Re: python3 statsmodels?

>> statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team >> (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact >> them directly (CCed them here) > > Why? Is there any specific reason? Wouldn't it make sense to bring > everything under one umbrella. because if you want to get an

Re: python3 statsmodels?

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > I see that there is no statsmodels package for python3 in Stretch. > > % apt-cache search statsmodels python3 > python3-seaborn - statistical visualization library statsmodels is maintained by Debian

Re: Ad-hoc Debian Python BoF at PyCon US 2017

> == Deprecate Python 2 == > > Lintian checks for python 2 only packages > Lintian checks for /usr/bin/python2? shebangs please dont (as in "favor python3" but dont actively discourage python2 development/packaging), see below > == python 2.7s future == > > Buster *may* be the last Debian

Re: python-modules-commits ml not receiving all commits?

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Tristan Seligmann wrote: > I sometimes get bounce messages for email notifications generated by commits > I push, due to the message size being too large; perhaps this is the cause? nope that was not the case -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My

Re: [Python-modules-commits] [python-cpuinfo] 02/02: Import Debian changes 3.0.0-1

are we really suggesting to create a separate binary package, for a single script, not even 400 bytes (in py-cpuinfo case, but i bet there are more just like this), mainly boilerplate, that simply loads the entrypoint from the main module and nothing else? that seems overkill to me (and probably

Re: [Python-modules-commits] [python-cpuinfo] 02/02: Import Debian changes 3.0.0-1

well, the py- prefix seems wrong as well (and not part of the recommendation) On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Ondrej Novy <n...@ondrej.org> wrote: > Hi, > > > 2017-04-14 20:25 GMT+02:00 Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org>: >> >> why the cli tools are in a separa

Re: [Python-modules-commits] [python-cpuinfo] 02/02: Import Debian changes 3.0.0-1

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote: > +Package: py-cpuinfo > +Architecture: all > +Depends: python3-cpuinfo, > + ${misc:Depends}, > + ${python3:Depends} > +Description: Python script for getting CPU info > + py-cpuinfo provides a

python-modules-commits ml not receiving all commits?

Hello there, it looks like http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/python-modules-commits/2017-April/thread.html is not receiving all the commits to our repo, f.e. i know numpy has been updated yday and today, but none of the commits area in the archive (nor in my mailbox, that's how i noticed

Re: Fwd: next version of csvkit

On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Saturday, April 01, 2017 05:12:38 PM Ghislain Vaillant wrote: >> On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 15:55 +, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> > On April 1, 2017 3:42:50 AM EDT, Ghislain Vaillant > wrote: >> > >

Re: Naming convention for -doc package

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 4:33 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > So based on #829744, both pytest-qt and > pytest-xvfb, which are new packages, do not produce a corresponding > Python 2 binary package. my point is: this looks wrong and premature, and should have been discussed

Re: Naming convention for -doc package

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 16:51 -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Now that new packages are targeting the B

Re: Naming convention for -doc package

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Now that new packages are targeting the Buster cycle, and that Python 2 > packages should no longer be built, this is news to me, can you point me to where this was announced? -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website:

Re: [Python-modules-commits] [python-social-auth] 55/89: Merge pull request #821 from open-craft/saml-no-idp

what's all this? 89 commits? are you pulling commits from upstream git? this looks just spam to the mailing list On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Wolfgang Borgert wrote: > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. > > debacle pushed a

Re: Upstream's new version for a package awaiting review and upload

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Alberto Caso wrote: > should I update master, upstream and pristine-tar > to sync with upstream sources and modify the initial debian/changelog > entry to reflect the new version number as if the current version never > existed yes,

Re: Need help uploading Python3 version of pychromecast

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Sandro Tosi <sandro.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Alberto Caso <alberto.c...@juntaex.es> wrote: >> >> Sandro Tosi wrote: >>> as a general rule, i'd be happy to sponsor any pkg adding a py3k pack

Re: Need help uploading Python3 version of pychromecast

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Alberto Caso <alberto.c...@juntaex.es> wrote: > > Sandro Tosi wrote: >> as a general rule, i'd be happy to sponsor any pkg adding a py3k package > > pydbus does not add a py3k to an py2-only package, but provides both a > py2 and a py3k

