, that process is called NMU (non maintainer upload). Or if you > think

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

Sandro Tosi writes: > thoughts from a concerned maintainer > Sandro, thank you for writing this email. > > it seems this email advocates for a "let's wing it"[1] type of transition. > > [1] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wing_it > > It appears there has been little work in preparing the work

Convert dephell and bowler ITPs to RFPs

submitter 962574 ! retitle 962574 RFP: dephell -- project management for Python noowner 962574 submitter 941054 ! retitle 941054 RFP: python-bowler -- safe code refactoring for modern Python projects noowner 941054 thanks I have not found the time to make meaningful progress on Dephell and its

Re: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#1007165: Bug#1007165: please import upstream v21.1.0

Antoine Beaupré writes: > I'm working on uploading v22 right now. > Thank you Antoine! signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: xlsxwriter: How to change homepage url

Hi Christian, c.bu...@posteo.jp writes: > Dear Emmanuel, > > Am 15.09.2021 21:36 schrieb Emmanuel Arias: >> Looking in the salsa repo [0], it is very old. And that shouldn't >> happen. I >> can updated to the last unstable version tonight/tomorrow. > > Just to improve my knowledge about Debian

Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs

Hi Jeremy! Wow, you've given me a lot to think about. Thank you :-) Yes, I agree with you that my MR doesn't adequately address the much more heterogeneous reality. (and is also indelicate, lacks nuance, etc) I'll take a day or two to think about this, and also to take into account what

Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs

Hi Simon, Simon McVittie writes: > On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 16:42:42 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> I feel like there is probably consensus against the use of PyPi-provided >> upstream source tarballs in preference for what will usually be a GitHub >> release tarball &

Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs

Hi Scott, Scott Talbert writes: > On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > [snip] > I tend to agree about PyPI being the official releases for a lot of > projects. "GitHub tarballs" also tend to include other undesirable stuff > for distribution like upstream CI/CD configuration files,

Re: [RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs

Hi Jeremy, Thank you for your comments, reply follows inline: Jeremy Stanley writes: > On 2021-06-25 16:42:42 -0400 (-0400), Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> I feel like there is probably consensus against the use of PyPi-provided >> upstream source tarballs in preference for wh

[RFC] DPT Policy: Canonise recommendation against PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs

Hi Team! I feel like there is probably consensus against the use of PyPi-provided upstream source tarballs in preference for what will usually be a GitHub release tarball, so I made an MR to this effect (moderate recommendation rather than a "must" directive):

Bug#984561: Pre-approval for uploading vorta/0.7.5-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Dear Release Team, With the exception of added translations (the bulk of the changes), six small features added by samuel-w ("papercut" class bugs), and commits irrelevant to the Debian package, all of the

Re: Questions around the python-policy document

Hi Fabrice, Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY writes: > Hello Debian-Python, > > I have a few questions regarding the Python Policy: > https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ > > - Is there a Debian package for reading it offline? (apparently not) > > - Who maintains this document: is

Re: Merging the PAPT and the DMPT

Ondrej Novy writes: > Hi, > > po 21. 9. 2020 v 13:04 odesílatel Ondrej Novy napsal: > >> Todo: >> >>- send debian-devel-announce (i will) >>- mass-commit vcs+maintainer change >> >> > done. > > Thanks to all who helped me with these. > Yes, thank you! And I'm sure maintainers with

Re: Merging the PAPT and the DMPT

Hi, Dmitry Shachnev writes: > Hi Ondrej! > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:59:00AM +0200, Ondrej Novy wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I prepared scripts for: >> >>- cloning ACLs from modules+applications subgroups to newly created >>packages subgroup >>- transferring all project from

Re: Joining PAPT

Hi Taowa, Taowa Munene-Tardif writes: > Hello, > > I am taking over membernator, currently maintained by pollo. To this > end, I'd like to be granted access to the team to allow me to > effectively do so. I am taowa on Salsa. > > I have read and agree to the Python Applications Packaging Team >

Re: Bug#962574: ITP: dephell -- project management for Python

Hi Scott, devel, and Python team, Nicholas D Steeves writes: > Control: block -1 by 962574 > > Tomlkit seems to be required for self-tests. > Thank you for taking care of tomlkit so quickly! I wish I had more time and energy to make faster progress with DepHell. Today I discovere

Re: Offer to help with packaging

Hi Pablo, Pablo Mestre writes: > El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió: >> Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too! > [.] >> If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the >> owner of #96360[5], and re

Re: Offer to help with packaging

Hi Pablo, Pablo Mestre writes: > Im working on python-language-server Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too! > but looks like also depends on python-jsonrpc-server and I dont find > any solution on Debian repositories. > > Any suggestion? > If you're committed to

Bug#962574: ITP: dephell -- project management for Python

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nicholas D Steeves Package name: dephell Version : 0.8.3 Upstream Author : Gram URL : http://www.example.org/ License : MIT (declared, but probably Expat) Programming Lang: Python Description : project management

Re: PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian

Hi Scott, Thank you for the quick reply! Scott Kitterman writes: > On Thursday, June 4, 2020 7:39:59 PM EDT Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> Scott Kitterman writes: >> > On Monday, April 13, 2020 5:18:53 AM EDT Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >> >> Hi Scott! >> >>

Re: PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian

Hi, Scott Kitterman writes: > On Monday, April 13, 2020 5:18:53 AM EDT Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >> Hi Scott! >> >> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 06:31:57PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> > This being roughly the mid-point in the development cycle, I thought it >> > might be good to see where we are

Re: Python Wheel Related Policy Change

Hi, Scott Kitterman writes: > On Thursday, April 30, 2020 5:49:20 PM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote: >> Hi Scott (2020.04.30_20:33:59_+) >> >> > > That seems reasonable, although if we're going down that road, it >> > > probably makes no sense for any of them to be universal. >> > >> > If we

