On 2024-04-16, John Crawley wrote:
>
> If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
> that supports IMAP.
>
Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.
>>>
>>> AIUI the OP's problem was not when reading mail, but with mail
>>> submission of
On 2024-04-16, Max Nikulin wrote:
>
> If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
> that supports IMAP.
Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.
>>>
>>> AIUI the OP's problem was not when reading mail, but with mail
>>> submission of
On Mon 15 Apr 2024 at 18:52:33 (-), Curt wrote:
> On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote:
> >> On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
> >> >
> >> > If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
> >> > that supports IMAP.
On 16/04/2024 01:52, Curt wrote:
On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote:
On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
that supports IMAP.
Gmail supports IMAP since more or less
On 16/04/2024 03:52, Curt wrote:
On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote:
On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
that supports IMAP.
Gmail supports IMAP since more or less
On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote:
>> On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
>> >
>> > If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
>> > that supports IMAP.
>> >
>>
>> Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.
>
>
On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote:
> On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
> >
> > If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
> > that supports IMAP.
> >
>
> Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.
AIUI the OP's problem was not when reading
On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
>
> If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
> that supports IMAP.
>
Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.
On 31/03/2024 22:35, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 31 Mar 2024 at 09:42:37 (+0300), Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
But I'm worried my Gmail in Firefox is capable of stealing
files off my USB stick.
I've no answer for that, particularly in view of Max's reply
to my previous post.
I've always copied
I filed bug report 1068122. I feel fine, despite my concern over my data.
Heartfelt thanks for all the advice!
On Sun 31 Mar 2024 at 09:42:37 (+0300), Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
> I'm mounting and unmounting through the stick icon's menu on Xfce desktop.
> Maybe a fancy file chooser dialogue stays around analyzing the directory,
> as you suspect? But I'm worried my Gmail in Firefox is capable of stealing
>
I'm mounting and unmounting through the stick icon's menu on Xfce desktop.
Maybe a fancy file chooser dialogue stays around analyzing the directory,
as you suspect? But I'm worried my Gmail in Firefox is capable of stealing
files off my USB stick.
On 31/03/2024 11:46, David Wright wrote:
Double-clicking on the directory
mounts it and displays the files in it. Opening a text file
displays it. At least for a small file, FF does not hold the
file open, so I can immediately unmount the stick.
Gmail may do something more fancy
-
On Sat 30 Mar 2024 at 21:06:27 (+0200), Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
> I was able to replicate this, by trying to send gmail to myself in Firefox,
> attaching a binary on a mounted USB stick.
Did you mount the stick yourself as a user (ie there's an
fstab entry for it), or as root, or does an
On 3/30/24 08:17, Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
What could be the deal, when Firefox tries to stop me from unmounting a
stick, after I've accessed files on it through Firefox? I worry about my
stick security. Thanks.
Linux knows what files are open on each file system. If you try to
unmount
I'd just like to add that I have seen the problem despite reinstalls with
Debian stable minor versions. Thanks!
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 07:32:16PM +0200, Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
> Yes, closing Firefox does allow the stick to unmount cleanly, but I still
> worry.
To get an idea of what's going on, you can use "lsof":
tomas@trotzki:~$ lsof /dev/sda1
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE
I can replicate this, by trying to send Gmail to myself in Firefox,
attaching a binary on a mounted USB stick. After the attachment supposedly
was uploaded, I tried to unmount the stick, but it blocked. "lsof | grep -i
KINGSTON" then shows a total of 129 lines from "x-www-browser". This lasted
for
I was able to replicate this, by trying to send gmail to myself in Firefox,
attaching a binary on a mounted USB stick. After the attachment supposedly
was uploaded, I tried to unmount the stick, but it blocks. "lsof | grep -i
KINGSTON" then shows a total of 129 lines from "x-www-browser". This
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 17:17:52 +0200
Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
> What could be the deal, when Firefox tries to stop me from unmounting
> a stick, after I've accessed files on it through Firefox? I worry
> about my stick security. Thanks.
It sounds like Firefox has a file open on the stick. To
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 1:19 PM gene heskett wrote:
>
> On 3/30/24 11:36, Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
> > What could be the deal, when Firefox tries to stop me from unmounting a
> > stick, after I've accessed files on it through Firefox? I worry about
> > my stick security. Thanks.
>
> Since
Yes, closing Firefox does allow the stick to unmount cleanly, but I still
worry.
On 3/30/24 11:36, Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
What could be the deal, when Firefox tries to stop me from unmounting a
stick, after I've accessed files on it through Firefox? I worry about
my stick security. Thanks.
Since this is normally a root operation, I'm confused. Likely what it
means
23 matches
Mail list logo
