On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:35:41PM +0100, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
On Tuesday 04 December 2007 09:54, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:27:22AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
Many people seem to think that ftp.debian.org is the canonical location
of Debian packages
.
--
Josip Rodin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with reasonably
responsive maintainers will not be affected; those who have ignored our
advice might notice changes.)
--
Josip Rodin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
]
--
Josip Rodin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 04:43:18AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:00:55 -0500 (CDT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In effort to control spam email we have implemented an email
verification system.
..url to credentials? This _is_ an official
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 07:17:47AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
This means e.g. gmane.org users will get a copy of each message, even
though they've already read them.
No, it doesn't. Try thinking about what it means when the web page says
This list is not moderated, posting is allowed to
Hi,
Please don't file bugs about .debian.org DNS records missing on
www.debian.org, that is not a suitable pseudo-package for this kind
of an issue and there's none other appropriate.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 11:29:50PM +0200, Manuel Samper wrote:
Debian has provides a security patch for Potato but not for
Woody/Sid. See http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-131
Debian does not provide security updates for testing or for unstable.
Need to get 2188kB/16.6MB of
Someone please deal with this...
- Forwarded message from Miguel Gomard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 11:29:34 +0200
From: Miguel Gomard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: info
Importance: Normal
Bonjour,
Je me permet de vous envoyer ce mail;
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 01:37:10AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Why is it prompting for these when I have not modified them at all
AFAIK? Is this a bug in dpkg or a packaging error? Anyone know?
You'll have to compare MD5 checksums to figure that out. Without those
we really can't say
- Forwarded message from Guy Nils [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 May 2002 02:29:11 +0200
From: Guy Nils [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new in debian need help
please if you can tell my
1)can i install debian sendmailon a SPARCstation
2)and if i can so
- Forwarded message from Varady Geza [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 May 2002 17:05:52 +0200
From: Varady Geza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debian hpt370 raid
Hi There,
I have a question, hopefully short enough worth answering :),
thank
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 11:20:08AM +0700, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote:
When you install from scratch you lose the configuration file changes on the
old installation.
It is not a problem, since most of the configs are default anyway.
Maybe for you...
Set the debconf level to critical
- Forwarded message from Chris Beswick [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 00:43:16 +0200
From: Chris Beswick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: iBook 600MHz
Hi,
I have been unable to get woody (the latest netinst cd) to find my hd during
install (ie fdisk
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:00:32PM +0700, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote:
I believe that most packages will be upgraded when stable is changed from
potato to woody. I guess that that process will be relatively slower since
it has to delete/ replace the old packages first before installing the
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 20 07:37:13 2002
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 07:37:05 +0100
Received: from master.debian.org ([216.234.231.5])
by cibalia.gkvk.hr with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16nZib-Nz-00
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 20 19:25:04 2002
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:25:03 +0100
Received: from master.debian.org ([216.234.231.5])
by cibalia.gkvk.hr with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16nkli-0003ei-00
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 12:30:51PM -0300, Hélio Alexandre Lopes Loureiro wrote:
It seems the mirrors on debian.lcmi.ufsc.br haven't been updated in a
while. Can you fix them, please?
I can't keep debian.lcmi.ufsc.br mirror up-to-date because some
repairs in room leave all machines
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 06:23:53PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
is there any online resource that documents the (current) status of the
woody freeze process?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2002/debian-devel-announce-200202/
(see all the release status updates?)
i just want
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 15 14:24:13 2002
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:24:10 +0100
Received: from master.debian.org ([216.234.231.5] ident=mail)
by cibalia.gkvk.hr with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id
Hi,
I so sincerely hope someone can help these nice, friendly people :)
- Forwarded message from Enduser [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 05:11:00 +0100
From: Enduser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bulk Mail Friendly Hosting Needed
X-Spam-Status: No,
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 01:38:21PM +, Rob Bradford wrote:
The Debian FAQoamtic seems to have disappeared, maybe a simpler FAQ
system should be developed from which we can export in variety of
formats to go to build up the debian-faq documentation.
I really don't think the format is crucial
Hi guys,
If anyone has some time to go through Debian Planet, Debian Help and other
similar sites and make a list of frequently asked questions, preferably with
answers, please do, and send me the results. :)
I think it's (way past) time to extend the Debian FAQ with some of that
stuff, like
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 01:29:56AM -0800, tluxt wrote:
Also document installed by apt-howto are useful.
Oh, my web page below also has some hints. Cheers :)
+ My debian quick-reference, http://qref.sourceforge.net/quick/ +
I found your quick reference very informative also!
Hi,
Will someone please explain to this person that we didn't usurp his web site :p
- Forwarded message from Pablo Prieto [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 04:50:56 +0100
From: Pablo Prieto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Corrijan este error
Date: Thu,
Hi,
The new xmms package that just got installed in unstable doesn't have the
locale stuff. Yes, I have noticed. Yes, I have persisted in uploading it
that way because it is not fatal and the new release fixes other, more fatal
bugs.
