gefixt (was: (wellicht al gefixt) Re: spamassassin spam drempel gehaald, maar X-Spam-Status: No)

>>> Ben ik weer :-) >>> >>> Het Bayes filter lijkt te werken, de hoeveelheid spam die in de INBOXen >>> terecht komt wordt minder. >>> >>> Gisteren besloten de drempelwaarde voor Spam te verlagen van 5.0 (de >>> default waarde) naar 3.5 >>> >>> in /etc/spamassassin/local.conf dit opgenomen >>> >>>

Re: (wellicht al gefixt) Re: spamassassin spam drempel gehaald, maar X-Spam-Status: No

Gijs Hillenius writes: > Gijs Hillenius writes: > >> Ben ik weer :-) >> >> Het Bayes filter lijkt te werken, de hoeveelheid spam die in de INBOXen >> terecht komt wordt minder. >> >> Gisteren besloten de drempelwaarde voor Spam te verlagen van 5.0 (de >>

(wellicht al gefixt) Re: spamassassin spam drempel gehaald, maar X-Spam-Status: No

Gijs Hillenius writes: > Ben ik weer :-) > > Het Bayes filter lijkt te werken, de hoeveelheid spam die in de INBOXen > terecht komt wordt minder. > > Gisteren besloten de drempelwaarde voor Spam te verlagen van 5.0 (de > default waarde) naar 3.5 > > in

Re: Spamassassin Upgraded, Now What?

David Baron wrote: Ever since my 64-bit fresh install adventure, various things simple are not working, no idea why. If you have done a fresh install then you will need to tell us what you have done. We won't know unless you give details. I no longer get logcheck emails, for example.

Re: Spamassassin ou spampd déraille

Le 28 juin 2014, Alain Rpnpif a écrit : Bonjour, J'utilise spampd sous Wheezy depuis des lustres et il fonctionnait bien jusqu'à quelques jours. Depuis quelques semaines, il fait des rapports bizarres. Pour un message déclaré avec raison en spam, le rapport est parfois sous cette forme

Re: Spamassassin ou spampd déraille

On 06/28/2014 11:15 AM, Alain Rpnpif wrote: Bonjour, J'utilise spampd sous Wheezy depuis des lustres et il fonctionnait bien jusqu'à quelques jours. Depuis quelques semaines, il fait des rapports bizarres. Pour un message déclaré avec raison en spam, le rapport est parfois sous cette forme :

(Solucionado) Re: Spamassassin: sa-update no se ejecuta

El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:23:44 +, Camaleón escribió: El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:57:28 +0200, fernando sainz escribió: El día 26 de junio de 2013 22:47, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: (...) Tal vez debería mirar el anacron No lo tengo instalado: root@stt005:/etc# whereis

Re: Spamassassin: sa-update no se ejecuta

El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:52:41 +0200, julio escribió: El mié, 26-06-2013 a las 17:37 +, Camaleón escribió: Ostras... ¿todos se ejecutan a la vez a las 18:25? No parece muy eficiente ¿no? pensaba que los /etc/cron.x no tenían hora fija sino al buen tún-tún (franja horaria aleatoria). Por

Re: Spamassassin: sa-update no se ejecuta

No tengo a mano una maquina con spamassassin andando pero pregunto por una experiencia que tuve hace unos años: ¿No descarga las actualizaciones o no compila las reglas y hace el reload? Quizás tenga que ver con esto: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601798 (que no es un bug sino

Re: Spamassassin: sa-update no se ejecuta

El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:02:18 -0300, Santiago Liz escribió: (ese html y ese top-posting...) El día 26 de junio de 2013 12:03, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: Hace unos días activé en Wheezy la tarea del cron para actualizar a diario las reglas de spamassassin pero me he dado cuenta de

(falsa alarma) Re: Spamassassin: sa-update no se ejecuta

El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:17:13 +, Camaleón escribió: El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:02:18 -0300, Santiago Liz escribió: (ese html y ese top-posting...) El día 26 de junio de 2013 12:03, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: Hace unos días activé en Wheezy la tarea del cron para actualizar a