Re: Need help uploading Python3 version of pychromecast

discovery didnt discover any test, you might wnat to look into that as a general rule, i'd be happy to sponsor any pkg adding a py3k package On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> wrote: > i can take care of this in ~6 hrs > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Ru

Re: Need help uploading Python3 version of pychromecast

i can take care of this in ~6 hrs On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Ruben Undheim wrote: > Dear fellow Python Modules Team members, > > I have prepared the Python3 binary package for pychromecast. (all > dependencies are now in sid finally) > Since I am a DM only, I cannot

Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> wrote: > > * Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org>, 2016-09-11, 10:42: >>> >>> Now, you've got to ask to the admin of that mailing list, which appears to >>> be jwilk. I find that parti

Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 09:41:46AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> now can we PLEASE stop talking about how the perfect smtp system >> should work and GET BACK to discuss if we are able and want to d

Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > Rejecting instead of discarding spam sent to mailing lists has also > been bad practice for a long time. thanks for another OT mail, please read my other reply on the matter or rejecting mails by smtp systems now can we PLEASE

Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm

On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Barry Warsaw <ba...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sep 10, 2016, at 02:46 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >>I'm sure i'm not the only member using gmail, which bounces spam >>emails and that what causes this problem. > > Are you sure about tha

Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm

On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > The correct behaviour if they really want to avoid spam to even reach > the spam folder, is to accept the email, and discard it. err that's wrong, so wrong. every email provider with a handful of users rejects spam

Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm

On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Santiago Vila <sanv...@unex.es> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 02:46:54PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:19 PM, >> <python-modules-team-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org> wrote: >> > Your membership in

can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm

On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:19 PM, wrote: > Your membership in the mailing list Python-modules-team has been > disabled due to excessive bounces The last bounce received from you > was dated 10-Sep-2016. You will not get any more messages from

Re: on keep providing python 2 packages

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 05:42:24PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > anyway, why wouldnt you want to provide a python2 package if the code > > supports it? if you got a py3k packa

Re: on keep providing python 2 packages

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Dmitry Shachnev <mity...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Sandro, > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:49:25AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> > For example, I have a module (which supports both Python 2 and 3), but >> > the only user of this module

on keep providing python 2 packages

I got a feeling we are somehow discouraging the introduction of python2 package in unstable (it was also discussed at the BoF). while i can see why we dont want to introduce new python2-only package, i feel that just providing a py3k pkg while the module is also py2 compatible is a disservice to

Re: PAPT Git (was: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt)

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:50 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2016-08-09 23:28, Daniel Stender wrote: >> On this occasion ... let it be me to start the discussion: let's get into Git >> also for Python Apps soon. > > A common VCS for both DPMT and PAPT would be nice, indeed.

Re: DPMT membership request

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Filip Pytloun wrote: > As the first package, I am working on packaging of python-aptly: > https://github.com/fpytloun/debian-python-aptly this package looks interesting, let me know if you need a sponsor and I'd be happy to be one -- Sandro

Re: [Python-apps-team] trac-xmlrpc_1.1.5+r15671-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

hey Martin, if you moved your packages to collab-maint, i dont think you should be using PAPT as maintainer (nor uploaders for that matters) On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > > Accepted: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash:

Re: Maintenance of pydap

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Hi Sandro, > > I engaged with the pydap community and I can confirm that the project > has moved on from the old 2.x API. Since pydap 3.x is now using a new > namespace (pydap instead of dap), then both package

Re: IPython: I would need some help/councels

; > Le 19/01/2016 22:17, Sandro Tosi a écrit : >> >> could you push already your changes to git (maybe first in a temporary >> branch)? once done, I would give it a look > > > It is here : > ssh://git.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/ipython4.git > > Not per

Re: Maintenance of pydap

for a start, you can try to get upstream to reply to this (old) question: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pydap/6A6q-Y6qwtE On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Forwarding to d-python, as it seems like a more appropriate place to > discuss this

Re: IPython: I would need some help/councels

could you push already your changes to git (maybe first in a temporary branch)? once done, I would give it a look On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Julien Puydt wrote: > Hi, > > I made a new version of my IPython packaging : > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/ipython