If you know an xmms user which might go berserk seeing this,
- Forwarded message from Bhavin Desai [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 12:06:04 +0100
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Originating-IP: [202.70.194.29]
From: Bhavin Desai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc:
Subject: Need E-Mail Distribution Server
Date:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 04:33:08PM -0500, rj fleck wrote:
Package: xmms
Version: 1.2.5-2
Severity: important
seems to have only started happening on newer versions of the x-libraries
ii xlibs 4.1.0-7X Window System client libraries
I've got xlibs 4.1.0-5 here
Hi,
Here's some interesting trivia: the debian-announce mailing list now has
more than twenty thousand subscribers. See http://lists.debian.org/stats/
for that and more statistics about our mailing lists[1].
I propose a virtual toast: here's to the twenty thousand, and let's hope
that the
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 08:58:46AM -0300, Marcos Alexandre Castilho wrote:
-- Marcos, thanks about your interest in keep a brazilian mirror.
-- It's a real complex-time-consuming-job, but an honor too. Just not me,
-- but all brazilian debian users are glad for you. If you need help,
- Forwarded message from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Delivery-date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:33:04 +0200
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 19:54:06 +0200
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gdk-imlib1_1.9.11-1.i386.deb is missing
- Forwarded message from Nicolò Chieffo [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:37:24 +0200
From: Nicolò Chieffo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: error in packages dependancies
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 17:33:17 +0200
debian:/var/cache/apt/archives# apt-get
- Forwarded message from kaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 20:36:29 +0200
From: kaki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 09:34:34 +0300
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 01:35:48AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
dialout:
HELP: Is this used for /dev/cua devices or something?
Like, find /dev -group dialout
dip:
HELP: WHat did this group's name signify? DIaluP?
The name dip probably comes from the name of the dip program. :)
Hi people,
I've made some changes to http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting that the
readers of this list should know about. It now suggests asking here in case
the reader/bug submitter doesn't have a clue what package has s/he noticed a
problem in.
This seemed like a sensible thing to do, since a
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 06:19:39PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
I've been having problems for ages with XMMS, and I just thought I'd put a
little flag up to see if anyone else has has similar experiences. In
particular, XMMS seems to have a really hard time playing nicely with
respect to it's
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 06:51:51PM -0200, Hélio Alexandre Lopes Loureiro wrote:
ftp.br.debian.org, the official Brazilian mirror, and several Debian users
from Brazil have asked about it, would you be interested to have us assign
that address to your server? (I believe I inquired about
Hi people,
It appears there's something fscked up with debconf+X+perl upgrade procedure
in sid, upgrading from potato. The upgrade left me without /etc/X11/X (I've
already filed a bug about that) and see what I get when I try to reconfigure
stuff:
# dpkg-reconfigure xserver-common
Can't locate
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:18:48AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
It appears there's something fscked up with debconf+X+perl upgrade
procedure in sid, upgrading from potato. The upgrade left me without
/etc/X11/X (I've already filed a bug about that) and see what I get when
I try to reconfigure
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:41:30PM +0100, joy wrote:
I guess I could close #83731 now, but I still don't know how to get
/etc/X11/X, how does it get created?
Ah, dpkg-reconfigure xserver-s3 did it. I'll assume that had it not been for
debconf/perl errors, the upgrade process would have done it.
Hi people,
As the subject says, I'd like to have a list with hanging indentation in a
manual page. Basically, I want to see this list in xmms(1):
* Audio MPEG layer 1, 2, and 3 (with mpg123 plug-in),
* WAV, RAW, AU (with internal wav plug-in and MikMod plug-
in),
*
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 10:28:12PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
There's a bug filed against the doc-debian package, including the Debian
FAQ, about not having good backup instructions for users (admins). See
http://bugs.debian.org/69197 for details.
Can someone please suggest an
Hi,
There's a bug filed against the doc-debian package, including the Debian
FAQ, about not having good backup instructions for users (admins). See
http://bugs.debian.org/69197 for details.
Can someone please suggest an answer to such a question so I can include it
in the FAQ? `apt-cache search
Hi people,
I was wondering if someone can tell me what is this about:
Oct 29 21:36:30 hostname dhcpd-2.2.x: BOOTREQUEST from 00:00:79:58:97:27 via
eth0 (non-rfc1048)
Oct 29 21:36:30 hostname dhcpd-2.2.x: No applicable record for BOOTP host
00:00:79:58:97:27 via eth0
This keeps happening at
Note: I don't read -user, just -devel, so I just saw this thread. I
apologize for duplication, if someone already said things I'm going to say
in my message.