Re: Spamassassin: sa-update no se ejecuta

El mié, 26-06-2013 a las 15:03 +, Camaleón escribió: El archivo /etc/default/spamassassin dice que la tarea se ejecuta por las noches (el equipo se apaga por la noche) pero no sé de dónde saca esa nocturnidad porque el script está en /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin sin hora concreta de

Re: Spamassassin: sa-update no se ejecuta

El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:57:58 +0200, julio escribió: El mié, 26-06-2013 a las 15:03 +, Camaleón escribió: El archivo /etc/default/spamassassin dice que la tarea se ejecuta por las noches (el equipo se apaga por la noche) pero no sé de dónde saca esa nocturnidad porque el script está en

Re: Spamassassin: sa-update no se ejecuta

El mié, 26-06-2013 a las 17:37 +, Camaleón escribió: Ostras... ¿todos se ejecutan a la vez a las 18:25? No parece muy eficiente ¿no? pensaba que los /etc/cron.x no tenían hora fija sino al buen tún-tún (franja horaria aleatoria). Por la mañana y tempranito los daily, 06:25 (6, no 18),

Re: Spamassassin: sa-update no se ejecuta

El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:52:41 +0200, julio escribió: El mié, 26-06-2013 a las 17:37 +, Camaleón escribió: Ostras... ¿todos se ejecutan a la vez a las 18:25? No parece muy eficiente ¿no? pensaba que los /etc/cron.x no tenían hora fija sino al buen tún-tún (franja horaria aleatoria).

Re: Spamassassin: sa-update no se ejecuta

El día 26 de junio de 2013 21:58, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:52:41 +0200, julio escribió: El mié, 26-06-2013 a las 17:37 +, Camaleón escribió: Ostras... ¿todos se ejecutan a la vez a las 18:25? No parece muy eficiente ¿no? pensaba que los /etc/cron.x no

Re: Spamassassin: sa-update no se ejecuta

El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:04:23 +0200, fernando sainz escribió: El día 26 de junio de 2013 21:58, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:52:41 +0200, julio escribió: El mié, 26-06-2013 a las 17:37 +, Camaleón escribió: Ostras... ¿todos se ejecutan a la vez a las

Re: Spamassassin: sa-update no se ejecuta

El día 26 de junio de 2013 22:47, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:04:23 +0200, fernando sainz escribió: El día 26 de junio de 2013 21:58, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:52:41 +0200, julio escribió: El mié, 26-06-2013 a las 17:37

Re: Spamassassin: sa-update no se ejecuta

On 26/06/2013 17:57, fernando sainz wrote: El día 26 de junio de 2013 22:47, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:04:23 +0200, fernando sainz escribió: El día 26 de junio de 2013 21:58, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:52:41 +0200, julio

Re: Spamassassin: sa-update no se ejecuta

El Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:57:28 +0200, fernando sainz escribió: El día 26 de junio de 2013 22:47, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: (...) Tal vez debería mirar el anacron No lo tengo instalado: root@stt005:/etc# whereis anacron anacron: Pero es que tampoco creo que lo lo necesite,

Re: spamassassin and detailed logs

Russell Coker wrote: I want to see something like the above with numbers for each test so I can easily determine why the total was determined. I know that I can search through the SA configuration for each test, but this is time consuming and has the problem that the SA configuration

Re: spamassassin and detailed logs

Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote: How about piping the email through: | spamassassin -d -t -D 21 | less That will produce a summary at the bottom with the points from each rule that fired. Is that good enough? Thanks for the suggestion, however there are several problems with this.