Re: Request to join the PAPT (already a member of DPMT)

Stefano Rivera writes: > Hi Nicholas (2020.01.28_00:03:37_+) >> I'd like to join the PAPT, since the PAPT is the best place for an RFP >> that I've chosen to work on. I am already a member of the DPMT, so have >> already accepted Team Policy, and of course have accepted remaining in >>

Request to join the PAPT (already a member of DPMT)

Hi, I'd like to join the PAPT, since the PAPT is the best place for an RFP that I've chosen to work on. I am already a member of the DPMT, so have already accepted Team Policy, and of course have accepted remaining in compliance with its changes. My Salsa login is "sten-guest" Regards,

Re: dh_python3 sets shebang to Python 2 -- is this a bug?

Hi, Andreas Henriksson writes: > I've personally seen some upstream use 'python' in shebang with the > intention of meaning 'works with either python2 or python3', Yes, this has worked thus far, and it will definitely work in cases where `which python` is a symlink to python3 within a virtual

Re: python-requests: adding a documentation package python-requests-doc

Hi Fabrice, Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY writes: > Hello Daniele, > > Daniele Tricoli writes: > >> Please next time can you assign it to me? I should reveive some sort of >> notification I hope! :) > > Sure, will do. > > I have updated the merge request. > > For d/changelog, I used "debchange -i"

Re: Future of Trac in Debian

Hi, Sandro Tosi writes: > Hello everyone, > i'd like to discuss the future of Trac in Debian. as we all know, Trac > is still python2, and while there are plans to port it to python3 > (https://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/12130) that port is not there yet, > and it may take quite some time to

Bug#944989: ITP: python-fissix -- backport of lib2to3, supporting the latest Python3 grammars, with enhancements

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: python-fissix Version : 19.2b1 Upstream Author : John Reese URL : https://github.com/jreese/fissix License : PSF Programming Lang: Python Description : backport of lib2to3, supporting the latest Python3 grammars,

Re: Bug#943666: python3: Update Python Policy for removal of the Python 2 stack

Brian May writes: > Stéphane Blondon writes: > >> Perhaps there is a doubt how to read it? >> - do not (remove python-foo-doc or rename it to python3-foo-doc) >> - (do not remove python-foo-doc) or (rename it to python3-foo-doc) >> >> Would it be better if we remove the indentation and use this

Re: Raising severity to serious for some Python 2 leaf packages with no Python 3 support upstream

Hi Thomas and Python Team, Thomas Goirand writes: > For example, today I looked into removing Python 2 from python-cogent. > Running sixer on all files lead to a huge log of problems to solve by > hand. There's no upstream support for Python 3 on that one. > > For this kind of package, I see no

Re: pylint and pylint3

Hi Fred, On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 07:29:06PM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello it seems that the pylint package does not provide pylint3 anymore > (since 21h ;) > But the spyder package still require pylint3 and pylint when installint > spyder or spyder3. > this is why the next

Bug#922938: RFS: python-css-parser/1.0.4-1~bpo9+1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Justification: necessary for to update the bpo for Calibre Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-css-parser" Package name: python-css-parser Version : 1.0.4-1~bpo9+1 Upstream Author : Christof Hoeke, Walter

Re: Re add my account?

Hi Andreas, On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 11:52:55AM +0100, Andreas Noteng wrote: >Hello, I am a DM who have not been active for a few years, but I can still >se my name in the list of DMs. Now coming back I see that quite a few >things have changed. Most noteably our packages has moved to

Re: Update of ipython3 to latest upstream

Hi Christoph, On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 06:49:15PM +0100, Jan Christoph Terasa wrote: > Hi, > > the soft freeze of buster is approaching fast, will there be a chance to get > a more recent (latest?) version of upstream ipython3 (https://ipython.org/) > into buster, or at least into sid? ipython3

Bug#920775: RFS: python-css-parser/1.0.4-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Justification: new required dep for Calibre Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-css-parser". It will be maintained on the Debian Python Modules Team. I hope that it can clear NEW before 12 Feb, because the Christmas

Re: P.S. Requesting to join team and for sponsorship of python-css-parser

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:33:09AM +0100, Ondrej Novy wrote: >Hi, >st 16. 1. 2019 v 7:35 odesÃlatel Nicholas D Steeves >napsal: > > > I'd like to finally join the DPMT > >welcome :) Thank you Ondřej! Cheers, Nicholas signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: P.S. Requesting to join team and for sponsorship of python-css-parser

On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 17:30, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > Dear Python team, > > I'd like to finally join the DPMT, and am requesting sponsorship of a > new package. That package is python-css-parser. > > I've been collaborating with Norbert Preining for a year on Calibre,

Requesting to join team and for sponsorship of python-css-parser

Dear Python team, I'd like to finally join the DPMT, and am requesting sponsorship of a new package. That package is python-css-parser. I've been collaborating with Norbert Preining for a year on Calibre, and Calibre's most recent release requires css-parser, a fork of css-utils.

Re: Bug#902629: missing required versioned dependency on python-lxml may cause FTBFS

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 06:08:52AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > > > I've already fixed this in g...@salsa.debian.org:debian/html5-parser.git > > > > If it's possible to fix the FTBR on i386 in sid, then that fix seems > > like it ought to included into the proposed 0.4.4-2

Bug#872183: RFP: importmagic -- Python library for finding unresolved symbols and managing imports

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: importmagic Version : 0.1.7 Upstream Author : Alec Thomas * URL : https://github.com/alecthomas/importmagic * License : BSD-2-Clause Programming Lang: Python Description : Python