Dear Debian team,
I was thinking about the current Sid situation of jackd2 and libopus,
and I do not known if this was already discussed neither if there are
some (QA?) tools to address the following.
Is there a possibility to evaluate package dependency relation in terms
of, for instance:
-
Hi,
This reminds me also the work of Lucas:
https://trends.debian.net/
that is not a member of the list in the Wiki Page of the Debian QA Group:
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org
I just found this in the Debian Wiki:
https://wiki.debian.org/Trends
but I suppose it is a bit old regarding
Dear Debian QA team,
For my curiosity, I am currently working to get a kind of QA webpage for the
list of packages that have not been «uploaded» since years (more than 3 by
default), for example: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/beav, meaning also no
change across Debian releases.
Technically it is
Hi,
Regarding DUCK it seems not to be very active looking there:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/duck
and its VCS is not responding.
Perhaps I will consider another Debian tool then...
Subsidiary question: contrary to the recent Debian Janitor now in the list,
Debian Trends
Hi Paul,
That is a good point and I will look for this.
Thanks for the advice!
I also working on a tool that tries checking (and suggest updates) to a given
list of URLs: bad links, different cases of redirections, replacing http by
https, etc.
This exercice was first to go over, Paul, your
Dear QA Team,
I hope to address here an interesting point otherwise sorry for the noise.
You may already have a (better) way to track this but... where?
(I did not see something related in the long list of the Debian QA Group's Wiki)
Also I hope to not offend any maintainer work providing a list
Thanks!
But I am still surprise to see such case for instance:
curl -s https://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/oldstable/main/source/Sources.xz |
xzgrep -A 3 "Package: appdirs"
Package: appdirs
Binary: python-appdirs, python3-appdirs, pypy-appdirs
Version: 1.4.0-2
Maintainer: Benjamin Drung
--
Hi,
So I'm assuming you are talking about the contents of Installed-Build-Depends
which is part of the .buildinfo file of the build packages output.
Because I tried to check the .deb content, the UDD, the different index files of
the Debian pool and also DPT, to find such a relationship but
Hi,
I am surprised to find multiple entries for a given package and
architecture having different versions
in a specific (same distribution, release, component) source index file.
For instance:
curl -s https://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/experimental/main/source/Sources.xz
| xzgrep -A 7
Hi,
I do not know if this is something already addressed.
Otherwise could it be interesting to handle such a situation in a
Debian QA perspective?
Regards,
Patrice
$ apt-file search environ.7.gz
manpages: /usr/share/man/man7/environ.7.gz
manpages-cs: /usr/share/man/cs/man7/environ.7.gz
Package: fwanalog
Version: 0.6.9-9
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The upgrade of the package failed due to this.
Thanks,
Patrice
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
merged-usr: no
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign
Source: fwanalog
Version: 0.6.9-9
Followup-For: Bug #1018875
Hi,
Regarding https://sources.debian.org/src/fwanalog/0.6.9-8/support/, the two
following files were removed in 0.6.9-9:
rw-r--r-- 1,439 mklangfile.fr.sh
rw-r--r-- 2,648 mklangfile.it.sh
(Note that the file rights are
Hi,
Regarding my previous post about replacing '2&>1' by '2>&1', most of
the issues reported upstream have been closed. Great!
Another point is about the following command:
apt-file search -x 'python(2|3\.(0|2|4|5|6|7|8|9))'
?
Is there something about this related to the Debian
Sorry maybe I wasn't clear enough, but my purpose was more to track packages
facing such cases (a subset of my first pattern):
chiark-scripts: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/fishdescriptor/__init__.py
chiark-scripts: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/fishdescriptor/indonor.py
gtimelog:
Hi,
I am facing ^M (\r) character in the .build output file using sbuild
on my system (Sid).
For instance:
$ file timidity_2.14.0-9_amd64-2023-03-18T18:33:37Z.build
timidity_2.14.0-9_amd64-2023-03-18T18:33:37Z.build: ASCII text, with
very long lines (307), with CRLF, CR, LF line terminators
It
Hi,
Following the recent case of #1032122 (chkrootkit: bad redirection
creating file '1'?) and previously #1030120 (ipmiutil: cron script is
creating file /root/1), I tried using Debian CodeSearch to look for
other possible wrong cases like those and here is for instance a list
of candidates to
Great, I will give a look at shellcheck.
Regarding the upstream cases, at least I started with two of them:
1. https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/3/1/396
2. https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/1787
And let's see my level of courage for the others.
Thanks!
Le mer. 1 mars 2023 à 01:38, James Addison a
Sorry.
So I should have split this work into two patches and then sent one to
linux-perf-user and the other one to linux-kselftest.
Would it be possible to send an email to these (sub)lists with just a
ref to my first post then or do I really have to split the patch etc.?
Any script to magically
to handle some of those?
But it sure would be a good thing.
Le mer. 1 mars 2023 à 18:06, James Addison a écrit :
>
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 at 15:53, Patrice Duroux wrote:
> >
> > Great, I will give a look at shellcheck.