Re: Spamassassin apprentissage

'lut, http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg901371.html f. -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe vers

Re: spamassassin -- cron.daily warning

On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:06:08 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote: On a server that still has lenny, I was getting a message (started on 27th June) as follows each day (from /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin script: Jul 2 15:16:26.778 [17797] warn: netset: cannot include 127.0.0.0/8 as it has already

Re: spamassassin -- cron.daily warning

Hi, Camaleón wrote: I can't see the problem now that you made the change. Is there still anything wrong with your current setup? :-? No, it is all fine with the change. I was going to post this as solved, but thought it might be better to see what others thought about the change and to make

Re: Spamassassin Cutoff

On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 14:56:25 +0300, David Baron wrote: Where might I set the cutoff number of points of spamassassin? Currently (defaults to) 5 and I get a lot of false alarms at 5.2, for example. Uusually (it varies depending on you setup) under /etc/mail/spamassassin/ local.cf

Re: Spamassassin Cutoff

On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 02:56:25PM +0300, David Baron wrote: Where might I set the cutoff number of points of spamassassin? Currently (defaults to) 5 and I get a lot of false alarms at 5.2, for example. Alternatively, where might I lower the points for its internal ruleset? You can do both

Re: spamassassin: rules set manually updating.

On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 07:40:55 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote: Check /etc/default/spamassassin file, there is a variable (CRON=0) that you can modify to get a cron job task for SA rules auto-updating. Yes, but does it need running SA as daemon, that is to specify in the same file allow daemon? Mmm,

Re: spamassassin: rules set manually updating.

Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón: Check /etc/default/spamassassin file, there is a variable (CRON=0) that you can modify to get a cron job task for SA rules auto-updating. Yes, but does it need running SA as daemon, that is to specify in the same file allow daemon? -- To

Re: spamassassin: rules set manually updating.

On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:14:29 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote: I wonder if it is possible to auto/manually update spamassassin rules without having it running in daemon mode - say, being run by cron only update script. I think SA is ready for that. Check /etc/default/spamassassin file, there is a

Re: SpamAssassin not following private whitelist commands

On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:34:46 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On 2010-03-04 08:15, Camaleón wrote: Mmmm, what MTA/POP3/IMAP design are you using? fetchmail/postfix/spamassassin/maildrop $ grep spam /etc/postfix/master.cf smtp inet n - n - - \ smtpd -o

Re: SpamAssassin not following private whitelist commands

On 2010-03-05 03:57, Camaleón wrote: On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:34:46 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On 2010-03-04 08:15, Camaleón wrote: Mmmm, what MTA/POP3/IMAP design are you using? fetchmail/postfix/spamassassin/maildrop $ grep spam /etc/postfix/master.cf smtp inet n - n - - \

Re: SpamAssassin not following private whitelist commands

On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:59:59 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On 2010-03-03 01:09, Ron Johnson wrote: Perhaps you need the line: allow_user_rules 1 in /etc/spamassassin/local.cf Thanks. I'll see how that worked. No luck. Added allow_user_rules 1 to /etc/spamassassin/local.cf but

Re: SpamAssassin not following private whitelist commands

On 2010-03-04 08:15, Camaleón wrote: On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:59:59 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On 2010-03-03 01:09, Ron Johnson wrote: Perhaps you need the line: allow_user_rules 1 in /etc/spamassassin/local.cf Thanks. I'll see how that worked. No luck. Added allow_user_rules 1 to

Re: SpamAssassin not following private whitelist commands

On 3.3.2010 3:38, Ron Johnson wrote: Hi, (Up-to-date Sid system.) SA, which is attached to Postfix, isn't doing what I think it should do. According to instructions I found on the Intarweb, per-user whitelist addresses go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with the format: whitelist_from

Re: SpamAssassin not following private whitelist commands

Jari Fredriksson wrote at 2010-03-03 07:52 -0600: On 3.3.2010 3:38, Ron Johnson wrote: SA, which is attached to Postfix, isn't doing what I think it should do. According to instructions I found on the Intarweb, per-user whitelist addresses go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with the format:

Re: SpamAssassin not following private whitelist commands

On 3.3.2010 17:42, green wrote: Jari Fredriksson wrote at 2010-03-03 07:52 -0600: On 3.3.2010 3:38, Ron Johnson wrote: SA, which is attached to Postfix, isn't doing what I think it should do. According to instructions I found on the Intarweb, per-user whitelist addresses go in

Re: SpamAssassin not following private whitelist commands

On 2010-03-03 01:09, Ron Johnson wrote: On 2010-03-02 21:54, green wrote: Ron Johnson wrote at 2010-03-02 19:38 -0600: per-user whitelist addresses go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with the format: whitelist_from f...@bar.com However, whitelisted accounts are still being scored as spam.

