Le 25/08/2017 à 08:10, Cédric Boutillier a écrit :
> Hi Philippe,
Hi Cédric,
> I've had a look at ruby-em-proxy. The package looks fine. Just a few
> details:
>
>
> - I am not sure deleting the Gemfile.lock is necessary. Is there a
> particular reason for that?
I had some problems with rspec
Hi Philippe,
Sorry for the delay. I've just uploaded ruby-net-dns.
I've had a look at ruby-em-proxy. The package looks fine. Just a few
details:
- to disable a test with rspec: simpler to replace it by xit instead of
deleting the whole test
- I am not sure deleting the Gemfile.lock is
Le 02/07/2017 à 12:13, Cédric Boutillier a écrit :
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 03:20:37PM +0200, Philippe Thierry wrote:
>>>
ruby-em-proxy (>= 0.1.8)
ruby-net-dns (>= 0.8.0)
ruby-network-interface (>= 0.0.1)
ruby-rubydns (>= 1.0.3)
> I had a brief look at
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 03:20:37PM +0200, Philippe Thierry wrote:
> >> I'm currently looking forward to package bettercap[1][2] in Debian,
> >yet this tool as multiple unsatistied dependencies on ruby libs:
> >> ruby-em-proxy (>= 0.1.8)
> >> ruby-net-dns (>= 0.8.0)
> >>
Le 22 juin 2017 15:03:57 GMT+02:00, "Cédric Boutillier" a
écrit :
>Hi Philippe,
>
>On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:23:24PM +0200, Philippe Thierry wrote:
>>[...]
>> I'm currently looking forward to package bettercap[1][2] in Debian,
>yet this tool as multiple unsatistied
Hi Philippe,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:23:24PM +0200, Philippe Thierry wrote:
>[...]
> I'm currently looking forward to package bettercap[1][2] in Debian, yet this
> tool as multiple unsatistied dependencies on ruby libs:
> ruby-em-proxy (>= 0.1.8)
> ruby-net-dns (>= 0.8.0)
>
6 matches
Mail list logo