Kurt Seifried wrote:
Basically, you are forking development. There is now a version to be
found in all the standard places where you
[please CC: any replies to -user]
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 02:24:10PM -0400, Maitland Bottoms wrote:
What should the permissions and ownership of /tmp/.X11-unix be to make
the X server happy?
drwxrwxrwt2 root usersgroup 1024 Jun 24 01:44 /tmp/.X11-unix
I'm not sure if the latest X
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 07:37:59PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
Apt uses a mixed approach: it uses the same textfiles as dpkg but
uses a binary cache to also get the advantages of a binary database.
it does? where?
See /var/cache/apt/*.bin files.
An example why is that good is the speed of
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 11:47:36AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Looking at the Debian home page, one get the impression that only the
now very old Slink distribution, with kernel 2.0.36, old X, old libc,
etc, released March 1999 is available.
It's the official one, still.
The News section
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 02:16:08PM +0200, Michel Verdier wrote:
| deb packages are a lot harder to create for the novice users. There is
| not much documentation to help in this area either.
There is perhaps not much documentation but :
# ls /usr/man/man1/dh*|wc -l
30
You people
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 04:54:14PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On one of my servers, I had to put this in pap-secrets to allow dialins:
# Every regular user can use PPP and has to use passwords from /etc/passwd
* silly *
hamishsilly 203.14.18.2
charles
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 12:04:30PM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
Guess I'm a tester.
debian-testing or debian-boot mailing lists might be more appropriate.
Almost every went well...except lynx.
.. dpkg error processing lynx
subproc post - install script returned error exit status 30
Hi people,
Sorry, I speak only English (and Croatian :), but I hope you'll understand
me.
I need someone to translate the CVS version of maint-guide document,
to-be version 0.96, so I can make a maint-guide-es package. Javier
Fernandes Sanguino Pena has shown me some references and I thought
On Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 06:36:47PM +0200, Robert Vollmert wrote:
With /bin/sh - /bin/ash, I get the following error:
guess.datestyle: 25: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ))
It works fine with bash. It seems the opening brace on
case $x in ( SystemV | posix | right )
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 02:16:59PM +0200, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote:
I've noticed some problem with manual pages of xemacs (an I think that
also with tin). When I run man, when it's updating the cache, it shows
a lot of annoying messages on screen of the following type:
[snip]
Why these
Hi,
I typed:
$ cvs commit -r 1.5 maint-guide.sgml
Edited the changelog, saved it, exited, and after some time got this
message:
cvs server: Up-to-date check failed for `maint-guide.sgml'
cvs [server aborted]: correct above errors first!
cvs commit: saving log message in /tmp/cvs01258baa
What
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 05:37:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I typed:
$ cvs commit -r 1.5 maint-guide.sgml
Edited the changelog, saved it, exited, and after some time got this
message:
cvs server: Up-to-date check failed for `maint-guide.sgml'
cvs [server
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 05:52:24AM -0700, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
How many bits of encryption does Mozilla use for secure documents? If
I am to use Mozilla as a replacement for netscape I'd like to see the
128 bit version, so I can use it for on-line purchases for e-merchants
with a credit
Hi people,
You can find mozilla .debs compiled for glibc2.0 (slink version) here:
http://pandora.debian.org/~joy/slink/
They worked on a mostly-slink system I tried them on.
I guess I should put a recompiled libgtk1.2 and libglib1.2 there, too...
tell me if anything else is needed.
On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 10:20:00AM -0700, Steven Work wrote:
I guess I should put a recompiled libgtk1.2 and libglib1.2 there, too...
tell me if anything else is needed.
I am using the ones that came with the gnome slink
compile. All is fine untill now.
But the dependencies require
Hi people,
Mark Eichin and Stephen Pitts were kind enough to do extra research
on why doesn't mozilla start on some occasions. And Stephen actually
got it all right :)
If it is run by an ordinary user, mozilla can't write files in
/usr/lib/mozilla directory, which is the $MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME
Hi people,
The subject says it all. They're also in http://pandora.debian.org/~joy/ .
Sorry, they'll run only on the unstable distribution (libc6 2.1)
--
enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 12:06:47PM -0400, William R Pentney wrote:
Just downloaded the new GNOME from the slink staging area ... but when I
try to run it, all I get is the following error:
GImLib ERROR: Cannot find file : /etc/im/im_palette.pal
gdk_imlib : Cannot find Palette. A Palette file
Hi everyone,
Me and Brent Fulgham managed to get Mozilla (nescaffe 5.0 prerelease
for those who don't know) milestone four (M4) Debian package ready
for wider testing. Please, download the .debs (two are needed, mozilla
and libnspr21) from here:
http://www.debian.org/~joy/mozilla/
If
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 02:33:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Libraries that have packaged for the first time after the release of hamm
typically do not have a libc5 compatibility version, and omit the g.
This is the reason why I'm asking. The mentioned package is being built
for the first
On 22.12.1998., at 14:35, Erick Branderhorst wrote:
JR There are two bug reports, and from what I can see,
JR you are/were the maintainer of mathpad. But, now I
JR can't find that package. Should the bugs (#2231 and
JR #3312) be closed now?
I don't maintain the package any more,
65 matches
Mail list logo