Re: SpamAssassin not following private whitelist commands

Ron Johnson wrote at 2010-03-02 19:38 -0600: per-user whitelist addresses go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with the format: whitelist_from f...@bar.com However, whitelisted accounts are still being scored as spam. Any thoughts? Perhaps you need the line: allow_user_rules 1 in

Re: SpamAssassin not following private whitelist commands

On 2010-03-02 21:54, green wrote: Ron Johnson wrote at 2010-03-02 19:38 -0600: per-user whitelist addresses go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with the format: whitelist_from f...@bar.com However, whitelisted accounts are still being scored as spam. Any thoughts? Perhaps you need the line:

Re: spamassassin best practices

29.10.2009 4:43, Umarzuki Mochlis kirjoitti: I got 2 debian 5 on vmware, both running postfix and dovecot-imap on server a, i already installed spamassassin and spamc (nothing else configured) and add .procmailrc in a user (user1) home directory with configuration as below: ## start

Re: Spamassassin + amavisd-new - brak oznaczania tematu i naglowkow

Dnia 2009-09-08, o godz. 10:14:02 Marcin Bieniaszewski studiow...@gmail.com napisał(a): $sa_tag_level_deflt = 4.0; # add spam info headers if at, or above that level $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 6.31; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level $sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.31; # triggers spam

Re: Spamassassin + amavisd-new - brak oznaczania tematu i naglowkow

W dniu 8 września 2009 10:41 użytkownik Krzysztof Kaczmar arr...@o2.pl napisał: Dnia 2009-09-08, o godz. 10:14:02 Marcin Bieniaszewski studiow...@gmail.com napisał(a): $sa_tag_level_deflt  = 4.0;  # add spam info headers if at, or above that level $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 6.31; # add 'spam

Re: Spamassassin + amavisd-new - brak oznaczania tematu i naglowkow

W dniu 8 września 2009 11:31 użytkownik Wojciech Firlej wfir...@gmail.com napisał: On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Marcin Bieniaszewskistudiow...@gmail.com wrote: Witam, Debian 5 Lenny, spamassasin + amavisd-new konfiguracja od lapania spamu ustawiona w amavisd-new w konfiguracji

Re: Spamassassin + amavisd-new - brak oznaczania tematu i naglowkow

2009/9/8 Marcin Bieniaszewski studiow...@gmail.com: wygooglalem gdzie ktos mial podobny problem i uzyl wpisu: @local_domains_maps = ( [.] ); ten wpis bedzie oznaczal wszystkie dostepne domeny. Z tego co wyczytalem nie jest to dobre rozwiazanie do uzycia na stale, jedynie do testow. On

Re: Spamassassin

Am 25.12.2008 um 16:07 schrieb Daniel D Jones: After an apt-get upgrade, Spamassassin failed to configure: r...@etch:~# dpkg --configure spamassassin Setting up spamassassin (3.1.7-2etch1) ... Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: [6777] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all [6777] dbg:

Re: spamassassin et dovecot

Daniel Caillibaud a écrit : Le 27/11/08 à 19:09, Debian User French [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : je n'arrive pas à déplacer le mail dans la boîte de réception car je ne sais pas dans quel répertoire je suis (multi-utilisateur) Une solution pourrait être de renvoyer le mail dans dovecot ou

Re: spamassassin et dovecot

Le vendredi 28 novembre 2008 12:26, rvenne a écrit : | Daniel Caillibaud a écrit : | Le 27/11/08 à 19:09, Debian User French [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : | | je n'arrive pas à déplacer le mail dans la boîte de réception car je ne | sais pas dans quel répertoire je suis (multi-utilisateur)

