On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 3:12 PM Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 10:49:16PM +0100, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote:
> > Greg Wooledge () wrote:
> >
> > > It's not just you. The use of three "b" names in a row (buster,
> > > bullseye, bookworm) was in my opinion a poor decision. I've
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 10:49:16PM +0100, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote:
> Greg Wooledge () wrote:
>
> > It's not just you. The use of three "b" names in a row (buster,
> > bullseye, bookworm) was in my opinion a poor decision. I've taken
> > to calling the releases by their numbers (10, 11, 12)
Greg Wooledge () wrote:
> It's not just you. The use of three "b" names in a row (buster,
> bullseye, bookworm) was in my opinion a poor decision. I've taken
> to calling the releases by their numbers (10, 11, 12) instead of
> their codenames to avoid confusion wherever possible.
>
I feel
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 01:31:40PM -0400, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
> On Sunday 17 March 2024 08:48:29 am Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 12:35:33PM +0100, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote:
> > > Well... it seems my brain can't distinguish Bookworm from Bullseye.
> >
> > It's not just
On Sunday 17 March 2024 08:48:29 am Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 12:35:33PM +0100, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote:
> > Well... it seems my brain can't distinguish Bookworm from Bullseye.
>
> It's not just you. The use of three "b" names in a row (buster,
> bullseye, bookworm) was in
On 2024-03-17 at 08:48, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 12:35:33PM +0100, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote:
>
>> Well... it seems my brain can't distinguish Bookworm from
>> Bullseye.
>
> It's not just you. The use of three "b" names in a row (buster,
> bullseye, bookworm) was in my
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 12:35:33PM +0100, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote:
> Well... it seems my brain can't distinguish Bookworm from Bullseye.
It's not just you. The use of three "b" names in a row (buster,
bullseye, bookworm) was in my opinion a poor decision. I've taken
to calling the releases by
Well... it seems my brain can't distinguish Bookworm from Bullseye.
Virtualbox is now installed from Fasttrack repository and is working fine.
Sorry for the inconveniences
"Miguel A. Vallejo" writes:
> Xiyue Deng () wrote:
>
>> See the version of virtualbox-qt has `fto11' instead of `fto12', while
>> looking at the repo I can find the build for fto12[1]. What's also
>> weird is that for all fasttrack supported releases I can only see
>> version 7.0.12 but no
Xiyue Deng () wrote:
> See the version of virtualbox-qt has `fto11' instead of `fto12', while
> looking at the repo I can find the build for fto12[1]. What's also
> weird is that for all fasttrack supported releases I can only see
> version 7.0.12 but no 7.0.6. Anyway, can you paste your
"Miguel A. Vallejo" writes:
> Xiyue Deng wrote:
>
>>
>> If you followed the fasttrack instruction on the website[1] literally,
>> you may be adding bullseye-fasttrack instead of bookworm-fasttrack where
>> the latter is what you wanted.
>>
>> [1] https://fasttrack.debian.net/
>>
>> --
>> Xiyue
Xiyue Deng wrote:
>
> If you followed the fasttrack instruction on the website[1] literally,
> you may be adding bullseye-fasttrack instead of bookworm-fasttrack where
> the latter is what you wanted.
>
> [1] https://fasttrack.debian.net/
>
> --
> Xiyue Deng
>
Of course I did it for Bookworm.
"Miguel A. Vallejo" writes:
> Hello!
>
> This evening I tried to install virtualbox into a fresh Bookworm install. I
> followed the steps in Virtualbox's Debian Wiki entry. After set up
> fasttrack repository successfully and issue a apt install virtualbox
> command I get:
>
>
>
> Reading
Hello :)
Le 15/03/2024 à 00:26, Miguel A. Vallejo a écrit :
Hello!
This evening I tried to install virtualbox into a fresh Bookworm
install. I followed the steps in Virtualbox's Debian Wiki entry. After
set up fasttrack repository successfully and issue a apt install
virtualbox command I
14 matches
Mail list logo