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Piotr Ożarowski <pi...@debian.org> wrote: > [Sandro Tosi, 2015-11-24] >> cool, will do soon then! do you want me to push a branch to git? if >> so, how would you like it to be called: 'jessie', 'bpo8', else? > > I don't have strong opinio

How to maintain multiple branches (sid/bpo/exp etc)?

to keep updating v1 and v2 releases (and so unstable and exp) as the come. Thanks for your help, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

Re: How to maintain multiple branches (sid/bpo/exp etc)?

mple sqlalchemy: I asked Piotr for a jessie backport of 1.0.8, he agreed I can go ahead, I have a package ready and I dont know how to commit it to the repo. what should I do at this point? Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista

Re: Git migration schedule

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Barry Warsaw <ba...@debian.org> wrote: > On Oct 21, 2015, at 08:36 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >>I need to backport quite some packages, and use often experimental to >>stage big packages new releases (think of numpy and matplotlib) so it &

Re: Git migration schedule

my breath on it :( -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

Re: Git migration schedule

erimental to stage big packages new releases (think of numpy and matplotlib) so it is not a rare situation at all and it should be considered now that we are at the beginning of a new era and changes are easier -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervist

Re: [DPMT] A newcomer to DPMT

dy, feel free to contact me directly for review and sponsorship -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

Re: Git migration schedule

+1. +1 on .ssh/config, I'm gonna change it now -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

Re: errors pushing tags to git

ss, but annoying to see the error, could be fixed changing the hook to verify if the prevrev is all 0 and act accordingly -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

disable the git summary email?

dpmt-commit ml is already full of emails (in 4 days I have 500+ emails there!) should we disable the git summary message? It doesnt give additional useful information, and in cases like small fix + push it would prevent to double the emails sent. -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu

Re: git repo lint tool

easy to just print also the url to stick into the d/control file (cut vs rewrite and add a typo); how to initialize git-dpm (a link to the wiki would do if there are not more specific docs) etc -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

requested not to commit anymore as what you did was very short of what's there still to fix. /me really hopes this thread has stopped days ago :( -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

Re: Git migration schedule

sorry, i forgot to ask another question: how will the packages already maintained in git be handled? On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Stefano Rivera <stefa...@debian.org> wrote: >> The errors: >&

Re: Git migration schedule

ough and others will need training/time. Additionally, now we are in the middle of the 3.5 transition, and so packages will need updating rather quickly: are we sure this is the best time to push full throttle with the migration? I'd rather wait a little bit longer and have a more automatic migrat

Re: Git migration schedule

s fragile: ~/.gitconfig applies to all the git repos I have (and I may want to specify a tag format there), while what is set in debian/.git-dpm (is this the file where the tag format is set right?) should override what's in ~/.gitconfig . -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My webs

Re: I've been removed from the Python team

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Barry Warsaw <ba...@debian.org> wrote: > Does it make sense to have some lightweight rules for the team? Is there > precedence within other Debian teams? please, there's already enough bureaucracy. we have team admins, that all we need -- Sandro Tos

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > On 09/29/2015 02:11 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >>> Are >>> there any specific changes you object to >> >> As for the technical aspects, tests were disabled mentioning they >> acces

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

plan to look at it and (if successful) upload numpy this evening BST, i simply dont have the tools/time to do it now -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

> I see nothing wrong with Goirand's upload. I believe Sandro Tosi is > still using the pre-binNMU, pre-NMU, pre-LowNMU, pre-Team packaging > maintenance mentality which is not the commonly accepted behaviour and > mentality in Debian anymore. this is not a binNMU (which is irrelevan

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > On 09/29/2015 03:48 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> On Sep 29, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> >>> Once again, the python policy about Maintainer/Uploaders has been ignored >>>

Re: Maintainer vs. Uploaders

out setting the fields. > > Maintainer vs Uploaders rules needs to be moved to policy. I will > propose a patch to the policy soon (I'd prefer a native speaker to do > it, though) > >> The wiki says that the general rule of thumb is to set the team as >> Maintai

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

en again. you mean taht again you will "look too fast" the maintainer and go on with your agenda? lintian reported W: python-networkx source: changelog-should-mention-nmu W: python-networkx source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.10-1 not even that was an alert for you? -- S