Re: spamassassin et dovecot

Bonjour, rvenne a écrit, vendredi 28 novembre 2008, à 12:26 : [...] dans ~/.procmailrc PATH=/bin:/usr/bin SHELL=/bin/bash MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/ :0: ^ sans le : final, le verrou est inutile dans un maildir/ * ^Subject: \*\*\*SPAM\*\*\*.*

Re: spamassassin et dovecot

rvenne a écrit : Daniel Caillibaud a écrit : Le 27/11/08 à 19:09, Debian User French [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : je n'arrive pas à déplacer le mail dans la boîte de réception car je ne sais pas dans quel répertoire je suis (multi-utilisateur) Une solution pourrait être de renvoyer le mail

Re: spamassassin et dovecot

Le jeudi 27 novembre 2008 19:09, Debian User French a écrit : | Bonjour la liste, Bonjour, | J'ai une petite question concernant Spamassassin et Dovecot. | Spamassassin analyse les mails et les marques, ou pas, comme SPAM. | Premier problème: dans les cas extrêmes, les mails SPAM sont purement et

Re: spamassassin et dovecot

Debian User French a écrit : Bonjour la liste, J'ai une petite question concernant Spamassassin et Dovecot. Spamassassin analyse les mails et les marques, ou pas, comme SPAM. Premier problème: dans les cas extrêmes, les mails SPAM sont purement et simplement supprimés. J'aimerais qu'ils ne le

Re: spamassassin et dovecot

Le 27/11/08 à 19:09, Debian User French [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : je n'arrive pas à déplacer le mail dans la boîte de réception car je ne sais pas dans quel répertoire je suis (multi-utilisateur) Une solution pourrait être de renvoyer le mail dans dovecot ou postfix (je ne sais pas lequel

Re: spamassassin and signatures

On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 15:35 +0200, Pol Hallen wrote: 1) Have you done a script for update the signatures of spamassassin? If you're just trying to get the latest score-files for SpamAssassin, you get those automatically with each new SpamAssassin version from Debian. You don't need to do

Re: Spamassassin in Lenny

Am 2008-05-25 10:55:16, schrieb David Fisher: Following a dist-upgrade this morning the spamd daemon in refusing to start in my lenny amd64 workstation box. Anyone else with the problem or is it just me? END OF REPLIED MESSAGE With Lenny/Sid

Re: Spamassassin in Lenny

Am 2008-05-25 17:42:28, schrieb Michelle Konzack: With Lenny/Sid you will be killed currently since the transition of perl 5.1. :-) Oops... 5.10 Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator 24V Electronic Engineer Tamay Dogan Network Debian

Re: Spamassassin in Lenny

On Mon, 26 May 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote: Am 2008-05-25 17:42:28, schrieb Michelle Konzack: With Lenny/Sid you will be killed currently since the transition of perl 5.1. :-) Oops... 5.10 Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator 24V Electronic

Re: Spamassassin in Lenny

On Sun, 25 May 2008, David Fisher wrote: Following a dist-upgrade this morning the spamd daemon in refusing to start in my lenny amd64 workstation box. Anyone else with the problem or is it just me? I had a very similar problem with my i386 box. Do you have the OpenPGP plugin installed by any

Re: Spamassassin don' t find perl

On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 16:52:17 +0200, Josep M. wrote: Hello. I have installed spamassassin from www.backports.org and runs well, but when I want stop this gives me a message error that perl is not found. I have all ok in my system, and perl is in the right place, what can I do here?

Re: Spamassassin and SpamCop

On Tuesday 18 March 2008 11:59:30 am Klein Moebius wrote: If I enable SpamCop reporting in Spamassassin and subsequently report a spam message on a mailing list to SpamCop via Spamassasin, will the mailing list then get a block from SpamCop? It can and has in the past. SpamCop's terms of

Re: Spamassassin and SpamCop

* Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-18 13:04:14 -0700]: It can and has in the past. SpamCop's terms of service expressly forbid you from reporting mailing list traffic, spam or not. Thanks. -- Regards, Klein Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the

Re: [SpamAssassin] Rules Emporium

Jean-Paul Lacquement a écrit : Bonjour, Dans le but d'améliorer le filtrage du Spam sur une chaine de production, je cherche à mettre en place des règles suffisamment robustes dans spassassin. Lors de mes recherches, j'ai vu ceci :SpamAssassin Rules Emporium (http://www.rulesemporium.com/).