>
> Thanks - if it can also detect these problems, then --
Sorry but the title of my message is wrong: s/having/that should have/
So stupid to create bad noise in the message archives.
Thanks Bart Martens!
ps: more MR or issues have been submitted upstream (sup-mail, plptools, vice)
Le mar. 28 févr. 2023 à 15:51, Patrice Duroux
a écrit :
>
&
Hi,
After considering https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/mrtg_2.17.10-4+b1.log
and reporting #1034530, I would like to be sure that another case
like: https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/pass/pipewire_0.3.65-3.log is
more tricky due to that pipewire may be purged after both with adduser
have been
Hi again,
Regarding the use of >&2 redirection in some echoing message,
is this useful when it is not to really do something special (hiding, ...)?
For instance:
$ sed -n 60,61p /var/lib/dpkg/info/xserver-xorg-legacy.postinst
echo "not updating $XWRAPPER_CONFIG; problems communicating" \
Hi,
Thanks for all your replies.
I built a small script that based on codesearch-cli tries to
approximate(*) the current state and
here is its current output:
[preinst]
adduser: 1useradd: 5both: 0 ()
deluser: 0userdel: 0both: 0 ()
addgroup: 12groupadd: 3both: 0 ()
Nice catch!
Even if it is also not available in a Debian package.
Let see if this one is less runtime sensitive and not suffering from the lack of
an installation procedure. Using codesearch-cli.py as is (and without modifying
the Python env by anyway) outside its own directory will throw a Python
Hi,
I would have helped more but looking in the source code of
jenkins.debian.net, I could not understand why the 'Tested suite' list
is sorted differently than in the other pages.
Regards,
Patrice
Hi Holger,
> thanks for reaching out and reporting the issue, which I have now fixed
> with
>
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/jenkins.debian.net/-/commit/6503fafd91f58b4a3b4dbff4b358a1ac3a2b7d00
So simple, stupid me. :)
> It might take up to 24h until the fix has propagated everywhere and
> the fix
Dear weston maintainers,
If I follow well, this request is already closed by this commit:
https://salsa.debian.org/xorg-team/wayland/weston/-/commit/a3edbe19bd55b8eee64e0a40c459c25e22afb4a9
that is included in 11.0.0-2 (rc-buggy).
Dear QA team,
My trouble was that its Debian Package Tracker
Hi,
My starting point is:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libxmp
that does not show the new upstream 4.6.0 (since 2023-06-15)
and UDD says also that upstream_version is 4.5.0 and not 4.6.0
Are the Debian Tracker content based on UDD?
How often is UDD content updated?
I checked at:
Hi,
I am a bit surprised with the following output:
udd=> select distinct distribution from upload_history;
distribution
-
experimental
froxzen unstable
froze unstable
frozen
frozen unstable
frozen unstable
frozen unstable contrib
frozen woody
web/cgi-bin/mentors.cgi:elsif l['distribution'] == 'experimental'
web/cgi-bin/mentors.cgi: puts "#{l['distribution']}"
And here it is the 'mentors_most_recent_package_versions' view based
on the 'mentors_raw_uploads' table.
Could this be improved or too late?
How? (some SQL ALTE
Ok so this is probably due to the version of the DHs used when generating the
postrm script during packaging.
On my system, the diversity is quite large regarding all the installed packages
and the dh_installsystemd:
$ grep -ho 'dh_installsystemd/.\+' /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.postrm | cut -d '/'
so could I suggest to consider the following packages:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sump-logicanalyzer - 2011-07-27
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libvirt-tck - 2011-11-13
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dtc - 2012-06-08
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tinysvm - 2013-02-16
Hi,
By the time on my Sid system, there is an accumulation of:
$ systemctl list-units --all | grep '●'
● run-credentials-systemd\x2dresolved.service.mount
not-found inactive dead
run-credentials-systemd\x2dresolved.service.mount
●
Hi,
Nice I found some similar cases to your one.
But I have even more strange cases like:
$ systemctl list-units --all "alsa*"
UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUB DESCRIPTION
● alsa-restore.service not-found inactive dead alsa-restore.service
● alsa-state.service not-found
Hi Lucas,
My curiosity sometimes pushes me to look at the list of packages that haven't
been uploaded to the archive both in unstable and experimental releases in more
than a certain number of years. And UDD is so useful for that!!
Many thanks,
Patrice
Hi,
Not sure where to address my point here.
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/puppet shows exp: 6.16.0-1
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/puppetserver shows exp: 8.4.0-1~exp1
And as both puppet and puppetserver provide the same binary packages
(puppet-master and puppet-master-passenger), it is a
Thanks!
My point is more on this fact:
is this a consequence of the fact that both src:puppet (6.16.0-1) and
src:puppetserver (8.4.0-1~exp1) are in experimental? And if this is
the case, why should the former still be there?
37 matches
Mail list logo