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > On 09/30/2015 12:45 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> nor is uploading a package just for their own interest and then let >> the maintainer fix the mistakes done. This has happened in the past, >> mo

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

orkx python-networkx-doc > Architecture: source all > Version: 1.10-1 > Distribution: experimental > Urgency: medium > Maintainer: Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> > Changed-By: Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> > Description: > python-networkx - tool to create, ma

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

hat package updated he could technical sub-optimal work, and then let the maintainer/somebody else fix what's left broken? because that's what's going to happen :( (python3-memcache anyone?) -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at De

Re: so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did!

to codify our workflow (which is completely unrelated to the migration) is kinda far away from 'everything'. -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python

Re: so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did!

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@debian.org wrote: On Aug 06, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: no I mean, really, read http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/git.html Thanks for the link Sandro. Reading this, I think it's on par with our https://wiki.debian.org/Python

so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did!

to) * they have a way to download all the packages and do mass-commit on them they manage more than 3k packages, their approach works in practice and scales, do we really need to reinvent the wheel here? (as I'm quite sure at debconf there will be discussion about it, this my input on the matter) -- Sandro

Re: DPMT: server-side git hooks

that down yet, but will report back if i find something. this is probably the first push you made, and it says it cant compare to a previous version (0) simply because there is none. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me

Re: [Python-modules-team] Request to join Debian Python Modules Team

...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ

Re: Sphinx 1.3 in Debian experimental

without changing each of them. yeah, please dont bind the solution to pybuild, or at least give a way to people not using it to be able to address the issue. Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org

Re: Sphinx 1.3 in Debian experimental

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Dmitry Shachnev mity...@debian.org wrote: Hi Sandro, On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:08:40 -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: that's great news! I just recently (like end of last week) received a patch for basemap to address dates in the doc, and it seemed like your effort

Re: Sphinx 1.3 in Debian experimental

will do it once and for all On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Dmitry Shachnev mity...@debian.org wrote: Hi Sandro, On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:12:33 -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: would you mind talking to the build reproducible folks to understand how to make sphinx generating reproducible builds

Re: Sphinx 1.3 in Debian experimental

, Sandro Tosi wrote: well that requires to carry the patch in all the packages using |today| instead of adapt sphinx to what Debian wants to achieve (reproducible build) in the place that makes more sense: the tool generating the doc. YMMV tho According to codesearch, only 59 packages out of 608

Re: Getting ready for Python 3.5

with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150624110544.033f7...@anarchist.wooz.org -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

Re: Sample DPMT SVN-GIT migration

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Stefano Rivera stefa...@debian.org wrote: * We have packages that have had upload history diverge from svn. - basemap could you elaborate? Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian

Re: Attempting to remove python-support?

, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive

Re: [Python-modules-commits] [python-mplexporter] 135/135: Merge pull request #30 from rainwoodman/patch-1

so is there any chance you stop this commit storm madness anytime soon? another bunch of 300 commit messages arrive this night On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: Hi all, there's some people who's subscribed to the commit ml, so getting all the changes

Re: Fwd: [Python-modules-commits] [python-mplexporter] 135/135: Merge pull request #30 from rainwoodman/patch-1

skip any changes in upstream/* (or whatever other name we'll choose) branches? (or only a brief notification a new push has been made on that branch) Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org

Fwd: [Python-modules-commits] [python-mplexporter] 135/135: Merge pull request #30 from rainwoodman/patch-1

___ Python-modules-commits mailing list python-modules-comm...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-commits -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me

Re: Proposed git migration plan

* what are the problems we currently have and that we want to solve, then we're just proposing a technical exercise without a real gain. and I cant stress this point never enough. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http

Re: Proposed git migration plan

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote: Hi Sandro, On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Sandro Tosi wrote: It seems to me like very vocal Git fanatics, who refuse to touch any package which is not maintained in Git (-.-), are pushing and pushing to that VCS without any

Re: Proposed git migration plan

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Antoine Musso has...@free.fr wrote: Le 27/08/2014 10:13, Sandro Tosi a écrit : snip Offline commits? how many time (for real..) you badly needed it? i guess so few that if you (for one time) just do a big commit instead of a storm of micro commit the world

Re: Proposed git migration plan

Standard-Versions, or to update debian/watch?). turning down my arguments because your wf is flawed because you use crappy tool is kinda weak but I'll accept it. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http

Re: python3-django and mysqldb

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au wrote: Have CCed the maintainer (Debian Python Modules Team is uploader). Sandro Tosi, do you have any objections if I package the latest version for Debian? it seems you uploaded anyway, but that's ok, thanks

Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same

. On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: Hi, Indeed, that's the same source package. Indeed as well, there's lots of problems in the current package in Debian. The current maintainer, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org, completely removes the futures API

Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same

of team maintenance? lecturing is not required, thanks -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe

Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same

). it is not the first time your interactions with DMPT or its team members has been problematic (if you need a hint, think about all the problems your fanatism to GIT has generated): maybe it's you that should rethink how you interact with the team and stop imposing your way. -- Sandro Tosi (aka

Re: python-networkx 1.8 in Sid

it, but thanks for asking. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules

rule, with just one exception: I'm calling source package python-X if X is too generic (see python-psutil, where upstream is calling the project psutil, too close to psutils). I don't feel there's anything to fix here, or to write a policy for source package name. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph

Re: Request to Join Project Python Modules Packaging Team from Mike Neish (neishm-guest)

on SVN Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: Accepted python-defaults 2.7.3-5 (source all)

for orders by the ultimate master - well done. I would suggest moving on to more constructive topics. sure let's ignore the problem, it's so much easier, isn't it? that's how the whole story was handled, so I can see your point here. well done, again. -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus

Re: Accepted python-defaults 2.7.3-5 (source all)

v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlGHAEsACgkQStlRaw+TLJz76gCeNKshCnWQDMSXEZtUVuqxvN4h hMsAoJOyX9bZkekVlgXjVZ+cTOjWfXQV =0CrF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

Re: Accepted python-defaults 2.7.3-5 (source all)

The lack of discussion, as mandated by TC. On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote: Do you object to the dropping of 2.6 or just the lack of discussion before it was done? Scott K On Monday, May 06, 2013 09:29:11 AM Sandro Tosi wrote: Hello, has

Re: About canonical Vcs fields

don't care. -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: [Python-apps-commits] r9456 - in packages/pyflakes/trunk/debian (7 files)

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs x...@debian.org wrote: On 25 February 2013 19:03, Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com wrote: hey, can you stop committing huge changes without asking to uploaders first? I've already contacted you when you un-coordinately upload pyflakes

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

release into the repository and they disappear is *not* what team maintenance is for (which might be the situation at hand given zigo just joined and we don't have any history); so please at least try to get in contact with the uploaders first (isn't it xnox?) -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 02/14/2013 04:53 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: If the team is in Maintainer field, I think you can freely upload the new version. See http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam/HowToJoin

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

search into the mailing list archive about the several iterations of such discussion and the outcome of them. -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python

Re: [Python-apps-commits] r9437 - in packages/pyflakes/trunk/debian (6 files)

Applications Packaging Team python-apps-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Uploaders: Tristan Seligmann mithra...@mithrandi.net, Varun Hiremath va...@debian.org, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.50~), python-support (= 1.0.0), python +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9), python

Re: python-xlrd

are more forced to ask Thomas first given the huge changes you're planning to do: did you contact him (it doesn't seem so from your email)? have you done that in a public tracable way (pinging a bug, f.e.)? did you give him enough time to reply? -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website

Re: python-xlrd

as of now: the team would fix the issues arising. -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Re: python-xlrd

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Thomas Kluyver tho...@kluyver.me.uk wrote: On 6 February 2013 19:30, Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com wrote: please read our unwritten policy about Maintainer field at http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam/HowToJoin As a general rule of thumb, just

Re: pythonX.Y maintenance team

ground to say that (but feel free to point me to what makes you think so, I might have expressed myself incorrectly). For sure, keeping the situation as it is doesn't make me satisfied (for any value that expression can have). Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website

Re: pythonX.Y maintenance team

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote: On Friday, April 13, 2012 08:37:26 AM Sandro Tosi wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 23:35, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote: On Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:04:33 PM Sandro Tosi wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2012

<    1   2   3   4   5   >