Re: Spamassassin : deplacement dans dossier

Le mercredi 30 janvier 2008 08:22, Alexandre Mackow a écrit : Bonjour à tous, mon FAI ne faisant plus très bien son boulot au niveau du filtrage/marquage des spams, je me suis décidé à installer et paramétrer spamassassin. Ca fonctionne :-) par contre puis je paramétrer une redirection dans

Re: Spamassassin : deplacement dans dossier

Alexandre Mackow wrote: Bonjour à tous, mon FAI ne faisant plus très bien son boulot au niveau du filtrage/marquage des spams, je me suis décidé à installer et paramétrer spamassassin. Ca fonctionne :-) par contre puis je paramétrer une redirection dans un dossier spécifique (créer auparavant ou

Re: SpamAssassin - Whitelist

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01-11-2007 11:45, ..:: S.e.r.i.a.L ::.. wrote: Bom dia Tenho um ambiente, aonde o Debian faz a higienização do email com SpamAssassin+Clamav+Postfix e depois eh feito um transport para meu servidor de colaboração. Gostaria de saber se

Re: Spamassassin

Em 24/10/07, Andre Luis Lopes[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Olá, Em 24/10/2007, às 17:01, Clayton Nogueira escreveu: Deixa eu fazer outra pergunta o nível de sensibilidade de meus spamassassin em 4.31 está de bom tamanho ? o que vocês sugerem ? Depende do seu ambiente. Eu sou menos

Re: Spamassassin

Em 24/10/07, André Luís Lopes[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Olá Clayton, Clayton Nogueira escreveu: Pessoal, estou com uma dificuldade para fazer o spamassassin não repassar para os usuários os e-mails identificados como Spam. eu tenho Spamassassin + clamav + amavis no meu server rodando

Re: Spamassassin

Olá Clayton, Clayton Nogueira escreveu: Pessoal, estou com uma dificuldade para fazer o spamassassin não repassar para os usuários os e-mails identificados como Spam. eu tenho Spamassassin + clamav + amavis no meu server rodando em Debian 4.0 o servidor já está todo configurado. Acho que é

Re: Spamassassin

Em 24/10/07, Clayton Nogueira[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Em 24/10/07, André Luís Lopes[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Olá Clayton, Clayton Nogueira escreveu: Pessoal, estou com uma dificuldade para fazer o spamassassin não repassar para os usuários os e-mails identificados como Spam.

Re: Spamassassin

Olá, Clayton Nogueira escreveu: $sa_kill_level_deflt = ; # triggers spam evasive actions Você deve estar recebendo todo e qualquer spam com o valor acima :-) O DISCARD dos spams só vai acontecer quando um spam pontuar um valor igual ou superior ao valor definido em

Re: Spamassassin

Olá, Em 24/10/2007, às 17:01, Clayton Nogueira escreveu: Deixa eu fazer outra pergunta o nível de sensibilidade de meus spamassassin em 4.31 está de bom tamanho ? o que vocês sugerem ? Depende do seu ambiente. Eu sou menos receptivo a spams e mantenho com um valor bem baixo, geralmente

Re: Spamassassin and Exim4

On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:05:00PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote: On Monday 24 September 2007 19:03:47 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote: On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: I've reconfigured the file

Re: Spamassassin and Exim4

On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:30:21PM +1000, Alex Samad wrote: On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:03:47PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote: On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at

Re: Spamassassin and Exim4

On Monday 24 September 2007 19:03:47 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote: On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: I've reconfigured the file with your recommendations and restarted exim. I'm still not

Re: Spamassassin and Exim4

On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:36:45PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote: Trying to get spamassassin and exim4 playing together. I do not want exim to drop email, only to add headers to the message so that the MUA can filter messages according to the users preference. I've recently done this on my

Re: Spamassassin and Exim4

On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:36:45PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote: SA should log to /var/log/mail.info, and that's a good place to look for info... I have two spamd entries in mail.info: Sep 24 14:51:09 etch spamd[10151]: spamd:

Re: Spamassassin and Exim4

On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote: On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:36:45PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote: SA should log to /var/log/mail.info, and that's a good place to look for info... I have two

Re: Spamassassin and Exim4

On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:03:47PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote: On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:36:45PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote: SA should log to

Re: spamassassin mbox odfiltrowanie spam

Wojciech Ziniewicz napisał. Dnia Wed, 9 May 2007 21:25:25 +0200 Mateusz (haras.pl) Harasymczuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a): On 5/9/07, Wojciech Ziniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sposob na filtrowanie spamu z mboxów z tej prezentacji nie działa ? Chcialem to zrobic posiadanym

Re: spamassassin mbox odfiltrowanie spam

On 5/9/07, Krzysztof Zubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Witam. Hm. moze prtzyda sie prezentacja Dartiusza Grzesisty Bezpieka w strukturach poczty z zeszkorocznej Jesienii Linuxowej. Linki pod http://jesien.linux.org.pl/2006/ Prezentacja pod Witam, nic z tego żaden z przykładów nie rozwiązuje

Re: spamassassin mbox odfiltrowanie spam

On 5/9/07, Krzysztof Zubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Witam. Hm. moze prtzyda sie prezentacja Dartiusza Grzesisty Bezpieka w strukturach poczty z zeszkorocznej Jesienii Linuxowej. Linki pod http://jesien.linux.org.pl/2006/ Prezentacja pod Witam, nic z tego żaden z przykładów nie rozwiązuje

Re: spamassassin mbox odfiltrowanie spam

Dnia Wed, 9 May 2007 16:47:39 +0200 Mateusz (haras.pl) Harasymczuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a): On 5/9/07, Krzysztof Zubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Witam. Hm. moze prtzyda sie prezentacja Dartiusza Grzesisty Bezpieka w strukturach poczty z zeszkorocznej Jesienii Linuxowej. Linki pod

Re: spamassassin mbox odfiltrowanie spam

On 5/9/07, Wojciech Ziniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sposob na filtrowanie spamu z mboxów z tej prezentacji nie działa ? -- Wojciech Ziniewicz Chcialem to zrobic posiadanym oprogramowaniem. -- Mateusz Harasymczuk www.haras.pl

Re: spamassassin mbox odfiltrowanie spam

Dnia Wed, 9 May 2007 21:25:25 +0200 Mateusz (haras.pl) Harasymczuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a): On 5/9/07, Wojciech Ziniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sposob na filtrowanie spamu z mboxów z tej prezentacji nie działa ? -- Wojciech Ziniewicz Chcialem to zrobic posiadanym

Re: spamassassin mbox odfiltrowanie spam

Mateusz (haras.pl) Harasymczuk napisał. witam, mam problem natury technicznej mam skrzynke 992MB w formacie mbox i pewne zadanie, musze odfiltrowac z niej spam, zostawic porzadane wiadomosci, a spamowe przeniesc do skrzynki spam posiadam spamassassina i probowalem juz (narazie testowo z

Re: Spamassassin e e-mail no formato HTML.

Otávio Fernandes escreveu: On 5/2/07, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Estimados, alguém sabe se é conveniente treinar o spamassassin com um e-mail em formato HTML? Um companheiro no trabalho recebe e-mails sobre cursos e seminários que são sempre enviados nesse

Re: Spamassassin e e-mail no formato HTML.

Otávio Fernandes wrote: On 5/2/07, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Otávio Fernandes escreveu: On 5/2/07, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Estimados, alguém sabe se é conveniente treinar o spamassassin com um e-mail em formato

Re: Spamassassin e e-mail no formato HTML.

On 5/2/07, Bruno Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Otávio Fernandes wrote: On 5/2/07, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Otávio Fernandes escreveu: On 5/2/07, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Estimados, alguém sabe se é

Re: Spamassassin e e-mail no formato HTML.

Bruno Oliveira escreveu: Miguel, pela pergunta acredito que não conhece o funcionamento do spamassassin para treinar as mensagens, bem se o seu colega de trabalho recebe mensagens válidas como spam e essas mensagens são html, as mesma podem ser adicionadas na whitelist do usuário, o que eu

Re: Spamassassin y Amavid-new - alterando el cuerpo de un e-mail.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática escribió: Para eso existen las opciones $defang-virus, $defang-spam, etc. Y esas opciones agregararían un pequeño mensaje de texto al e-mail problemático y adjuntarían el e-mail original que fue marcado como

Re: Spamassassin y Amavid-new - alterando el cuerpo de un e-mail.

amphora escribió: Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática escribió: Para eso existen las opciones $defang-virus, $defang-spam, etc. Y esas opciones agregararían un pequeño mensaje de texto al e-mail problemático y adjuntarían el e-mail original que fue marcado como problemático. Necesitava

Re: Spamassassin y Amavid-new - alterando el cuerpo de un e-mail.

Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática escribió: Colegas, estoy montando un servidor de e-mail para sustituir el que está funcionando actualmente en el trabajo. Estoy usando Postfix + Dovecot + Amavisd-new (Clamav como anti-virus y Spamassassin para evitar spam). Estuve leyendo el FAQ de

Re: Spamassassin y Amavid-new - alterando el cuerpo de un e-mail.

Carlos Velásquez wrote: Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática escribió: Colegas, estoy montando un servidor de e-mail para sustituir el que está funcionando actualmente en el trabajo. Estoy usando Postfix + Dovecot + Amavisd-new (Clamav como anti-virus y Spamassassin para evitar spam). Estuve

Re: Spamassassin e Amavid-new - alterando o corpo de um e-mail.

Miguel, Uso o amavisd-new há alguns anos, e nunca usei o defang habilitado, não o vejo como uma opção chave. Porem, recomendo que vc utilize o dual postfix, porque desta forma o amavisd vai ter autoridade sobre o corpo e cabeçalho da mensagem, além de ser o metodo recomendado pelo Mark

Re: Spamassassin e Amavid-new - alterando o corpo de um e-mail.

Otávio Fernandes escribió: Miguel, Uso o amavisd-new há alguns anos, e nunca usei o defang habilitado, não o vejo como uma opção chave. Porem, recomendo que vc utilize o dual postfix, porque desta forma o amavisd vai ter autoridade sobre o corpo e cabeçalho da mensagem, além de ser o

Re: Spamassassin e Amavid-new - alterando o corpo de um e-mail.

On 2/23/07, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Otávio Fernandes escribió: Miguel, Uso o amavisd-new há alguns anos, e nunca usei o defang habilitado, não o vejo como uma opção chave. Porem, recomendo que vc utilize o dual postfix, porque desta forma o amavisd

Re: SpamAssassin/ProcMail Questions

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:50:07 -0800 Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:06:05PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: a. Start a new thread not reply to an existing one another one of those simple things that many people don't seem to get right away... Is it

Re: SpamAssassin/ProcMail Questions

On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 11:09:40AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:50:07 -0800 Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:06:05PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: a. Start a new thread not reply to an existing one another one of those

Re: SpamAssassin/ProcMail Questions

Andrew Sackville-West wrote: Now if only we could get people to spell, as well. Whut? Spel? Keeboords is hard ennuf! Ciao, Dave signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Spamassassin

OoO Pendant le temps de midi du mercredi 07 février 2007, vers 12:39, Edi STOJICEVIC [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait: J'utilise spamassassin avec razor mais je me retrouve avec beaucoup de mails qui ne devraient pas être considérés comme du spam. C'est surtout embêtant pour des réponses de boulot

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >